The purpose of this study is to examine the different factors that shape and facilitate punitive attitudes among Israeli public. Punitive attitudes were examined in respect to several demographic and environmental variables such as gender, level of religiosity, level of education, political affiliation, and victimization. In addition, social distress in respect to the political climate of the country was taken into consideration to examine the effect of “historical” events on results reliability. Using a random selection, a sample of 471 Israeli respondents was examined at two different time periods (Wave I: 2008–2009 and Wave II: 2011). Results of the current study indicate that demographic characteristics as well as social distress are related to the manifestation of punitive attitudes among Israelis, and thus the study demonstrates the different factors that affect public attitudes toward crime and punishment in the Israeli context. Results are discussed in regard to policy, and recommendations are made for future studies.
ApplegateB. K.CullenF. T.FisherB. S. (2002). Public views towards crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap?Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 89–100.
2.
ArcherD.GartnerR. (1984). Violence and crime in cross-national perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
BarkanS. E.CohnS. F. (1994). Racial prejudice and support for the death penalty by whites. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 202–209.
4.
BottomsA. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In ClarkstonC.MorganR. (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform. New-York, NY: Oxford University Press/ Clarendon Press.
5.
BrownE. K. (2006). The dog that did not bark: Punitive social, views and the ‘professional middle classes'. Punishment Society, 8, 287–308.
6.
BrownS. (1999). Public attitudes towards the treatment of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 239–252.
7.
ConroyS. J.EmersonT. L. M. (2004). Business ethics and religiosity as a predictor of ethical awareness among students. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 383–396.
8.
CoserL. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York, NY: The Free Press.
9.
CostelloeM. T.ChiricosT.GertzM. (2009). Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Exploring the relevance of crime salience and economic insecurity. Punishment Society, 11, 25–44.
10.
CullenF. T.ClarkG.CullenJ.MathersR. (1985). Attributes, salience, and attitudes towards criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305–331.
11.
DowlerK. (2003). Media consumption and public attitudes towards crime and Justice: The relationship between fear of crime, punitive attitudes, and perceived police effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Cultural, 10, 109–126.
12.
FritzC. (1961). Disasters. In MertonR.NisbettR. (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 651–694). New York, NY: Harcourt.
13.
FritzC. E.WilliamsH. B. (1957). The human being in disasters: A research perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 309, 42–51.
14.
GarlandD. (1990). Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
GaultB. A.SabiniJ. (2000). The role of empathy, anger, and gender in predicting attitude towards punitive, reparative and preventative public policies. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 495–520.
16.
GerosiF.KingG. (2002). Short term effects of war deaths on public health in the U.S. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences.
17.
GideonL.LovelandN. (2011). Public attitude toward rehabilitation and reintegration: How supportive are people of getting-tough-on-crime policies and the second Chance Act. In GideonL.SungH. E. (Eds.), Rethinking corrections: Rehabilitation, reentry, and reintegration (pp. 19–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
GideonL.HsiaoY. G. (2012). Stereotype and age in the prediction Taiwanese public support of rehabilitation. Asian Journal of Criminology, 7, 309–326.
19.
GrasmickH. G.CochranJ. K.BursikR. J.JrKimpelM. L. (1993). Religion, punitive justice, and support for the death penalty. Justice Quarterly, 10, 289–314.
20.
HalimS.StilesB. L. (2001). Differential support for police use of force, the death penalty, and perceived harshness of the courts: Effects of race, gender, and region. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 13–23.
21.
HartnagelT. F.TempletonL. J. (2012). Emotions about crime and attitudes to punishment. Punishment & Society, 14, 452–474.
22.
HerzogS. (2003). The relationship between public perceptions of crime seriousness and support for plea-bargaining practices in Israel: A factorial-survey approach. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 94, 103–131.
23.
HerzogS. (2003a). Does the ethnicity of offenders in crime scenarios affect public perceptions of crime seriousness? A randomized survey experiment in Israel. Social Forces, 82, 757–781.
24.
JohnsonD. (2009). Anger about crime and support for punitive criminal justice policies. Punishment and Society, 11, 51–66.
25.
KingA.MarunaS. (2009). Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged? Exploring the origins of punitive views. Punishment Society, 11, 147–169.
26.
KuryH.BrandensteinM.Obergfell-FuchsJ. (2009). Dimensions of punitiveness in Germany. European journal on criminal policy and research, 15, 63–81.
27.
KuryH.FerdinandT. (1999). Public opinion and punitivity. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 373–392.
28.
KutateladzeB. (2009). Is America so punitive? Exploring a continuum of US state criminal justice policies. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
29.
LambertE. G.JiangS.JinW.TuckerK. A. (2009). A preliminary study of gender differences on views of crime and punishment among Chinese college students. International Criminal Justice Review, 17, 108–124.
30.
LandauS. F. (2003a). Societal costs of political violence. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture, 10, 28–35.
31.
LandauS. F. (2003b). Violence in Israeli society: Its relation to social stress. In MeddingP. Y. (Ed.), Studies in Contemporary Jewry, vol. 19, Jews and Violence: Images, Ideologies, Realities (pp. 126–148). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
LandauS.Beit-HallahmiB. (1982). Aggression in Israel: A psycho-historical perspective. In GoldsteinA. P.SegallM. (Eds.), Aggression in global perspective (pp. 329–365). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
33.
LandauS. F.PfeffermannD. (1988). A time-series analysis of violent crime and its relation to prolonged status of warfare: The Israeli case. Criminology, 26, 489–504.
34.
LangworthR. H.WhiteheadJ. T. (1986). Liberalism and fear as explanations of punitiveness. Criminology, 24, 575–591.
35.
MarunaS.KingA. (2009). Once a criminal, always a criminal?: ‘Redeemability’and the psychology of punitive public attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15, 7–24.
36.
MarunaS.MatraversA.KingA. (2004). Disowning our shadow: A psychoanalytic approach to understanding punitive public attitudes. Deviant Behavior, 25, 277–299.
37.
MarkidesK. C.CohnS. F. (1982). External conflict or internal cohesion: A revelation of an old theory. American Sociological Review, 47, 88–98.
38.
McBrideJ. (1995). Capital punishment as the unconstitutional establishment of religion: A guardian reading of the death penalty. Journal of Church and State, 37, 263–287.
39.
McCorkleR. (1993). Punish and rehabilitation: Public attitudes towards six common crimes. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 40–252.
MillerW. B. (1973). Ideology and criminal justice policy: Some current issues. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 141–162.
42.
MullinsC. W.YoungJ. K. (2012). Cultures of violence and act of terror: Appling a legitimation-habituation model to terrorism. Crime and Delinquency, 58, 28–56.
43.
Obergfell-FuchsJ. (2008). Punitivity within the criminal justice system in Germany. In KuryH. (Ed.), Fear of crime – Punitivity. New developments in theory and research (pp. 303 – 320). Bochum, Germany: Brockmeyer.
44.
PayneB. K.GaineyR. R.TriplettR. A.DannerM. J. E. (2004). What drives punitive beliefs? Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 195–206.
45.
PettitB.WesternB. (2004). Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in US incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69, 151–169.
46.
PrattJ.BrownD.BrowmM.HallsworthS.MorrisonW. (2005). The new punitiveness: Trends, theories, perspectives. Portland, OR: William Publishing.
47.
RoccatoM.VienoA.RussoS. (2013). Criminal victimization fosters conservatism among people living in areas with high unemployment rates: A multilevel longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 585–592.
48.
RobertsJ. V. (1992). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Crime and Punishment, 16, 99–163.
49.
RosenblumK.TravisT. M. C. (2008). The meaning of difference: American constructions of race,sex and gender, social class, sexual orientation, and disability. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
50.
ShohamA. (1988). Violent delinquency among minors after the Yom Kippur War. Crime and Social Deviance, 17, 273–288.
51.
SobelZ.Beit-HallahmiB. (1991). Tradition, innovation, conflict: Jewishness and Judaism in Cotemporary Israel. New York, NY: University of New York.
52.
SprottJ. B.DoobA. N. (1997). Fear, victimization, and attitudes to sentencing, the courts and the police. The Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39, 275–291.
53.
SprottJ. (1999). Are members of the public tough on crime? Dimensions of public punitiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 467–474.
54.
SteinA. A. (1976). Conflict and cohesion: A review of the literature. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20, 143–172.
55.
StinchcombeA. L.AdamsR.HeimerC. A.ScheppeleK. L. (1980). Crime and punishment—Changing attitudes in America. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
56.
SundtJ. L.CullenF. T.ApplegateB. K.TurnerM. G. (1998). The tenacity of the rehabilitative label revisited: Have attitudes towards offender treatment changed?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 426–442.
57.
TaylerT. R.BoeckmannR. J.SmithH. J.Huo-YvenJ. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: West view Press.
58.
TaylorD. G.ScheppeleK. L.StinchocombeA. L. (1979). Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions. Social Problems, 26, 413–424.
59.
TompsonW. R.RadkinD. P. (1981). Collaboration, consensus and Détente. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 615–637.
60.
TurnerM. G.CullenF. T.SundtJ. L.ApplegateB. K. (1997). Public tolerance for community-based sanctions. The Prison Journal, 77, 6–26.
61.
UnneverJ. D.BensonM. L.CullenF. T. (2008). Public support for getting tough on corporate crime: Racial and political divides. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 163–190.
62.
UlmerJ. T.BaderC.GaultM. (2008). Do moral communities play a role in criminal sentencing? Evidence from Pennsylvania. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 737–768.
63.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T.ApplegateB. K. (2005). Turning the other cheek: Reassessing the impact of religion on punitive ideology. Justice Quarterly, 22, 304–335.
64.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T.BartkowskiJ. P. (2006). Images of God and public support for capital punishment: Dose a close relationship with a loving god matters?Criminology, 44, 835–866.
65.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T.FisherB. S. (2007). A liberal is someone who has not been mugged: Criminal victimization and political beliefs. Justice Quarterly, 24, 309–334.
66.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2007). Reassessing the racial divide in support for capital punishment: The continuing significance of race. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 124–158.
67.
WannerR. A.CaputoT. C. (1987). Fear of crime, and perceptions of violence. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 12, 331–344.
68.
WolffN.BjerlieJ. R.MachiT. (2005). Reentry planning for mentally disordered inmates: A social investment perspective. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42, 21–42.
69.
WoodJ. L.VikiG. T. (2001). Public attitudes to crime and punishment: A review of the research. Funded/commissioned by: Esmee Fairbairn Charitable Trust, UK. Esmee Fairbairn Charitable Trust.
70.
YatesJ.FordingR. (2005). Politics and state punitiveness in black and white. The Journal of Politics, 67, 1099–1121.
71.
ZimringF. E.HawkinsG.KaminS. (2001). Punishment and democracy: Three strikes and you're out. Oxford, England: Oxford University press.
