Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study proposes and tests a process model linking deep-level team composition and innovation. Two cognitive styles, sequential thinking and connective thinking, are the deep-level team attributes hypothesized to affect team innovation. Psychological safety and cooperative learning are hypothesized to link cognitive styles and innovation at the team level. Findings from a sample of 83 natural innovation teams with dual-source data indicate that sequential thinking contributes to decreases in team innovation by inhibiting psychological safety, while connective thinking helps improve team innovation through increased cooperative learning. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

deep-level composition innovation teams psychological safety cooperative learning cognitive styles

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agars

M. D.

Kaufman

J. C.

Locke

T. R.

(2008). Social influence and creativity in organizations: A multi-level lens for theory, research, and practice. In Mumford

M. D.

Hunter

S. T.

Bedell-Avers

K. E.

(Eds.), Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation (Vol. 7, pp. 3-61). New York, NY: Elsevier.

Allinson

C. W.

Hayes

(1996). The Cognitive Style Index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 119-135.

Anderson

De Dreu

C.K W

Nijstad

B. A.

(2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147-173.

Armstrong

S. J.

Cools

(2009). Cognitive styles and their relevance for business and management: A review of development over the past two decades. In Zhang

L.-F.

Sternberg

R. J.

(Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 253-290). New York, NY: Spring.

Baer

Frese

(2003). Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68.

Barrick

M. R.

Stewart

G. L.

Neubert

M. J.

Mount

M. K.

(1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.

Barry

Stewart

G. L.

(1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 62-78.

Baruch

Holtom

B. C.

(2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139-1160.

Basadur

Graen

G. B.

Scandura

T. A.

(1986). Training effects on attitudes toward divergent thinking among manufacturing engineers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 612-617.

10.

Basadur

Head

(2001). Team performance and satisfaction: A link to cognitive style within a process framework. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 227-248.

11.

Bell

S. T.

(2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595-615.

12.

Bell

S. T.

Villado

A. J.

Lukasik

M. A.

Belau

Briggs

A. L.

(2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37, 709-743.

13.

Belsley

D. A.

Kuh

Welsch

R. E.

(2004). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

14.

Bentler

P. M.

Chou

C.-P.

(1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.

15.

Blau

(1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.

16.

Bliese

P. D.

(2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

17.

Bordia

Restubog

S. L. D.

Jimmieson

N. L.

Irmer

B. E.

(2011). Haunted by the past: Effects of poor change management history on employee attitudes and turnover. Group & Organization Management, 36, 191-222.

18.

Brunner

(1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

19.

Carmeli

Gittell

J. H.

(2009). High quality relationships, psychological safety and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 709-729.

20.

Chan

(1996). Cognitive misfit of problem-solving style at work: A facet of person-organization fit. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 194-207.

21.

Chan

(1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology 83(2): 234-246.

22.

Choi

J. N.

Anderson

T. A.

Veillette

(2008). Contextual inhibitors of employee creativity in organizations: The insulating role of creative ability. Group & Organization Management, 34, 330-357.

23.

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S.

(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

24.

Cohen

S. G.

Bailey

. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management 23(3): 239-290.

25.

Cohen

W. M.

Levinthal

D. A.

(1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.

26.

Cole

D. A.

Ciesla

J. A.

Steiger

J. H.

(2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 381-398.

27.

Cools

(2011, August 12-16). Cognitive styles in organizational behavior: A four decade review. Paper presented at the 71st Academy of Management annual conference, San Antonio, TX.

28.

De Stobbeleir

K. E. M.

Ashford

S. J.

Buyens

(2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 811-831.

29.

Edmondson

(1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.

30.

Edmondson

A. C.

(2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13(2), 128-147.

31.

Edmondson

A. C.

(2004). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(1), 66-90.

32.

Edmondson

A. C.

(2007). Psychological safety, trust and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In Kramer

R. M.

Cook

K. S.

(Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239-272). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

33.

Edmondson

Roberto

M. A.

Watkins

M. D.

(2003). A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: Managing unstructured task streams. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 297-325.

34.

Elfenbein

H. A.

O’Reilly

C. A.

III . (2007). Fitting in: The effects of relational demography and person-culture fit on group process and performance. Group & Organization Management, 32(1), 109-142.

35.

Entwistle

McCune

Walker

(2001). Conceptions, styles, and approaches within higher education: Analytic abstractions and everyday experiences. In Sternberg

R. J.

Zhang

L.-F.

(Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 103-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

36.

Fletcher

J. M.

Marks

A. D.

Hine

D. W.

(2011). Working memory capacity and cognitive styles in decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1136-1141.

37.

Fox

(1991). Regression diagnostics (Vol. 79). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

38.

Fuller

L. R.

Kaplan

S. E.

(2004). A note about the effect of auditor cognitive style on task performance. Behavioral Research In Accounting, 16(1), 131-143.

39.

Funk

C. A.

Kulik

B. W.

(2012). Happily ever after: Toward a theory of late stage group performance. Group & Organization Management, 37(1), 36-66.

40.

Gracia

Cifre

Grau

(2010). Service quality: The key role of service climate and service behavior of boundary employee units. Group & Organization Management, 35, 276-298.

41.

Grigorenko

E. L.

(2009). What is so stylish about styles? Comments on the genetic etiology of intellectual styles. In Zhang

L.-F.

Sternberg

R. J.

(Eds.), Perpsectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 233-252). New York, NY: Springer.

42.

Guilford

J. P.

(1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

43.

Harrison

D. A.

Price

K. H.

Bell

M. P.

(1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96-107.

44.

Harrison

D. A.

Price

K. H.

Gavin

J. H.

Florey

A. T.

(2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045.

45.

Hayes

Allinson

C. W.

(1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, 51, 847-871.

46.

Hodgkinson

G. P.

Sadler-Smith

(2003). Complex or unitary? A critique and empirical re-assessment of the Allinson-Hayes Cognitive Style Index. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 243-268.

47.

Homan

A. C.

Van Knippenberg

Van Kleef

G. A.

DeDreu

C. K. W.

(2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189-1199.

48.

Hooper

Coughlan

Mullen

M. R.

(2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60).

49.

Howard

. (1994). Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior 15(5): 399-404.

50.

L.-T. H.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1), 1-55.

51.

Huber

G. P.

(1983). Cognitive style as a basis for MIS and DSS designs: Much ado about nothing? Management Science, 29, 567-579.

52.

Hülsheger

U. R.

Anderson

Salgado

J. F.

(2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128-1145.

53.

Ilgen

D. R.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Johnson

Judith

(2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-outcome models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.

54.

Ingram

K. L.

Cope

J. G.

Harju

B. L.

Wuensch

K. L.

(2000). Applying to graduate school: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 215-226.

55.

Jabri

M. M.

(1991). The development of conceptually independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 975-983.

56.

Janssen

(2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302.

57.

Janz

B. D.

Prasarnphanich

(2003). Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: The importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decision Science, 34, 351-384.

58.

Jassawalla

A. R.

Sashittal

H. C.

(2002). Cultures that support product innovation processes. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 42-54.

59.

Jehn

K. A.

Northcraft

G. B.

Neale

M. A.

(1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.

60.

Joshi

Roh

(2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 599-627.

61.

Kanter

R. M.

(1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In Staw

B. M.

Cummings

L. L.

(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 169-211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

62.

Keller

R. T.

(1986). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 715-726.

63.

Kelloway

E. K.

(1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A Researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

64.

Kenny

D. A.

(2011). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm

65.

Kirton

(1976). Adaptors and Innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629.

66.

Kline

R. B.

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

67.

Kostopoulos

K. C.

Bozionelos

(2011). Team exploratory and exploitative learning: Psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 36, 385-415.

68.

Kozlowski

SWJ

Klein

. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein

Kozlowski

SWJ

(eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 3-90. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

69.

Kozhevnikov

(2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 464-481.

70.

Kumar

Stern

L. W.

Anderson

J. C.

(1993). Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1633-1651.

71.

Kurtzberg

T. R.

(2005). Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 51-65.

72.

Lau

D. C.

Murnighan

J. K.

(1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325-340.

73.

Leonard

Beauvais

L. L.

Scholl

(2005). A multi-level model of group cognitive style in strategic decision-making. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(1), 119-138.

74.

Lindell

M. K.

Whitney

D. J.

(2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114-121.

75.

Luke

D. A.

(2004). Multilevel modeling (Vol. 143). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

76.

MacCallum

R. C.

Browne

M. W.

Sugawara

H. M.

(1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.

77.

Marquardt

D. W.

(1980). You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 87-91.

78.

Mathieu

J. E.

Heffner

T. S.

Goodwin

G. F.

Salas

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

(2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.

79.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T. J.

(1987). Validation of the five factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.

80.

McQuitty

(2004). Statistical power and structural equation models in business research. Journal of Business Research, 57, 175-183.

81.

Messick

(1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In Messick

(Ed.), Individuality in learning (pp. 4-23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

82.

Mezoff

(1982). Cognitive style and interpersonal behavior: A review with implications for human relations training. Group & Organization Management, 7(1), 13-34.

83.

Miron-Spektor Erez

Naveh

(2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740-760.

84.

Miron

Erez

Naveh

(2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175-199.

85.

Moskvina

Kozhevnikov

(2011). Determining cognitive styles: Historical perspective and directions for future research. In Rayner

Cools

(Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 19-31). New York, NY: Routledge.

86.

Mumford

M. D.

(2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resources Management Review, 10, 313-351.

87.

Myers

I. B.

McCaulley

M. H.

Quenk

N. L.

Hammer

A. L.

(2003). MBTI Manual: A guide to the development and use of Meyers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

88.

Nembhard

I. M.

Edmondson

A. C.

(2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 941-966.

89.

Neuman

Wagner

S. H.

Christiansen

N. D.

(1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organization Management, 24(1), 28-45.

90.

Page

S. E.

(2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

91.

Paletz

S. B. F.

Schunn

C. D.

(2010). A social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(1), 73-95.

92.

Pask

Scott

B. C. E.

(1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4, 217-253.

93.

Payne

Lane

Jabri

M. M.

(1990). A two dimensional person-environment fit analysis of the performance, effort, and satisfaction of research scientists. British Journal of Management, 1(1), 45-57.

94.

Pearsall

Ellis

APJ

Evans

. (2008). Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key? Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1): 225-234.

95.

Pelled

L. H.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

Xin

K. R.

(1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.

96.

Peters

Karren

R. J.

(2009). An examination of the roles of trust and functional diversity on virtual team performance ratings. Group & Organization Management, 34, 479-504.

97.

Phillips

K. W.

Lloyd

D. L.

(2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 143-160.

98.

Post

De Lia

DiTomaso

Tirpak

T. M.

Borwankar

(2009). Capitalizing on thought diversity for innovation. Research Technology Management, 52(6), 14-25.

99.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.

100.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.

101.

Rayner

Peterson

E. R.

(2011). Reaffirming style as an individual difference: Toward a global paradigm or knowledge diaspora? In Rayner

Cools

(Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 107-134). New York, NY: Routledge.

102.

Rayner

Riding

(1997). Towards a categorization of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17(1&2), 5-28.

103.

Renzulli

J. S.

Dai

D. Y.

(2001). Abilities, interests, and styles as aptitudes for learning: A Person-situation interaction perspective. In Sternberg

R. J.

Zhang

L.-F.

(Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 23-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

104.

Riding

R. J.

Sadler-Smith

(1997). Cognitive style and learning strategies: Some implications for training design. International Journal of Training and Development, 1, 199-208.

105.

Root-Bernstein

(1999). Sparks of genius. The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

106.

Sadler-Smith

(2001). A reply to Reynolds’ critique of learning style. Management Learning, 32, 291-304.

107.

Savelsbergh

Gevers

J. M. P.

van der Heijden

B. I. J. M.

Poell

R. F.

(2012). Team role stress: Relationships with team learning and performance in project teams. Group & Organization Management, 37(1), 67-100.

108.

Schermelleh-Engel

Moosbrugger

Müller

(2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.

109.

Schulz-Hardt

Brodbeck

F. C.

Mojzisch

Kerschreiter

Frey

(2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080-1093.

110.

Scott

S. G.

Bruce

R. A.

(1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A Path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.

111.

Shin

S. J.

Kim

T.-Y.

Lee

J.-Y.

Bian

(2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 197-212.

112.

Snijders

T. A. B.

Bosker

R. J.

(1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

113.

Steiger

J. H.

Shapiro

Browne

M. W.

(1985). On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, 50, 253-264.

114.

Sternberg

R. J.

Grigorenko

E. L.

(1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52, 700-712.

115.

Sternberg

R. J.

Grigorenko

E. L.

(2001). A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In Sternberg

R. J.

Zhang

L.-F.

(Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 1-21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

116.

Stewart

G. L.

(2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29-54.

117.

Sung

S. Y.

Choi

J. N.

(2012). Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(1), 4-13.

118.

Tiedemann

(1989). Measures of cognitive styles: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 24, 261-275.

119.

Tushman

M. L.

O’Reilly

C. A.

(2002). Winning through innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

120.

Tyran

K. L.

Gibson

C. B.

(2008). Is what you see, what you get? The relationship among surface- and deep-level heterogeneity characteristics, group efficacy, and team reputation. Group & Organization Management, 33(1), 46-76.

121.

Van de Ven

A. H.

Polley

(1992). Learning while innovating. Organization Science, 3(1), 92.

122.

van Knippenberg

De Dreu

C. K. W.

Homan

A. C.

(2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.

123.

van Knippenberg

Schippers

M. C.

(2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-541.

124.

Wegner

D. M.

Erber

Raymond

(1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.

125.

Weick

K. E.

Roberts

K. H.

(1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.

126.

West

M. A.

Farr

J. L.

(Eds.). (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

127.

Williams

H. M.

Parker

S. K.

Turner

(2007). Perceived dissimilarity and perspective taking within work teams. Group & Organization Management, 32, 569-597.

128.

Williams

L. J.

Brown

B. K.

(1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resource research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-209.

129.

Witkin

H. A.

Goodenough

D. R.

(1981). Cognitive style: Essence and origins. New York, NY: International Universities Press.

130.

Wong

K. F.

Kwong

J. Y. Y.

C. K.

(2008). When thinking rationally increases biases: The role of rational thinking style in escalation of commitment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 246-271.

131.

Woodman

R. W.

Sawyer

J. E.

Griffin

R. W.

(1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.

132.

Woolley

A. W.

Hackman

J. R.

Jerde

T. E.

Chabris

C. F.

Bennett

S. L.

Kosslyn

S. M.

(2007). Using brain-based measures to compose teams: How individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance. Social Neuroscience, 2(2), 96-105.

133.

Yuan

Woodman

R. W.

(2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 323-342.

134.

Zhang

L.-F.

Huang

(2001). Thinking styles and the big five personality traits revisited. European Journal of Personality, 15, 465-476.

135.

Zhang

L.-F.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1-53.

Deep-Level Team Composition and Innovation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References