We consider the information design problem of a demand-maximizing firm launching a product of unknown quality to a market consisting of customers who have heterogeneous prior beliefs about quality. The firm publicly discloses information about quality to all customers. These customers can subsequently opt to acquire additional information about the product at a cost from sources beyond the firm’s control. Our study is motivated by the common practice of firms conducting public pilot tests or soliciting reviews from opinion leaders before launching a new product to inform potential customers about its quality. To analyze this problem, we construct a game-theoretic model of Bayesian persuasion between the firm and its customers. We characterize the firm’s optimal information policy and show that it can range from fully disclosing quality to exaggerating or downplaying quality to not disclosing quality at all depending on market characteristics. We delineate the impact of market heterogeneity and access to additional information on the optimal information disclosure policy of the firm. Our analysis provides managerial guidance for firms in designing information provision strategies and operationalizing them for different market characteristics.
BagwellKRiordanMH (1991) High and declining prices signal product quality. The American Economic Review81(1): 224–239.
8.
BesterHRitzbergerK (2001) Strategic pricing, signalling, and costly information acquisition. International Journal of Industrial Organization19(9): 1347–1361.
9.
BimpikisKMantegazzaG (2023) Strategic release of information in platforms: Entry, competition, and welfare. Operations Research71(5): 1619–1635.
10.
BoyacıTAkçayY (2018) Pricing when customers have limited attention. Management Science64(7): 2995–3014.
11.
CandoganO (2020) Information design in operations, in Pushing the Boundaries: Frontiers in Impactful OR/OM Research. INFORMS, pp. 176–201.
12.
CandoganO (2022) Persuasion in networks: Public signals and cores. Operations Research70(4): 2264–2298.
13.
CandoganODrakopoulosK (2020) Optimal signaling of content accuracy: Engagement vs. misinformation. Operations Research68(2): 497–515.
14.
ChakrabortySSwinneyR (2021) Signaling to the crowd: Private quality information and rewards-based crowdfunding. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management23(1): 155–169.
DeboLGParlourCRajanU (2012) Signaling quality via queues. Management Science58(5): 876–891.
19.
DelmasMANairn-BirchNBalzarovaM (2013) Choosing the right eco-label for your product. MIT Sloan Management Review54(4): 10–12.
20.
de VéricourtFGurkanHWangS (2021) Informing the public about a pandemic. Management Science67(10): 6350–6357.
21.
DrakopoulosKJainSRandhawaR (2021) Persuading customers to buy early: The value of personalized information provisioning. Management Science67(2): 828–853.
FarahaniMHDawandeMJanakiramanG, et al. (2021) Avoiding fields on fire: Information dissemination policies for environmentally safe crop-residue management. Management Science(Forthcoming).
GillDSgroiD (2012) The optimal choice of pre-launch reviewer. Journal of Economic Theory147(3): 1247–1260.
26.
GitmezAAMolaviP (2022) Polarization and media bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12698.
27.
GuoPHavivMLuoZ, et al. (2022) Optimal queue length information disclosure when service quality is uncertain. Production and operations management31(5): 1912–1927.
KüçükgülCÖzerÖWangS (2022) Engineering social learning: Information design of time-locked sales campaigns for online platforms. Management Science68(7): 4899–4918.
40.
LernerJTiroleJ (2006) A model of forum shopping. American Economic Review96(4): 1091–1113.
PlambeckELTaylorTA (2016) Supplier evasion of a buyer’s audit: Implications for motivating supplier social and environmental responsibility. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management18(2): 184–197.
YuMAhnH-SKapuscinskiR (2015) Rationing capacity in advance selling to signal quality. Management Science61(3): 560–577.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
