A new construct called Cynicism About Organizational Change (CAOC) was proposed and distinguished from related concepts. The measure of CAOC was supported by confirmatory factor analysis and has acceptable internal consistency reliability. Potential antecedents (measured 21 months before the measurement of CAOC) were examined. Little support was found for CAOC having dispositional roots in one’s general negative affectivity. More support was found for CAOC being learned as a result of little previous change, ineffective leadership practices, and lack of participation in decisions. CAOC was negatively correlated with a concurrent measure of organizational change and with the motivation to keep on trying to support change efforts. In addition, CAOC was negatively correlated with factors outside the realm of change: organizational commitment and the number of labor grievances. Finally, CAOC weakened the instrumentality perception of the relationship between performing well and earning more money, while holding the actual pay system constant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, S.
(1996). The Dilbert principle. New York: Harper Business.
2.
Aktouf, O.
(1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward an initial radical humanism?Academy of Management Review, 17, 407-431.
3.
Andersson, L. M.
(1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49, 1395-1418.
4.
Andersson, L. M.
, & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449-469.
5.
Austin, J. T.
, Boyle, K. A., & Lualhati, J. C. (1998). Statistical conclusion validity for organizational science researchers: A review. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 164-208.
6.
Blanck, P. D.
, & Turner, A. N. (1987). Gestalt research: Clinical-field-research approaches to studying organizations. In J.W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 109-125). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Brannick, M. T.
(1995). Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 201-213.
8.
Browne, M. W.
, Mels, G., & Cowan, M. (1994). Path analysis: RAMONA. SYSTAT for DOS: Advanced applications (Ver. 6; pp. 167-224). Evanston, IL: SYSTAT.
9.
Cohen, A.
(1993). Organizational commitment and turnover: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1140-1157.
10.
Cooper, W. H.
, & Richardson, A. J. (1986). Unfair comparisons. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 179-184.
11.
Cudeck, R. W.
(1989). Analysis of correlation matrices in covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317-327.
12.
Friedlander, F.
, & Brown, L. D. (1974). Organizational development. Annual Review of Psychology, 25, 313-341.
13.
Guzzo, R. A.
, Jette, R. D., & Katzell, R. A. (1985). The effects of psychologically based intervention programs on productivity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 275-291.
14.
Hammer, M.
, & Champy, J. (1993). Re-engineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper.
15.
House, R. J.
, Rousseau, D. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. (1995). The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 71-114). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16.
Hulin, C. L.
, Henry, R., & Noon, S. (1990). Adding a dimension: Time as a factor in the generalizability of predictive relations. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 328-340.
17.
Ilgen, D. R.
, Nebeker, D. M., & Pritchard, R. D.(1981). Expectancy theory measures: An empirical comparison in an experimental setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 189-223.
18.
Jones, E. E.
, & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-226). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Juran, J. M.
, & Gryna, F. M. (1980). Quality planning and analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Kanter, D. L.
, & Mirvis, P. H. (1989). The cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Kelloway, E. K.
(1995). Structural equation modeling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 215-224.
22.
Likert, R.
(1967). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
MacCallum, R. A.
, Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
24.
Mann, F. C.
(1957). Studying and creating change: A means to understanding social organization. In C. M. Arensberg (ed.), Research in industrial human relation (pp. 146-167). New York: Harper.
25.
Mathieu, J. E.
, & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
26.
Mowday, R. T.
, Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
27.
Neuman, G. A.
, Edwards, J. E., & Raju, N. S. (1989). Organizational development interventions: A meta-analysis of their effects on satisfaction and other attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 42, 461-483.
28.
Niederhoffer, A.
(1967). Behind the shield: The police in urban society. Garden City, NJ: Anchor.
29.
Peters, T.
, & Austin, N. (1985). A passion for excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
30.
Peters, T.
, & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
31.
Pope, K. S.
, Butcher, J. N., & Seelen, J. (1993). The MMPI, MMPI-2 & MMPI-A in court. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
Porras, J. I.
, & Berg, P. O. (1978). The impact of organizational development. Academy of Management Review, 3, 249-266.
33.
Porras, J. I.
, & Robertson, P. J. (1992). In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), The handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 719-822). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
34.
Reichers, A. E.
, & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5-39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Reichers, A. E.
, Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T.1997. Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 48-59.
36.
Schein, E. H.
(1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Shapiro, B.
(1997, October). Dilbert hits close to home for some I/O psychologists. APA Monitor, 34-34.
38.
Steiger, J. H.
(1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
39.
Steiger, J. H.
, & Lind, J. M. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
40.
Susman, G. I.
, & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582-603.
41.
Tett, R. P.
, & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259-293.
42.
Tjosvold, D. W.
, & Tjosvold, M. M. (1991). Leading the team organization. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
43.
Vroom, V. H.
(1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
44.
Wanous, J. P.
, Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (1994). Organizational cynicism: An initial study. Academy of management best papers proceedings, 269-273.
45.
Watson, D.
, Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of a brief measure of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
46.
Weick, K. E.
(1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39, 40-49.
