Incivility, an often ignored but potentially destructive workplace behavior, represents violations in norms of respect. The authors propose that norms of respect may not be shared within a work place and that variations in norms are reflected in the way individuals assess uncivil behavior toward others. Tests are carried out for variations in personal norms of respect with data from observers of the behavior by professional men toward a professional woman. Results from this study suggest that males and females may have different thresholds at which they perceive a vio lation of their norms of respect. Furthermore, perceptions may be affected by observers’ social identification (by race and sex) with either the perpetrators or the targets of incivility. The authors discuss implications from the study for perpetuating workplace inequalities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, E. (1992). Race and gender stereotyping in the Thomas confirmation hearings. In R. Chrisman & E. Allen (Eds.), Court of appeal: The Black community speaks out on the racial and sexual politics of Clarence Thomas vs. Anita Hill. New York: Ballentine.
2.
Allen, J. G., & Haccoon, D. M. (1976). Sex differences in emotionality: A multi-dimensional approach. Human Relations, 29, 711-722.
3.
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452-471.
4.
Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
5.
Barley, S. R., & Knight, D. B. (1992). Toward a cultural theory of stress complaints. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 1-48.
6.
Baron, R. A., & Neumann, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161-173.
7.
Basow, S. A. (1986). Gender stereotypes: Traditions and stereotypes. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
9.
Bies, R., & Tripp, T. (1995). Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations (pp. 246-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact (pp. 281-302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., Reizenstein, R. M., & Pugh, S. D. (1997). Beyond good intentions: The next steps toward racial equality in the American workplace. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 59-72.
12.
Brody, L. R. (1993). On understanding gender differences in the expression of emotion: Gender roles, socialization, and language. In S. L. Ablon, D. Brown, E. J. Khantzian, & J. E. Mack (Eds.), Human feelings: Explorations in affect development and meaning. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic.
13.
Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447-461). New York: Guilford.
14.
Coltrane, S., & Messineo, M. (2000). The perpetuation of subtle prejudice: Race and gender imagery in 1990s television advertising. Sex Roles, 42, 363-389.
15.
Cox, T. (1994). Cultural diversity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
16.
Crow, S. M., Hartman, S. J., Hammond, D., & Fok, L. Y. (1995). The impact of personality factors on sexual and non-sexual harassment sensitivity. Women in Management Review, 10, 9-19.
17.
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124.
18.
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989-1999. Psychological Science, 11, 315-323.
19.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Feagin, J. R. (1992). On not taking gendered racism seriously: The failure of the mass media and the social sciences. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 400-406.
21.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578-589.
22.
Gurin, P., & Townsend, A. (1986). Properties of gender identity and their implications for gender consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 139-148.
23.
Hall, J. A. (1987). On explaining gender differences: The case of nonverbal communication. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 177-201). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Hendrick, S., Hendrick, C., Slapion-Foote, M., & Foote, F. (1985). Gender differences in sexual attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 630-642.
25.
Kane, K., & Montgomery, K. (1998). A framework for understanding dysempowermentin organizations. Human Resource Management, 37, 263-275.
26.
Kerr, C. (1983). The future of industrial societies: Convergence or continued diversity? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Kim, S. H., & Smith, R. H. (1993). Revenge and conflict escalation. Negotiation Journal, 9, 37-43.
28.
Kinney, J. A. (1995). Violence at work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
Konrad, A., & Gutek, B. (1986). Impact of work experiences on attitudes toward sexual harassment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 422-438.
30.
Krosnick, J. (1990). Americans’ perceptions of presidential candidates: A test of the projection hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 159-182.
31.
Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513-520.
32.
McKay, N. (1992). Remembering Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas: What really happened when one Black woman spoke out. In E. Morrison (Ed.), Raceing, en-gendering power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the construction of social reality (pp. 269-289). New York: Pantheon.
33.
Montgomery, K. (1997). Dimensions of diversity: A hierarchical framework. In Decision Sciences Institute Fourth International Conference Proceedings, pp. 161-165.
34.
Morse, C., Woodward, E., & Zweigenhaft, R. (1992). Gender differences in flashbulb memories elicited by the Clarence Thomas hearings. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 453-458.
35.
Murrell, A., & Dietz-Uhler, B. (1993). Gender identity and adversarial sexual beliefs as predictors of attitudes toward sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 169-175.
36.
Napier, R., & Gershenfeld, M. (1993). Groups: Theory and experience (5th ed.). Dallas: Houghton Mifflin.
37.
O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. (1996). Organization-motivated aggression: A research framework. Academy of Management Review, 21, 225-253.
38.
Oliver, M. B., Sargent, S. L., & Weaver, J. B. (1998). The impact of sex and gender role self-perception on affective reactions to different types of film. Sex Roles, 38, 45-63.
39.
Phelps, T., & Winternitz, H. (1992). Capitol games: Clarence Thomas, Anita Hill, and the story of a Supreme Court nomination. New York: Hyperion.
40.
Race and the workplace. (1995, May 2). Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
41.
Ragins, B. R., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 28-42.
42.
Robinson, S. & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multi dimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572.
43.
Sev’er, A., & Ungar, S. (1997) No laughing matter: Boundaries of gender-based humour in the classroom. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 87-106.
44.
Spreitzer, G. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
45.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
46.
Tangri, S. S., Burt, M. R., & Johnson, L. B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33-54.
47.
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand. New York: William Morrow.
48.
Tata, J. (1993). The structure and phenomenon of sexual harassment: Impact of category of sexually harassing behavior, gender, and hierarchical level. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 199-211.
49.
Tata, J. (1998). The influence of gender on the use and effectiveness of managerial accounts. Group and Organization Management, 23, 266-288.
50.
Terpstra, D., & Baker, D. (1986). Psychological and demographic correlates of perception of sexual harassment. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 112, 459-478.
51.
Thacker, R., & Gohmann, S. (1993). Male/female differences in perceptions and effects of hostile environment sexual harassment: “Reasonable” assumptions? Public Personnel Management, 22, 462-472.
52.
Views of affirmative action. (1997, December 14). New York Times, p. 1.
53.
Workplace sweet workplace. (1997, September 15). Los Angeles Times, p. 21.
