A substantial body of literature has been devoted to examine the efficacy of prison privatization. Unfortunately, the empirical findings to date are equivocal regarding whether prison privatization fulfills its promises and our expectations of cost efficiency, prison quality, postrelease success, nonprofit prison privatization, system-wide improvement in corrections, local economic development, and determinants of privatizing prisons. Such inconclusive evidence may result from the shortcomings of past research, and thus there is a continuing need for more work using a wide range of data sources and research designs. This article conducts a review of empirical research, discusses conceptual and methodological problems in the literature, and offers guidance for future research. It may not only stimulate additional research but also inform public policy decision-making on prison privatization.
ArmstrongG. S.MacKenzieD. L. (2003). Private versus public Juvenile correctional facilities: Do differences in environmental quality exist?Crime & Delinquency, 49, 542–563.
3.
ArmstrongS. (2002). Punishing not-for-profit: Implications of nonprofit privatization in juvenile punishment. Punishment & Society, 4, 345–368.
4.
AustinJ.CoventryG. (2001). Emerging issues on privatized prisons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
5.
BacakV.RidgewayG. (2018). Availability of health-related programs in private and public prisons. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 24, 62–70.
6.
BalesW. D.BedardL. E.QuinnS. T.EnsleyD. T.HolleyG. P. (2005). Recidivism of public and private state prison inmates in Florida. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 57–82.
7.
BayerP.PozenD. E. (2005). The effectiveness of juvenile correctional facilities: Public versus private management. Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 549–589.
8.
BelenkoS. (1999). Literature review of private prison costs. In GreeneJ. A. (Ed.), Privatization of correctional services: Evaluating the role of private prison management. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Law School Institute of Criminal Justice.
BrakelS. J. (1988). Prison management, private enterprise style: The inmate’s evaluation. The New Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement, 14, 177–244.
11.
BurkhardtB. C. (2015). Where have all the (White and Hispanic) inmates gone? Comparing the racial composition of private and public adult correctional facilities. Race and Justice, 5, 33–57.
12.
BurkhardtB. C. (2016). Who punishes whom? Bifurcation of private and public responsibilities in criminal punishment. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40, 512–527.
13.
BurkhardtB. C. (2018). Does the public sector respond to private competition? An analysis of privatization and prison performance. Journal of Crime and Justice. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2018.1497524
14.
BurkhardtB. C.JonesA. (2016). Judicial intervention into prisons: Comparing private and public prisons from 1990 to 2005. Justice System Journal, 37, 39–52.
15.
BurnsideJ.LoucksN.AdlerJ. R.RoseG. (2011). My brother’s keeper: Faith-based units in prisons. London, England and New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
CampS. D. (1999). Do inmate survey data reflect prison conditions? Using surveys to assess prison conditions of confinement. The Prison Journal, 79, 250–268.
17.
CampS. D.GaesG. G. (2002). Growth and quality of U.S. private prisons: Evidence from a national survey. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 427–450.
18.
CampS. D.GaesG. G.Klein-SaffranJ.DaggettD. M.SaylorW. G. (2002). Using inmate survey data in assessing prison performance: A case study comparing private and public prisons. Criminal Justice Review, 27, 26–51.
19.
CampS. D.GaesG. G.SaylorW. G. (2002). Quality of prison operations in the US federal sector: A comparison with a private prison. Punishment and Society, 4, 27–53.
20.
CarsonE. A. (2018). Prisoners in 2016. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
CrantsD. R. (1991). Private prison management: A study in economic efficiency. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 7, 49–59.
22.
CullenF. T.GendreauP. (2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal, 81, 313–338.
23.
DaggettD. M.CampS. D. (2009). Do official misconduct data tell the same story as the individuals who live in prison?Criminal Justice Review, 34, 428–449.
GaesG. G.CampS. D.NelsonJ. B.SaylorW. G. (2004). Measuring prison performance: Government privatization and accountability. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
GenterSHooksG.MosherC. (2013). Prisons, jobs and privatization: The impact of prisons on employment growth in rural US counties, 1997-2004. Social Science Research, 42, 596–610.
38.
GlasmeierA. K.FarriganT. (2007). The economic impacts of the prison development boom on persistently poor rural places. International Regional Science Review, 30, 274–299.
39.
GlazeL. E.ErinnJ. H. (2013). Correctional populations in the United States, 2012(Report No. NCJ 243936). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
HallettM. A. (2002). Race, crime, and for-profit imprisonment: Social disorganization as market opportunity. Punishment & Society, 4, 369–393.
43.
HardingR. (1997). Private prisons and public accountability. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
44.
HartO.SchleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1997). The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1127–1161.
45.
HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.FretzR.EricksonJ.GerardiD.HalperC. (2008). Criminal recidivism of female offenders: The importance of structured, community-based aftercare. Corrections Compendium, 33, 1–2.
46.
HooksG.MoserC.RotoloT.LobaoL. (2004). The prison industry: Carceral expansion and employment in U.S. counties, 1969-1994. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 37–57.
47.
HulingT. (1999). Prisons as a growth industry in rural America: An exploratory discussion of the effects on young African American men in the inner cities. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Retrieved fromhttps://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/prisons_as_rural_growth.shtml
48.
HulingT. (2002). Building a prison economy in rural America. In MauerM.Chesney-LindM. (Eds.), From invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 197–213). New York, NY: The New Press.
KimY.PriceB. E. (2014). Revisiting prison privatization: An examination of the magnitude of prison privatization. Administration & Society, 46, 255–275.
51.
KingR. S.MauerM.HulingT. (2003). Big prisons, small towns: Prison economics in rural America. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
52.
Lanza-KaduceL.ParkerK. F.ThomasC. W. (1999). A comparative recidivism analysis of releases from private and public prisons. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 28–47.
53.
LevinsonR. B. (1985). Okeechobee: An evaluation of privatization in corrections. The Prison Journal, 65, 75–94.
54.
Lewis-BeckM. S. (1980). Applied regression: An introduction. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-022. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55.
LippkeR. L. (1997). Thinking about private prisons. Criminal Justice Ethics, 16, 26–38.
56.
LoganC. H. (1992). Well kept: Comparing quality of confinement in private and public prisons. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 577–613.
57.
LoganC. H. (1993). Criminal justice performance measures for prisons. In GreenfieldL. (Ed.), Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 1–18). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
58.
LoganC. H. (1996). Public vs. private prison management: A case comparison. Criminal Justice Review, 21, 62–85.
59.
LoganC. H.McGriffB. W. (1989). Comparing costs of public and private prisons: A case study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
60.
LoganC. H.RauschS. P. (1985). Punish and profit: The emergence of private enterprise prisons. Justice Quarterly, 2, 303–318.
61.
LowD. L. (2003). Nonprofit private prisons: The next generation of prison management. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 29, 1–66.
62.
LukemeyerA.McCorkleR. C. (2006). Privatization of prisons: Impact on prison conditions. The American Review of Public Administration, 36, 189–206.
63.
LundahlB. W.KunzC.BrownellC.HarrisN.VleetR. V. (2009). Prison privatization: A meta-analysis of cost and quality of confinement indicators. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 383–394.
64.
MakariosM. D.MaahsJ. (2012). Is private time quality time? A national private-public comparison of prison quality. The Prison Journal, 92, 336–357.
65.
MasonC. (2013). International growth trends in prison privatization. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
66.
McDonaldD. C. (1990). The costs of operating public and private correctional facilities. In McDonaldD. C. (Ed.), Private prisons and the public interest (pp. 86–106). New Brunswick, Canada and London, England: Rutgers University Press.
67.
MooreA. T. (1998). Private prisons: Quality corrections at a lower cost(Policy Study No. 240). Los Angeles, CA: Reason Public Policy Institute.
Nicholson-CrottyS. (2004). The politics and administration of privatization: Contracting out for corrections management in the United States. The Policy Studies Journal, 32, 41–57.
71.
OgleR. S. (1999). Prison privatization: An environmental catch-11. Justice Quarterly, 16, 579–600.
72.
PerroneD.PrattT. V. (2003). Comparing the quality of confinement and cost-effectiveness of public versus private prisons: What we know, why we do not know more, and where to go from here. The Prison Journal, 83, 301–322.
73.
PowersR. A.KaukinenC.JeanisM. (2017). An examination of recidivism among inmates released from a private reentry center and public institutions in Colorado. The Prison Journal, 97, 609–627.
74.
PranisK. (2005). Cost-saving or cost-shifting: The fiscal impact of prison privatization in Arizona. Tallahassee, FL: Private Corrections Institute. Retrieved fromhttps://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/AZ_PP_Rpt_v4.pdf
75.
PrattT. C.MaahsJ. M. (1999). Are private prisons more cost-effective than public prisons? A meta-analysis of evaluation research studies. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 358–371.
76.
PrattT. C.WinstonM. R. (1999). The search for the frugal grail: An empirical assessment of the cost-effectiveness of public versus private correctional facilities. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 10, 447–471.
77.
PriceBCarrizalesT. J.SchwesterR. W. (2009). Race and ethnicity as determinants of privatizing state prisons. International Review of Public Administration, 13, 81–88.
78.
PriceB. E.RiccucciN. M. (2005). Exploring the determinants of decisions to privatize state prisons. The American Review of Public Administration, 35, 223–235.
ReichR. B. (2007). Supercapitalism: The transformation of business, democracy, and everyday life. New York, NY: Knopf.
81.
SavasE. S. (1982). Privatizing the public sector: How to shrink government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
82.
ScottW. D. (2015). Investigating the need for transparent disclosures of political campaign contributions and lobbying expenditures by U.S. private prison corporations. Accounting and the Public Interest, 15, 27–52.
83.
SechrestD. K.ShichorD. (1996). Comparing public and private correctional facilities in California: An exploratory study. In MaysG. L.GrayT. (Eds.), Privatization and the provision of correctional services: Context and consequences (pp. 133–151). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
84.
SegalG. F.MooreA. T. (2002). Weighing the watchmen: Evaluating the costs and benefits of outsourcing correctional services, Policy Study No. 290. Los Angeles, CA: Reason Public Policy Institute.
85.
SellersM. P. (1989). Private and public prisons: A comparison of costs, programs and facilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 33, 241–256.
86.
SessionsJ. B. (2017). Rescission of memorandum on use of private prisons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Deputy Attorney General.
TartagliaM. (2014). Private prisons, private records. Boston University Law Review, 94, 1689–1744.
91.
The Urban Institute. (1989). Comparison of privately and publicly operated correctional facilities in Kentucky and Massachusetts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
92.
ThomasC. W. (1997). Comparing the cost and performance of public and private prisons in Arizona. Phoenix: Arizona Department of Corrections.
TurcotteJ. W. (1997). Information brief: Comparing costs of public and private prisons. Tallahassee, FL: Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability.
95.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1984). Prisoners in 1983. Washington, DC: Author.
WoodP. J. (2007). Globalization and prison privatization: Why are most of the world’s for-profit adult prisons to be found in the American south?International Political Sociology, 1, 222–239.
102.
YatesS. Q. (2016). Reducing our use of private prisons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Deputy Attorney General.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
