The authors examine the effect of having women on the top management teams of initial public offering (IPO) firms on the organizations' short- and long-term financial performance. Looking at three different samples, the authors found that trend data indicated IPO firms were gaining in the number of women they employ in their top management teams. Using data from 534 IPO firms, results suggest one reason why the trend is growing; women appear to have a positive association with the firms' short-term performance (Tobin's Q, which is market price to book value per share), 3-year stock price growth, and growth in earnings per share. Possible reasons for the positive effect of women on performance include better innovation and problem-solving processes in more diverse top management teams and the possibility that, on average, the women on these teams are higher performers than are the men on the same teams.
Adler, N. (2002). Women joining men as global leaders in the new economy. In M. Gannon & K. Newman (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of cross-cultural management (pp. 236-250). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
2.
Bantel, K.A., & Jackson, S.E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
3.
Beatty, R.P., & Zajac, E.J. (1994). Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly,39, 313-335.
4.
Brady, D. (2005). Pamela Thomas-Graham: A change of wardrobe. Business Week,3954, 95-96.
5.
Brush, C.G. (1992). Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective, and future direction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(4), 5-30.
6.
Carter, N., Williams, M., & Reynolds, P. (1997). Discontinuance among firms in retail: The influence of initial resources, strategy and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 125-145.
7.
Carter, R.B., Dark, F.H., & Singh, A.K. (1998). Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. Journal of Finance, 53, 285-311.
8.
Carter, R.B., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation . Journal of Finance, 65, 1045-1067.
9.
Catalyst. (2004). The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. New York: Author.
10.
Certo, S.T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28, 432-447.
11.
Certo, S.T., Daily, C.M., & Dalton, D.R. (2001). Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(2), 33-50.
12.
Chaganti, R., & Parasuraman, S. (1996). A study of the impacts of gender on business performance and management patterns in small businesses . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(2), 73-75.
13.
Child, J. (1972). Organizational structures, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22.
14.
Cordeiro, J.J., & Stites-Doe, S. (1997). The impact of women managers on firm performance: Evidence from large U.S. firm. International Review of Women and Leadership, 3(1), 1-20.
15.
D'Aveni, R.A. (1990). Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy . Organizational Science, 1, 121-142.
16.
Eagly, A.S., & Carli, L.L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-835.
17.
Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, S., & Van Engen, S.J. (2003). Transformation, transactional and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men . Psychological Bulletin,129, 569-591.
18.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizations support an employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.
19.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-551.
20.
Eisenhardt, K.M., & Schoonhoven, C.B. (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504-529.
21.
Eisenhardt, K.M., & Tabrizi, B.N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly,40, 84-110.
22.
Ely, R.J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly,39, 203-238.
23.
Feeney, S.A. (2004, March). Women at the top, better bottom line. Workforce Management, p. 24.
24.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D.C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion . Administrative Science Quarterly,35, 484-503.
25.
Fischer, E.M., Reuber, A.R., & Dyke, L.S. (1993). A theoretical overview of extension of research on sex, gender, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 151-168.
26.
Fisher, S.R., & Nelson, D.L. (1996). Feeling at the top: An underutilized resource in top management teams. Journal ofSocial Behavior & Personality, 11(5), 77-90.
27.
Francis, D.H., & Sandberg, W.R. (2000, Winter). Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 5-25.
28.
Frink, D.D., Robinson, R.K., Reither, B., Arthur, M.M., Ammeter, A.P., Ferris, G.R., et al. (2003). Gender demography and organizational performance: A two-study investigation with convergence. Group & Organization Management, 28, 127-147.
29.
Hambrick, D.C., Cho, S.T., & Chen, M.-J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly,41, 659-684.
30.
Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
31.
Harrington, A., & Stanley, M. (2003). The power 50. Fortune, 148(8), 104-108.
32.
Higgins, M.C., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14, 244-263.
33.
Hisrich, R.D., & Brush, C.G. (1984). The women entrepreneur: Implications of family, educational, and occupational experience. Journal of Small Business Management, 22(1), 30-37.
Hopkins, M.M., & Bilimoria, D. (2004). Care and justice orientations in workplace ethical dilemmas of women business owners. Group & Organization Management, 29, 495-516.
36.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673-704.
37.
Jackson, S.E., May, K.E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 204-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
Kamm, J.B., Shuman, J.C., Seeger, J.A., & Nurick, A.J. (1990, Summer). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp. 7-17.
39.
Keck, S.L. (1997). Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organization Science, 8, 143-156.
40.
Kochan, T., Berzrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., et al. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of diversity research network. Human Resource Management , 42(1), 3-21.
41.
Korac-Kakabadse, A., Korac-Kakabadse, N., & Myers, A. (1998). Demographics and leadership philosophy: Exploring gender difference. Journal of Management Development,17, 351-388.
42.
Lawrence, B.S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1-22.
43.
MacDonald, E., & Schoenberger, C.R. (2005). The 100 most powerful women. Forbes, 176(3), 46-48.
44.
Marino, K.E., Castaldi, R.M., & Dollinger, M.J. (1989, Fall). Content analysis in entrepreneurship research: The case of initial public offerings. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp. 51-66.
45.
Megginson, W.L., & Weiss, K. (1991). Venture capitalists certification in initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 46, 879-903.
46.
Mero, J., Bennet, P., Demos, T., Elliott, J., Ellis, E., Fung, A., et al. (2005). On top of the world. Fortune , 152(10), 157-163.
47.
Michaely, R., & Shaw, W.H. (1995). Does the choice of auditor convey quality in n initial public offering?Financial Management, 24(4), 15-30.
48.
Michel, J.G., & Hambrick, D.C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 9-37.
49.
Mohan, N. (2004). Are IPO's priced differently based on gender. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5(1), 57-65.
50.
Murray, A.I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance . Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125.
51.
Neuborne, E. (1996, October 14). Survey: Women fare the best. USA Today, p. 3.
52.
Norburn, D. (1986). GOGOs, YOYOs and DODOs: Company directors and industry performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 101-117.
53.
Norburn, D., & Birley, S. (1988). The top management team and corporate performance . Strategic Management Journal, 9, 225-237.
54.
O'Flaherty, J.S. (1984). Going public: The entrepreneur's guide. New York: John Wiley.
55.
Pelled, L.H., Eisenhardt, K.M., & Xin, K.R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,44, 1-28.
56.
Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 299-357) Greenwich, CT: JAI.
57.
Priem, R.L., Lyons, D.W., & Dess, G.G. (1999). Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management teams' heterogeneity research. Journal of Management , 25, 935-953.
58.
Rasheed, A.M.A., & Datta, D.K. (1997). Determinants of price premiums: A study of initial public offerings in the medical diagnostic and device industry. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(4), 11-23.
59.
Reich, R.B. (1987). Entrepreneurship reconsidered: The team as hero . Harvard Business Review, 65(3), 77-83.
60.
Richard, O. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 164-177.
61.
Richard, O., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., & Chadwick, K. (2004). Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 255-266.
62.
Roberson, L., Kulik, C.T., & Pepper, M.B. (2003). Using needs assessment to resolve controversies in diversity training design. Group & Organization Management , 28, 148-174.
63.
Roberts, P. (1999). Product innovation, product competition, and persistent innovation in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 655-670.
64.
Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21-31.
65.
Sanders, W.G., & Boivie, S. (2004). Sorting things out: Valuation of new firms in uncertain markets. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 167-186.
66.
Spence, A. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355-379.
67.
Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
68.
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
69.
Virany, B., & Tushman, M.L. (1986). Top management teams and corporate success in an emerging industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 261-274.
70.
Vogus, T.J., & Welbourne, T.M. (2003). Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(7), 877-903.
71.
Webber, S.S., & Donahue, L.M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141-163.
72.
Welbourne, T.M., & Andrews, A.O. (1996). Predicting performance of initial public offerings: Should human resource management be in the equation?Academy of Management Journal, 39, 891-919.
73.
Wiersema, M.F., & Bantel, K. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 91-121.
74.
Williams, K.Y., & O'Reilly, C.A. , III. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior,20, 77-141.
75.
Wright, P., Ferris, S.P., Hiller, J.S., & Kroll, M. (1995). Competitiveness through management of diversity: Effects on stock price valuation. Academy of Management Journal , 38, 272-287.
Zimmerman, M.A., & Zeitz, G.J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414-431.
