Does Moral Identity Matter in Situational Action Theory? Some Evidence of Iranian Fans’ Cyberbullying Perpetration

Abstract

Situational action theory (SAT) posits that morality plays a core role in determining whether situations are viewed as suitable for crime. However, little attention has been paid to moral identity, the degree to which a person considers morality to occupy a central position in their view of themselves. Using a convenience sample of Iranian soccer fans (N = 374), we test both the direct and moderated role of moral identity in explaining cyberbullying, an outcome that differs from most SAT research focusing on violent/property crime. We find that fans with a weaker moral identity tend to engage in more cyberbullying and that moral identity significantly interacts with a number of SAT-derived predictors (moral emotions, self-control, perceptual deterrence, and situational morality) in expected ways.

Keywords

situational action theory cyberbullying morality moral identity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alshehri

(2016). The effect of increasing awareness about the use of social media on sport fanaticism for Saudi soccer fans [Doctor of Philosophy]. Middle Tennessee State University.

Antonaccio

Tittle

C. R.

(2008). Morality, self-control, and crime. Criminology, 46(2), 479–510.

Aquino

Freeman

Reed

Lim

V. K.

Felps

(2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141.

Aquino

Reed

II Thau

Freeman

(2007). A grotesque and dark beauty: How moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 385–392.

Aquino

Reed

(2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.

Berendt

Uhrich

(2018). Rivalry and fan aggression: Why acknowledging conflict reduces tension between rival fans and downplaying makes things worse. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(4), 1–24.

Blasi

(2004). Moral functioning: Moral understanding and personality. In Lapsley

D. K.

Narvez

(Eds.), Moral development, self and identity (pp. 335–347). Erlbaum.

Block

Lesneskie

(2018). A thematic analysis of spectator violence at sporting events in North America. Deviant Behavior, 39(9), 1140–1152.

Brauer

J. R.

Tittle

C. R.

(2017). When crime is not an option: Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 818–846.

10.

Camacho

Hassanein

Head

(2014). Understanding the factors that influence the perceived severity of cyber-bullying [Paper presentation]. International Conference on HCI in Business. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_13

11.

Cochran

J. K.

(2016). Moral propensity, setting, and choice: A partial test of situational action theory. Deviant Behavior, 37(7), 811–823.

12.

Delia

E. B.

(2019). “You can’t just erase history”: Coping with team identity threat. Journal of Sport Management, 33(3), 203–214.

13.

Fornell

Larcker

(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Market Research, 18, 39–50.

14.

Gallupe

Baron

S. W.

(2014). Morality, self-control, deterrence, and drug use: Street youths and situational action theory. Crime & Delinquency, 60(2), 284–305.

15.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

16.

Hair

J. F.

Jr Anderson

R. E.

Tatham

R. L.

Black

W. C.

(1995). Multivariate data analysis (3rd ed.). Macmillan.

17.

Hardy

S. A.

(2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Motivation & Emotion, 30(3), 205–213.

18.

Hardy

S. A.

Bean

D. S.

Olsen

J. A.

(2015). Moral identity and adolescent prosocial and antisocial behaviors: Interactions with moral disengagement and self-regulation. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 44(8), 1542–1554.

19.

Hertz

S. G.

Krettenauer

(2016). Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior? A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 20(2), 129–140.

20.

Heydarinejad

Gholami

(2012). Identification of factors of aggression incidence among football spectators in Khuzestan. Studies in Physical Culture Tourism, 1(19), 34–45.

21.

Hilliard

R. C.

Johnson

C. G.

(2018). Sport fan attitudes and willingness to commit aggressive acts. Journal of Sport Behavior, 41(3), 305–329.

22.

Hinduja

Patchin

J. W.

(2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129–156.

23.

Hirtenlehner

Pauwels

L. J.

Mesko

(2014). Is the effect of perceived deterrence on juvenile offending contingent on the level of self-control? Results from three countries. British Journal of Criminology, 54(1), 128–150.

24.

Hirtenlehner

Treiber

(2017). Can situational action theory explain the gender gap in adolescent shoplifting? Results from Austria. International Criminal Justice Review, 27(3), 165–187.

25.

Hitlin

(2007). Doing good, feeling good: Values and the self’s moral center. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(4), 249–259.

26.

Kabiri

Rahmati

M. M.

Shadmanfaat

S. M.

(2015). Sport identity and verbal/physical reactions among soccer fans [Paper presentation]. Eighth International Congress on Physical Education and Sport Science, Tehran, Iran.

27.

Kabiri

Rahmati

M. M.

Sharepour

(2016). Instrumental and hostile aggression among the fans of Padideh Soccer Club of Iran. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(3), 1007–1023.

28.

Kabiri

Shadmanfaat

S. M. S.

Choi

Yun

(2020). The impact of life domains on cyberbullying perpetration in Iran: A partial test of Agnew’s general theory of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101633

29.

Kavussanu

Stanger

Ring

(2015). The effects of moral identity on moral emotion and antisocial behavior in sport. Sport, Exercise, Performance & Psychology, 4(4), 268–279.

30.

Kennedy

(1992). A guide to econometrics. Blackwell.

31.

Kim

Cohen

T. R.

(2015). Moral character and workplace deviance: Recent research and current trends. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 134–138.

32.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.

33.

Knapton

Espinosa

Meier

H. E.

Bäck

E. A.

Bäck

(2018). Belonging for violence: Personality, football fandom, and spectator aggression. Nordic Psychology, 70(4), 1–12.

34.

Kroneberg

Schulz

(2018). Revisiting the role of self-control in situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 56–76.

35.

McFerran

Aquino

Duffy

(2010). How personality and moral identity relate to individuals’ ethical ideology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 35–56.

36.

Mitchell

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2006). The stability and resiliency of self-control in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 52(3), 432–449.

37.

Mudrick

Miller

Atkin

(2016). The influence of social media on fan reactionary behaviors. Telematics Informatics, 33(4), 896–903.

38.

Narvaez

Lapsley

D. K.

(2009). Moral identity, moral functioning, and the development of moral character. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 237–274.

39.

Nunally

(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

40.

Osswald

Frey

Streicher

(2011). Moral courage. In Kals

Maes

(Eds.), Justice and conflicts (pp. 391–405). Springer.

41.

Piquero

A. R.

Jennings

W. G.

Diamond

Farrington

D. P.

Tremblay

R. E.

Welsh

B. C.

Gonzalez

J. M. R.

(2016). A meta-analysis update on the effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(2), 229–248.

42.

Piquero

A. R.

Jennings

W. G.

Farrington

D. P.

(2010). On the malleability of self-control: Theoretical and policy implications regarding a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 27, 803–834.

43.

Sage

Kavussanu

Duda

(2006). Goal orientations and moral identity as predictors of prosocial and antisocial functioning in male association football players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(05), 455–466.

44.

Sanderson

(2013). From loving the hero to despising the villain: Sports fans, Facebook, and social identity threats. Mass Communication Society, 16(4), 487–509.

45.

Schepers

Reinecke

(2018). Conditional relevance of controls: A simultaneous test of the influences of self-control and deterrence on criminal behaviour in the context of situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 77–92.

46.

Serrano-Maíllo

(2018). Crime contemplation and self-control: A test of Situational Action Theory’s hypothesis about their interaction in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 93–110.

47.

Shadmanfaat

S. M.

Cochran

J. K.

Muniz

C. N.

Kabiri

(2019). Soccer hooliganism in Iran: A test of Agnew’s general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 40(5), 544–558.

48.

Shadmanfaat

S. M.

Howell

C. J.

Muniz

C. N.

Cochran

J. K.

Kabiri

Fontaine

E. M.

(2020). Cyberbullying perpetration: An empirical test of social learning theory in Iran. Deviant Behavior, 41(3), 278–293.

49.

Sonnentag

T. L.

Barnett

M. A.

(2016). Role of moral identity and moral courage characteristics in adolescents’ tendencies to be a moral rebel. Ethics & Behavior, 26(4), 277–299.

50.

Svensson

(2015). An examination of the interaction between morality and deterrence in offending: A research note. Crime & Delinquency, 61(1), 3–18.

51.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S

(2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

52.

Thornton

M. A.

Rupp

D. E.

(2016). The joint effects of justice climate, group moral identity, and corporate social responsibility on the prosocial and deviant behaviors of groups. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(4), 677–697.

53.

Trivedi-Bateman

(2019). The combined roles of moral emotion and moral rules in explaining acts of violence using a situational action theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519852634

54.

Vale

Fernandes

(2018). Social media and sports: Driving fan engagement with football clubs on Facebook. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(1), 37–55.

55.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

(2014). Why crime happens: A situational action theory. In Manzo

(Ed.), Analytical sociology: Actions and networks (pp. 74–94). John Wiley & Sons.

56.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

(2019). Explaining crime and criminal careers: The DEA model of situational action theory. Journal of Developmental Life-Course Criminology, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-019-00116-5

57.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Oberwittler

Treiber

Hardie

(2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford University Press.

58.

Wikstroüm

P.-O. H.

Treiber

K. H.

(2009). Violence as situational action. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3(1), 75–96.

59.

Wikström

P. O. H.

Treiber

K. H.

(2016). Situational theory: The importance of interactions and action mechanisms in the explanation of crime. In Piquero

A. R.

(Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 415–444). John Wiley & Sons.

60.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Treiber

H. (2017). Beyond risk factors: An analytical approach to crime prevention. In Teasdale

Bradley

M. S.

(Eds.), Preventing crime and violence (pp. 73–87). Springer.

61.

Wyman

P. A.

Cross

Brown

C. H.

Eberly

(2010). Intervention to strengthen emotional self-regulation in children with emerging mental health problems: Proximal impact on school behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(5), 707–720.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.34 MB