Many analysts would agree that terrorism is an ever-changing phenomenon. However, like all forms of human behavior, there are certain sociological and psychological elements of terrorism that remain constant. One such element is that of identity, which can serve to both inform and influence terrorist behavior through individuals' perceptions of themselves and their environment. This article relies on symbolic interactionism and five of its organizing concepts—symbols and objects, acts and social acts, meaning, role-taking and role-making, and the emergence of the self—to create an interpretative model for understanding terrorist behavior through identity theory. The conceptual framework is then used to examine the creation and maintenance of identities within three terrorist groups: the Provisional Irish Republican Army, the Hamas, and the Tupamaros. Although these groups do not account for all of the terrorist attacks in the world, they do represent three diverse forms of terrorism (i.e., national, religious, and revolutionary) from three distinct regions of the globe (the West, the Middle East, and Latin America). Therefore, understanding their behavior through the identity prism can help to shed light on other terrorist groups—those that currently exist and those that have yet to emerge. Implications are proposed for the areas of law enforcement, public policy, research, and the model's general utility in assessing other forms of human behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Social identity and social cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2.
Anderson, J. (2003, June 28). Hamas at historic crossroads; pressure rises to back truce, end bombings. Washington Post, p. A16.
3.
Anderson, J., & Moore, M. (2003, August 22). Israeli strike kills Hamas political figure; attack in Gaza follows bus bombing; Palestinian militant groups call off truce. Washington Post, p. A01.
4.
Arena, M. P., & Arrigo, B. A. (2000). White supremacist behavior: Toward an integrated social psychological model. Deviant Behavior, 21, 213–244.
5.
Baldwin, J. D. (1986). George Herbert Mead: A unifying theory for sociology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Barkan, S. E., & Snowden, L. L. (2000). Collective violence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Bell, J. B. (1997). The secret army: The IRA (3rd ed.). London: Transaction.
8.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
9.
Berman, P. (2003). Terrorism and liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
10.
Best, J. (Ed.). (1989). Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
11.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
12.
Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29.
13.
Burton, A. (1976). Urban terrorism. New York: Free Press.
14.
Butler, R. E. (1976). Terrorism in Latin America. In Y. Alexander (Ed.), International terrorism (pp. 53–59). New York: Praeger.
15.
Coogan, T. P. (1994). The IRA: A history. Niwot, CO: Roberts Rinehart.
16.
Cooley, C. H. (1996). The social self. In H. N. Pontell (Ed.), Social deviance: Readings in theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 62–68). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Original work published 1902)
17.
Costigan, G. (1980). A history of modern Ireland. Indianapolis: Bobbs–Merrill.
18.
Derfner, L., & Toameh, K. A. (2000, September 18). Just saying no to terror. U.S. News and World Report, pp. 50–51.
19.
Dershowitz, A. M. (2002). Why terrorism works: Understanding the threat, responding to the challenge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Dobbs, M. (2003, August 21). Palestinians urged to break up terrorist groups; moving to shield peace after bombing, U.S. toughens rhetoric in pressing Abbas to act. Washington Post, p. A14.
21.
Dobratz, B. A., & Shanks-Meile, S. L. (1997). White power, white pride! The white separatist movement in the United States. New York: Twayne.
22.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (Eds.). (1999). Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
Emerson, S. (1998). Terrorism in America: The threat of militant Islamic fundamentalism. In H. Kushner (Ed.), The future of terrorism: Violence in the new millennium (pp. 33–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Emerson, S. (2002). American jihad: The terrorists living among us. New York: Free Press.
25.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers by Erik H. Erikson. New York: International Universities Press.
26.
Flemming, P., & Stohl, M. (1988). The theoretical utility of typologies of terrorism: Lessons and opportunities. In M. Stohl (Ed.), The politics of terrorism (pp. 157–170). New York: Marcel Dekker.
27.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
28.
Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Gibson, J. W. (1994). Warrior dreams: Paramilitary culture in post-Vietnam America. New York: Hill and Wang.
30.
Gilio, M. E. (1972). The Tupamaros. London: Seeker & Warburg.
31.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
32.
Goode, E. (1996). On behalf of labeling theory. In H. N. Pontell (Ed.), Social deviance: Readings in the theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 86–96). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
Guevara, E. (1968). Reminiscences of the Cuban Revolutionary War. New York: Monthly Review Press.
34.
Hagan, F. E. (1997). Political crime: Ideology and criminality. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
35.
Hamm, M. S. (1993). American skinheads: The criminology and control of hate crime. Westport, CT: Praeger.
36.
Hewitt, J. P. (1976). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
37.
Hilbert, R. A. (1990). Ethnomethodology and the micro–macro order. American Sociological Review, 55, 794–808.
38.
Hoffman, B. (1998). Inside terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
Horgan, J., & Taylor, M. (1997). The Provisional Irish Republican Army: Command and functional structure. Terrorism and Political Violence, 9(3), 1–32.
40.
Hroub, K. (2000). Hamas: Political thought and practice. Washington, DC: Institute for Palestine Studies.
41.
Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. New York: Routledge.
42.
Johnson, A. G. (1995). The Blackwell dictionary of sociology: A user's guide to sociological language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
43.
Johnson, P. W., & Feldmann, T. B. (1992). Personality types and terrorism: Self-psychology perspectives. Forensic Reports, 5(4), 293–303.
44.
Katzman, K. (2002). Terrorism: Near Eastern groups and state sponsors, 2002. CRS Report for Congress. Retrieved May 29, 2004, from http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL31119.pdf.
45.
Kelly, R. J. (1998). Terrorism in America: The threat of militant Islamic fundamentalism. In H. Kushner (Ed.), The future of terrorism: Violence in the new millennium (pp. 33–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Kepel, G. (2002). Jihad: The trail of political Islam (A. Roberts, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Khalidi, R. (1997). Palestinian identity: The construction of modern national consciousness. New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
Khalidi, R. (2003, June 17). Can Hamas cut a deal for peace? Los Angeles Times, p. 15.
49.
Kushner, H. W. (Ed.). (1998a). The future of terrorism: Violence in the new millennium. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Kushner, H. W. (1998b). Terrorism in America: A structured approach to understanding the terrorist threat. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
51.
Laqueur, W. (1999). The new terrorism: Fanaticism and the arms of mass destruction. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
Laqueur, W. (2003). No end to war: Terrorism in the twenty-first century. New York: Continuum Publishing Group.
53.
Lauer, R., & Boardman, L. (1971). Role-taking: Theory, typology, and propositions. Sociology and Social Research, 55(2), 137–153.
54.
Lauer, R. H., & Handel, W. H. (1983). Social psychology: The theory and application of symbolic interactionism (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
55.
Lemert, E. M. (1994). Primary and secondary deviation. In J. E. Jacoby (Ed.), Classics of criminology (2nd ed.) (pp. 287–293). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
56.
Lifton, R. J. (1976). The life of the self. New York: Simon and Schuster.
57.
Lifton, R. J. (1979). The broken connection. New York: Simon and Schuster.
58.
Livingston, E. (1987). Making sense of ethnomethodology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
59.
Marighella, C. (1985). Manual of the urban guerrilla. Chapel Hill, NC: Documentary Publications.
60.
Mario, F. H. (1999). WMD terrorism and U.S. intelligence collection. Terrorism and Political Violence, 11(3), 53–71.
61.
Martin, G. (2003). Understanding terrorism: Challenges, perspectives, and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
McGuire, M. (1973). To take arms: My year with the IRA Provisionals. New York: Viking Press.
63.
Meltzer, B. (1978). Mead's social psychology. In J. G. Manis & B. N. Meltzer (Eds.), Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 15–27). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
64.
Mish, F. C. (Ed.). (1997). The Merriam–Webster dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam–Webster.
65.
Mishal, S., & Sela, A. (2000). The Palestinian Hamas: Vision, violence, and coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.
66.
Morris, C. W. (Ed.). (1967). Mind, self, & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
Nüsse, A. (1998). Muslim Palestine: The ideology of Hamas. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
68.
O'Ballance, E. (1997). Islamic fundamentalist terrorism, 1979–95: The Iranian connection. New York: New York University Press.
69.
Pearlstein, R. M. (1991). The mind of the political terrorist. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
70.
Pinto, M. D. C. (1999). Some U.S. concerns regarding Islamist and Middle Eastern terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 11(3), 72–96.
71.
Pontell, H. (1996). Social deviance: Readings in theory and research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
72.
Porzecanski, A. C. (1973). Uruguay's Tupamaros. New York: Praeger.
73.
Post, J. M. (1998). Terrorist psycho-logic: Terrorist behavior as a product of psychological forces. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind (pp. 25–40). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
74.
Provisional Irish Republican Army. (2003). Wikipedia. Retrieved May 30, 2004, from www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_Irish_Republican_Army.
75.
Q&A: What the roadmap means. (2003, July 2). BBC news. Retrieved September 10, 2003, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2938444.stm.
76.
Reich, W. (Ed.). (1998). Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
77.
Rouhana, N. (1997). Palestinian citizens in an ethnic Jewish state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
78.
Schaefer, R. T. (2000). Sociology: A brief introduction. Boston: McGraw–Hill.
79.
Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
80.
Smith, B. L. (1994). Terrorism in America: Pipe bombs and pipe dreams. Albany: SUNY Press.
81.
Stone, G. P. (1962). Appearance and the self. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 86–118). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
82.
Stone, G. P., & Farberman, H. A. (Eds.). (1970). Social psychology through symbolic interaction. Waltham, MA: Ginn–Blaisdell.
83.
Stryker, S. (1977). Developments in ‘two social psychologies’: Toward an appreciation of mutual relevance. Sociometry, 40, 145–160.
84.
Taithe, B., & Thornton, T. (1999). Propaganda: Political rhetoric and identity, 1300–2000. Gloucestershire, UK: Sutton.
85.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
86.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
87.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed.) (pp. 7–24.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
88.
Taylor, M. (1991). The fanatics: A behavioural approach to political violence. London: Brassey's.
89.
Taylor, M., & Quayle, E. (1994). Terrorist lives. London: Brassey's.
90.
Taylor, P. (1997). Behind the mask: The IRA and Sinn Fein. New York: TV Books.
91.
Tucker, J. B. (Ed.). (2000). Toxic terror: Assessing terrorist use of chemical and biological weapons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92.
U.S. Department of State. (2003). Patterns of global terrorism. Retrieved May 29, 2004, from http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/pgtrpt/.
93.
Weigert, A. J., Teitge, J. S., & Teitge, D. W. (1986). Society and identity: Toward a sociological psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
94.
Weinstein, M. (1975). Uruguay: The politics of failure. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
95.
White, J. R. (1998). Terrorism: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
96.
White, R. W. (1993). Provisional Irish Republicans: An oral and interpretative history. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
97.
Whittaker, D. J. (Ed.). (2001). The terrorism reader. New York: Routledge.
98.
Wieviorka, M. (1993). The making of terrorism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
99.
Wilson, M. C. (1974). The Tupamaros. Boston: Branden Press.
100.
Worchel, S., Morales, F., Páez, D., & Deschamps, J. C. (Eds.). (1998). Social identity: International perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
101.
Wright, J. (1991). Terrorist propaganda: The Red Army Faction and the Provisional IRA, 1968–86. New York: St. Martin's Press.
102.
Wright, R. (2000). The last great revolution: Turmoil and transformation in Iran. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
