Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Building from a paradox frame, we argue that at the between-person level the relationship between self-efficacy and effort may be nonlinear. We bound our conceptual model with a focus on perceived proximity, reflecting employees’ perceptions of how close they feel to their organization and colleagues. We test our model in a lagged, multi-source field study, with matching employee survey data from 1502 employees, and archival effort, and performance, metrics collected several months later. The results from our analyses reveal a curvilinear association between self-efficacy and effort, which is moderated by perceived proximity. We also find that the relationship between self-efficacy and performance is mediated by effort for individuals with low self-efficacy (Low SEs), but not for individuals with moderate (Moderate SEs) or high self-efficacy (High SEs). Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords

self-efficacy effort performance perceived proximity curvilinear paradox

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahearne

Jones

Rapp

Mathieu

(2008). High touch through high tech: The impact of salesperson technology usage on sales performance via mediating mechanisms. Management Science, 54(4), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0783.

Ahearne

Mathieu

Rapp

(2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945.

Aiken

L. S.

West

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Anderson

Oliver

R. L.

(1987). Perspectives on behavior-based versus outcome-based salesforce control systems. Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298705100407.

Armstrong

J. S.

Morwitz

V. G.

Kumar

(2000). Sales forecasts for existing consumer products and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy? International Journal of Forecasting, 16(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00058-3.

Audia

P. G.

Morwitz

V. G.

Kumar

K. G.

(2000). The paradox of success: an archival anda laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556413.

Bachrach

D. G.

Bendoly

Podsakoff

P. M.

(2001). Attributions of the “causes” of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1285.

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive view. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice.

10.

Bandura

(1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175.

11.

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Dallas, TX: Freeman.

12.

Bandura

(1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In Pervin

John

(Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

13.

Bandura

(2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606.

14.

Bandura

Locke

E. A.

(2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87.

15.

Beck

J. W.

Schmidt

A. M.

(2018). Negative relationships between self-efficacy and performance can be adaptive: The mediating role of resource allocation. Journal of Management, 44(2), 555–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314567778.

16.

Chen

Bliese

P. D.

(2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self-and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.549.

17.

Chen

Gully

S. M.

Eden

(2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004.

18.

Churchill

G. A.

Ford

N. M.

Hartley

S. W.

Walker

O. C.

(1985). The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378502200201.

19.

Dawson

J. F.

Richter

A.W.

(2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917.

20.

De Stobbeleir

K. E. M.

Ashford

S. J.

Buyens

(2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64870144.

21.

DeCarlo

L. T.

(1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2(3), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.292.

22.

Denis

D. J.

(2018). SPSS data analysis for univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

23.

Ede

Sullivan

P. J.

Feltz

D. L.

(2017). Self-doubt: Uncertainty as a motivating factor on effort in an exercise endurance task. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 28(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.10.002.

24.

Epstein

L. G.

(1999). A definition of uncertainty aversion. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(3), 579–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00099.

25.

Fang

Palmatier

R. W.

Evans

K. R.

(2004). Goal-setting paradoxes? Trade-offs between working hard and working smart: The United States versus China. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303261413.

26.

Forsyth

(1998). Group dynamics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

27.

Fuchs

Sting

F. J.

Schlickel

Alexy

(2019). The ideator’s bias: How identity-induced self-efficacy drives overestimation in employee-driven process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1498–1522. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0438.

28.

Gecas

(1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.001451.

29.

Gielnik

Bledow

Stark

(2020). A dynamic account of self-efficacy in entrepreneurship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(5), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000451.

30.

Gist

M. E.

(1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306562.

31.

Gist

M. E.

Mitchell

T. R.

(1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279530.

32.

Goolsby

J. R.

(1992). A theory of role stress in boundary spanning positions of marketing organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0092070392202006.

33.

Grant

A. M.

Schwartz

(2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393523.

34.

Gregus

S. J.

Rodriguez

J. H.

Pastrana

F. A.

Craig

J. T.

McQuillin

S. D.

Cavell

T. A.

(2017). Teacher self-efficacy and intentions to use antibullying practices as predictors of children’s peer victimization. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0060.V46-3.

35.

Hambrick

D. C.

Finkelstein

Mooney

A. C.

(2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.17293355.

36.

Harush

Lisak

Glikson

(2018). The bright side of social categorization: The role of global identity in reducing relational conflict in multicultural distributed teams. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 25(1), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-11-2016-0202.

37.

Hayes

A. F.

Preacher

K. J.

(2010). Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2010.498290.

38.

Hayward

M. L.

Hambrick

D. C.

(1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393810.

39.

Hmieleski

K. M.

Baron

R. A.

(2008). Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41330755.

40.

Hollander

(2009). Inclusive leadership. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

41.

Jex

S. M.

Bliese

P. D.

(1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.349.

42.

Jones

G. R.

(1986). Socialization tactics, Self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.5465/256188.

43.

Judge

T. A.

Bono

J. E.

(2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80.

44.

Judge

T. A.

Jackson

C. L.

Shaw

J. C.

Scott

B. A.

Rich

B. L.

(2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107.

45.

Kanfer

Ackerman

P. L.

(1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 657–690. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.657.

46.

Kanfer

Heggestad

E. D.

(1997). Motivational traits and skills: A person-centered approach to work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 1–56.

47.

Kiesler

Cummings

J. N.

(2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? In Hinds

Kiesler

(Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 57–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

48.

Lam

Huang

Snape

(2007). Feedback-seeking behavior and leader-member exchange: Do supervisor-attributed motives matter? Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634440.

49.

Lee

Bobko

(1994). Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.364.

50.

Lee

Yun

Lee

J. h.

(2019). The curvilinear relationship between self-efficacy and creativity: The moderating role of supervisor close monitoring. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9546-9.

51.

Leon-Perez

J. M.

Medina

F. J.

Munduate

(2011). Effects of self-efficacy on objective and subjective outcomes in transactions and disputes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 22(2), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061111126693.

52.

Lewis

(2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707712.

53.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1(4), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00207.x.

54.

Lovallo

Kahneman

(2003). Delusions of success. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 56–63.

55.

Mann

Eland

(2005). Self-efficacy in mastery learning to apply a therapeutic psychomotor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.100.1.77-84.

56.

Margolis

McCabe

P. P.

(2004). Resolving struggling readers’ homework difficulties: A social cognitive perspective. Reading Psychology, 25(4), 225–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710490512064.

57.

Mathieu

J. E.

(1991). A cross-level nonrecursive model of the antecedents of organizational commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.607.

58.

Micceri

(1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.156.

59.

Miller

(1994). What happens after success: The perils of excellence. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 325–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00621.x.

60.

Monge

P. R.

Contractor

N. S.

(2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

61.

Moore

D. A.

Healy

P. J.

(2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502.

62.

Mulki

J. P.

Jaramillo

(2011). Workplace isolation: salespeople and supervisors in USA. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(4), 902–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.555133.

63.

O’Leary

M. B.

Wilson

J. M.

Metiu

(2014). Beyond being there: The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically dispersed colleagues. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1219–1243. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.13.

64.

Pajares

(1997). Current direction in self-efficacy research. In Maehr

Pintrich

P. R.

(Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 1–49). Stanford, CT: JAI Press.

65.

Peterson

R. A.

(2020). Self-efficacy and personal selling: Review and examination with an emphasis on sales performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 40(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2019.1654390.

66.

Phillips

J. M.

(1998). Effects of realistic job previews on multiple organizational outcomes: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.5465/256964.

67.

Pierce

J. R.

Aguinis

(2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39(2), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410060.

68.

Quinones

M. A.

Ford

J. K.

Teachout

M. S.

(1995). The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual and meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01785.x.

69.

Raghuram

Wiesenfeld

Garud

(2003). Technology enabled work: The role of self-efficacy in determining telecommuter adjustment and structuring behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00040-X.

70.

Rapp

A. A.

Bachrach

D. G.

Rapp

T. L.

(2013). Time management skill and resource allocation: Curvilinearity in the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031733.

71.

Rapp

T. L.

Bachrach

D. G.

Rapp

A. A.

Mullins

(2014). The role of team goal monitoring in the curvilinear relationship between team efficacy and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036978.

72.

Rapp

Baker

T. L.

Bachrach

D. G.

Ogilvie

Beitelspacher

L. S.

(2015). Perceived customer showrooming behavior and the effect on retail salesperson self-efficacy and performance. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.12.007.

73.

Renn

R. W.

Fedor

D. B.

(2001). Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management, 27(5), 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206301j02700504.

74.

Rhoads

G. K.

Singh

Goodell

P. W.

(1994). The multiple dimensions of role ambiguity and their impact upon psychological and behavioral outcomes of industrial salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 14(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.1994.10753990.

75.

Rodríguez

Regueiro

Pena

R. B.

Valle

Piñeiro

Menéndez

R. C.

(2014). Teacher self-efficacy and its relationship with students’ affective and motivational variables in higher education. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 7(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1989/ejep.v7i2.183.

76.

Rosenberg

(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

77.

Rovai

A. P.

Baker

J. D.

Ponton

M. K.

(2013). Social science research design and statistics: A practitioner’s guide to research methods and IBM SPSS. Chesapeake, VA: Watertree Press LLC.

78.

Rubin

R. S.

Dierdorff

E. C.

Bachrach

D. G.

(2013). Boundaries of citizenship behavior: Curvilinearity and context in the citizenship and task performance relationship. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 377–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12018.

79.

Ruiller

Van Der Heijden

Chedotel

Dumas

(2019). “You have got a friend”: The value of perceived proximity for teleworking success in dispersed teams. Team Performance Management, 25(1/2), 2–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-11-2017-0069.

80.

Satorra

Bentler

P. M.

(2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.

81.

Schmidt

A. F.

Finan

(2018). Linear regression and the normality assumption. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 98(1), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.006.

82.

Schwarzer

Jerusalem

(1995). Optimistic self-beliefs as a resource factor in coping with stress. In Extreme stress and communities: Impact and intervention (pp. 159–177). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8486-9_7.

83.

Sherer

Maddux

J. E.

Mercandante

Prentice-Dunn

Jacobs

Rogers

R. W.

(1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663.

84.

Shipman

A. S.

Mumford

M. D.

(2011). When confidence is detrimental: Influence of overconfidence on leadership effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.006.

85.

Simon

Houghton

S. M.

(2003). The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040610.

86.

Simonsohn

(2018). Two lines: A valid alternative to the invalid testing of U-shaped relationships with quadratic regressions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 538–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918805755.

87.

Sitzmann

Yeo

(2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the within-person self-efficacy domain: Is self-efficacy a product of past performance or a driver of future performance? Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 531–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12035.

88.

Stajkovic

A. D.

Luthans

(1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240.

89.

Staples

D. S.

Hulland

J. S.

Higgins

C. A.

(1998). A self‐efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 3(4), 758–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00085.x.

90.

Stone

D. N.

(1994). Overconfidence in initial self-efficacy judgments: Effects on decision processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 452–474. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1069.

91.

Sujan

Weitz

B. A.

Sujan

(1988). Increasing sales productivity by getting salespeople to work smarter. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 8(2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298605000404.

92.

Tasa

Whyte

(2005). Collective efficacy and vigilant problem solving in group decision making: A non-linear model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.01.002.

93.

Tzur

K. S.

Ganzach

Pazy

(2016). On the positive and negative effects of self-efficacy on performance: Reward as a moderator. Human Performance, 29(5), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1192631.

94.

Vancouver

J. B.

Day

D. V.

(2005). Industrial and organization research on self-regulation: From constructs to applications. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 155–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x.

95.

Vancouver

J. B.

Gullekson

N. L.

Morse

B. J.

Warren

M. A.

(2014). Finding a between-person negative effect of self-efficacy on performance: Not just a within-person effect anymore. Human Performance, 27(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2014.913593.

96.

Vancouver

J. B.

Kendall

L. N.

(2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1146–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1146.

97.

Vancouver

J. B.

K. M.

Yoder

R. J.

(2008). Self-efficacy and resource allocation: Support for a nonmonotonic, discontinuous model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.35.

98.

Vroom

V. H.

(1964). Work and motivation. Oxfordshire, UK: Wiley.

99.

Whyte

Saks

A. M.

Hook

(1997). When success breeds failure: The role of perceived self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(5), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-13718:5<415::AID-JOB813>3.0.CO;2-G.

100.

Wilson

S. R.

Gettings

P. E.

Guntzviller

L. M.

Munz

E. A.

(2014). Parental self-efficacy and sensitivity during playtime interactions with young children: Unpacking the curvilinear association. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(4), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.911937.

101.

Wilson

J. M.

O'Leary

Metiu

Jett

Q. R.

(2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7), 979–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607083105.

102.

Yeo

G. B.

Neal

(2006). An examination of the dynamic relationship between self-efficacy and performance across levels of analysis and levels of specificity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1088.

103.

Zacharakis

A. L.

Shepherd

D. A.

(2001). The nature of information and overconfidence on venture capitalists’ decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00052-X.

“Too Much” Self-Efficacy? Understanding the Curvilinear Consequences of Between-Person Self-Efficacy through a Moderated-Mediation Model of Perceived Proximity and Employee Effort

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References