The first and perhaps most fundamental problem of criminology, when practiced as a science, is the challenge of defining crime, of identifying a stable, empirical “essence” of crime that can guide data collection. In this article, an early stage in the history of this problem—represented by the competing views of Raffaele Garofalo, Émile Durkheim, and Willem Bonger—is examined to illustrate its complexity and its seemingly unavoidable ideological dimension. All three of these scholars embraced inductive scientific research and, to a degree, attempted to construct an empirically grounded definition of crime. Nonetheless, they “discovered” three very different essences of crime. These essences represent contradictory reality claims concerning human/social evolution, imply significantly different images of criminals, and serve as important historical reference points for several ideological currents that continue to flow through the field of criminology.
AgnewR. (2011). Toward a unified criminology: Integrating assumptions about crime, people, and society. New York: New York University Press.
2.
BeccariaC. (1764/1819). An essay on crimes and punishments (2nd American ed.). Philadelphia: Philip H. Nicklin.
3.
BeirneP. (1993). Inventing criminology: Essays on the rise of ‘Homo Criminalis’. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
4.
BenthamJ. (1789/1948). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York, NY: Hafner Publishing.
5.
BongerW. A. (1905/1916). Criminality and economic conditions (HortonH. P., Trans.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.
6.
BongerW. A. (1936). An introduction to criminology (LooE. V., Trans.). London, England: Methuen and Company.
7.
BongerW. A. (1943/1969). Race and crime (HordykM. M., Trans.). Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.
8.
DiCristinaB. (2004). Durkheim’s theory of homicide and the confusion of the empirical literature. Theoretical Criminology, 8, 57–91.
9.
DiCristinaB. (2012). The birth of criminology: Readings from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer.
10.
DiCristinaB. (2016). Durkheim’s theory of anomie and crime: A clarification and elaboration. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 49(3), 311–331.
11.
DurkheimÉ. (1893/1984). The division of labor in society (HallsW. D., Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
12.
DurkheimÉ. (1895/1982). The rules of sociological method (HallsW. D., Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
13.
DurkheimÉ. (1895/1983). Crime and social health (ScullA., Trans.). In LukesS.ScullA. (Eds.), Durkheim and the law (pp. 92–100). Oxford, England: Martin Robertson.
14.
DurkheimÉ. (1897/1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (SpaldingJ. A.SimpsonG., Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
15.
DurkheimÉ. (1900/1958). Professional ethics and civic morals (BrookfieldC., Trans.). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
16.
DurkheimÉ. (1900/1969). Two laws of penal evolution (JeffreyW.Jr., Trans.). University of Cincinnati Law Review, 38, 32–60.
17.
EngelsF. (1845/1887). The condition of the working class in England in 1844 (WischnewetzkyF. K., Trans.). New York, NY: John W. Lovell Company.
18.
FriedrichsD. O. (2013). Transcending the conventional definition of crime: Toward a twenty-first century criminology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
KramerR. C. (2013). Expanding the core: Blameworthy harms, international law and state-corporate crimes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
26.
LombrosoC. (1895-96/2012). Criminal anthropology: Its origin and application. In DiCristinaB. (Ed.), The birth of criminology: Readings from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (pp. 101–109). New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer.
27.
MichaelJ.AdlerM. J. (1933/2001). The nature of crime. In HenryS.LanierM. M. (Eds.), What is crime? Controversies over the nature of crime and what to do about it (pp. 19–25). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
28.
MichalowskiR. (2013). What is crime? Why is criminology?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
29.
PepinskyH. E. (1988). Violence as unresponsiveness: Toward a new conception of crime. Justice Quarterly, 5, 539–563.
30.
PollockF.MaitlandF. W. (1959). The history of English law: Before the time of Edward I (Vol. II, 2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Lawyer’s Literary Club.
31.
QuinneyR. (1970). The social reality of crime. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.
32.
QuinneyR. (1991). The way of peace: On crime, suffering, and service. In PepinskyH. E.QuinneyR. (Eds.), Criminology as peacemaking (pp. 3–13). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
33.
RafterN. (2009). The origins of criminology: A reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
RedfieldR. (1964/1967). Primitive law. In BohannanP.(Ed.), Law and warfare: Studies in the anthropology of conflict (pp. 3–24). Garden City, NY: The Natural History Press.
35.
ReimanJ.LeightonP. (2010). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class, and criminal justice (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
SchwendingerH.SchwendingerJ. (1970/2001). Defenders of order or guardians of human rights? In HenryS.LanierM. M. (Eds.), What is crime? Controversies over the nature of crime and what to do about it (pp. 65–98). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
37.
SchwendingerH.SchwendingerJ. (1977). Social class and the definition of crime. Crime and Social Justice, 7, 4–13.
38.
TappanP. W. (1947/2001). Who is the criminal? In HenryS.LanierM. M. (Eds.), What is crime? Controversies over the nature of crime and what to do about it (pp. 27–36). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
39.
TifftL. L. (1995). Social harm definitions of crime. The Critical Criminologist, 7, 9–13.
40.
TifftL. L.SullivanD. (1980). The struggle to be human: Crime, criminology, and anarchism. Orkney, England: Cienfuegos Press.
41.
WalshA. (2002). Biosocial criminology: Introduction and integration. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
