This study examined whether possession of relevant knowledge plus encouragement to use it would positively affect rates of emergent leadership for women. Hypotheses derived from expectation states and social role theories that such “informed women” would be more passive, less influential, and less well liked than comparably informed men were tested in 40 mixed-sex groups. In each group, either a man or a woman (hint person) was instructed privately to gain the adoption of an unusual but effective solution (hint solution) to a production problem. Members’ influential behaviors were observed, coded, and compared with peer ratings. Contrary to predictions, as many hint women as hint men gained adoption of the hint solution (45%). Nevertheless, although successful hint women were seen by their peers to be as influential, competent, and participative as successful hint men, they received significantly lower ratings on leadership and likability. Conditions that promote or inhibit women’s task leadership are discussed.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction Process Analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Bales, R. F.,& Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization, and interaction process(pp. 259-306). New York: Free Press.
3.
Balkwell, J. W., & Berger, J. (1996). Gender, status, and behavior in task situations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 273-283.
4.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 42, 155-162.
5.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
Bem, S. L., Martyna, W.,& Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1016-1023.
7.
Berdahl, J. L. (1996). Gender and leadership in work groups: Six alternative models. Leadership Quarterly, 7(1), 21-40.
8.
Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York: Elsevier.
9.
Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63(3), 379-405.
10.
Burke, R. J., Maier, N. R. F.,& Hoffman, L. R. (1966). Functions of hints in individual problemsolving. American Journal of Psychology, 79, 389-399.
11.
Carli, L. L. & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender effects on social influence andemergent leadership. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbookof gender and work(pp. 203-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Eagly, A. H.,& Carli, L.L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typedcommunications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: Ameta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1-20.
14.
Eagly, A. H.,& Johnson, B. T. (1991). Gender and leadership style: Ameta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256.
15.
Eagly, A. H.,& Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: Ameta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 685-710.
16.
Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J.,& Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125-145.
17.
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G. & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3-22.
18.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W.,& Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eches& H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender(pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
19.
Fisher, B. A. (1980). Small group decision making(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Harmon, J., Schneer, J. A., & Hoffman, L. R. (1993). Electronic meetings and established decision groups: Audio-conferencing effects on performance and structural stability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes61(2), 138-147.
21.
Hoffman, L. R. (1979). The group problem-solving process: Studies of a Valence Model. New York: Praeger.
22.
Hoffman, L. R., Burke, R. J.,& Maier, N. R. F. (1979). Participation, influence, and satisfaction among members of problem-solving groups. In L. R. Hoffman (Ed.), The group problemsolving process: Studies of a Valence Model. New York: Praeger.
23.
Hoffman, L. R., & Clark, M. M. (1979). Participation and influence in problem-solving groups. In L. R. Hoffman (Ed.), The group problem-solving process: Studies of a Valence Model. New York: Praeger.
24.
Hoffman, L. R.,& Kleinman, G. B. (1994). Individual and group in group problem-solving: The Valence Model redressed. Human Communications Research, 21, 36-59.
25.
Hoffman, L. R.,& Maier, N. R. F. (1961). Sex differences, sex composition, and group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 453-456.
26.
Hoffman, L. R.,& Maier, N. R. F. (1964). Valence in the adoption of solutions by problem-solving groups: Concept, method and results. Journal of Abnormal and SocialPsychology, 69, 264-271.
27.
Hoffman, L. R.,& Maier, N. R. F. (1966). Social factors influencing problemsolving in women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 389-399.
28.
Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
29.
Johnson, S. D.& Bechler, C. (1998). Examining the relationship between listening effectiveness and leadership emergence. Small Groups, 29(4), 452-472.
30.
Kent, R. L.,& Moss, S. E. (1994). Effects of sex and gender-role on leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1335-1346.
31.
Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1988). Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluation, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 528-542.
32.
Kolb, J. A. (1997). Are we still stereotyping leadership?Small Group Research, 28(3), 370-393.
33.
Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P.,& Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593-641.
34.
Korabik, K., Baril, G. L., & Watson, C. (1993). Managers’ conflict management style and leadership effectiveness: The moderating effects of gender. Sex Roles, 29, 407-422.
35.
Maier, N. R. F.,& Hoffman, L. R. (1965). Acceptance and quality of solutions as related to leaders’ attitudes toward disagreement in group problem-solving. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1, 373-385.
36.
Molm, L. D. (1986). Gender, power, and legitimation: Atest of three theories. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1356-1386.
37.
Nieva, V. F.,& Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 267-276.
38.
Propp, K. M. (1995). An experimental examination of biological sex as a status cue in decisionmaking groups and its influence on information use. Small Group Research, 26(4), 451-474.
39.
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 637-655.
40.
Ridgeway, C. L., & Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51, 603-617.
41.
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629-645.
42.
SAS Institute Inc. (1985). SAS user’s guide: Statistics, Version 5 edition. Cary, NC: Author.
43.
Sherman, P. J., & Spence, J. T. (1997). A comparison of two cohorts of college students in response to the Male-Female Relations Questionnaire. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 265-278.
44.
Smith-Lovin, L., Skvoretz, J. V.,& Hudson, C. G. (1986). Status and participation in six-person groups: A test of Skvoretz’s comparative status model. Social Forces, 64(4), 992-1005.
45.
Stein, R. T., & Heller, T. (1979). An empirical analysis of the correlations between leadership status and participation rates reported in the literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 11-11.
46.
Stein, R. T., Hoffman, L. R., Cooley, S. J., & Pearce, R. W. (1979). Leadership valence: Modeling and measuring the process of emergent leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in leadership. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
47.
Tharenou, P., Latimer, S.,& Conroy, D. (1994). How do you make it to the top? An examination of influences on women’s and men’s managerial advancement. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 899-931.
48.
Walker, H. A., Ilardi, B. C., McMahon, A. M.,& Fennell, M. L. (1996). Gender, interaction, and leadership. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 255-272.
49.
Watson, C. (1988). When a woman is the boss: Dilemmas in taking charge. Group and Organization Studies, 13, 163-181.
50.
Wentworth, D. K., & Anderson, L. R. (1984). Emergent leadership as a function of sex and task type. Sex Roles, 11(5/6), 513-524.
51.
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
