Entrepreneurial activity is widely seen as an important tool for addressing the racial wealth gap. However, the survival of minority-owned businesses depends on their ability to win contracts from buyer firms—which might be impacted by buyers’ racial biases. Whether discrimination can exist in sourcing and affect this ability is an unexplored question, perhaps due to an implicit assumption that business-to-business settings are immune from discriminatory biases. In this paper, we use controlled experiments to study whether racial discrimination can affect sourcing decisions. We find that when a supplier's sales manager has a distinctively Black name, buyers are 6.5% less likely (statistically significant at 1% level) to select that supplier compared to a supplier with a sales manager with a distinctively white name. Our findings suggest that equal-opportunity legislation similar to that already in place in the labor market may be needed in the sourcing context. Our findings have implications for executives, suggesting that supplier diversity programs and procurement-bias training can boost corporate performance by expanding the supplier pool, and simultaneously enhance a firm's corporate social responsibility profile.
AignerDJCainGG (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Industrial and Labor Relations Review30(2): 175–187.
2.
AltonjiJGBlankRM (1999) Race and gender in the labor market. In: AshenfelterOCardD (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, Handbooks in Economics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 3143–3259.
AralKDBeilDRVan WassenhoveLN (2021) Supplier sustainability assessments in total-cost auctions. Production and Operations Management30(4): 902–920.
5.
ArrowKJ (1973) The theory of discrimination. In: AshenfelterOReesA (eds) Discrimination in Labor Markets. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 3–33.
6.
AyresISiegelmanP (1995) Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. The American Economic Review85(3): 304–321.
BeckerGS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination, 2nd ed Chicago, Il.: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BeerRAhnHSLeiderS (2018) Can trustworthiness in a supply chain be signaled?Management Science64(9): 3974–3994.
10.
BertrandMDufloE (2017) Field experiments on discrimination. In: DufloEBanerjeeA (eds) Handbook of Field Experiments. New York, NY: Elsevier, 309–393.
11.
BertrandMMullainathanS (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal?American Economic Review94(4): 991–1013.
12.
BoltonGGreinerBOckenfelsA (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Science59(2): 265–285.
13.
BoltonGKatokE (2008) Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management10(3): 519–538.
14.
BoltonGKatokEOckenfelsA (2004) How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Management Science50(11): 1587–1602.
15.
BostonTD (1999) Affirmative Action and Black Entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
BostonTD (2006) The role of black-owned businesses in black community development. In: OngPLoukaitou-SiderisA (eds) Jobs and Economic Development in Minority Communities. Philadelphia, Penn.: Temple University Press, 161–175.
17.
BradfordWD (2003) The wealth dynamics of entrepreneurship for black and white families in the U.S. Review of Income and Wealth49(1): 89–116.
18.
BradfordWDOsborneAE (1976) The entrepreneurship decision and black economic development. The American Economic Review66(2): 316–319.
19.
CastilloMPetrieRToreroM and Vesterlund L (2013) Gender differences in bargaining outcomes: A field experiment on discrimination. Journal of Public Economics99: 35–48.
ChenLLeeHL (2016) Sourcing under supplier responsibility risk: The effects of certification, audit, and contingency payment. Management Science63(9): 2795–2812.
22.
CoffmanKBExleyCLNiederleM (2021) The role of beliefs in driving gender discrimination. Management Science67(6): 3551–3569.
23.
CohenJ (1983) The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement7(3): 249–253.
24.
CohenMC (2018) Big data and service operations. Production and Operations Management27(9): 1709–1723.
DavisAM (2015) An experimental investigation of pull contracts in supply chains. Production and Operations Management24(2): 325–340.
27.
DavisAMHyndmanK (2021) Private information and dynamic bargaining in supply chains: An experimental investigation. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management23(6): 1449–1467.
28.
De-ArteagaMFeuerriegelSSaar-TsechanskyM (2022) Algorithmic fairness in business analytics: Directions for research and practice. Production and Operations Management31(10): 3749–3770.
29.
DonnerAEliasziwM (1994) Statistical implications of the choice between a dichotomous or continuous trait in studies of interobserver agreement. Biometrics50(2): 550–555.
30.
DonohueKKatokELeiderS (2019) The Handbook of Behavioral Operations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
31.
DonohueKÖzerÖZhengY (2020) Behavioral operations: Past, present, and future. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management22(1): 191–202.
GuryanJCharlesKK (2013) Taste-based or statistical discrimination: The economics of discrimination returns to its roots. Economics Journal123(572): F417–F432.
40.
HaruvyEKatokE (2013) Increasing revenue by decreasing information in procurement auctions. Production and Operations Management22(1): 19–35.
41.
KlinePRoseEKWaltersCR (2022) Systemic discrimination among large U.S. employers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics137(4): 1963–2036.
42.
LawKKFZuoL (2022) Public concern about immigration and customer complaints against minority financial advisors. Management Science68(11): 8464–8482.
43.
LeeYSSeoYWSiemsenE (2018) Running behavioral operations experiments using Amazon’s mechanical turk. Production and Operations Management27(5): 973–989.
44.
LeonardJSLevineDIGiulianoL (2010) Customer discrimination. The Review of Economics and Statistics92(3): 670–678.
45.
LochCHWuY (2008) Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study. Management Science54(11): 1835–1849.
46.
MaSHaoLAloysiusJA (2021) Women are an advantage in supply chain collaboration and efficiency. Production and Operations Management30(5): 1427–1144.
OndrichJRossSYingerJ (2003) Now you see it, now you don’t: Why do real estate agents withhold available houses from black customers?Review of Economics and Statistics85(4): 854–873.
49.
ÖzerÖZhengY (2019) Trust and trustworthiness. In: DonohueKKatokELeiderS (eds) The Handbook of Behavioral Operations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 489–523.
50.
ÖzerÖZhengYChenK (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Science57(6): 1111–1137.
51.
ÖzerÖZhengYRenY (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the United States. Management Science60(10): 2435–2460.
52.
PayneBKVuletichHABrown-IannuzziJL (2019) Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(24): 11693–11698.
53.
PhelpsES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review62(4): 659–661.
54.
SpiliotopoulouEDonohueKGürbüzMC (2016) Information reliability in supply chains: The case of multiple retailers. Production and Operations Management25(3): 548–567.
ZhangYDonohueKCuiTH (2016) Contract preferences and performance for the loss-averse supplier: Buyback vs. revenue sharing. Management Science62(6): 1734–1754.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
