The authors investigate how pay differences between the CEO and the rest of the members of the top management team influence a firm's competitive behavior as reflected in the observable and purposeful competitive moves launched by the firm. Using data from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, the authors found a positive relationship between the CEO pay gap and the volume and complexity dimensions of firm competitive behavior. The authors discuss both theoretical and managerial implications of these findings as they relate to important topics such as competitive strategy, corporate governance, and executive compensation.
Adams, J.S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
2.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage . Journal of Management, 17, 9-121.
3.
Becker, B.E., & Huselid, M.A. (1992). The incentive effects of tournament compensation systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 336-350.
4.
Bloom, M. (1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 25-40.
5.
Borger, J. (2001). USA: The pharmaceutical industry stalks the corridors of power. The Guardian Unlimited. Retrieved from http://www.corpwatch.org/news/PND.jsp?articleid=178
6.
Buchholtz, A.K., Young, M.N., & Powell, G.N. (1998). Are board members pawns or watch-dogs? The link between CEO pay and firm performance. Group & Organization Management, 23, 6-26.
7.
Calian, S. (2002, September 19). Global shareholders network wants rules for executive pay. The Wall Street Journal.
8.
Carpenter, M.A., & Sanders, W.G. (2002). Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 367-375.
9.
Carpenter, M.A., & Sanders, W.G. (2004). The effects of top management team pay and firm internationalization on MNC performance. Journal of Management , 30, 509-528.
10.
Chen, M.J. (1996). Competitor analysis and inter-firm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21, 100-134.
11.
Chen, M.J., & Hambrick, D. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 453-482.
12.
Chen, M.J., & MacMillan, I.C. (1992). Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves. Academy of Management Journal , 35, 539-570.
13.
Chen, M., Smith, K.G., & Grimm, C.M. (1992). Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses. Management Science, 38, 439-455.
14.
Clark, H. (2006, June 20). Mind the (CEO pay) gap. Fortune.
15.
Conyon, M.J. (2006). Executive compensation and incentives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25-44.
16.
Conyon, M.J., & Murphy, K.J. (2000). The prince and the pauper? CEO pay in the United States and United Kingdom. The Economic Journal, 110, 640-671.
17.
Conyon, M.J., Peck, S.I., & Sadler, G.V. (2001). Corporate tournament and executive compensation: Evidence from the U.K. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 805-815.
18.
D'Aveni, R. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Freedom Press .
19.
Davis, J., Schoorman, F., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47.
20.
Ehrenberg, R.G., & Bognanno, M.L. (1990). Do tournaments have incentive effects? Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1307-1324.
21.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
22.
Eisinger, J. (2006, January 11). Lavish pay puts a bite on profits: As big executive compensation grows even bigger, shareholders should note destruction of value. Wall Street Journal, p. C1.
23.
Eriksson, T. (1999). Executive compensation and tournament theory. Empirical tests on Danish data. Journal of Labor Economics , 17, 262-280.
24.
Ferrier, W. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 858-877.
25.
Ferrier, W., Smith, K., & Grimm, C. (1999). The role of competition in market share erosion and dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 372-388.
26.
Ferrin, D.L., Bligh, M., & Kohles, J.C. (2007). Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships . Group & Organization Management, 32(4), 465-499.
27.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. (1988). Chief executive compensation: A synthesis and reconciliation. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 43-58.
28.
Gehart, B., & Milkovich, G.T. (1990). Employee compensation . In M. D. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 482-568). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29.
Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. New York: Wiley Press.
30.
Gibbons, R., & Murphy, K.J. (1990). Relative performance evaluation for chief executive officers. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 43, 30-51.
31.
Gnyawali, D.R., He, J., & Madhavan, R. (2002). Network structure and competitive behavior: Empirical evidence from the Global Steel Industry. Paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.
32.
Gnyawali, D.R., He, J., & Madhavan, R. (2006). Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: An empirical examination. Journal of Management, 32(4), 507-530.
33.
Gnyawali, D.R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 431-445.
Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844-864.
39.
Hambrick, D.C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the "team" label. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 171-214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40.
Hambrick, D., Cho, T., & Chen, M. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firm's competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly , 414, 659-688. Hambrick, D.C., & D'Aveni, R.A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science , 28, 1445-1466.
41.
Heckman, J.J. (1981). The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process. In C. F. Manski & D. McFadden (Eds.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications (pp. 179-195). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Henderson, A.D., & Fredrickson, J.W. (2001). Top management team coordination needs and the CEO pay gap: A competitive test of economic and behavioral views . Academy of Management Journal, 44, 96-117.
43.
Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of panel data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
45.
Jensen, M.C., & Murphy, K.J. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives . Journal of Political Economy, 98, 225-264.
46.
Klein, G.A. (1999). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
Lazear, E.D., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank order tournaments as optimum labor contracts . Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-864.
48.
Lindell, M.K., & Brandt, C.J. (1999). Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test: A comparison of the CVI, T, rwg(j), and r*wg(j) indexes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 640-652.
49.
Long, J.S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
50.
Lublin, J.S. (2004, April 12). Executive pay: The Journal report. Wall Street Journal, pp. R1-R11.
51.
Main, B.G., O'Reilly, C.A., & Wade, J. (1993). Top executive pay: Tournament or teamwork. Journal of Labor Economics, 11, 606-628.
52.
McCarthy, R.C. (2003). Technology roadmapping: Linking technological change to business needs. Research Technology Management, 46, 47-52.
53.
McDavid, J.C., & Hawthorn, L.R.L. (2005). Program evaluation and performance measurement. An introduction to practices. New York: Sage.
54.
Miller, D., & Chen, M.J. (1994). Sources and consequences of competitive inertia . Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 1-23.
55.
Miller, D., & Chen, M. (1996). The simplicity of competitive repertoires: An empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 419-440.
56.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
57.
Most profitable companies: Return on revenue. (2003, September). Med Ad News, 22(9), 15.
58.
Nayyar, P.R., & Bantel, K.A. (1994). Competitive agility: A source of competitive advantage based on speed and variety. Advances in Strategic Management , 10, 193-222.
59.
New drug pipeline slows but sales remain steady: from torrent to trickle. (2003, August 18). Drug Store News, 25(10), 63.
60.
Nugent, P., & Abolafia, M.Y. (2006). The creation of trust through interaction and exchange. Group & Organization Management , 31(6), 628-650.
61.
Offstein, E.H. (2004). The upper-echelon perspective of firm competitive behavior. Unpublished dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
62.
Offstein, E.H., & Gnyawali, D.R. (2005). CEO compensation and firm competitive behavior: Empirical evidence from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry . Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22, 201-225.
63.
Offstein, E.H., Gnyawali, D.R., & Cobb, A.T. (2005). A strategic human resource perspective of firm competitive behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 305-318.
64.
Pedhazur, E.J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. New YorkHarcourtCollege.
65.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 382-407.
67.
Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York : Free Press.
68.
Rosen, S. (1986). Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments . American Economic Review, 76, 701-715.
69.
Salazar, A., Hackney, R., & Howells, J. (2003). The strategic impact of internet technology in biotechnology and pharmaceutical firms: Insights from a knowledge management perspective. Information Technology and Management, 4, 289-300.
70.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and social sciences. New York : Teachers College Press.
71.
Siegel, P.A., & Hambrick, D.C. (2005). Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organization Science, 16, 259-274.
72.
Smith, K.G., Ferrier, W.J., & Ndofor, H. (2001). Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. In M. A. Hitt, E. R. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 315-361). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
73.
Smith, K.G., Grimm, C., Gannon, M., & Chen, M. (1991). Organizational information-processing, competitive responses and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 60-85.
74.
Stark, E.M., Shaw, J.D., & Duffy, M.K. (2007). Preference for group work, winning orientation, and social loafing behavior in groups. Group & Organization Management, 32, 699-723.
75.
Top 50 companies ranked by consolidated revenue. (2003, September). Med Ad News, 22(9), 14.
76.
Useem, J. (2003, March 28). "Have they no shame?" Fortune, pp. 57-64.
77.
Welbourne, T.M., & Ferrante, C.J. (2008). To monitor or not to monitor: A study of individual outcomes from monitoring one's peers under gainsharing and merit pay. Group & Organization Management, 33(2), 139-162.
78.
Wooldridge, J.M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79.
Wright, P., Kroll, M., Lado, A., & Elenkov, E. (2005). Influences of relative rewards of top managers on firm performance. Strategic Organization, 3, 311-335.
