This study examines whether recruiter-applicant demographic similarity affects selection decisions. In addition, the mediators proposed by the similarity-attraction paradigm were tested. However, consistent with Graves and Powell’s (1995) findings and with the propositions of social identity theory, I also proposed that female recruiters would prefer male applicants. Significant race similarity effects were observed for White recruiters on overall interview assessments and offer decisions, sex dissimilarity had a significant direct effect on overall interview assessments, and age similarity was not related to either criterion. In addition, there was some evidence that the significant direct effects were mediated by perceived similarity and interpersonal attraction. The sex dissimilarity effect appeared to be the result of male recruiters’ preference for female applicants. Post hoc analyses revealed that this relationship was mediated by applicant appearance.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theoryand the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
2.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Byrne, D. E., & Blalock, B. (1963). Similarity and assumed similarity of attitudes between husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 636-640.
5.
Byrne, D. E., & Clore, G. L. (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An International Journal, 1, 103-128.
6.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. (1997). Interviewers’ perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 546-561.
7.
Dalessio, A., & Imada, A. S. (1984). Relationships between interview selection decisions and perceptions of applicant similarity to an ideal employee and self: A field study. Human Relations, 37, 67-80.
8.
Dipboye, R. (1992). Selection interviews: Process perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
9.
Drogosz, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1996). Another look at the effects of appearance, gender, and job type on performance-based decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 437-445.
10.
Edwards, J. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51-100.
11.
Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
12.
Ely, R. J. (1994). Organizational demographics and the dynamics of relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203-238.
13.
Ely, R. J. (1995). The power of demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 589-604.
14.
Ferris, G. R., Judge, T. A., Rowlands, K. M., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (1994). Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process. Test of a model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 101-135.
15.
Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (1975). Beliefs, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Freeman, H. R. (1987). Structure and content of gender stereotypes: Effects of somatic appearance and trait information. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 59-68.
17.
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common In group Identity Model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
18.
Goldberg, C., Finkelstein, L., Perry, E., & Konrad, A. (in press). Job and industry fit: The effects of age and gender on career progress outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
19.
Goldberg, C., Riordan, C., & Schaffer, B. (2003, August). Missing pieces in Social Identity Theory: Continuity and status as moderators of similarity. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Seattle, WA.
20.
Gordon, R. A., Rozelle, R. M., & Baxter, J. C. (1988). The effect of applicant age, job level, and accountability on the evaluation of job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 41, 20-33.
21.
Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). The effect of sex similarity on recruiters’ evaluations of actual applicants: A test of the similarity-attraction paradigm. Personnel Psychology, 48, 85-98.
22.
Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1996). Sex similarity, quality of the employment interview and recruiters’ evaluation of actual applicants. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 243-261.
23.
Griffitt, W. (1969). Personality similarity and self-concept as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Social Psychology, 78, 137-146.
24.
Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Harrison, D., Price, K., & Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
26.
Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269-298.
27.
Heilman, M. E., Martell, R. F., & Simon, M. C. (1988). The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 98-110.
28.
Howard, J. L., & Ferris, G. R. (1996). The employment interview context: Social and situational influences on interview decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 112-136.
29.
Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-789.
30.
Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). The elusive criterion of fit in human resources staffing decisions. Human Resource Planning, 15, 47-67.
31.
Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 80-105.
32.
Kenny, D. A. (1998). Mediation. Retrieved August 7, 1998, from http://nw3.nai.net/%7Edakenny/kenny/html
33.
Kinicki, A. J., & Lockwood, C. A. (1985). The interview process: An examination of factors recruiters use in evaluating job applicants. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 117-125.
34.
Kirchmeyer, C. (2002). Change and stability in managers’ gender roles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 929-940.
35.
Konrad, A. M., & Cannings, K. (1997). The effects of gender role congruence and statistical discrimination in managerial advancement. Human Relations, 50, 1305-1328.
36.
Konrad, A. M., Corrigall, E., Lieb, P., & Ritchie, J. E. (2000). Sex differences in job attribute preferences among managers and business students. Group and Organization Management, 25, 108-132.
37.
Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593-641.
38.
Lagace, R. R. (1990). Leader-member exchange: Antecedents and consequences of the cadre and hired hand. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 10, 11-19.
39.
LaPrelle, J., Insko, C. A., Cooksey, L., & Graetz, K. (1993). Self similarity, ideal similarity, and undesired self similarity as indicators of attraction. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 19, 65-74.
40.
Larose, H., Tracy, J., & McKelvie, S. (1994). Effects of genderon the physical attractiveness stereotype. Journal of Psychology, 127, 677-691.
41.
Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1-22.
42.
Lin, T. R., Dobbins, G. H., & Farh, J. L. (1992). A field study of race and age similarity effects on interview ratings in conventional and situational interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 363-371.
43.
Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased?Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 11-21.
Milliken, F., & Martins, L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
46.
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
47.
O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21-37.
48.
Pelled, L. (1997). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615-631.
49.
Perry, E. L., & Finkelstein, L. M. (1999). Toward a broader view of age discrimination in employment-related decisions: A joint consideration of organizational factors and cognitive processes. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 21-49.
50.
Powell, G. N., & Goulet, L. R. (1996). Recruiters’ and applicants’ reactions to campus interviews and employment decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1619-1640.
51.
Prewett-Livingston, A., Field, H., Veres, J., & Lewis, P. (1996). Effects of race on interview ratings in a situational panel interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 178-186.
52.
Rand, T. M., & Wexley, K. N. (1975). Demonstration of the effect, “similar to me,” in simulated employment interviews. Psychological Reports, 36, 535-544.
53.
Ravenson, T. A. (1989). Compassionate stereotyping of elderly patients by physicians: Revising the social contact hypothesis. Psychology and Aging, 4, 230-234.
54.
Riordan, C. M., & Shore, L. M. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 342-358.
55.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
56.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
57.
Sprecher, S. (1989). The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction. Sex Roles, 21, 591-607.
58.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261-302.
59.
Stewart, L. D., & Perlow, R. (2001). Applicant race, job status, and racial attitude as predictors of employment discrimination. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 259-275.
60.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
62.
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
63.
Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
64.
Tsui, A. S., Xin, K. R., & Egan, T. D. (1995). Relational demography: The missing link in vertical dyad linkage. In S. E. Jackson & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 97-129). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65.
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237-252.
66.
Wade, K. J., & Kinicki, A. J. (1997). Subjective applicant qualifications and interpersonal attraction as mediators within a process model of interview selection decisions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 23-40.
67.
Wetzel, C. G., & Insko, C. A. (1984). The similarity-attraction relationship: Is there an ideal one?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 253-276.
68.
Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. (1993). Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 996-1025.
69.
Wiley, M. G., & Eskilson, A. (1985). Speech style, gender stereotypes, and corporate success: What if women talked more like men?Sex Roles, 12, 993-1007.
70.
Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 353-376.
