Typically, the development of gang typologies have used either behaviorally based or structurally based characteristics to develop a classification system of gangs. The current study aims to assess the results of typologies approached from both angles, drawing from the same data source. It also examines whether using a combination of both approaches would prove to be useful. A separate but related aim of this study is to examine the boundaries between self-identified group members and gang members, especially on structural and behavioral characteristics. A hierarchical cluster analysis approach is used to group participants on both behavioral and structural measures using a sample of self-identified gang members (n = 44) and delinquent group members (n = 171). A number of important findings emerged from this analysis. First, the “types” of gangs and groups found were not differentiated based on membership status. Second, patterns found strongly depended on the chosen approach (behavioral or structural), but neither proved to be clearly superior. Instead, the choice between the two depend on the interest of the researcher. Finally, using a mixed approach appears to produce the most accurate picture and it does help differentiate between gang and group members more clearly. Yet, a much more complex picture of gangs and groups emerge, which suggests that a purely behavioral or structural classification may sometimes lead to oversimplification and misdirected policy interventions.
AldenderferM. S.BlashfieldR. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
AnglinM. D.SpeckartG. (1988). Narcotic use and crime: A multisample, multimethod analysis. Criminology, 26, 197–233.
3.
BallR. A.CurryG. D. (1995). The logic of definition in criminology: Purposes and methods for defining “gangs”. Criminology, 33, 225–245.
4.
BattinS. R.HillK. G.AbbottR. D.CatalanoR. F.HawkinsJ. D. (1998). The contribution of gang membership to delinquency beyond delinquent friends. Criminology, 36, 93–115.
5.
BjerregaardB. (2002). Self-definitions of gang membership and involvement in delinquent activities. Youth & Society, 34, 31–54.
6.
BouchardM.AlainM.NguyenH. (2009). Convenient labour: The prevalence and nature of youth involvement in the cannabis cultivation industry. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20(6), 467–474.
7.
BouchardM.SpindlerA. (2010). Gangs, groups, and delinquency: Does organization matter?. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 921–933.
8.
BursikR. J.GrasmickH. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
9.
ClowardR. A.OhlinL. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. New York, NY: Free Press.
10.
CohenA. K.ShortJ. F.Jr (1958). Research in delinquent subcultures. Journal of Social Issues, 14, 20–37.
11.
CurryG. D.DeckerS. H. (2003). Confronting gangs: Crime and community (2nd ed.).
Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
12.
CurryG. D.DeckerS. H.EgleyA. (2002). Gang involvement and delinquency in a middle school population. Justice Quarterly, 19, 275–292.
13.
DawkinsM. P. (1997). Drug use and violent crime among adolescents. Adolescence, 32, 395–405.
14.
DeckerS. H. (1996). Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 13, 243–264.
15.
DeckerS. H. (2001). The impact of organizational features on gang activities and relationships. In KleinM. W.KernerH.MaxsonC.WeitekampE. G. M. (Eds.), The Eurogang paradox: Street gangs and youth groups in the U.S. and Europe (pp. 21–39). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
16.
DeckerS. H.BynumT.WeiselD. (1998). A tale of two cities: Gangs as organized crime groups. Justice Quarterly, 15, 395–425.
17.
DeckerS. H.CurryG. D. (2000). Addressing key features of gang membership: Measuring the involvement of young offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 473–482.
18.
DeckerS. H.KatzC. M.WebbV. J. (2008). Understanding the black box of gang organization: Implications for involvement in violent crime, drug sales, and violent victimization. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 153–172.
19.
DeckerS. H.Van WinkleB. (1994). Slinging dope: The role of gangs and gang members in drug sales. Justice Quarterly, 11, 583–604.
20.
DeckerS. H.Van WinkleB. (1996). Life in the gang: Family, friends, and violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DescormiersK.MorselliC. (in press). Alliances, conflicts, and contradictions in Montreal’s street gang landscape. International Criminal Justice Review,
22.
DukesR. L.SteinJ. A. (2003). Gender and gang membership. Youth & Society, 34, 415–440.
23.
EsbensenF.HuizingaD. (1993). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology, 31, 565–589.
24.
EsbensenF.WinfreeL. T.Jr (1998). Race and gender differences between gang and nongang youths: Results from a multisite survey. Justice Quarterly, 15, 505–526.
25.
EsbensenF.WinfreeL. T.JrHeN.TaylorT. J. (2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter?. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 105–130.
26.
FaganJ. (1989). The social organization of drug use and drug dealing among urban gangs. Criminology, 27, 633–667.
27.
FleisherM. S. (1998). Inside the Fremont hustlers. In EgleyA.Jr.MaxsonC. L.MillerJ.KleinM. W. (Eds.), The modern gang reader (3rd ed., pp. 130–138). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
28.
GermainM.GuyonL.LandryM.TremblayJ.BrunelleN.BergeronJ. (2005). DEP-ADO Grille de dépistage de consummation problématique d’alcool et de drogues chez les adolescents et les adolescents (Version 3.1) (Recherche et intervention sur les substances psychoactives). Québec, Canada: RISQ.
29.
GoldsteinP. J. (1985). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 143–174.
30.
GordonR. M. (2000). Criminal business organizations, street gangs and wanna-be groups: A Vancouver perspective. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 39–60.
31.
HagedornJ. M. (1988). People and folks: Gangs, crime, and the underclass in a rustbelt city. Chicago, IL: Lake View.
32.
HagedornJ. M. (1994). Neighborhoods, markets, and gang drug organization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 264–294.
33.
HaynieD. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013–1057.
34.
HillK. G.HowellJ. C.HawkinsJ. D.Battin PearsonS. R. (1999). Childhood risk factors for adolescent gang membership: Results from the Seattle Social Development Project. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 300–322.
35.
JankowskiM. (1991). Islands in the street: Gangs and American urban society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
JessnessC. F. (1988). The Jessness inventory classification system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 78–91.
37.
Journal de Montreal. (2004). La mecque des producteurs de pot en milieu agricole. Journal de Montreal, September 17, 2004,
38.
KleinM. W. (1971). Street gangs and street workers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
KleinM. W. (1995). The American street gang: Its nature, prevalence, and control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
KleinM. W. (1996). Gangs in the United States and Europe. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 4, 63–80.
41.
KleinM. W. (2002). Street gangs: A cross national perspective. In Ronald HuffC. (Ed.), Gangs in America III (pp. 237–254). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
KleinM. W.KernerH.-J.MaxsonC.WeitekampE. G. M. (2001). The Eurogang paradox: Street gangs and youth groups in the US and Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
43.
KleinM. W.MaxsonC. L. (1989). Street gang violence. In WeinerN. A.WolfgangM. E. (Eds.), Violent crime, violent criminals (pp. 198–234). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
44.
KleinM. W.MaxsonC. L. (2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
LeblancM. (1996). MASPAQ, mesures de l’adaptation sociale et personnelle pour les adolescents québécois: manuel et guide d’utilisation (3rd ed.).
Montréal, Canada: Ecole de psychoéducation, Groupe de recherche sur les adolescents en difficulté, Université de Montréal.
46.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
47.
MaxsonC. L.KleinM. W. (1995). Investigating gang structures. Journal of Gang Research, 3, 33–40.
48.
McGloinJ. M.ShermerL. O. (2009). Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 35–72.
49.
MooreJ. W. (1991). Going down to the barrio: Homeboys and homegirls in change. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
50.
MorashM. (1983). Gangs, groups, and delinquency. The British Journal of Criminology, 23, 309–335.
51.
NaginD. S.TremblayR. E. (2005). Developmental trajectory groups: Fact or useful statistical fiction?. Criminology, 43, 873–904.
52.
New York City Youth Board. (1960). Reaching the fighting gang. New York: Author.
53.
PetersonD.MillerJ.EsbensenF. (2001). The impact of sex composition on gangs and gang member delinquency. Criminology, 39, 411–440.
54.
RomesburgH. C. (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning.
55.
SheleyJ. F.ZhangJ.BrodyC. J.WrightJ. D. (1995). Gang organization, gang criminal activity, and individual gang members' criminal behavior. Social Science Quarterly, 76, 53–68.
56.
SherifM.SherifC. W. (1964). Reference groups. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
57.
ShortJ. F.JrStrodtbeckF. L. (1965). Group process and gang delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
58.
TaylorC. (1990). Dangerous society. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
59.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring crime and delinquency. Criminal Justice, 4, 33–83.
60.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.Chard-WierschmeD. (1993). The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 55–87.
61.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.SmithC. A.TobinK. (2003). Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
ThrasherF. M. (1963). The gang: A study of 1313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63.
VigilJ. D. (1988). Barrio gangs: Street life and identity in southern California. Austin: University of Texas Press.
64.
WeiselD. L. (2002). The evolution of street gangs: An examination of form and variation. In ReedW. L.DeckerS. H. (Eds.), Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research (pp. 25–65). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
65.
WinfreeL. T.JrFullerK.VigilT.MaysG. L. (1992). The definition and measurement of “gang status”: Policy implications for juvenile justice. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 43, 29–37.
66.
WortleyS.TannerJ. (2004). Social groups or criminal organizations? The extent and nature of youth gang activity in Toronto. In KiddB.PhillipsJ. (Eds.), From enforcement and prevention to civic engagement: Research on community safety (pp. 59–80). Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.
67.
YablonskyL. (1962). The violent gang. New York, NY: Macmillan.
