Previous research on sexual violence has focused on individual-level behaviors that typically include a single victim in an isolated event. Criminologists have failed to examine sexual violence as a group-level phenomenon, which is often exhibited during war. For this study, case study methodology was used to analyze court transcripts from the United Nations, detailing the conflict of Sierra Leone. By utilizing the framing perspective, the purpose of this study was to determine the nature of sexual violence during war, focusing specifically on whether the evolution of sex offending motivations changes overtime. A better understanding of how sex offending becomes a group behavior will expand the current literature on collective and sexual violence, identify preconflict indicators of collective sexual violence, and provide strategies for postconflict mediations in warring countries.
AbdullahI. (1998). Bush path to destruction: The origin and character of the Revolutionary United Front/Sierra Leone. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 36, 203–235.
2.
AlisonM. (2007). Wartime sexual violence: Women’s human rights and questions of masculinity. Review of International Studies, 33, 75–90.
3.
BaazM. E.SternM. (2009). Why do soldiers rape? Masculinity, violence, and sexuality in the armed forces in the Congo (DRC). International Studies Quarterly, 53, 495–518.
4.
BahrH. M. (1982). The Perrigo paper: A local influence upon Middletown in transition. Indiana Magazine of History, 72, 1–25.
5.
BahrH. M.BrackenA. E. (1983). The Middletown of Yore: Population, persistence, migration, and stratification. Rural Sociology, 48, 120–132.
6.
BahrH. M.CaplowT.LeighG. K. (1980). The slowing of modernization in Middletown. In KriesbergL. (Ed.), Research in social movements, conflicts, and change (Vol. 3, pp. 219–232). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
BastickM.GrimmK.KunzR. (2007). Sexual violence in armed conflict: Global overview and implications for the security sector. Geneva, Switzerland: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.
9.
BelknapJ. GrahamD. (2000). Factors related to domestic violence court dispositions in a large urban area: The role of victim/witness reluctance and other variables—Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
10.
Bell-FialkoffA. (1993). A brief history of ethnic cleansing. Foreign Affairs, 72, 110–121.
11.
BellowsJ.MiguelE. (2006). War and institutions: New evidence from Sierra Leone. The American Economic Review, 96, 394–399.
12.
BenardC. (1994). Rape as terror: A case of Bosnia. Terrorism and Political Violence, 6, 24–43.
13.
BenfordR. D. (1993). Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces, 71, 677–701.
14.
BenfordR. D.SnowD. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
15.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York, NY: Fawcett Books.
17.
BrownmillerS. (1994). Making female bodies the battlefield. In StiglmayerA. (Ed.), Mass rape: The war against women in Bosnia-Herzegovina (pp. 180–182). Lincoln, England: University of Nebraska.
18.
BuechlerS. (2004). The strange career of strain and breakdown theories of collective action. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 47–66). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
19.
CastellsM. (1977). The urban question. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
ClinardM. B. (1952). The Black market: A study of White Collar crime. New York, NY: Holt.
21.
CohenD. K. (2010). Explaining sexual violence during civil war (PhD dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
22.
CohenD. K. (2013). Explaining rape during civil war: Cross-national evidence (1980-2009). American Political Science Review, 107, 461–477.
23.
CopelanR. (1994). Surfacing gender: Reconceptualizing crimes against women in time of war. In StiglmayerA. (Ed.), Mass rape: The war against women in Bosnia-Herzegovina (pp. 197–218). Lincoln, England: University of Lincoln.
24.
CresseyD. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. New York, NY: Free Press.
25.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
DaltonR. J.KuechlerM. (1990). Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in western democracies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
DaviesE.SeymourF. W. (1998). Questioning child complainants of sexual abuse: Analysis of criminal court transcripts in New Zealand. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 5, 47–61.
28.
DianiM. (1996). Linking mobilization frames and political opportunities: Insights from regional populism in Italy. American Sociological Review, 61, 1053–1069.
29.
EderK. (1985). The new social movements: Moral crusades, political pressures groups, or social movements?Social Research, 52, 869–890.
30.
EntmanR. M. (1991). Framing United-States coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41, 6–27.
31.
FarrK. (2009). Extreme war rape in today’s civil-war-torn states: A contextual and comparative analysis. Gender Issues, 26, 1–41.
32.
FerreeM. M. (2003). Resonance and radicalism: Feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 304–344.
33.
FerreeM. M.MillerF. D. (1985). Mobilization and meaning: Toward an integration of social psychological and resource mobilization perspectives on social movements. Sociological Inquiry, 55, 8–51.
34.
ForsythC. J.LuthraA. D.BankstonW. B. (2007). Framing perceptions of oil development and social disruption. The Social Science Journal, 44, 287–299.
35.
GamsonW. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In MorrisA. D.MuellerC. M. (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53–76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
GerhardsJ.RuchtD. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 555–595.
37.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
HaganJ.Rymond-RichmondW. (2009). Darfur and the crime of genocide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HainesH. H. (1996). Against capital punishment: The anti-death penalty movement in America, 1972-1994. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
HanlonJ. (2005). Is the international community helping to recreate the pre-conditions for war in Sierra Leone. Milton Keynes, England: The World Institute for Development Economics Research.
41.
HartungF. E. (1950). White-collar offenses in the wholesale meat industry. American Sociological Review, 56, 25–34.
42.
HoffmanD. (2004). The civilian target in Sierra Leone and Liberia: Political power, military strategy, and humanitarian intervention. African Affairs, 103, 211–226.
43.
HorneyJ.SpohnC. (1996). The influence of blame and believability factors on the processing of simple versus aggravated rape cases. Criminology, 34, 135–162.
44.
Human Rights Watch. (1999). Getting away with murder, mutilation, and rape: New report from the field. Vol. 11(3A). New York, NY: Author.
45.
Human Rights Watch. (2003). We’ll kill you if you cry: Sexual violence in the Sierra Leone Conflict. Vol 15 (1A). New York, NY: Author.
46.
IyengarS. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47.
JohnsonV. (1997). Operation rescue, vocabularies of motive, and tactical action: A study of movement framing in the practice of quasi-nonviolence. Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change, 20, 103–150.
48.
JohnstonH. (2002). Verification and proof in frame and discourse analysis. In KlandermansB.StaggenborgS. (Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 62–91). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
49.
JohnstonH.KlandermansB. (1995). Social movements and culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
50.
JohnstonH.NoakesJ. (2005). Frames of protest: Social movements and the framing perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
51.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
52.
KresselN. J. (2002). Mass hate: The global rise of genocide and terror. New York, NY: Westview Press.
53.
LakoffG. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
54.
LeibyM. L. (2009). Wartime sexual violence in Guatemala and Peru. International Studies Quarterly, 53, 445–468.
55.
MacKinnonC. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
MalamuthN. (1996). The confluence model of sexual aggression: Feminist and evolutionary perspectives. In BussD.MalamuthN. (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 269–295). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
57.
McCabeM. P.WauchopeM. (2005). Behavioural characteristics of rapists. Journal of Sexual Aggression: An International, Interdisciplinary Forum for Research, Theory and Practice, 11, 235–247.
58.
McCarthyJ. D. (1994). Activists, authorities, and media framing of drunk driving. In LaranaE.JohnstonH.GusfieldJ. (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity (pp. 133–167). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
59.
MelucciA. (1985). The symbolic challenge of contemporary movements. Social Research, 52, 789–815.
60.
MeyerD. S. (1995). Framing national security: Elite public discourse on nuclear weapons during the cold war. Sociological Forum, 14, 79–92.
61.
MezeyG. (1994). Rape in war. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 5, 583–597.
62.
MillsC. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904–913.
63.
MirchandaniR. (2005). What’s so special about specialized courts? The state and social change in Salt lake city’s domestic violence court. Law & Society Review, 39, 379–418.
64.
MullinsC. W. (2009). “He would kill me with his penis”: Genocidal rape in Rwanda as a state crime. Critical Criminology, 17, 15–33.
65.
NepstadS. E. (1997). The process of cognitive liberation: Cultural synapses, links, and frame contradictions in the United States—Central America peace movement. Sociological Inquiry, 67, 470–487.
66.
NasrV. (2006). The Shia Revival: How conflicts within Islam will shape the future. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
67.
OffeC. (1985). New social movements: Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, 52, 817–868.
68.
PedrianaN. (2006). From protective to equal treatment: Legal framing processes and transformation of the women’s movement in the 1960s. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1718–1761.
69.
PowerS. (2002). A problem from hell: America and the age of genocide. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishing.
70.
ReisC.AmowitzL. L.Hare LyonsK.LacopinoV. (2002). War-related sexual violence in Sierra Leone. Boston, MA: Physicians for Human Rights.
71.
RichardsP. (2005). West-African warscapes: War as smoke and mirrors: Sierra Leone 1991-2, 1994-5, 1995-6. Anthropological Quarterly, 78, 377–402.
72.
RonJ. (2000). Savage restraint: Israel, Palestine and the dialectics of legal repression. Social Problems, 47, 445–472.
73.
RuvaC. L.BryantJ. B. (2004). The impact of age, speech style, and question form on perceptions of witness credibility and trial outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1919–1944.
74.
SalzmanT. A. (1998). Rape camps as a means of ethnic cleansing: Religious, cultural, and ethical responses to rape victims in the former Yugoslavia. Human Rights Quarterly, 20, 348–378.
75.
SandayP. R. (2007). Fraternity gang rape (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.
76.
SanínF. (2008). Telling the difference: Guerrillas and paramilitaries in the Colombian war. Politics and Society, 36, 3–34.
77.
SeifertR. (1994). War and rape: A preliminary analysis. In StiglmayerA. (Ed.), Mass rape: The war against women in Bosnia-Herzegovina (pp. 54–72). Lincoln, England: University of Nebraska.
78.
ShawC. R. (1930). The jack-roller: A delinquent boy’s own story. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
SjobergG.WilliamsN.VaughanT. R.SjobergA. F. (1991). The case study approach in social research: Basic methodology issues. In FeaginJ. R.OrumA. M.SjobergG. (Eds.), A case for the case study (pp. 27–79). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina.
SnowD. A.AndersonL. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal communication and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1336–1371.
82.
SnowD. A.AndersonL. (1991). Researching the homeless: The characteristic features and virtues of the case study. In FeaginJ. R.OrumA. M.SjobergG. (Eds.), A case for the case study (pp. 148–173). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina.
83.
SnowD. A.BenfordR. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–218.
84.
SnowD. A.BenfordR. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In MorrisA. D.MuellerC. M. (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
85.
SnowD. A.ByrdS. C. (2000). Ideology, framing processes, and Islamic terrorist movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly Review, 12, 119–136.
86.
SnowD. A.RochfordE. B.WordenS. K.BenfordR. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.
87.
SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (2004). Mapping the terrain. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 3–16). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
88.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
89.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
90.
StiglmayerA. (1994). The war in the former Yugoslavia. In StiglmayerA. (Ed.), Mass rape: The war against women in Bosnia-Herzegovina (pp. 1–34). Lincoln, England: University of Nebraska Press.
91.
SutherlandE. H. (1949). White collar crime. New York, NY: Dryden.
92.
TarrowS. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
93.
ThomasD. Q.RalphR. E. (1994). Rape in war: Challenging the tradition of impunity. SAIS Review, 14, 81–99.
94.
ThrasherF. (1927). The gang: A study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
95.
TillyC. (2003). The politics of collective violence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
96.
ToshJ. (2004). Hegemonic masculinity and the history of gender. In DudinkS.HagemannK.ToshJ. (Eds.), Masculinities in politics and war: Gendering modern history (pp. 41–58). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
97.
TurnerR.KillianL. M. (1972). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
98.
WeedF. J. (1997). The framing of political advocacy and service responses in the crime victim rights movement. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 24, 43–61.
99.
WhyteW. F. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
100.
WilliamsR. H.BenfordR. D. (2000). Two faces of collective frames: A theoretical consideration. Current Perspective in Social Theory, 20, 127–151.
101.
WoodE. (2013). Multiple perpetrator rape during war. In HorvathM. A. H.WoodhamsJ. (Eds.), The handbook on the study of multiple perpetrator rape: A multidisciplinary response to an international problem (pp. 132–159). New York, NY: Routledge.
102.
WoodE. J. (2006). Variation in sexual violence during war. Politics Society, 34, 307–341.
103.
WoodE. J. (2008). The social processes of civil war: The wartime transformation of social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 539–561.
104.
WoodE. J. (2009). Armed groups and sexual violence: When is wartime rape rare?Politics Society, 37, 131–161.
105.
WoodE. J. (2010). Sexual violence during war: Variation and accountability. In SmeulersA. (Ed.), Collective crimes and international criminal justice: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 295–322). Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.
106.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
107.
Zack-WilliamsA. B. (1999). Sierra Leone: The political economy of civil war, 1991-98. Third World Quarterly, 20, 143–162.
108.
ZajacR.GrossJ.HayneH. (2003). Asked and answered: Questioning children in the courtroom. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law10, 199–209.
109.
ZurcherL. A.SnowD. A. (1981). Collective behavior: Social movements. In RosenbergM.TurnerR. H. (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 447–482). New York, NY: Basic Books.
