We consider a supply chain where multiple suppliers and a manufacturer contribute to the assembly of a product (through providing components or labor). The product fails if any of its components (or elements of work) fails, but finding the faulty component can be prohibitively difficult. We study group warranty contracts for the manufacturer to induce suppliers to improve their quality levels. When information is symmetric and the manufacturer can contract on his own quality level, we show that a group warranty contract can achieve the first-best outcome. When the manufacturer’s quality level is not contractible, we show that the manufacturer and all the suppliers under-invest in qualities. We then extend our model to the asymmetric information case where suppliers have private quality cost information. Further, we consider whether the manufacturer benefits from sourcing multiple components from a single supplier, that is, supply consolidation. We find that supply consolidation benefits the manufacturer when his quality level is not contractible, but hurts him in the presence of asymmetric quality cost information of the suppliers.
AgrawalAMuthulingamSRajapaksheT (2017) How sourcing of interdependent components affects quality in automotive supply chains. Production and Operations Management26(8): 1512–1533.
2.
AungMMSeok ChangY (2014) Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food control39: 172–184.
3.
Ayvaz-ÇavdaroğluNKazazBWebsterS (2021) Incentivizing farmers to invest in quality through quality-based payment. Production and Operations Management30(10): 3812–3830.
4.
BabichVHilaryG (2020) OM forum—Distributed ledgers and operations: What operations management researchers should know about blockchain technology. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management22(2): 223–240.
5.
BabichVTangCS (2012) Managing opportunistic supplier product adulteration: Deferred payments, inspection, and combined mechanisms. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management14(2): 301–314.
6.
BaimanSFischerPERajanMV (2000) Information, contracting, and quality costs. Management Science46(6): 776–789.
7.
BaimanSNetessineSKunreutherH (2004) Procurement in supply chains when the end-product exhibits the ‘weakest link’ property. Working Paper. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
8.
BakkerTGoedeMTeusinkG (2002) Strategic souring: A bridge too far?Management Site for and by Professionals.
9.
BalachandranKRRadhakrishnanS (2005) Quality implications of warranties in a supply chain. Management Science51(8): 1266–1277.
10.
BondarevaMPinkerE (2019) Dynamic relational contracts for quality enforcement in supply chains. Management Science65(3): 1305–1321.
11.
BushnellMAgrawalV (2004) Essentials of electronic testing for digital, memory and mixed-signal VLSI circuits. Springer Science & Business Media
ChenJQiADawandeM (2020) Supplier centrality and auditing priority in socially responsible supply chains. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management22(6): 1199–1214.
14.
ChenLLeeHL (2016) Sourcing under supplier responsibility risk: The effects of certification, audit, and contingency payment. Management Science63(9): 2795–2812.
15.
ChenTKlastorinTWagnerMR (2015) Incentive contracts in serial stochastic projects. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management17(3): 290–301.
16.
ChevalierPBWeinLM (1997) Inspection for circuit board assembly. Management Science43(9): 1198–1213.
17.
CohenYNabrzyskiJTaylorI (2021) Framework for block-chain deployment in assembly of an air-craft or a SpaceCraft. IFAC-PapersOnLine54(1): 988–992.
18.
CuiYHuMLiuJ (2023) Value and design of traceability-driven blockchains. Forthcoming at Manufacturing & Service Operations Management.
19.
DalyPH (1975) Selecting and designing a group incentive plan. Personnel Journal54: 322–323.
20.
DavisAMHuBHyndmanKQiA (2021) Procurement for assembly under asymmetric information: Theory and evidence. Management Science68(4): 2694–2713.
21.
DawandeM.QiA (2021) Auditing, Inspections, and Testing for Social Responsibility in Supply Networks. In: Swaminathan, J.M., Deshpande, V. (eds) Responsible Business Operations. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 10. Springer, Cham.
22.
DongLGengXXiaoGYangN (2022) Procurement strategies with unreliable suppliers under correlated random yields. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management24(1): 179–195.
23.
DongLJiangPXuF (2023) Impact of traceability technology adoption in food supply chain networks. Management Science69(3): 1518–1535.
24.
DongLRashkovaIShiD (2022) Food safety audits in developing economies: Decentralization vs. centralization. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management24(6): 2863–2881.
25.
EzeanyimOCNwosuMCOnwurahUOChukwunekeJ (2014) A comparative analysis of cost of rework and cost of conformance to quality in manufacturing sector: A case study of aluminium industry in Nigeria. International Journal of Material Science and Manufacturing Engineering41(1): 1140–1146.
26.
FangXRuJWangY (2014) Optimal procurement design of an assembly supply chain with information asymmetry. Production & Operations Management23(12): 2075–2088.
27.
GuimaraesTCookDNatarajanN (2002) Exploring the importance of business clockspeed as a moderator for determinants of supplier network performance. Decision Sciences33(4): 629–644.
28.
HaAYShangWWangY (2022) Supplier audit information sharing and responsible sourcing. Management Science69(1): 308–324.
29.
HastigGMSodhiMS (2020) Blockchain for supply chain traceability: Business requirements and critical success factors. Production and Operations Management29(4): 935–954.
30.
HatfieldJWKojimaF (2009) Group incentive compatibility for matching with contracts. Games and Economic Behavior67: 745–749.
31.
HillAV (2021) The encyclopedia of operations management terms. Production Operations Management Society
32.
HoffmanJRRogelbergSG (1998) A guide to team incentive systems. Team Performance Management4: 23–32.
33.
HolmstromB (1982) Moral hazard in teams. The Bell Journal of Economics13(2): 324–340.
34.
HowerDRMontesinosPCezeLHillMDTorrellasJ (2009) Two hardware-based approaches for deterministic multiprocessor replay. Communications of the ACM52(6): 93–100.
35.
HuBQiA (2018) Optimal procurement mechanisms for assembly. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management20(4): 655–666.
36.
HuselidAM (1995) The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal38(3): 635–672.
37.
HwangIRadhakrishnanSSuL (2006) Vendor certification and appraisal: Implications for supplier quality. Management Science52(10): 1472–1482.
38.
IyengarGSalehFSethuramanJWangW (2023) Economics of permissioned blockchain adoption. Management Science69(6): 3415–3436.
39.
JacobyJChestnutRWFisherWA (1978) A behavioral process approach to information acquisition in nondurable purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research15(4): 532–544.
40.
JiangLWangY (2010) Supplier competition in decentralized assembly systems with price-sensitive and uncertain demand. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management12(1): 93–101.
41.
JinCLeviRLiangQRenegarNSpringsSZhouJZhouW (2021) Testing at the source: Analytics-enabled risk-based sampling of food supply chains in China. Management Science67(5): 2985–2996.
42.
KacmarKMAndrewsMCVan RooyDLSteilbergRCCerroneS (2006) Sure everyone can be replaced…but at what cost? Turnover as a predictor of unit-level performance. Academy of Management Journal49(1): 133–144.
43.
KayaMOzerO (2009) Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractible product quality and private quality cost information. Naval Research Logistics56(7): 669–685.
44.
KempfKGKeskinocakPUzsoyR (2011) Planning production and inventories in the extended enterprise: A state of the art handbook.
45.
KoHFNicoliciN (2008) Automated trace signals identification and state restoration for improving observability in post-silicon validation. Design, Automation and Test in Europe, DATE’08. IEEE
46.
LeeH-HLiC (2018) Supplier quality management: Investment, inspection, and incentives. Production and Operations Management 27(2): 304–322.
47.
LimWS (2001) Producer-supplier contracts with incomplete information. Management Science47(5): 709–715.
LondonMOldhamGR (1977) A comparison of group and individual incentive plans. Academy of Management Journal20: 34–41.
50.
MckeefryHI (2000) Building a total quality system. Electronic News.
51.
MedvedevAMMylovGV (2013) Concept of incoming inspection of materials and components coming into production. Structural Reliability. The Theory and Practice
52.
MiettinenJMäntysaloMKaijaKRistolainenEO (2004) System design issues for 3d system-in-package (SIP). Electronic Components and Technology Conference610–615.
53.
MoinzadehKTanY (2005) Economic control and inspection policies for high-speed unreliable production systems. IIE Transactions37: 1–14.
MyersonRB (1982) Optimal coordination mechanisms in generalized principal-agent problems. Journal of Mathematical Economics67–81.
56.
NikoofalMEGumusM (2018) Quality at the source or at the end? Managing supplier quality under information asymmetry. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management20(3): 498–516.
57.
OlsenPBoritM (2013) How to define traceability. Trends in Food Science & Technology29: 142–150.
58.
PetersonM (2013) Sustainable enterprise: A macromarketing approach. SAGE Publication Inc.
59.
QianYangLiJJWeissDM (2009) A survey of coverage-based testing tools. The Computer Journal52: 589–597.
60.
ReyniersDJTapieroCS (1995a) Contract design and the control of quality in a conflictual environment. European Journal of Operational Research82(2): 373–382.
61.
ReyniersDJTapieroCS (1995b) The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producer contracts. Management Sciences41(10): 1581–1589.
62.
SaakAE (2016) Traceability and reputation in supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics177: 149–162.
UlagaWEggertA (2009) Value-based differentiation in business relationships: Gaining and sustaining key supplier status. Journal of Marketing70(1): 119–136.
65.
VosooghidizajiMTaghipourACanel-DepitreB (2020) Supply chain coordination under information asymmetry: A review. International Journal of Production Research58(6): 1805–1834.
66.
ZhangHAydinGParkerRP (2021) Social responsibility auditing in supply chain network. Management Sciences68(2): 1058–1077.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
