In this review, we provide a framework for understanding both the predictors and approaches of CPA that firms undertake to achieve their objectives. We identify the predictors of CPA and classify them into two distinct categories: internal and external. In addition, we suggest that CPA approaches will vary depending on the firm’s goal to either manage or mitigate regulation and legislation as compared to attempting to pass new bills into law. We conclude by suggesting several future CPA research directions for management scholars.
AbdurakhmonovM.RidgeJ. W.HillA.D. (2021). Strategic Risk and Lobbying: Investigating lobbying breadth as risk management. Journal of Management. Online Firsthttps://doi.org/10.1177%2F01492063211011762.
2.
AggarwalR. K.MeschkeF.WangT. Y. (2012). Corporate political donations: investment or agency?Business and Politics, 14(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/1469-3569.1391.
3.
AguileraR. V.FilatotchevI.GospelH.JacksonG. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322.
BanerjeeS.VenaikS. (2018). The effect of corporate political activity on MNC subsidiary legitimacy: An institutional perspective. Management International Review, 58(5), 813–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-017-0324-0.
6.
BarronA.PeredaA.StaceyS. (2017). Exploring the performance of government affairs subsidiaries: A study of organisation design and the social capital of European government affairs managers at Toyota Motor Europe and Hyundai Motor Company in Brussels. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.11.006.
7.
BaumgartnerF. R.BerryJ. M.HojnackiM.LeechB. L.KimballD. C (2009). Lobbying and policy change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BaysingerB. D. (1984). Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: An expanded typology. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277642.
9.
BebchukL. A.JacksonR. JJr (2012). Shining light on corporate political spending. Georgetown Law Journal, 101(12), 923–967.
10.
BermissY. S.McDonaldR. (2018). Ideological misfit? Political affiliation and employee departure in the private equity industry. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2182–2209. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0817.
11.
BlauB. M.BroughT. J.ThomasD. W. (2013). Corporate lobbying, political connections, and the bailout of banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 3007–3017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.005.
12.
BonardiJ.-P.HillmanA. J.KeimG. D. (2005). The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387895.
13.
BorgattiS. P.FosterP. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00087-4.
14.
BriscoeF.ChinM. K.HambrickD. C. (2014). CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1786–1809. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0255.
15.
BrownL. W.De LeonJ. A.RasheedA. A. (2019). Corporate political activity and free riding under market uncertainty: An investigation of TARP funding. Business and Society Review, 124(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12165.
16.
BrownL. W.GollI.RasheedA. A.CrawfordW. S. (2020a). Nonmarket responses to regulation: A signaling theory approach. Group & Organization Management, 45(6), 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120963693.
17.
BrownL. W.ManegoldJ. G.MarquardtD. J. (2020b). The effects of CEO activism on employees person-organization ideological misfit: A conceptual model and research agenda. Business and Society Review, 125(1), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12196.
18.
BrownL. W.YaşarM.RasheedA. A. (2018). Predictors of foreign corporate political activities in United States politics. Global Strategy Journal, 8(3), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1185.
ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.TreviñoL. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213486984.
23.
ChinM. K.ZhangS. X.Afshar JahanshahiA.NadkarniS (2021). Unpacking political ideology: CEO social and economic ideologies, strategic decision-making processes, and corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.1228.
24.
ChungH. M.DingH. B (2010). Political connections and family business diversification. In CooperC. L.GregoryA. (Eds), Advances in mergers and acquisitions. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
25.
CoatesJ. C.IV (2012). Corporate politics, governance, and value before and after citizens united. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9(4), 657–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01265.x.
26.
DahanN. M.HadaniM.SchulerD. A. (2013). The governance challenges of corporate political activity. Business & Society, 52(3), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313491470.
De VillaM. A.RajwaniT.LawtonT. (2015). Market entry modes in a multipolar world: Untangling the moderating effect of the political environment. International Business Review, 24(3), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.001.
29.
De VillaM. A.RajwaniT.LawtonT. C.MellahiK. (2019). To engage or not to engage with host governments: Corporate political activity and host country political risk. Global Strategy Journal, 9(2), 208–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1205.
30.
DengX.TianZ.AbrarM. (2010). The corporate political strategy and its integration with market strategy in transitional China. Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.371.
31.
DohJ. P.LawtonT. C.RajwaniT. (2012). Advancing nonmarket strategy research: Institutional perspectives in a changing world. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0041.
32.
DohJ.McGuireS.OzakiT. (2015). The journal of world business special issue: global governance and international nonmarket strategies: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of World Business, 50(2), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.002.
33.
DorobantuS.KaulA.ZelnerB. (2017). Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 114–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2590.
ElsahnZ. F.Benson-ReaM. (2018). Political schemas and corporate political activities during foreign market entry: A micro-process perspective. Management International Review, 58(5), 771–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-018-0350-6.
FismanD.FismanR. J.GalefJ.KhuranaR.WangY (2012). Estimating the value of connections to Vice-President Cheney. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 13(3), 125. https://doi.org/10.1515/1935-1682.3272.
40.
FissP. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586092.
41.
FissP. C.MarxA.CambréB (2013). Configurational theory and methods in organizational research: Introduction. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
42.
FremethA.RichterB. K.SchaufeleB (2016). Motivations for corporate political activity. In de FigueiredoJ. M.LenoxM.Oberholzer-GeeF.Vanden BerghR. G. (Eds.), Strategy beyond markets (34). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-332220160000034006.
43.
GaoY.YangZ.HuangK.-F.GaoS.YangW. (2018). Addressing the cross-boundary missing link between corporate political activities and firm competencies: The mediating role of institutional capital. International Business Review, 27(1), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.07.006.
GinsbergA.VenkatramanN. (1985). Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278950.
46.
GoldmanE.RochollJ.SoJ. (2009). Do politically connected boards affect firm value?The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2331–2360. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn088.
47.
GoldmanE.RochollJ.SoJ. (2013). Politically connected boards of directors and the allocation of procurement contracts. Review of Finance, 17(5), 1617–1648. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs039.
GrayS.HarymawanI.NowlandJ. (2016). Political and government connections on corporate boards in Australia: Good for business?Australian Journal of Management, 41(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896214535788.
50.
GreinerM.LeeJ. (2020). A supply-side approach to corporate political activity: Performance consequences of ideologically driven CPA. Journal of Business Research, 115(3), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.038.
51.
HadaniM. (2007). Family matters: Founding family firms and corporate political activity. Business & Society, 46(4), 395–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650306293394.
52.
HadaniM. (2012). Institutional ownership monitoring and corporate political activity: Governance implications. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 944–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.003.
53.
HadaniM.AksuB.CoombesS. (2021). Fifteen minutes of fame? The impact of media visibility and media reputation on the relationship between corporate political activity and government contract awards. Academy of Management Discoveries, 7(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0064.
54.
HadaniM.BonardiJ.-P.DahanN. M. (2017a). Corporate political activity, public policy uncertainty, and firm outcomes: A meta-analysis. Strategic Organization, 15(3), 338–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016651001.
55.
HadaniM.DahanN. M.DohJ. P. (2015). The CEO as chief political officer: Managerial discretion and corporate political activity. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2330–2337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.046.
56.
HadaniM.DohJ. P.SchneiderM. A. (2018). Corporate political activity and regulatory capture: How some companies blunt the knife of socially oriented investor activism. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2064–2093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638162.
57.
HadaniM.DohJ. P.SchneiderM. (2019). Social movements and corporate political activity: Managerial responses to socially oriented shareholder activism. Journal of Business Research, 95(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.031.
58.
HadaniM.MunshiN.ClarkK. (2017b). The more you give, the more you get? The impact of corporate political activity on the value of government contracts. Business and Society Review, 122(3), 421–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12122.
59.
HadaniM.SchulerD. A. (2013). In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns on corporate political investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2006.
HansenW. L.MitchellN. J. (2000). Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: Domestic and foreign corporations in national politics. American Political Science Review, 94(4), 891–903. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586214.
62.
HerschP.NetterJ. M.PopeC. (2008). Do campaign contributions and lobbying expenditures by firms create “political” capital?Atlantic Economic Journal, 36(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-008-9125-y.
63.
HewlinP. F. (2003). And the award for best actor goes to…: Facades of conformity in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10899442.
64.
HillmanA. J. (2005). Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line?Journal of Management, 31(3), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272187.
65.
HillmanA. J.HittM. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825–842. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553256.
66.
HillmanA. J.KeimG. D.SchulerD. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003.
67.
HoskissonR. E.CastletonM. W.WithersM. C. (2009). Complementarity in monitoring and bonding: More intense monitoring leads to higher executive compensation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985541.
68.
JiaN. (2018). The “make and/or buy” decisions of corporate political lobbying: Integrating the economic efficiency and legitimacy perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 43(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0148.
69.
JohnsonA (2019). Board of director independence, CEO duality, and corporate political activity. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 84(4), 67.
70.
KatzD.KahnR. L (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
71.
KeimG. D. (1981). Foundations of a political strategy for business. California Management Review, 23(3), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/41172600.
72.
KeimG. D.HillmanA. J. (2008). Political environments and business strategy: Implications for managers. Business Horizons, 51(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.09.004.
73.
KelleherC. A.YackeeS. W. (2006). Who’s whispering in your ear? The influence of third parties over state agency decisions. Political Research Quarterly, 59(4), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900412.
74.
KelleherC. A.YackeeS. W. (2009). A political consequence of contracting: Organized interests and state agency decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 579–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun014.
KimJ. H. (2019). Is your playing field unleveled? US defense contracts and foreign firm lobbying. Strategic Management Journal, 40(12), 1911–1937. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3061.
77.
KingsleyA. F.Vanden BerghR. G.BonardiJ.-P. (2012). Political markets and regulatory uncertainty: Insights and implications for integrated strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0042.
78.
Korn/Ferry International (2000). Annual report on corporate governance. New York, NY: Korn/Ferry.
LawtonT.McGuireS.RajwaniT. (2013a). Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00337.x.
81.
LawtonT.RajwaniT.DohJ. (2013b). The antecedents of political capabilities: A study of ownership, cross-border activity and organization at legacy airlines in a deregulatory context. International Business Review, 22(1), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.04.001.
82.
LesterR. H.HillmanA.ZardkoohiA.CannellaJr, A. A. (2008). Former government officials as outside directors: The role of human and social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.34789675.
83.
LiedongT. A. (2021). Responsible firm behaviour in political markets: Judging the ethicality of corporate political activity in weak institutional environments. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(2), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04503-7.
84.
LiedongT. A.AghanyaD.RajwaniT. (2020). Corporate political strategies in weak institutional environments: A break from conventions. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(4), 855–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04342-1.
85.
LiedongT. A.GhobadianA.RajwaniT.O’ReganN. (2015). Toward a view of complementarity: Trust and policy influence effects of corporate social responsibility and corporate political activity. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114560064.
86.
LiouR.-S.BrownL. W.HasijaD. (2021). Political animosity in cross-border acquisitions: EMNCs’ market and nonmarket strategy in a developed market. Multinational Business Review, 29(4), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-02-2020-0034.
87.
LordM. D. (2000). Constituency-based lobbying as corporate political strategy: Testing an agency theory perspective. Business and Politics, 2(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1012.
88.
LuxS. (2016). Strategic fit to political factors and subsequent performance: Evidence from the US coal industry, 1986 to 2000. Business & Society, 55(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313476938.
89.
LuxS.CrookT. R.WoehrD. J. (2011). Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. Journal of Management, 37(1), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310392233.
90.
MbalyohereC.LawtonT. C. (2018). Engaging stakeholders through corporate political activity: Insights from MNE nonmarket strategy in an emerging African market. Journal of International Management, 24(4), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2018.04.006.
91.
McKayA.YackeeS. W. (2007). Interest group competition on federal agency rules. American Politics Research, 35(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x06296571.
92.
MellahiK.FrynasJ. G.SunP.SiegelD. (2016). A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. Journal of Management, 42(1), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617241.
93.
MeznarM. B.JohnsonJ. H.Jr (2005). Business-government relations within a contingency theory framework: Strategy, structure, fit, and performance. Business & Society, 44(2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305275305.
94.
MilyoJ.PrimoD.GrosecloseT. (2000). Corporate PAC campaign contributions in perspective. Business and Politics, 2(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1004.
95.
MinefeeI.McDonnellM. H.WernerT. (2021). Reexamining investor reaction to covert corporate political activity: A replication and extension of Werner (2017). Strategic Management Journal, 42(6), 1139–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3252.
96.
NalickM.KubanS.RidgeJ. W.ZardkoohiA.BiermanL.SchijvenM (2022). When not one of the crowd: The effects of CEO ideological divergence on lobbying strategy. Journal of Management. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F01492063211073690.
97.
NownesA. J (2006). Total lobbying: What lobbyists want (and how they try to get it). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
98.
OlsonM (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
99.
OrmrodR. P.HennebergS. C (2010). An investigation into the relationship between political activity levels and political market orientation. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011020480.
100.
OvtchinnikovA. V.PantaleoniE. (2012). Individual political contributions and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(2), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.007.
101.
OzerM. (2010). Top management teams and corporate political activity: Do top management teams have influence on corporate political activity?Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1196–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.017.
102.
PanagopoulosC.GreenD. P.KrasnoJ.Schwam-BairdM.EndresK. (2020). Partisan consumerism: Experimental tests of consumer reactions to corporate political activity. The Journal of Politics, 82(3), 996–1007. https://doi.org/10.1086/707491.
103.
PerchardA.MacKenzieN. G. (2020). Aligning to disadvantage: How corporate political activity and strategic homophily create path dependence in the firm. Human Relations, 74(7), 978–1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720908923.
104.
PinkseJ.GrootK. (2015). Sustainable entrepreneurship and corporate political activity: Overcoming market barriers in the clean energy sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12055.
105.
PuckJ.LawtonT.MohrA. (2018). The corporate political activity of MNCs: Taking stock and moving forward. Management International Review, 58(5), 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-018-0364-0.
106.
RidgeJ. W.IngramA.HillA. D. (2017). Beyond lobbying expenditures: How lobbying breadth and political connectedness affect firm outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1138–1163. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0584.
107.
RivalM.MajorR. (2018). What lobbying ethics and what for? The case of French lobbying consulting firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3141-7.
108.
RiveraJ.PatnaikS. (2017). Corporate lobbying expenditures and green performance original article. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3(2), 230–231. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2017.0038.
109.
RudyB. C.CavichJ. (2020). Nonmarket signals: Investment in corporate political activity and the performance of initial public offerings. Business & Society, 59(3), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317717263.
110.
RudyB. C.JohnsonA. F. (2019). The chief political officer: CEO characteristics and firm investment in corporate political activity. Business & Society, 58(3), 612–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316675606.
SchulerD. A.RehbeinK.CramerR. D. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069303.
113.
SemadeniM.ChinM. K.KrauseR (2021). Pumping the brakes: Examining the impact of CEO political ideology divergence on firm responses. Academy of Management Journal. In presshttps://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.1131.
ShiW.GaoC.AguileraR. V. (2021). The liabilities of foreign institutional ownership: Managing political dependence through corporate political spending. Strategic Management Journal, 42(1), 84–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3211.
116.
ShirodkarV.MohrA. T. (2015a). Resource tangibility and foreign firms’ corporate political strategies in emerging economies: Evidence from India. Management International Review, 55(6), 801–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-015-0248-5.
117.
ShirodkarV.MohrA. T. (2015b). Explaining foreign firms’ approaches to corporate political activity in emerging economies: The effects of resource criticality, product diversification, inter-subsidiary integration, and business ties. International Business Review, 24(4), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.014.
118.
SkaifeH. A.WernerT. (2020). Changes in firms’ political investment opportunities, managerial accountability, and reputational risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04224-6.
119.
SunP.DohJ. P.RajwaniT.SiegelD (2021). Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1818–1853. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00438-x.
120.
SunP.HuH. W.HillmanA. J. (2016). The dark side of board political capital: Enabling blockholder rent appropriation. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1801–1822. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0425.
ThomsonS.JohnS (2007). Public affairs in practice: A practical guide to lobbying. London, UK: Kogan Page Publishers.
123.
TianZ.DengX. (2007). The determinants of corporate political strategy in Chinese transition. Journal of Public Affairs: An International Journal, 7(4), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.273.
124.
TyllströmA.MurrayJ. (2021). Lobbying the client: The role of policy intermediaries in corporate political activity. Organization Studies, 42(6), 971–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619866486.
125.
WalkerE. T (2012). Putting a face on the issue: Corporate stakeholder mobilization in professional grassroots lobbying campaigns. Business & Society, 51(4), 561–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309350210.
WardA. J.BrownJ. A.RodriguezD. (2009). Governance bundles, firm performance, and the substitutability and complementarity of governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 646–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00766.x.
128.
WernerT. (2017). Investor reaction to covert corporate political activity. Strategic Management Journal, 38(12), 2424–2443. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2682.
129.
WrightJ. (2004). Campaign contributions and congressional voting on tobacco policy, 1980–2000. Business and Politics, 6(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1066.
130.
YackeeJ. W.YackeeS. W. (2006). A bias towards business? Assessing interest group influence on the US bureaucracy. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00375.x.
131.
YoshikawaT.RasheedA.Del BrioE. B (2018). Performance decline, political connections and institutional factors: A multi-country analysis. In AhmedZ. U.RajS (Eds.), Contemporary issues in global business research across emerging countries (pp. 18–30). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education (India).
