Based on all publicly available International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) early release decisions as of May 31, 2017, this explorative article empirically analyzes, systematizes, and evaluates how ICTY convicts reflected on their past crimes during early release proceedings and how this affected decision-making of the ICTY President regarding their level of rehabilitation and early release. For this purpose, we developed an analytical framework distinguishing between acknowledgement of responsibility and remorse, as two forms of reflection on the past crimes, and their general and personal dimensions. Our analysis demonstrates that of all 53 individuals early released at the ICTY, 36% were considered sufficiently rehabilitated and a part of their sentence pardoned without any information regarding their outlook on the crimes they had been convicted of. Only 19% of the early released prisoners acknowledged their personal responsibility and expressed remorse for the crimes they committed. Others denied, only partially accepted responsibility and/or showed remorse on a general level, which, however, did not bar their early release. The article argues that this haphazard practice brings into question the ICTY legacy with respect to its goal of offender rehabilitation and its potential effects on reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia.
AndersonK. (2017). Perpetrating genocide: A criminological account. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
BagaricM.AmarasekaraK. (2001). Feeling sorry?—Tell someone who cares: The irrelevance of remorse in sentencing. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 40, 364–376.
3.
BibasS.BierschbachR. A. (2004). Integrating remorse and apology into criminal procedure. The Yale Law Journal, 114, 85–90.
4.
BullockK.CondryR. (2013). Responding to denial, minimization and blame: The ‘real world’ implications of offender neutralizations. European Journal of Criminology, 10, 572–590.
5.
ByrneR. (2006). Promises of peace and reconciliation: Pre-viewing the legacy of the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda. European Review, 14, 485–498.
6.
ClarkJ. N. (2009a). Judging the ICTY: Has it achieved its objectives?Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 9, 123–142.
7.
ClarkJ. N. (2009b). Plea bargaining at the ICTY: Guilty pleas and reconciliation. The European Journal of International Law, 20, 415–436.
8.
ClarkJ. N. (2012). The ICTY and reconciliation in Croatia: A case study of Vukovar. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10, 397–422.
9.
CombsN. A. (2003). Prosecutor v. Biljana Plavšić: Case No. IT-00-39&40/1-S. The American Journal of International Law, 97, 929–937.
10.
D’AscoliS. (2011). Sentencing in international criminal law. Portland, OR: Hart.
11.
de GreiffP. (2007). The role of apologies in national reconciliation processes: On making trustworthy institutions trusted. In GibneyM.Howard-HassmannR. E.CoicaudJ.-M.SteinerN. (Eds.), The age of apology, facing up to the past (pp. 120–136). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
DignanJ. (2005). Understanding victims and restorative justice. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
13.
EnrightR. D. (1996). Counseling within the forgiveness triad: On forgiving, receiving forgiveness, and self-forgiveness. Counseling & Values, 40, 107–126.
14.
Gobodo-MadikizelaP. (2003). Remorse, forgiveness, and rehumanization: Stories from South Africa. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42, 7–32.
15.
HarmonM.GaynorF. (2007). Ordinary sentences for extraordinary crimes. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5, 683–712.
16.
HaydenR. M. (2011). What’s reconciliation got to do with it? The international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) as antiwar profiteer. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 5, 313–330.
17.
HodginsH. S.LiebeskindE. (2003). Apology versus defense: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 297–316.
18.
HolaB.van WijkJ. (2014). Life after conviction at international criminal tribunals, an empirical overview. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 12, 109–132.
19.
HolaB.van WijkJ. (2016). Rehabilitating international prisoners. In MulgrewR.AbelsD. (Eds.), Research handbook on international penal system (pp. 274–297). London, England: Routledge.
20.
HolmgrenM. R. (1993). Forgiveness and the intrinsic value of persons. American Philosophical Quarterly, 30, 341–352.
KelderJ.HolaB.van WijkJ. (2014). Rehabilitation and early release of perpetrators of international crimes; A case study of ICTY and ICTR. International Criminal Law Review, 14, 1177–1203.
23.
KleinkeC. L.WallisR.StalderK. (1992). Evaluation of a rapist as a function of expressed intent and remorse. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 525–537.
24.
KremerJ. F.StephensL. (1983). Attributions and arousal as mediators of mitigation’s effect on retaliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 335–343.
25.
Kutnjak IvkovićS.HaganJ. (2011). Reclaiming justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
MeernikJ.GuerreroJ. R. (2014). Can international criminal justice advance ethnic reconciliation? The ICTY and ethnic relations in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 14, 383–407.
27.
MorrisV.ScharfM. (1995). An insider’s guide to the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia: A documentary history and analysis. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational.
28.
OrentlicherD. (2008). Shrinking the space of denial—The impact of the ICTY in Serbia. New York, NY: Open Society Institute.
29.
PayneL. A. (2008). Unsettling accounts: Neither truth nor reconciliation in state violence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
ProeveM. J.HowellsK. (2006). Effects of remorse and shame and criminal justice experience on judgements about a sex offender. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 145–161.
Prosecutor v. Biljana Plavsic, Transcript of Sentencing Hearing (IT-00-40-S), ICTY, December 17, 2002.
33.
Prosecutor v. Delalic., Judgement (IT-96-21-T), ICTY, November 16, 1998.
34.
Prosecutor v. Dragan Zelenovic, Decision of President on Application for Pardon or Commutation of Sentence of Dragan Zelenovic(IT-96-23/2-ES), ICTY, June 10, 2010.
35.
Prosecutor v. Dragan Zelenovic, Public Redacted Version of the August 28, 2015 Decision of the President on the Early Release of Dragan Zelenovic (MICT-15-89-ES), MICT, September 15, 2015.
36.
Prosecutor v. Drago Josipovic, Decision of the President on the Application for pardon or Commutation of Sentence of Drago Josipovic(IT-95-16-ES), ICTY, January 30, 2006.
37.
Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Decision of the President on the Early Release of Dragoljub Kunarac(MICT-15-88-ES.1), MICT, February 2, 2017.
38.
Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Ojdanic, Public Redacted Version of the 10 July 2013 Decision of the President on the Early Release of Dragoljub Ojdanic(IT-05-87-ES.1), ICTY, August 29, 2013.
39.
Prosecutor v. Drazen Erdemovic, Transcript of Sentencing Hearing(IT-96-22), ICTY, November 20, 1996.
40.
Prosecutor v. Drazen Erdemovic, Sentencing Judgment(IT-96-22-Tbis), ICTY, March 5, 1998.
41.
Prosecutor v. Drazen Erdemovic, Decision of the President on Early Release(IT-96-22-ES), ICTY, July 15, 2008.
42.
Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga, Decision on the review concerning reduction of sentence of Mr. Germain Katanga(ICC-01/04/01/07), ICC, November 13, 2015.
43.
Prosecutor v. Haradin Bala, Decision on application of Haradin Bala for Sentence Remission(IT-03-66-ES), ICTY, October 15, 2010.
44.
Prosecutor v. Haradin Bala, Public Redacted Version of the 28 June 2012 Decision of the President on Early Release of Haradin Bala(IT-03-66-ES), ICTY, January 9, 2013.
45.
Prosecutor v. Ivica Rajic, Decision of President on Early Release of Ivica Rajic(IT-95-12-ES), ICTY, August 22, 2011.
46.
Prosecutor v. Johan Tarculovski, Decision of President on Early Release of Johan Tarculovski(IT-04-82-ES), ICTY, April 8, 2013.
47.
Prosecutor v. Kvocka et al., Judgement(IT-98-30/1-T), ICTY, November 2, 2001.
48.
Prosecutor v. Ljubomir Borovcanin, Public Redacted Version of the 14 July 2016 Decision of the President on the Early Release of Ljubomir Borovcanin(MICT-15-85-ES.6), MICT, August 2, 2016.
49.
Prosecutor v. Milan Simic, Transcript of hearing(IT-95-9/2), ICTY, July 22, 2002.
50.
Prosecutor v. Milan Simic, Order of the President on the Application for the Early Release of Milan Simic(IT-95-9/2), ICTY, October 27, 2003.
51.
Prosecutor v. Milomir Stakic, Decision of President on Early Release of Milomir Stakic (IT-97-24-ES), ICTY, July 15, 2011.
52.
Prosecutor v. Mladen Naletilic, Public Redacted Version of the 29 November 2012 Decision of the President on Early Release of Mladen Naletilic(IT-98-34-ES), ICTY, March 26, 2013.
53.
Prosecutor v. Mlado Radic, Decision of the President on Commutation of Sentence(IT-98-30/1-ES), ICTY, June 22, 2007.
54.
Prosecutor v. Mlado Radic, Decision of President on Application for Pardon or Commutation of Sentence of Mlado Radic(IT-98-30/1-ES), ICTY, April 23, 2010.
55.
Prosecutor v. Mlado Radic, Public Redacted Version of the 13 February 2012 Decision of the President on Early Release of Mlado Radic(IT-98-30/1-ES), ICTY, January 9, 2013.
56.
Prosecutor v. Radomir Kovac, Public and Redacted Version of the 27 March 2013 Decision of President on Early Release of Radomir Kovac(IT-96-23 & 23/l-ES), ICTY, July 3, 2013.
57.
Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. Decision on the review concerning reduction of sentence of Mr. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo(ICC-01/04-01/06), ICC, September 22, 2015.
58.
Prosecutor v. Veselin Sljivancanin, Decision of President on Early Release of Veselin Sljivancanin(IT-95-13/1-ES.1), ICTY, July 5, 2011.
59.
Prosecutor v. Vinko Martinovic, Decision of the President on Early Release of Vinko Martinovic—Confidential(IT-98-34-ES), ICTY, December 16, 2011.
60.
Prosecutor v. Zdravko Mucic, Order of the President in Response to Zdravko Mucic’s Request for Early Release(IT-96-21-A bis), ICTY, July 9, 2003.
61.
RobinsonG.CrowI. (2013). Offender rehabilitation, theory, research and practice. Great Britain, England: Sage.
62.
Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (RPE)(as Amended on 10 December 2009), February 11, 1994.
63.
Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (as Amended on 17 May 2002), UN Security Council 827, May 25, 1993.
64.
StoverE. (2005). The witnesses: War crimes and the promise of justice in The Hague. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
65.
SuboticJ. (2012). The cruelty of false remorse: Biljana Plavsic at The Hague. Southeastern Europe, 36, 39–59.
66.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.HafezL. (2011). Shame, guilt and remorse: Implications for offender populations. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22, 706–723.
67.
TheriotM. T. (2006). Adolescent sex offenders. In HilarskiC.WodarskiJ. S. (Eds.), Comprehensive mental health practice with sex offenders and their families (pp. 21–46). New York, NY: Harworth Press.
68.
van KalmthoutA. M.DurnescuI. (2008). European probation service system. A comparative overview. In van KalmthoutA. M.DurnescuI. (Eds.), Probation in Europe (pp. 1–49). Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Wolf Legal.
69.
WareJ.MannR. E. (2012). How should “acceptance of responsibility” be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 279–288.
70.
WilsonR. A. (2011). Writing history in international criminal trials. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
71.
ZhongR.BaranoskiM.FeigesonN.DavidsonL.BuchananA.ZonanaH.V. (2014). So you’re sorry? The role of remorse in criminal law. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 42, 39–48.
