This study explores the effects of competition on fair trade operations. Specifically, as a benchmark, we first consider a model with a single fair trade organization (FTO), that is, a monopoly FTO. We then extend the analysis to a setting with two competing FTOs, that is, duopoly FTOs. Although both FTOs share the common goal of alleviating farmers’ poverty, they adopt contrasting strategies: One FTO seeks to lower the barriers to fair trade, aiming to mainstream it, while the other maintains stricter standards to prevent fairwashing (or greenwashing). Following industry practices, we implement two modes of competition and compare them with the monopoly benchmark. We find that, while competition between FTOs increases the aggregate demand for fair trade certified products (mainstreaming), it results in less aggregate premium (fairwashing). Furthermore, we consider the potential application of blockchain technology in fair trade operations and demonstrate that it offers a promising solution to mitigate the fairwashing effects from competition between FTOs.
AroraPRahmaniMRamachandranK (2022) Doing less to do more? Optimal service portfolio of NPOs that serve distressed individuals. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management24(2): 883–901.
2.
BecchettiLHuybrechtsB (2008) The dynamics of fair trade as a mixed-form market. Journal of Business Ethics81(4): 733–750.
BottegaLDe FreitasJ (2009) Public, private and NPO regulation for environmental quality. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy18(1): 105–123.
6.
BoydDESpekmanREKamauffJW, et al. (2007) Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: A procedural justice perspective. Long Range Planning40(3): 341–356.
7.
BrécardD (2014) Consumer confusion over the profusion of eco-labels: Lessons from a double differentiation model. Resource and Energy Economics37: 64–84.
8.
BrodyE (1996) Institutional dissonance in the nonprofit sector. Villanova Law Review41: 433.
ChodJTrichakisNTsoukalasG, et al. (2020) On the financing benefits of supply chain transparency and blockchain adoption. Management Science66(10): 4378–4396.
CorbettCJKlassenRD (2006) Extending the horizons: Environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management8(1): 5–22.
13.
DarianJCTucciLNewmanCM, et al. (2015) An analysis of consumer motivations for purchasing fair trade coffee. Journal of International Consumer Marketing27(4): 318–327.
14.
DevalkarSKSohoniMGAroraP (2017) Ex-post funding: How should a resource-constrained non-profit organization allocate its funds?Production and Operations Management26(6): 1035–1055.
15.
DistelhorstGHainmuellerJLockeRM (2017) Does lean improve labor standards? Management and social performance in the nike supply chain. Management Science63(3): 707–728.
16.
DohertyBDaviesIATranchellS (2013) Where now for fair trade?Business History55(2): 161–189.
FrumkinPAndre-ClarkA (2000) When missions, markets, and politics collide: Values and strategy in the NPO human services. NPO and Voluntary Sector Quarterly29(1): 141–163.
30.
GkizaIGNastisSA (2017) Health and women’s role in agricultural production efficiency. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy39(3): 428–440.
HeyesAMartinS (2017) Social labeling by competing NGOs: A model with multiple issues and entry. Management Science63(6): 1800–1813.
35.
HeyesAGMaxwellJW (2004) Private vs. public regulation: Political economy of the international environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management48(2): 978–996.
36.
HsuVNLaiGLiangG (2019) Agricultural partnership for dairy farming. Production and Operations Management28(12): 3042–3059.
37.
HuMLiuYWangW (2019) Socially beneficial rationality: The value of strategic farmers, social entrepreneurs, and for-profit firms in crop planting decisions. Management Science65(8): 3654–3672.
38.
IshibashiIMatsushimaN (2009) The existence of low-end firms may help high-end firms. Marketing Science28(1): 136–147.
39.
JaffeeD (2014) Brewing Justice: Fair Trade Coffee, Sustainability, and Survival. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
JaffeeDHowardPH (2016) Who’s the fairest of them all? The fractured landscape of US fair trade certification. Agriculture and Human Values33: 813–826.
41.
JiraCToffelMW (2013) Engaging supply chains in climate change. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management15(4): 559–577.
42.
KamilarisAFontsAPrenafeta-BoldvFX (2019) The rise of blockchain in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in Food Science & Technology91: 640–652.
43.
KimSWagnerSMColicchiaC (2019) The impact of supplier sustainability risk on shareholder value. Journal of Supply Chain Management55(1): 71–87.
44.
KlassenRDMcLaughlinCP (1996) The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science42(8): 1199–1214.
45.
LiaoCNChenYJ (2017) Farmers’ information management in developing countries–A highly asymmetric information structure. Production and Operations Management26(6): 1207–1220.
46.
LimMKMakHYParkSJ (2019) Money well spent? Operations, mainstreaming, and fairness of fair trade. Production and Operations Management28(12): 3023–3041.
LiuXMishraAGoldsteinS, et al. (2019) Toward improving factory working conditions in developing countries: An empirical analysis of Bangladesh ready-made garment factories. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management21(2): 379–397.
49.
LoCKTangCSZhouY, et al. (2018) Environmental incidents and the market value of firms: An empirical investigation in the Chinese context. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management20(3): 422–439.
50.
McDonaldRE (2007) An investigation of innovation in nonprofit organizations: The role of organizational mission. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly36(2): 256–281.
51.
McKenzieDSwailsB (2012) Child slavery and chocolate: All too easy to find. CNN, January 19.
NeumanW (2011) A question of fairness. The New York Times, November 23.
54.
OnishiN (2001) The bondage of poverty that produces chocolate. The New York Times, July 29.
55.
ParsaIEftekharMCorbettC (2022) Does governance ease the overhead squeeze experienced by nonprofits?Production and Operations Management31(8): 3288–3303.
56.
PérezAGarcia de los SalmonesMDM (2018) How do consumers face the decision to buy fair trade products? A marketing approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly47(5): 1057–1080.
57.
RandleMDolnicarS (2009) Not just any volunteers: Segmenting the market to attract the high contributors. Journal of NPO & Public Sector Marketing21(3): 271–282.
58.
SaberiSKouhizadehMSarkisJ, et al. (2019) Blockchain and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research57(7): 2117–2135.
59.
TuckmanHP (1998) Competition, commercialization, and the evolution of NPO organizational structures. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management17(2): 175–194.
WangZZhengZJiangW, et al. (2021) Blockchain-enabled data sharing in supply chains: Model, operationalization, and tutorial. Production and Operations Management30(7): 1965–1985.
XuJGuoSXieD, et al. (2020) Blockchain: A new safeguard for agri-foods. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture4: 153–161.
64.
YangSHHuWMupandawanaM, et al. (2012) consumer willingness to pay for fair trade coffee: A Chinese case study. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics44(1): 21–34.
65.
YazijiMDohJ (2009) NGOs and Corporations: Conflict and Collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
YiZWangYChenYJ (2021) Financing an agricultural supply chain with a capital-constrained smallholder farmer in developing economies. Production and Operations Management30(7): 2102–2121.
