As the nature of work in today’s organizations becomes more complex, dynamic, and global, there has been increasing emphasis on distributed, “virtual” teams as organizing units of work. Despite their growing prevalence, relatively little is known about this new form of work unit. The purpose of this article is to present a theoretical framework to focus research toward understanding virtual teams and identifying implications for effective leadership. The authors focus on delineating the dimensions of a typology to characterize different types of virtual teams. First, the authors distinguish virtual teams from conventional teams to identify where current knowledge applies and new research needs exist. Second, the authors distinguish among different types of virtual teams, considering the critical role of task complexity in determining the underlying characteristics of virtual teams and leadership challenges the different types entail. Propositions addressing leadership implications for the effective management of virtual teams are proposed and discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ancona, D.
, & Chong, C. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 251-284). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
2.
Bettenhausen, K.
(1991). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345-381.
3.
Bridges, W.
(1986). Managing organizational transitions. Organizational Dynamics, 15, 24-33.
4.
Buono, A. F.
, Bowditch, J. L., & Lewis, J. W. (1985). When cultures collide: The anatomy of a merger. Human Relations, 38, 477-500.
5.
Butler, A.
(1973). Project management: A study of organizational conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 84-102.
6.
Byrne, J.
, Brandt, R., & Port, O. (1993). The virtual corporation. Business Week, 8, 98-102.
7.
Cohen, S. G.
, & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
8.
Daly, B. L.
(1993). The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management, and Information Technologies, 3, 1-22.
9.
Davidow, W. H.
, & Malone, M. S. (1992). The virtual organization. New York: HarperCollins.
10.
Davis, S. M.
, & Lawrence, P. R. (1977). Matrix. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
Dennis, A. R.
, & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.
12.
Dess, G.
, Rasheed, A., McLaughlin, K., & Priem, R. (1995). The new corporate architecture. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 7-20.
13.
El-Shinnawy, M.
, & Vinze, A. S. (1997). Technology, culture, and persuasiveness: A study of choice-shifts in group settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 473-496.
14.
Farmer, S. M.
, & Hyatt, C. W. (1994). Effects of task language demands and task complexity on computer-mediated work groups. Small GroupResearch, 25, 331-366.
15.
Fleishman, E. A.
, Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quarterly, 2(4), 245-287.
16.
Galbraith, J. R.
(1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Gallupe, R. B.
, Biastianutti, L., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137-142.
18.
Geber, B.
(1995). Virtual teams. Training, 32, 36-40.
19.
Gersick, C. J.
(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
20.
Gersick, C.J.G.
, & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65-97.
21.
Goodman, P. S.
(1986). Designing effective work groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Graen, G. B.
(1996). At last, a production system that works and allows everyone to be an insider. Applied Psychology an International Review, 45, 130-135.
23.
Graen, G. B.
, & Wakabayashi, M. (1994). Cross-cultural leadership-making: Bridging American and Japanese diversity for team advantage. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 415-446). New York: Consulting Psychologist Press.
24.
Guzzo, R. A.
, & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
25.
Hackman, J. R.
, & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. S. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Hofstede, G.
(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Hofstede, G.
(1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Hollingshead, A. B.
, McGrath, J. E., & O’Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small GroupResearch, 24, 307-333.
29.
Hrebiniak, L. G.
, & Joyce, W. F. (1984). Implementing strategy. New York: Macmillan.
30.
Joyce, W. F.
(1986). Matrix organization: A social experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 536-561.
31.
Kahai, S. S.
, Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment. Personnel Psychology, 50, 121-146.
32.
Komaki, J. L.
, Zlotnick, S., & Jensen, M. (1986). Development of an operant-based taxonomy and observational index of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 260-269.
33.
Kozlowski, S.W.J.
(1998). Training and developing adaptive teams: Theory, principles, and research. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Implications for training and simulation (pp. 115-153). Washington, DC: APA Books.
34.
Kozlowski, S.W.J.
, Gully, S. M., McHugh, P. P., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). A dynamic theory of leadership and team effectiveness: Developmental and task contingent leader roles. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 14, pp. 253-305). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
35.
Kozlowski, S.W.J.
, Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of work and performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development (SIOP Frontiers Series). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Kozlowski, S.W.J.
, Gully, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team leadership (Vol. 3, pp. 251-289). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
37.
Levine, J. M.
, & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
38.
Levine, J. M.
, & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 4150-4169). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
39.
Lipnack, J.
, & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. New York: John Wiley.
40.
Manz, C. C.
, & Sims, H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-128.
41.
McGrath, J. E.
(1962). Leadership behavior: Some requirements for leadership training. Washington, DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission.
42.
McGrath,J.E.
(1984). Groups:Interaction and performance.EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:PrenticeHall.
43.
McGrath, J. E.
(1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small GroupResearch, 22, 147-174.
44.
Merrick, N.
(1996). Remote control. People Management, 2, 40-41.
45.
Moreland, R. L.
, & Levine, J. M. (1989). Newcomers and oldtimers in groups. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of groupinfluence (2nd ed., pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Moreland, R. L.
, Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding groupbehavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Understanding group behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 11-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Ostroff, C.
, & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (1992). Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849-874.
48.
Pape, W. R.
(1997). Group insurance: Virtual teams can quickly gather the knowledge of even far-flung staff. Inc., 19, 29-29.
49.
Reeser, C.
(1969). Some potential human problems of the project organization. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 459-467.
50.
Rizzo, J. R.
, House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.
51.
Roby, T. B.
(1961). The executive function in small groups. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadershipand interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
52.
Siegel, J.
, Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
53.
Smith, E. M.
, Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 89-118). Washington, DC: APA Books.
54.
Sosik, J. J.
, Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1998). Inspiring group creativity: Comparing anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming. Small GroupResearch, 29, 3-31.
55.
Sosik, J. J.
, Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S. S., & Jung, D. I. (1998). Computer-supported work group potency and effectiveness: The role of transformational leadership, anonymity, and task interdependence. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 491-511.
56.
Straus, S. G.
, & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
57.
Sundstrom, E.
, de Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
58.
Tesluk, P.
, Mathieu, J. E., Zaccaro, S. J., & Marks, M. (1997). Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 197-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
Thompson, J. D.
(1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60.
Townsend, A. M.
, DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1996). Are you ready for virtual teams?HR Magazine, 41, 122-126.
61.
Townsend, A. M.
, DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 17-29.
62.
Valacich, J. S.
, Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467.
63.
Van de Ven, A. H.
, Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322-328.
64.
Weisband, S. P.
(1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
65.
Zaccaro, S. J.
, & Burke, C. S. (1998). Team versus crew leadership: Differences and similarities. In R. J. Klimoski (Chair), When is a work team a crew-and does it matter? Symposium conducted at the 13th annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
