Managerial responses, which represent firms’ public replies to online reviews, are commonly employed in customer communications. Using a dataset collected from a leading mobile game app platform in China, this research examines the effect of managerial responses on the review updates of customers who receive them, that is, the direct effect of managerial responses. Platform users can update their reviews, and complete records of review updates are observable, which allows us to utilize variations in the same customer’s review ratings of a single game both before and after receiving a managerial response. Addressing concerns regarding the endogeneity of managerial responses, improvements in game quality, and censored data in rating updates, we find that users who update their reviews after receiving managerial responses upgrade their ratings by an average of one star. In addition, we find that the positive direct effect of managerial responses is negatively moderated by the level of response politeness, measured separately using both machine learning and large language models. By conducting a survey study, we further show that as the level of politeness increases, the likelihood of reviewers perceiving a managerial response as an attempt to persuade them also increases. These findings highlight the positive direct effect of managerial response and the importance of response style, specifically politeness, which can produce a backfire effect in online communications.
AhluwaliaRBurnkrantRE (2004) Answering questions about questions: A persuasion knowledge perspective for understanding the effects of rhetorical questions. Journal of Consumer Research31(1): 26–42.
2.
AllonGAskalidisGBerryR, et al. (2021) When to be agile: Ratings and version updates in mobile apps. Management Science68(6): 4261–4278.
3.
AnanthakrishnanUProserpioDSharmaS (2023) I hear you: Does quality improve with customer voice?Marketing Science42(6): 1143–1161.
4.
BaSHeSLeeS (2022) Mobile app adoption and its differential impact on consumer shopping behavior. Production and Operations Management31(2): 764–780.
5.
BarcelosRHDantasDCSénécalS (2018) Watch your tone: How a brand’s tone of voice on social media influences consumer responses. Journal of Interactive Marketing41(1): 60–80.
6.
BrownPLevinsonSC (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BurkeMKrautR (2008) Mind your Ps and Qs: the impact of politeness and rudeness in online communities. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, 8–12 November, pp. 281–284.
8.
ChakrabortyIChiongKDoverH, et al. (2024) Can AI and AI-hybrids detect persuasion skills? Salesforce hiring with conversational video interviews. Marketing Science. Forthcoming.
9.
ChenWGuBYeQ, et al. (2019) Measuring and managing the externality of managerial responses to online customer reviews. Information Systems Research30(1): 81–96.
10.
ChevalierJADoverYMayzlinD (2018) Channels of impact: User reviews when quality is dynamic and managers respond. Marketing Science37(5): 688–709.
11.
CuiRGallinoSMorenoA, et al. (2018) The operational value of social media information. Production and Operations Management27(10): 1749–1769.
12.
Danescu-Niculescu-MizilCSudhofMJurafskyD, et al (2013) A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sophia, Bulgaria, pp. 250–259.
13.
EffronDAMillerDT (2015) Do as I say, not as I’ve done: Suffering for a misdeed reduces the hypocrisy of advising others against it. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes131: 16–32.
14.
Ervin-TrippSGuoJLampertM (1990) Politness and persuasion in children’s control acts. Journal of Pragmatics14(2): 307–311.
15.
FriestadMWrightP (1994) The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research21(1): 1–31.
16.
GohK-YHengC-SLinZ (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user-and marketer-generated content. Information Systems Research24(1): 88–107.
17.
GolmohammadiAHavakhorTGauriDK, et al. (2021) Complaint publicization in social media. Journal of Marketing85(6): 1–23.
18.
GretryAHorváthCBeleiN, et al. (2017) “Don’t pretend to be my friend!” when an informal brand communication style backfires on social media. Journal of Business Research74: 77–89.
19.
GuBYeQ (2014) First step in social media: Measuring the influence of online management responses on customer satisfaction. Production and Operations Management23(4): 570–582.
20.
HaoLGuoHEasleyRF (2017) A mobile platform’s in-app advertising contract under agency pricing for app sales. Production and Operations Management26(2): 189–202.
21.
HerhausenDGrewalLCummingsKH, et al. (2023) Complaint de-escalation strategies on social media. Journal of Marketing87(2): 210–231.
22.
HerhausenDLudwigSGrewalD, et al. (2019) Detecting, preventing, and mitigating online firestorms in brand communities. Journal of Marketing83(3): 1–21.
23.
HongYPengJBurtchG, et al. (2021) Just DM me (politely): Direct messaging, politeness, and hiring outcomes in online labor markets. Information Systems Research32(3): 786–800.
24.
JavornikAFilieriRGumannR (2020) “Don’t forget that others are watching, too!” the effect of conversational human voice and reply length on observers’ perceptions of complaint handling in social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing50: 100–119.
25.
JenkinsMDragojevicM (2013) Explaining the process of resistance to persuasion: A politeness theory-based approach. Communication Research40(4): 559–590.
26.
JeongMMinsonJYeomansM, et al. (2019) Communicating with warmth in distributive negotiations is surprisingly counterproductive. Management Science65(12): 5813–5837.
27.
KumarNQiuLKumarS (2018a) Exit, voice, and response on digital platforms: An empirical investigation of online management response strategies. Information Systems Research29(4): 849–870.
28.
KumarSMookerjeeVShubhamA (2018b) Research in operations management and information systems interface. Production and Operations Management27(11): 1893–1905.
29.
LakoffR (1973) The logic of politeness: Or, minding your p’s and q’s. In: Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (eds C Corum, TC Smith-Stark, and Weiser A), 13–15 April, Chicago, pp. 292–305.
30.
LeLHHaQ-A (2021) Effects of negative reviews and managerial responses on consumer attitude and subsequent purchase behavior: An experimental design. Computers in Human Behavior124: 77–89.
31.
LeeJKJunqué de FortunyE (2022) Influencer-generated reference groups. Journal of Consumer Research49(1): 25–45.
32.
LeeS-YRuiHWhinstonAB (2019) Is best answer really the best answer? The politeness bias. MIS Quarterly43(2): 579–600.
33.
LeiZYinDMitraS, et al. (2022) Swayed by the reviews: Disentangling the effects of average ratings and individual reviews in online word-of-mouth. Production and Operations Management31(6): 2393–2411.
34.
LiCCuiGPengL (2018) Tailoring management response to negative reviews: The effectiveness of accommodative versus defensive responses. Computers in Human Behavior84: 272–284.
35.
LiMHickmanLTayL, et al (2020) Studying politeness across cultures using English Twitter and Mandarin Weibo. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 4(CSCW2): 1–15.
36.
LiPCasteloNKatonaZ, et al. (2024) Frontiers: Determining the validity of large language models for automated perceptual analysis. Marketing Science43(2): 254–266.
37.
MaoSDewanSHoY-J (2022) Personalized ranking at a mobile app distribution platform. Information Systems Research34(3): 811–827.
38.
McDanielSW (1986) Church advertising: Views of the clergy and general public. Journal of Advertising15(1): 24–29.
39.
McGrawPASchwartzJATetlockPE (2012) From the commercial to the communal: Reframing taboo trade-offs in religious and pharmaceutical marketing. Journal of Consumer Research39(1): 157–173.
40.
MeireMHewettKBallingsM, et al. (2019) The role of marketer-generated content in customer engagement marketing. Journal of Marketing83(6): 21–42.
41.
MinHLimYMagniniVP (2015) Factors affecting customer satisfaction in responses to negative online hotel reviews: The impact of empathy, paraphrasing, and speed. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly56(2): 223–231.
O’ConnorKEffronDALucasBJ (2020) Moral cleansing as hypocrisy: When private acts of charity make you feel better than you deserve. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology119(3): 540–559.
44.
PackardGMooreSGMcFerranB (2018) (I’m) happy to help (you): The impact of personal pronoun use in customer–firm interactions. Journal of Marketing Research55(4): 541–555.
45.
PengJ (2023) Identification of causal mechanisms from randomized experiments: A framework for endogenous mediation analysis. Information Systems Research34(1): 67–84.
46.
PennebakerJWBoydRLJordanK, et al. (2015) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Technical report.
47.
PicardRRCookRD (1984) Cross-validation of regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association79(387): 575–583.
48.
PocchiariMSchoenmuellerVDoverY (2023) The dynamic potential of online reviews: Review updates and platform solicitations. Working paper, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
49.
ProserpioDTroncosoIValsesiaF (2021) Does gender matter? The effect of management responses on reviewing behavior. Marketing Science40(6): 1199–1213.
50.
ProserpioDZervasG (2017) Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Science36(5): 645–665.
51.
PuhaniPA (2000) The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. Journal of Economic Surveys14(1): 53–68.
52.
QiuLHongYWhinstonA (2021) Special issue of production and operations management: Social technologies in operations. Production and Operations Management30(8): 2792–2793.
53.
QuXLotfiAJainDC, et al. (2022) Predicting upgrade timing for successive product generations: An exponential-decay proportional hazard model. Production and Operations Management31(5): 2067–2083.
54.
RavichandranTDengC (2022) Effects of managerial response to negative reviews on future review valence and complaints. Information Systems Research34(1): 319–341.
55.
SelaAWheelerSCSarial-AbiG (2012) We are not the same as you and I: Causal effects of minor language variations on consumers’ attitudes toward brands. Journal of Consumer Research39(3): 644–661.
56.
SparksBABradleyGL (2017) A “triple A” typology of responding to negative consumer-generated online reviews. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research41(6): 719–745.
57.
SparksBASoKKFBradleyGL (2016) Responding to negative online reviews: The effects of hotel responses on customer inferences of trust and concern. Tourism Management53: 74–85.
58.
StephanELibermanNTropeY (2010) Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98(2): 268–280.
59.
SwiatekJ (2017) Persuasion, politeness and relational models. Styles of Communication9(2): 42–64.
60.
WangCZhangXHannI-H (2018) Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Information Systems Research29(3): 641–655.
61.
WangLZuoP (2017) Flag backlash: Why does the presence of the American flag reduce product evaluation? Psychology & Marketing34(7): 693–707.
62.
WangYChaudhryA (2018) When and how managers’ responses to online reviews affect subsequent reviews. Journal of Marketing Research55(2): 163–177.
63.
YangNZhangR (2022) Dynamic pricing and inventory management in the presence of online reviews. Production and Operations Management31(8): 3180–3197.
64.
YouYYangXWangL, et al. (2020) When and why saying “thank you” is better than saying “sorry” in redressing service failures: The role of self-esteem. Journal of Marketing84(2): 133–150.
65.
ZhangXCuiRYaoO (2023) The version effect of apps and operating systems in mobile commerce. Production and Operations Management32(2): 637–654.
66.
ZhaoCWangXXiaoY, et al. (2022) Effects of online reviews and competition on quality and pricing strategies. Production and Operations Management31(10): 3840–3858.
67.
ZhaoYWenLFengX, et al. (2020) How managerial responses to online reviews affect customer satisfaction: An empirical study based on additional reviews. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services57: 10225.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
