Longitudinal research in organizations has gained momentum to the point where it may now be considered to reflect the tenor of the times, or zeitgeist, for organizational studies. An important part of that longitudinal research is what, borrowing and extending from the work of Ilgen and Hulin, is called the third scientific discipline. That discipline consists of numerous perspectives focusing on various aspects of chaos/complexity, dynamic systems, and processual approaches. These approaches are being increasingly applied across various organizational research fields such as social and industrial/organizational psychology and small-group and leadership studies. A dynamic systems approach is turned on itself to analyze the scientific development of third-discipline approaches. Although the jury is still out, these approaches appear to be making increasingly strong contributions to the longitudinal zeitgeist and to organizational studies in general.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P. (1968). Simulation of social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 274-335). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic.
3.
Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216-232.
4.
Anderson, P., Meyer, A., Eisenhardt, K., Carley, K., & Pettigrew, A. (Eds.). (1999). Applications of complexity theory to organizational science [Special issue]. Organization Science, 10(3).
5.
Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 373-341). Westport, CT: JAI.
6.
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. (2000). Harnessing complexity. New York: Free Press.
8.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.
9.
Bengtsson, L. (2001, April). European and American management research: The nomothetic and idiographic research methodology divide. Presented at the founding conference of the European Academy of Management, Barcelona, Spain.
10.
Berdahl J. L. (1998). The dynamics of composition and socialization in small groups: Insights gained from developing a computational model. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & D. H. Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing in groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 209-227). Westport, CT: JAI.
11.
Berdahl, J. L. (1999). The dynamics of composition and socialization in small-groups: Insights from a computational model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
12.
Beyer, J. M., & Browning, L. D. (1999). Transforming an industry in crisis: Charisma, routinization, and supportive cultural leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 483-520.
13.
Black, J. A., & King, J. P. (2001, May). Charismatic leaders and the context for learning. Presented at the festschrift for Dr. Bernard M. Bass, School of Management and Center for Leadership Studies, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY.
14.
Black, J. A., King, J. P., & Howell, J. P. (2000, September 22). Leader's complex behaviors and the capacity to change. Presented at a colloquium at Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
15.
Bluedorn, A. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
Brindle, M. C., & Stearns, P. N. (2001). Facing up to management faddism: A new look at an old force. New York: Quorum.
17.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Cohen, M. (1999). Commentary on the Organization Science special issue on complexity. Organization Science, 10(3), 373-376.
19.
Costantino, R., Desharnais, R., Cusing, J., & Dennis, D. (1997). Chaotic dynamics in an insect population. Science, 275, 389-391.
20.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.
21.
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116-127.
22.
Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Czarniawska, B. (1999). Writing management. Organization theory as a literature genre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
Dachler, H. P., & Hosking, D. M. (1995). The primacy of relations in socially constructing organizational realities. In D. M. Hosking, H. P. Dachler, & K. J. Gerger (Eds.), Management and organization: Relational alternatives to individualism (pp. 1-28). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
25.
Dansereau, F., Alutto, J., & Yammarino, F. J. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The variant approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (1998). Leadership: The multiple-level approaches. Stamford, CT: JAI.
27.
Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., & Kohles (1999). Multiple levels of analysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theory building. Academy of Management Review, 24, 346-357.
28.
Davis, J. H. (2000). Simulations on the cheap. In D. R. Ilgen & C. L. Hulin (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 217-220). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
Davis, J. H., & Kerr, N. (1986). Thought experiments and the problem of sparse data in small-group performance results. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing of effective work groups. New York: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Davis, J. N., Hunt, J. G., & Boal, K. B. (2001). A systems dynamics model of Beyer and Browning's case study of the charisma of Robert Noyce at SEMATECH. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Leadership Research, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
31.
Engwall, L. (2001, April). The American challenge revisited. Presented at the founding conference of the European Academy of Management, Barcelona, Spain.
32.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
33.
Fineman, S., & Gabriel, Y. (1996). Experiencing organizations. London: Sage.
34.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D.C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West.
35.
Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 248-251.
36.
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Forrester, J. W. (1973). World dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen.
38.
Fox-Wolfgram, S., Boal, K. B., & Hunt, J. G. (1998). Towards an understanding of organizational adaptation: Inside the black box. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 87-126.
39.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
40.
Hanneman, R. A., Collins, R., & Mordt, G. (1995). Discovering theory dynamics by computer simulation: Experiments on state legitimacy and imperialist capitalism. Sociological Methodology, 24, 1-47.
41.
Harris, R. J. (1974, October). This is a science? Social psychologists' aversion to knowing what their theories say. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Two comments on the uncertain connection between theory and data in social psychology (Social Psychology Bulletin 74-2). Columbus: Psychology Department, Ohio State University.
42.
Harris, R. J. (1976). The uncertain connection between verbal theories and research hypotheses in social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 210-219.
43.
Hinings, C. R. (1997). Reflections on processual research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 493-503.
44.
Hollenbeck, J. R. (2000). Commentary: Consequences of organizational reward systems. In D. R. Ilgen & C. L. Hulin (Eds.), Computation modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 129-134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45.
Horgan, J. (1995, June). From complexity to perplexity. Scientific American, 242(6), 104-109.
46.
Hulin, C. L., & Ilgen, D. R. (2000). Introduction to computational modeling in organizations: The good that modeling does. In D. R. Ilgen & C. L. Hulin (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 3-19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47.
Hunt, J. G. (1991). Leadership: A new synthesis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
Hunt, J. G. (1999). Transformational/charismatic leadership's transformation of the field: An historical essay. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 129-144.
49.
Hunt, J. G. (2000). Comments from the Yearly Review editor. The Leadership Quarterly Yearly Review of Leadership, 11(4), 431-432.
50.
Hunt, J. G., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). Leadership déjà vu all over again. The Leadership Quarterly Yearly Review of Leadership, 11(4), 435-458.
51.
Hunt, J. G., & Ropo, A. (1997). Systems motivation, leadership, and teaching in an innovative academic setting. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), Teaching well and liking it: The motivation of faculty in higher education (pp. 219-247). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52.
Hunt, J. G., & Ropo, A. (1998). Multi-level leadership: Grounded theory and mainstream theory applied to the case of General Motors. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches (pp. 289-328). Westport, CT: JAI.
53.
Hunt, S. D. (1991). Modern marketing theory: Critical issues in the philosophy of marketing science. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern.
54.
Ilgen, D. R., & Hulin, C. L. (Eds.) (2000). Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55.
Jacobsen, C., & Bronson, R. (1995). Computer simulations and empirical testing of sociological theory. Sociological Methods & Research, 23(4), 479-506.
56.
Jacobsen, C., Bronson, R., & Vekstein, D. (1990). A strategy for testing the empirical adequacy of macro-sociological theories. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15(2), 137-148.
57.
Jacobsen, C., & House, R. J. (2001). Dynamics of charismatic leadership: A process theory, simulation model, and tests. The Leadership Quarterly. 12(1), 75-112.
58.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
59.
Kaufman, S. (1993). The origins of order. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Kieser, A. (1994). Crossroads. Why organization theory needs historical analyses—and how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5(4), 608-620.
61.
Klein, J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.). (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62.
Krackhardt, D. M. (2000). Commentary: Modeling structures of organizations. In D. R. Ilgen & C. A. Hulin (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 269-274). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
63.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
Latané, B. (2000). Pressures to uniformity and the evolution of cultural norms: Modeling dynamic social impact. In D. R. Ilgen & C. A. Hulin (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 185-215). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65.
Levy, S, (1992). Artificial life: The quest for new creation. New York: Random House.
66.
Lewin, A. Y. (1999). Application of complexity theory to organization science. Organization Science. 10(3), 215.
67.
Lomi, A., Larsen, E. R., & Ginsberg, A. (1997). Adaptive learning in organizations: A system dynamics-based exploration. Journal of Management, 23, 561-582.
68.
Long, R. G., White, M. C., Mathews, K. M., & Pieperl, M. (2001). Self organizing systems, complexity theory and levels of analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State.
69.
Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
Marion, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership of complex organizations. The Leadership Quarterly Yearly Review of Leadership, 12(4), 389-418.
71.
Mathews, K. M., White, M. C., & Long, R. G. (1999). Human Relations, 52, 439-462.
72.
McGrath, J. E. (1997). Small-group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(1), 7-27.
73.
McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford.
74.
McKelvey, B. (1999a). Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: Strategies for rugged landscapes. Organization Science, 10(3), 294-321.
75.
McKelvey, B. (1999b). Complexity theory in organization science: Seizing the promise or becoming a fad? Emergence, 1(1), 5-32.
76.
McKelvey, B. (2001). Microstrategy and macroleadership: New science meets distributed intelligence. In A. Y. Lewin & H. Volberda (Eds.), Mobilizing the self-renewing organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
Melcher, A. J. (1976). Structure and process of organizations: A systems approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
78.
Mitroff, I., & Kilman, R. (1975). Stories managers tell: A new tool for organizational problem solving, Management Review, 65, 13-28.
79.
Monge, P. R. (1990). Theoretical and analytical issues in studying organizational processes. Organization Science, 1(4), 406-430.
80.
Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1988). Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
81.
Morgeson, F. P., & Hofman, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 24, 266-285.
82.
Parry, K. W. (1998). Grounded theory and social process: A new direction for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(1), 85-106.
83.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337-348.
84.
Pettigrew, A. M., & Fenton, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). The innovating organization. London: Sage.
85.
Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 697-713.
86.
Poole, M. S., & Associates. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research. New York: Oxford University Press.
87.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategies: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
88.
Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
89.
Rigdon, E. E. (1998). Structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 251-294). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90.
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357.
91.
Ropo, A., Erikkson, P., & Hunt, J. G. (1997). Reflections on conducting processual research on management and organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 331-335.
92.
Ropo, A., & Hunt, J. G. (1995). Entrepreneurial processes as virtuous and vicious spirals in a changing opportunity structure: A paradoxical perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(3), 91-111.
93.
Ropo, A., & Hunt, J. G. (1999). Leadership and organizational change: Some findings from a processual grounded theory study. In J. A. Wagner III (Ed.), Advances in qualitative organizational research (Vol. 2, pp. 169-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
94.
Saam, N. J. (1999). Simulating the micro-macro link: New approaches to an old problem and an application to military coups. Sociological Methodology, 29, 43-79.
95.
Sackmann, S. (2001, April). Potential contributions of a European perspective to management research, education and practice. Presented at the founding conference of the European Academy of Management, Barcelona, Spain.
96.
Sanders, T. I. (1998). Strategic thinking and the new science. New York: Free Press.
97.
Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
98.
Schwab, D. P., & Olson, C. A. (2000). Simulating effects of pay-for-performance systems on pay-performance systems. In D. R. Ilgen & C. A. Hulin (Eds.), Computer modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 115-128). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
99.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. The art and practice of learning in organizations. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
100.
Simon, H. A. (1992). What is an explanation of behavior? Psychological Science, 3, 150-161.
101.
Stasser, G. (2000). Information distribution, participation, and group decision: Explorations with the DISCUSS and SPEAK models. In D. R. Ilgen & C.F. Hulin (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 135-156) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
102.
Staw, B. M., & Epstein, L. D. (2000). What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 523-556.
103.
Sterman, J. D., Repenning, N., & Kofman, F. (1997). Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Science, 43, 501-521.
104.
Sterman, J. D., & Wittenberg, J. (1999). Path dependence, competition, and succession in the dynamics of scientific revolution. Organization Science, 10(3), 322-341.
105.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
106.
Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster.
107.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations. New York: Free Press.
108.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
109.
Weingart, L. R. (1997). How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group processes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 189-240). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
110.
Wheatley, M. J. (1999). Leadership and the new science (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
