A laboratory experiment was conducted to assess the effects of participative and directive leadership on participation, performance, and satisfaction of 24 undergraduate student work groups that interacted electronically via a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) to performa creativity task. Participative and directive leadership were manipulated through confederate leaders who entered scripted comments into the GDSS. Performance was measured in terms of quality and uniqueness of solutions.Results of partial least squares analysis indicated that perceptions of both leader participativeness and directiveness were positively related to levels of participation. Participation in turn was positively related to performance but negatively related to satisfaction. Problem structure moderated all these relationships except for the relationship between participation and performance. Practical and research implications, study contributions, and limitations are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Heerlen, the Netherlands: Open University Press.
2.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Fornell, C. (1982). Theoretical concepts, measurements, and meaning. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis (Vol. 2, pp. 24-38). New York: Praeger.
3.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Youjae, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
4.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285-309.
6.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stodgill’s handbook of leadership (3rded.). New York: Free Press.
7.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Bass, B. M., Valenzi, E., Farrow, D., & Solomon, R. (1975). Management styles associated with organizational, task, personal, and interpersonal contingencies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 720-729.
9.
Brown, D. J., & Lord, R. G. (1999). The utility of experimental research in the study of transformational/charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 531-539.
10.
Campbell, J. P. (1986). Labs, fields, and straw issues. In E. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 269-279). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
11.
Cascio, W. F. (1995). Whither industrial and organizational psychology in a changing world of work. American Psychologist, 50, 928-939.
12.
Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20, 143-165.
13.
Chin, W., & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption intention in GSS: Relative importance of beliefs. Database, 26, 42-63.
14.
Clawson, V. K., Bostrom, R. P., & Anson, R. (1993). The role of the facilitator in computer-supported meetings. Small Group Research, 24, 547-565.
15.
Connolly, T., Jessup, L., & Valacich, J. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 689-703.
16.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
17.
Dennis, A., George, J., Jessup, L., Nunamaker, J., & Vogel, D. (1988). Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly, 12, 591-624.
18.
Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Carte, T. A., Garfield, M. J., Haley, B. J., & Aronson, J. E. (1997). Research report: The effectiveness of multiple dialogues in electronic brainstorming. Information Systems Research, 8, 203-211.
19.
Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J., & Nunamaker, J. (1990). An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting system environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 25, 1049-1057.
20.
DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group support systems. Management Science, 33, 589-601.
21.
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity of technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
22.
Dickson, G. W., Partridge, J. L., & Robinson, L. (1993). Exploring modes of facilitative support for GDSS technology. MIS Quarterly, 17, 173-194.
23.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987).Productivity loss in brain storming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
24.
Duxbury, R. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1991). Gender differencesin work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 60-74.
25.
Fiedler, F. E. (1968). Personality and situational determinants of leadership effectiveness. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 362-380). New York: Harper and Row.
26.
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440-452.
27.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
28.
Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper,W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker,J. F. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 350-369.
29.
George, J. F., Dennis, A., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). An experimental investigation of facilitation in an EMS decision room. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1, 57-70.
30.
Gopal, A., Bostrom, R., & Chin, W. (1992). Applying adaptive structuration theory to investigate the process of group support system use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, 45-69.
31.
Hiltz, S., Johnson K., & Turoff, M. (1991). Group decision support: The effects of designated leaders and statistical feedback in computerized conferences. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8, 81-108.
32.
Hiltz, S., Turoff, M., & Johnson, K. (1989). Experiments in group decision making, 3: Disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conference. Decision Support Systems, 5, 217-232.
33.
Ho, T., & Raman, K. (1991). The effect of GDSS and elected leadership on small group meetings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8, 109-133.
34.
House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323-352.
35.
House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Contemporary Business, 3, 81-98.
36.
Ilgen, D., Hollenbeck, J., & Sego, D. (1991). The structure of work: Job design and roles. In M. D. Dunette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 245-270). New York: Academic Press.
37.
James, L., Demaree, R., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
38.
Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., & Galegher, J. (1990). The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14, 313-321.
39.
Jessup, L., & Tansik, D. (1991). Decision making in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity on group process and outcome with a GDSS. Decision Sciences, 22, 266-279.
40.
Jung, D.I., & Sosik, J.J. (1999). Effects of group characteristics on work group performance: A longitudinal investigation. Group Dynamics, 3, 279-290.
41.
Kahai, S. S., Avolio, B. J., & Sosik, J. J. (1998). Effects of source and participant anonymity and difference initial opinions in an EMS context. Decision Sciences, 29, 427-460.
42.
Keen, P. G. W., & Scott-Morton, M. S. (1978). Decision support systems: An organizational perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43.
Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375-403.
44.
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, J. H. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.
45.
Lam, S. S. K. (1997). The effects of group decision support systems and task structures on group communciation and decison quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 193-215.
46.
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
47.
Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
48.
Locke,E. A. (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field settings. Lexington,MA: D. C. Heath.
49.
Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1979). Participation in decision-making behavior: One more look. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 265-339). Green-wich, CN: JAI.
50.
Lohmoller, J. B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
51.
Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1-62). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
52.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
53.
Mennecke, B., & Valacich, J. (1998). Information is what you make of it: The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality, and member perceptions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 173-197.
54.
Miller, K. I., & Monge, P. R. (1986). Participation, satisfaction and productivity: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 727-753.
55.
Nunamaker,J. F., Briggs, R. O., Mittleman, D. D., Vogel, D. R., & Balthazard, P. A. (1997).Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 163-207.
56.
Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., & George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work: Theory and practice at Arizona. Communications of the ACM, 34, 40-61.
57.
Sagie, A., & Koslowsky, M. (1994). Organizational attitudes and behaviors as a function of participation in strategic and tactical change decisions: An application of path-goal theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 37-47.
58.
Sambamurthy, V., & Chin, W. (1994). The effects of group attitudes toward alternative GDSS designs on the decision-making performance of computer-supported groups. Decision Sciences, 25, 215-241.
59.
Schwab, D. P. (1980).Construct validity in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, 3-43.
60.
Shaw, M. E. (1973). Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 29, 143-158.
61.
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. (1969). Social psychology. New York: Harper and Row.
62.
Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decisions. New York:Narper and Row.
63.
Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89-103.
64.
Townsend, A., DeMarie, S., & Hendrickson, A. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 17-29.
65.
Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly,T. (1994).Idea generation in computer-basedgroups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467.
66.
Valacich, J., Dennis, A., & Nunamaker, J. (1992). Anonymity and group size effects in an EMS environment. Small Group Research, 23, 49-73.
67.
Van de Ven, A., & Delbecq, A. (1974).A task contingentmodel of work-unitstructure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 183-197.
68.
Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
69.
Weick, K. (1979). The socialpsychology of organization (2nd ed.). New York:Random House.
70.
Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In K. G. Joreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under observation, Part II (pp. 1-53). Amsterdam, Holland: North-Holland.
71.
Wold,H. (1985).Systems analysis bypartialleast squares. In P. Nijkamp, H. Leitner, & N. Wrigley (Eds.), Measuring the unmeasurable (pp. 221-252). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
72.
Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
