This research examined the influence of role (leader or follower) within a group on the use of the equality rule (dividing resources equally) in allocation decisions. Different positions in the organizational hierarchy may activate different role schemas on how individuals should behave. Role schemas for leaders communicate that they should act responsibly, but also that they deserve certain privileges relevant to the allocation situation. It was predicted that leaders would allocate more resources to themselves than to their followers. The results of three studies (two scenario studies and one experimental study) revealed that leaders violated the equality rule by allocating more than a fair share of resources to themselves. Results also showed that leaders used the equality rule more for identifiable decisions (high accountability) than for unidentifiable decisions (low accountability). Findings are discussed in terms of leadership and social decision theories. Practical implications are outlined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic.
2.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3.
Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1990). Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 195-204.
4.
Ancona, D. G. (1990). Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 334-365.
5.
Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (1998). A social dilemma perspective on cooperative behavior in organizations: The effects of scarcity, communication, and unequal access on the use of a shared resource. Group & Organization Management, 23, 390-413.
6.
Baumeister, R. F., & Hutton, D. G. (1987). Self-presentation theory: Self-construction and audience pleading. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 390-413) New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
8.
Blount, S. (1995). When social outcomes aren't fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 131-144.
9.
Bonacich, P. (1987). Communication networks and collective action. Social Networks, 9, 389-396.
10.
Bond, M. H., Leung, K., & Wan, K. C. (1982). How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward distribution. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 186-200.
11.
Camerer, C., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 209-219.
12.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637-647.
13.
De Cremer, D. (2001). Effects of roles and performance feedback on the equality rule in resource-sharing tasks. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 153-155.
14.
De Cremer, D. (2002). Charismatic leadership and cooperation in social dilemmas: A matter of transforming motives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 997-1016.
15.
De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & Dewitte, S. (2001). The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not?): The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 93-107.
16.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
17.
Fahr, J., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 421-444.
18.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 155-194). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
19.
Fiske, S. T. (1996). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
20.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
22.
Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367-388.
23.
Harris, R. J., & Joyce, M. A. (1980). What's fair? It depends on how you phrase the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 165-179.
24.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Kahneman, D.Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76, 728-741.
27.
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 13, pp. 191-228). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
29.
Kramer, R. M., Pommerenke, P., & Newton, E. (1993). Effects of social identity and interpersonal accountability on negotiator decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 633-654.
30.
Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58-75.
31.
Langholtz, H., Gettys, C., & Foote, B., (1993). Resource-allocation behavior under certainty, risk, and uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 203-224.
32.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
33.
Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 640-675). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793-804.
35.
Loewenstein, G. F., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 426-441.
36.
Lord, R. G., Foti, R., & DeVader, C. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
37.
Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions. New York: John Wiley.
38.
Mannix, E. A. (1993). Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 1-22.
39.
Messick, D., & Schell, T. (1992). Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision making. Acta Psychologica, 80, 311-323.
40.
Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solution to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294-309.
41.
Morris, M. W., & Leung, K. (1999). Justice for all? Progress in research on cultural variation in the psychology of distributive and procedural justice(Research paper No. 1582). Stanford, CA: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
42.
Murnighan, J. K., & Ross, T. W. (1999). On the collaborative potential of psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39, 1-10.
43.
Pfeffer, J. (1997). New directions in organizational theory: Problems and prospects. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Rutte, C. G., & Messick, D. M. (1995). An integrated model of perceived unfairness in organizations. Social Justice Research, 8, 239-261.
45.
Rutte, C. G., Wilke, H. A. M., & Messick, D. M. (1987). Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 208-216.
46.
Samuelson, C. D., & Allison, S. T. (1994). Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource-sharing tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 1-27.
47.
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based concept. Organizational Science, 4, 577-594.
49.
Sniezek, J. A., May, D. R., & Sawyer, J. E. (1990). Social uncertainty and interdependence: A study of resource allocation decision in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 155-180.
50.
Staw, B. M., (1980). Rationality and justification in organizational life. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 45-80). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
51.
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331-376.
52.
Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388-398.
53.
Thorn, B. K., & Connolly, T. (1987). Discretionary data bases: A theory and some experimental findings. Communication Research, 14, 512-528.
54.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
55.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
56.
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic.
57.
Van Dijk, E., & Grodzka, M. (1992). The influence of endowments asymmetry and information level on the contribution to a public step good. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 329-342.
58.
Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1994). Asymmetry of wealth and public good provision. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 352-359.
59.
Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
60.
Yorges, S. L., Weiss, H. M., & Strickland, O. J. (1999). The effect of leader outcomes on influence, attributions, and perceptions of charisma. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 428-436.
61.
Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
