While trusting coworker relationships are conducive to knowledge transfer, distinct types of trust and the contextual conditions under which they are most effective have received limited empirical attention. In this article, we distinguish between professional and personal trust, and hypothesize that their relative knowledge transfer advantage may vary as a function of the duration of the receiver-source relationship. Using survey data from 135 knowledge receivers reporting on their relationships with their knowledge sources, we find that both professional and personal trust interact with relationship duration, albeit in opposite directions. We also find a synergistic effect of the two types of trust on knowledge transfer but only in long duration relationships. The implications of distinguishing professional and personal trust within the overall nomological network of trust are discussed in terms of theory and practice development.
AdlerP. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12, 215-234.
2.
AdlerP. S.HeckscherC. (2006). Towards collaborative community. In HeckscherC.AdlerP. S. (Eds.), The firm as a collaborative community: Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy (pp. 11-105). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40.
ArgoteL.IngramP. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 82, 150-169.
6.
ArgoteL.McEvilyB.ReagansR. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49, 571-582.
7.
AshleighM.PrichardJ. (2012). An integrative model of the role of trust in transactive memory development. Group & Organization Management, 37, 5-35.
8.
AtkinsonS. (2004). Senior management relationships and trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 571-587.
9.
BachmannR. (1998). Conclusion: Trust—Conceptual aspects of a complex phenomenon. In LaneC.BachmannR. (Eds.), Trust within and between organisations (pp. 298-322). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
BachmannR. (2011). At the crossroads: Future directions in trust research. Journal of Trust Research, 1, 203-213.
11.
BaldwinM. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461-484.
12.
BaumJ. A. C.McEvilyB.RowleyT. J. (2012). Better with age? Tie longevity and performance implications of bridging and closure. Organization Science, 23, 529-546.
13.
BecerraM.LunnanR.HuemerL. (2008). Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 691-713.
14.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
15.
BorgattiS. P.CrossR. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49, 432-445.
16.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW. L. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
17.
ChowdhuryS. (2005). The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, 310-326.
18.
ChuaR. W. J.IngramP.MorrisM. W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 436-452.
19.
ChuaR. W.MorrisM. W.IngramP. (2009). Guanxi vs. networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs. American managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 490-508.
20.
CookJ.WallT. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.
21.
CurrallS. C.JudgeT. A. (1995). Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 64, 151-170.
22.
DahlanderL.McFarlandD. A. (2013). Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 69-110.
23.
DietzG. (2011). Going back to the source: Why do people trust each other?Journal of Trust Research, 1, 215-222.
DietzG.GillespieN.ChaoG. (2010). Unravelling the complexities of trust across cultures. In SaundersM.SkinnerD.DietzG.GillespieN.LewickiR. J. (Eds.), Organizational trust: A cultural perspective (pp. 3-41). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26.
DingZ.NgF.CaiQ. (2007). Personal constructs affecting interpersonal trust and willingness to share knowledge between architects in project design teams. Construction Management and Economics, 25, 937-950.
27.
DirksK. T.FerrinD. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
28.
DotyH. D.GlickW. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results?Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374-406.
29.
DyerJ. H.ChuW. (2000). The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 259-285.
30.
FerrinD. L.BlighM. C.KohlesJ. C. (2008). It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 161-178.
31.
FerrinD.DirksK. T.ShahP. P. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 870-883.
32.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust. New York, NY: Free Press.
33.
GillespieN. (2003). Measuring trust in work relationships: The behavioral trust inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
34.
GillespieN.DietzG. (2009). Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review, 34, 127-145.
35.
GoldenT. D.RaghuramS. (2010). Teleworker knowledge sharing and the role of altered relational and technological interactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1061-1085.
36.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
37.
GranovetterM. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
38.
GrantR. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
39.
HansenM. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
40.
HerzbergF. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: The World Publishing.
41.
HindsP. J.CarleyK. M.KrackhardtD.WholeyD. (2000). Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 226-251.
42.
HolsteJ. S.FieldsD. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 128-140.
43.
HuangL.MurnighanJ. K. (2010). What’s in a name? Subliminally activating trusting behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 62-70.
44.
InkpenA. C.TsangE. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30, 146-165.
45.
KaneA. A. (2010). Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organization Science, 21, 643-660.
46.
KanferR.AckermanP. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology—Monograph, 74, 657-690.
47.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
48.
KoD. G. (2010). Consultant competence trust doesn’t pay off, but benevolence trust does! Managing knowledge with care. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 202-213.
49.
KogutB.ZanderU. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
50.
KoskinenK. U.PihlantoP. (2007). Trust in a knowledge related project work environment. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 8, 75-88.
51.
KrackhardtD. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342-369.
52.
KrackhardtD. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In NohriaN.EcclesR. G. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216-239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
53.
KramerR. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
54.
KramerR. M.LewickiR. J. (2010). Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 245-277.
55.
KrishnanR.MartinX.NoorderhavenN. G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance?Academy of Management Journal, 49, 894-917.
56.
LeeD. G.ParkJ. Y.LeeH. T.YuG. (2008). The effects of trust dimensions on relationship commitment: The relative efficacy and effect symmetry. Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 457-466.
57.
LeeP.GillespieN.MannL.WearingA. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management Learning, 41, 473-491.
58.
LevinD. Z.CrossR. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477-1490.
59.
LevinD. Z.WhitenerE. M.CrossR. (2006). Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating role of relationship length. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1163-1171.
60.
LevittB.MarchJ. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
61.
LewickiR. J.BrinsfieldC. T. (2009). Trust, distrust and building social capital. In BarktusV. O.DavisJ. H. (Eds.), Social capital: Reaching out, reaching in (pp. 275-303). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
62.
LewickiR. J.BunkerB. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In BunkerB. B.RubinJ. Z. (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice (pp. 133-175). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
63.
LewickiR. J.BunkerB. B. (1996). Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In KramerR.TylerT. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 114-139). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
64.
LewickiR. J.McAllisterD. J.BiesR. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438-458.
65.
LewickiR. J.TomlinsonE. C.GillespieN. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32, 991-1022.
66.
LewisJ. D.WeigertA. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967-985.
67.
LinH. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33, 135-149.
68.
LincolnJ. R.MillerJ. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181-199.
69.
LindkvistL. (2005). Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: A typology of knowledge work in groups. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1189-1210.
70.
LucasL. M. (2005). The impact of trust and reputation on the transfer of best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 87-101.
71.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
72.
McAllisterD. J.LewickiR. J.ChaturvediS. (2006). Trust in developing relationships: From theory to measurement. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, G1-G6.
73.
McEvilyB.TortorielloM. (2011). Measuring trust in organizational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1, 23-63.
74.
McEvilyB.PerroneV.ZaheerA. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14, 91-103.
75.
MenonT.BlountS. (2003). The messenger bias: A relational model of knowledge valuation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 137-186.
76.
MeyersonD.WeickK. E.KramerR. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
77.
MinbaevaD.PedersenT.BjörkmanI.FeyC.ParkH. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 586-599.
78.
MoranP. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1129-1151.
79.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
80.
NooteboomB. (2002). Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
81.
OliverA. L.MontgomeryK. (2001). A system cybernetic approach to the dynamics of individual- and organizational-level trust. Human Relations, 54, 1045-1063.
82.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569.
83.
PolitisJ. D. (2003). The connection between trust and knowledge management: What are its implications for team performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, 55-66
84.
ReagansR.McEvilyB. (2000). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267.
85.
RousseauD. M.SitkinS. B.BurtS. R.CamererC. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
86.
RulkeD. L.RauD. (2000). Investigating the encoding process of transactive memory development in group training. Group & Organization Management, 25, 373-396.
87.
SchindlerP. L.ThomasC. C. (1993). The structure of interpersonal trust in the workplace. Psychological Reports, 73, 563-573.
88.
SchoormanF. D.MayerR. C.DavisJ. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32, 344-354.
89.
SeligmanA. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90.
ShapiroD. L.SheppardB. H.CheraskinL. (1992). In theory: Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8, 365-377.
91.
SzulanskiG. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
92.
TanisM.PostmesT. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 413-424.
93.
TsengS.FoggB. J. (1999). Credibility and computer technology. Communications of the ACM, 42, 39-44.
94.
TsoukasH. (2003). Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In Easterby-SmithM.LylesM. A. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 410-427). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
95.
van WijkR.JansenJ. J. P.LylesM. A. (2008). Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 830-853.
96.
WalterF.BruchH. (2008). The positive affect group spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 239-261.
97.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
98.
WeibelA. (2003). Book review: Lane and Bachmann: Trust within and between organizations. Personnel Review, 32, 667-671.
99.
WhitenerE. M.BrodtS. E.KorsgaardM. A.WernerJ. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513-530.
100.
WildmanJ. L.ShufflerM. M.LazzaraE. H.FioreS. M.BurkeC. S.SalasE.GarvenS. (2012). Trust development in swift starting action teams: A multilevel framework. Group & Organization Management, 37, 137-170.
101.
ZandD. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229-239.
102.
ZhouS.SiuF.WangM. (2010). Effects of social tie content on knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 449-463.
