Gender Equality and State Executions Within and Across 100 Countries From 1997 to 2010

Abstract

The achievement of gender equality requires strong support from the state and changes, in turn, the behavior of the state in both domestic and international arenas. Research suggests that an increased representation of women in government provides more ethical governance as well as greater state pacifism in international conflicts. While research has shown that women are more likely than men to oppose death penalty, no study has examined the influence of women’s representation in government on executions carried out by the state. Using a modified negative binomial random-effects model, this study examines gender equality as a predictor of executions and fills the growing need for longitudinal analysis of executions by using data from 100 countries over 14 years. The results indicate that increases in women’s representation in parliament are negatively associated with executions over time and are conditioned by the level of democracy between countries.

Keywords

gender equality executions death penalty cross-national

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(2005). Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, NC: The SAS Institute.

Allison

P. D.

(2009). Fixed effects regression methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Allison

P. D.

(2012). Beware of software for fixed effects negative binomial regression. Retrieved from http://www.statisticalhorizons.com/fe-nbreg

Allison

P. D.

Waterman

(2002). Fixed effects negative binomial regression models. In Stolzenberg

R. M.

(Ed.), Sociological methodology 2002 (pp. 246–265). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

Amnesty International. (1991). Death sentences and executions in 1990. New York, NY: Author.

Amnesty International. (1997). Death sentences and executions in 1996. New York, NY: Author.

Amnesty International. (2010). Amnesty international challenges China’s continued secrecy in death penalty executions. Washington, DC: Author.

Amnesty International. (2011). Death sentences and executions in 2010. New York, NY: Author.

Amnesty International. (2014). Death sentences and executions in 2013. New York, NY: Author.

10.

Baumer

E. P.

Wolff

K. T.

(2014). The breadth and causes of contemporary cross-national homicide trends. Crime and Justice, 43, 231–287.

11.

Beck

N. L.

(2001). Time-series cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 271–293.

12.

Blalock

H. M.

(1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: Wiley.

13.

Boots

D. P.

Cochran

J. K.

(2011). The gender gap in support for capital punishment: A test of attribution theory. Women and Criminal Justice, 21, 171–197.

14.

Breuning

(2001). Women’s representation and development assistance. Women and Politics, 23, 35–55.

15.

Bush

S. S.

(2011). International politics and the spread of quotas for women in legislatures. International Organization, 65, 103–137.

16.

Butler

J. P.

(1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

17.

Caprioli

(2000). Gendered conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 37, 53–68.

18.

Caprioli

Boyer

M. A.

(2001). Gender, violence, and international crisis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 503–518.

19.

Chambliss

W. J.

(1964). A sociological analysis of the law of vagrancy. Social Problems, 12, 67–77.

20.

Chambliss

Mankoff

(1976). Whose law? What order?: A conflict approach to criminology. New York, NY: John Wiley.

21.

Cochran

Sanders

(2009). The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 525–533.

22.

D’Agostino

M. J.

(2014). The difference that women make: Government performance and women-led agencies. Administration & Society, 47, 532–548.

23.

DeLue

S. M.

(2006). The enlightenment, public memory, liberalism, and the post-communist world. East European Politics and Societies, 20, 395–418.

24.

Dilli

Rijpma

Carmichael

S. G

. (2014). Achieving gender equality: Development versus historical legacies. CESifo Economic Studies. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifu027

25.

Dollar

Fisman

Gatti

(2001). Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46, 423–429.

26.

Dreher

Gaston

Martens

(2016). Measuring globalisation—Gauging its consequences. New York, NY: Springer.

27.

Dui Hua Foundation. (2015). Criminal justice. Retrieved from Dui Hua Foundation: http://duihua.org/wp/?page_id=136

28.

Dunér

Geurtsen

(2002). The death penalty and war. International Journal for Human Rights, 6, 1–28.

29.

Eagly

A. H.

(1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

30.

Eagly

A. H.

Karau

S. J.

(2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573.

31.

Eagly

A. H.

Wood

Diekman

A. B.

(2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes

Trautner

H. M.

(Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

32.

Elias

Jephcott

(1982). The civilizing process (Vol. 2). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

33.

Firebaugh

Warner

Massoglia

(2013). Fixed effects, random effects, and hybrid models for causal analysis. In Morgan

(Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (Chap. 7, pp. 113–132). New York, NY: Springer.

34.

Fukuyama

(2014). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

35.

Garland

(1990). Punishment and modern society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

36.

Giordano

P. C.

Cernkovich

S. A.

(1997). Gender and antisocial behavior. In Stoff

D. M.

Breiling

Maser

J. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 496–510). New York, NY: John Wiley.

37.

Goetz

A. M.

(2007). Political cleaners: Women as the new anti-corruption force? Development and Change, 38, 87–105.

38.

Goldstone

J. A.

Bates

R. H.

Epstein

D. L.

Gurr

T. R.

Lustik

M. B.

Marshall

M. G.

… Woodward

. (2010). A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 190–208.

39.

Gould

L. A.

Pate

(2011). Penalty, power, and polity: Exploring the relationship between political repression and corporal punishment. International Criminal Justice Review, 21, 443–461.

40.

Greenberg

D. F.

West

(2008). Siting the death penalty internationally. Law and Social Inquiry, 33, 295–343.

41.

Hausman

(1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.

42.

Hsiao

(2003). Analysis of panel data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

43.

Institute for Criminal Policy Research. (2017). World prison brief data. Retrieved from Institute for Criminal Policy Research: http://prisonstudies.org/world-prison-brief-data

44.

Interparliamentary Union. (2014). Women in parliament: 20 years in review. Retrieved from http://www.ipu.org/pdf/publications/WIP20Y-en.pdf

45.

Interparliamentary Union. (2015). Statiscal archive: Women in national parliaments. Retrieved from Women in Parliament: http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif-arc.htm

46.

Jacobs

Carmichael

J. T.

(2002). The political sociology of the death penalty: A pooled time-series analysis. American Sociological Review, 67, 109–123.

47.

Jacobs

Carmichael

J. T.

(2004). Ideology, social threat, and the death sentence: Capital sentences across time and space. Social Forces, 83, 249–278.

48.

Jacobs

Kent

S. L.

(2007). The determinants of executions since 1951: How politics, protests, public opinion, and social divisions shape capital punishment. Social Problems, 54, 297–318.

49.

Jacobs

Kleban

(2003). Political institutions, minorities, and punishment: A pooled cross-national analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces, 82, 725–755.

50.

Jiang

Lambert

E. G.

Wang

Saito

Pilot

(2010). Death penalty views in China, Japan and the US: An empirical comparison. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 862–869.

51.

Johnson

B. T.

Eagly

A. H.

(1990). Involvement and persuasion: Types, traditions, and the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 375–384.

52.

Kent

S. L.

(2010). Predicting abolition: A cross-national survival analysis of the social and poltical determinants of death penalty statutes. International Criminal Justice Review, 20, 56–72.

53.

Lambert

E. G.

Baker

D. N.

Elechi

O. O.

Jiang

Khondaker

M. I.

Pasupuleti

Hogan

N. L.

(2016). Gender and cultural differences on death penalty support and views among Indian and US college students. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15377938.2015.1015195.

54.

Long

(1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

55.

Marano

Cuervo-Cazurra

Kwok

C. C.

(2013). The impact of conflict types and location on trade. The International Trade Journal, 27, 197–224.

56.

Marshall

M. G

. (2013). Major episodes of political violence (MEPV) and conflict regions, 1946–2012. Retrieved from Center for Systemic Peace: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/MEPVcodebook2012.pdf

57.

Marshall

M. G.

Gurr

T. R.

Jaggers

. (2012). Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2012. Retrieved from Center for Systemic Peace: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2012.pdf

58.

Mathias

M. D.

(2013). The sacralization of the individual: Human rights and the abolition of the death penalty. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 1246–1283.

59.

McGann

Sandholtz

(2012). Patterns of death penalty abolition, 1960–2005: Domestic and international factors. International Studies Quarterly, 56, 275–289.

60.

Melander

(2005a). Gender equality and intrastate armed conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 695–714.

61.

Melander

(2005b). Political gender equality and state human rights abuse. Journal of Peace Research, 42, 149–166.

62.

Miethe

T. D.

Diebert

G. R.

(2005). Cross-national variability in capital punishment: Exploring the sociopolitical sources of its differential legal status. International Criminal Justice Review, 15, 115–130.

63.

Miethe

T. D.

Troshynski

E. I.

Hart

T. C.

(2017). Social conditions and cross-national imprisonment rates: Using set-theoretic methods for theory testing and identifying deviant cases. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33, 152–172.

64.

Neapolitan

J. L.

(2001). An examination of cross-national variation in punitiveness. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 691–710.

65.

Neilson

Stanfors

(2014). It’s about time! Gender, parenthood, and household divisions of labor under different welfare regimes. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 1066–1088.

66.

Neumayer

(2008). Death penalty: The polticial foundations of the global trend toward abolition. Human Rights Review, 9, 241–268.

67.

Norgaard

York

(2005). Gender equality and state environmentalism. Gender and Society, 19, 506–522.

68.

Piscopo

J. M.

(2015). States as gender equality activists: The evolution of quota laws in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 57, 27–49.

69.

Plumper

Troeger

V. E.

(2007). Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis, 15, 124–139.

70.

Regan

P. M.

Paskeviciute

(2003). Women’s access to politics and peaceful states. Journal of Peace Research, 40, 287–302.

71.

Robison

(2010). Unpacking the social origins of terrorism: The role of women’s empowerment in reducing terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 33, 735–756.

72.

Ruddell

(2005). Social disruption, state priorities, and minority threat: A cross-national study of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 7, 7–28.

73.

Ruddell

Fearn

N. E.

(2005). The stability of punishment hypothesis revisited: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 5, 1–28.

74.

Ruddell

Urbina

M. G.

(2004). Minority threat and punishment: A cross-national analysis. Justice Quarterly, 21, 903–931.

75.

Ruddell

Urbina

M. G.

(2007). Weak nations, political repression, and punishment. International Criminal Justice Review, 17, 84–107.

76.

Rusche

Kirchheimer

(1939). Punishment and social structure. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

77.

Smith

(2008). Punishment and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

78.

Solt

(2014). The standardized world income inequality database: Working paper. Retrieved from http://myweb.uiowa.edu/fsolt/swiid/swiid.html

79.

Stack

(2000). Support for the death penalty: A gender-specific model. Sex Roles, 43, 163–179.

80.

Sung

H.-E.

(2003). Fairer sex or fairer system? Gender and corruption revisited. Social Forces, 82, 705–725.

81.

Sung

H.-E.

(2012). Women in government, public corruption and liberal democracy in cross-national perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58, 195–219.

82.

Swamy

Knack

Lee

Azfar

(2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64, 25–55.

83.

The Association of Religion Data Archives. (2011). World religion dataset. Retrieved from Assosciation of Religion Data Archives: http://www.thearda.com/Archive/CrossNational.asp

84.

United Nations General Assembly. (1989). Second optional protocol to the international covenant on civil and political rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty. Retrieved December 15, 1989, from http://www.ohchr.orgEN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/2ndOPCCPR.aspx

85.

Vijayalakshmi

(2008). Rent-seeking and gender in local governance. Journal of Development Studies, 44, 1262–1288.

86.

Volden

Wiseman

A. E.

Wittmer

D. E.

(2013). When are women more effective lawmakers than men. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 326–341.

87.

White

R. D.

(1999). Are women more ethical? Recent findings on the effects of gender upon moral development. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 459–471.

88.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.