This study investigates expertise (i.e., high level of individual task performance) and self-efficacy as predictors of an individual's contribution to teamwork processes (problem analysis, goal specification) during team meetings. Multilevel, multisource data from a longitudinal field study in 22 professional software design teams reveal large within-team variability in individual contributions to teamwork processes. Expertise positively predicted a team member's contribution to meeting processes 1 year later, also when controlling for the initial level of contribution. Contrary to the hypothesis, self-efficacy was negatively related to problem analysis during team meetings.
Ashford, S.J., Blatt, R., & VandeWalle, D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations . Journal of Management, 29, 773-799.
2.
Atwater, L.E., Brett, J.F., Waldman, D., DiMare, L., & Hayden, M.V. (2004). Men's and women's perceptions of the gender typing of management subroles. Sex Roles, 50, 191-199.
3.
Bales, R.F., & Strodtbeck, F.L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solving . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495.
4.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.
Bandura, A., & Jourden, F.J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 941-951.
6.
Barry, B., & Stewart, G.L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology , 82, 62-78.
7.
Baruch, Y. (1999). Response rate in academic studies. A comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52, 421-438.
8.
Berger, J., Cohen, B.P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241-255.
9.
Bonner, B.L., Baumann, M.R., & Dalal, R.S. (2002). The effects of member expertise on group decision-making and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 719-736.
10.
Bosch-Sijtsema, P. (2007). The impact of individual expectations and expectation conflicts on virtual teams. Group & Organization Management , 32, 358-388.
11.
Brodbeck, F.C. (2001). Communication and performance in software development projects. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , 10, 73-94.
12.
Brown, S.P., Jones, E., & Leigh, T.W. (2005). The attenuating effect of role overload on relationships linking self-efficacy and goal level to work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 972-979.
13.
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
14.
Bunderson, J.S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557-591.
15.
Burke, M.J., & Dunlap, W.P. (2002). Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user's guide. Organizational Research Methods , 5, 159-172.
16.
Chen, G., & Kanfer, R. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223-267.
17.
Chen, G., & Klimoski, R.J. (2003). The impact of expectation on newcomer performance in teams as mediated by work characteristics, social exchanges, and empowerment. Academy of Management Journal , 46, 591-607.
18.
Chen, G., Thomas, B., & Wallace, J.C. (2005). A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance . Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 827-841.
19.
Cohen, S.G., & Bailey, D.E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management , 23, 239-290.
20.
Cohen, S.G., Mohrman, S.A., & Mohrman, A.M., Jr. (1999). We can't get there unless we know where we are going: Direction setting for knowledge work teams. In R. Wageman (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 1-31). Stamford, CT: JAI .
21.
Cross, R., & Cummings, J.N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 928-937.
22.
Curtis, B., Krasner, H., & Iscoe, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11), 1268-1287.
23.
DeShon, R.P., Kozlowski, S.W.J., Schmidt, A.M., Milner, K.R., & Wiechman, D. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1035-1056.
24.
Ericsson, K.A., & Lehmann, A.C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology , 47, 273-305.
25.
Ford, J.K., & Kraiger, K. (1995). The application of cognitive constructs and principles to the instructional systems model of training: Implications for needs assessment, design, and transfer. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 1-48). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
26.
Franz, T.M., & Larson, J.R.J. (2002). The impact of experts on information sharing during group discussion. Small Group Research , 33, 383-411.
27.
Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 271-340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
28.
Green, A.J.K., & Gilhooly, K.J. (1992). Empirical advances in expertise research. In M. T. Keane & K. J. Gilhooly (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking (Vol. 1, pp. 45-70). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
29.
Gully, S.M., Incalcaterra, K.A., & Joshi, A. (2002). A meta-analysis of team efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
30.
Hacker, W. (2003). Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 105-130.
31.
Hackman, J.R., & Morris, C.G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
32.
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.
33.
Hochwarter, W.A., Witt, L.A., Treadway, D.C., & Ferris, G.R. (2006). The interaction between social skill and organizational support on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology , 91, 482-489.
34.
Howell, J.M., & Shea, C.M. (2006). Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group & Organization Management, 31, 180-211.
35.
Ilgen, D.R., Hollenbeck, J.R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
36.
Kellett, J.B., Humphrey, R.H., & Sleeth, R.G. (2002). Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 523-544.
37.
Kellett, J.B., Humphrey, R.H., & Sleeth, R.G. (2006). Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 146-162.
38.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Bell, B.S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333-375). Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley.
39.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Klein, K.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations. Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
41.
Larson, J.R.J., Christensen, C., Abbott, A.S., & Franz, T.M. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330.
42.
Larson, J.R., Christensen, C., Franz, T.M., & Abbott, A.S. (1998). Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information team-based medical decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 93-108.
43.
LePine, J.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Ilgen, D.R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803-811.
44.
LePine, J.A., Piccolo, R.F., Jackson, C.L., Mathieu, J.E., & Saul, J.R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria . Personnel Psychology, 61, 273-307.
45.
Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E., & Zaccaro, S.J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
46.
Morgeson, F.P., Reider, M.W., & Campion, M.A. (2005). Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personal characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology, 58, 583-611.
47.
Ng, K.Y., & Van Dyne, L. (2005). Antecedents and performance consequences of helping behavior in work groups. Group & Organization Management , 30, 514-540.
48.
Nixon, C.T., & Littlepage, G.E. (1992). Impact of meeting procedures on meeting effectiveness. Journal of Business and Psychology , 6, 361-369.
49.
O'Leary Kelly, A.M., Martocchio, J.J., & Frink, D.D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285-1301.
50.
O'Neill, B.S., & Mone, M.A. (1998). Investigating equity sensitivity as a moderator of relation between self-efficacy and workplace attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 805-816.
51.
Phillips, J.M., & Gully, S.M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 792-802.
52.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies . Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
53.
Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., et al. (2000). A user's guide to MLwiN. London: University of London, Multilevel Models Project, Institute of Education.
54.
Reus, T.H., & Liu, Y. (2004). Rhyme and reason: Emotional capability and the performance of knowledge-intensive work groups. Human Performance , 17, 245-266.
55.
Richard, E.M., Diefendorff, J.M., & Martin, J.H. (2006). Revisiting the within-person self-efficacy and performance relation. Human Performance, 19, 67-87.
56.
Rogelberg, S.G., Leach, D.J., Warr, P.B., & Burnfield, J.L. (2006). "Not another meeting!" Are meeting time demands related to employee well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 83-96.
57.
Rousseau, V., Aubé, C., & Savoie, A. (2006). Teamwork behaviors: A review and integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37, 540-570.
58.
Sawyer, S. (2004). Software development teams. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 95-99.
59.
Schuler, H., Funke, U., Moser, K., & Donat, M. (1995). Personalauswahl in Forschung und Entwicklung: Eignung und Leistung von Wissenschaftlern und Ingenieuren [Personnel selection in research and development: Aptitude and performance of scientists and engineers] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
60.
Seijts, G.H., Latham, G.P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B.W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 227-239.
61.
Shanteau, J. (1988). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers. Acta Psychologica, 68, 203-215.
62.
Sonnentag, S. (1995). Excellent software professionals: Experience, work activities, and perceptions by peers. Behaviour & Information Technology, 14, 289-299.
63.
Sonnentag, S. (2001). High performance and meeting participation. An observational study in software design teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 5, 3-18.
64.
Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
65.
Stein, E.W. (1995). Social and individual characteristics of organizational experts. International Journal of Expert Systems, 8, 121-143.
66.
Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23, 473-496.
67.
Stewart, G.L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management , 32, 29-54.
68.
Stewart, G.L., Fulmer, I.S., & Barrick, M.R. (2005). An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58, 343-365.
69.
Stone, D.N. (1994). Overconfidence in initial self-efficacy judgments: Effects on decision processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 452-474.
70.
Stout, R.J., Salas, E., & Carson, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: What's important for team functioning? Military Psychology , 6, 177-192.
71.
Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G.H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 17-27.
72.
Thomas-Hunt, M.C., & Phillips, K.W. (2004). When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1585-1598.
73.
Tschan, F. (1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms task requirements: The concept of the ideal communication cycles . Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 371-393.
74.
Tschan, F. (2002). Ideal cycles of communication (or cognitions) in triads, dyads, and individuals. Small Group Research, 33, 615-643.
75.
Vancouver, J.B., Thompson, C.M., Tischner, E.C., & Putka, D.J. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 506-516.
76.
Walz, D.B., Elam, J.J., & Curtis, B. (1993). Inside a software design team: Knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration. Communications of the ACM, 36(10), 63-77.
77.
Wood, R.E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407-415.
