The Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences Code of Ethics and the American Society of Criminology Draft Code of Ethics raise the possibility of a conflict arising between research ethics and the law relating to evidentiary and testimonial privilege. However, they say nothing about the form that legal threats to research confidentiality may take in Canada and the United States, the two countries where these codes apply, nor do they describe the strategies that researcher can employ to protect confidential research information in court. The purpose ofthis article is to address these matters. It begins with a brief description ofthe role that confidentiality plays in protecting research participants and maintaining the validity and reliability of criminal justice research. It then describes the legal context in which the researchers' ethical obligations unfold and the strategies that researchers can employ to protect confidential research information when third parties use legal force to try to obtain it. The article argues that the ethical responsibilities of rea s studying criminal justice issues are bet fulfilled and their research participants best protected when researchers ue their understanding of law to design research so as to anticipate the evidentiary requirements of the courts. It concludes with a discussion of the respective advantages and disadvantages of statutory as compared to common law protections for research confidentiality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, L. (1983). Proposed legislation to improve statistical and research access to federal records. In R. F. Boruch & J. S. Cecil (Eds.), Solutions to ethical and legalproblems in social research (pp. 273-292). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. U.S., 85 Cust. Ct. 128 (1980).
3.
Bond, K. (1978). Confidentiality and the protection of human subjects in social science research: A report on recent developments. The American Sociologist, 13, 144-152.
4.
Brajuha, M., & Hallowell, L. (1986). Legal intrusion and the politics of field work: The impact of the Brajuha case. Urban Life, 14, 454-478.
5.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. (1998). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Supply and Services. Available: http://www.sshrc.ca/english/programinfo/policies/index.htm.
6.
Caroll, J., & Knerr, C. (1973). Confidentiality of social science research sources and data: The Popkin case. Political Science Quarterly, 6, 268-280.
7.
Caroll, J., & Knerr, C. (1975). A report of the APSA confidentiality in social science research data project. Political Science Quarterly, 8, 258-261.
8.
Cecil, J., & Wetherington, G. T. (Eds.). (1996). Court ordered disclosure of academic research: A clash of values of science and law [Special issue]. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59, 1-191.
9.
Clayman, B. (1997, October 30). The law of the land. Simon Fraser News, p. 5-5.
10.
Comarow, M. (1993, December 15). Are sociologists above the law?The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A44-A44.
11.
Cotchett, J. W., & Elkind, A. B. (1993). Federal courtroom evidence (3rd ed.). New York: Butterworth.
12.
Crabb, B. B. (1996). Judicially compelled disclosure of researchers' data: A judge's view. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59,9-34.
13.
Daisley, B. (1994, December 9). Clear evidence needed to invoke Wigmore rules. The Lawyer's Weekly, p. 28-28.
14.
Deitchman v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., 740 F.2d 556 (7th Cir. 1984).
15.
Dow Chemical Co. v. Allen, 672 F.2d 1262 (7th Cir. 1982).
16.
Fanning, J. (1999). Privacyand research: Publicpolicy issues. Unpublished manuscript, Office ofthe Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, United States Department of Health and Human Services.
17.
Fischer, P. M. (1996). Science and subpoenas: When do the courts become instruments of manipulation?Law and Contemporary Problems, 59, 159-168.
18.
Friedson, E. (1976). The legal protection of social research: Criteria for definition. In P. Nejelski (Ed.), Social research in conflict with law and ethics (pp. 123-137). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
19.
In re American Tobacco Co., 866 F.2d 552 (2nd Cir. 1989a).
20.
In re American Tobacco Co., 880 F.2d 1520 (2nd Cir. 1989b).
21.
In re Grand Jury Proceedings. James Richard Scarce, 5 F.3d 397 (9th Cir. 1993).
22.
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dtd. January 4, 750 F.2d 223 (2nd Cir. 1984).
23.
In re Michael A. Cusumano and David B. Yoffie [United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation], No. 98-2133, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (1998). Available: http:/Iwww.law.emory.edu/lcircuitldec98/98-2133.01aChtml.
24.
Inquest of Unknown Female, 91-240-0838, Burnaby, B.C. (1994).
25.
Iutcovich, J., Hoppe, S., Kennedy, J., & Levine, F. J. (1999). Confidentiality and the ASA Code of Ethics: A response from COPE. Footnotes, 27, 5-5.
26.
Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S.I (1996).
27.
Lempert, R. O., & Saltzburg, S. A. (1982). A modern approach to evidence: Text, problems, transcripts, and cases (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
28.
Leo, R. (1995). Trial and tribulations: Courts, ethnography, and the need foranevidentiary privilege foracademic researchers. American Sociologist, 26, 113-133.
29.
Levine, F., & Kennedy, J. M. (1999). Promoting a scholar's privilege: Accelerating the pace. Law and Social Inquiry, 24, 967-976.
30.
Lowman, J., & Palys, T. S. (1998a). The history of limited confidentiality at SFU. Submission prepared for the SFU Ethics Review Policy Revision Task Force. Available: http://www.sfu.ca/-palys/history.htm.
31.
Lowman, J., & Palys, T. S. (1998b, June). When research ethics and law conflict. CAUT Bulletin, pp. 6-7.
32.
Lowman, J., & Palys, T. S. (1999, February). Confidentiality and the 1997 ASA Code of Ethics: A query. Footnotes, p. 5-5.
33.
Lowman, J., & Palys, T. S. (2000). Ethics and institutional conflict of interest: The research confidentiality controversy at Simon Fraser University. Sociological Practice, 2, 245-264.
34.
Madden, T. J., & Lessin, H. S. (1983). Statutory approaches to ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of social science research information: The Law Enforcement Assistance Administration experience. In R. F. Boruch & J. S. Cecil (Eds.), Solutions to ethical and legalproblems in social research (pp. 263-272). New York: Academic Press.
35.
Marshall, M. (1992). When isasecretnotasecret? Available: http:/lwww.cookdukecox.com/newsletters/issue6-1992/secret.htm.
36.
McLaughlin, R. H. (1999). From the field to the courthouse: Should social science research be privileged?Law and Social Inquiry, 24, 927-966.
37.
Moynihan, D. (1999). Thomas Jefferson Researcher's Privilege Act of 1999. Available: http://www.senate.gov/member/ny/moynihan/general/072699b.htm.
38.
Nejelski, P., & Finsterbusch, K. (1973). The prosecutor and the researcher: Present and prospective variations on the Supreme Court's Branzburg decision. Social Problems, 21, 3-21.
39.
Nejelski, P., & Peyser, H. (1976). A proposed researcher's shield statute: Text and summary of commentary. In P. Nejelski (Ed.), Social research in conflict with law and ethics (pp. 163-187). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
40.
Nelson, R. I., & Hedrick, T. E. (1983). The statutory protection of confidential research data: Synthesis and evaluation. In R. F. Boruch & J. S. Cecil (Eds.), Solutions to ethical and legalproblems in social research (pp. 213-238). New York: Academic Press.
41.
O'Neil, R. M. (1996). A researcher's privilege: Does any hope remain?Law and Contemporary Problems, 15, 35-50.
42.
Palys, T. S., & Lowman, J. (2000). Ethical and legal strategies for protecting confidential research information. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 15, 39-80.
43.
Palys, T. S., & Lowman, J. (in press). Anticipating law: Research methods, ethics and the common law of privilege. Sociological Methodology.
44.
People v. Newman, 345 N.Y.S. 2d 502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).
45.
Picou, J. S. (1996). Compelled disclosure of scholarly research: Some comments on "high stakes" litigation. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59, 149-157.
46.
Privacy Protection Study Commission. (1977). Personalprivacy in an information society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47.
R. v. Gruenke, 3 S.C.R. 263 (1991).
48.
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Fischer, 427 S.E. 2d 810 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993).
49.
Richards of Rockford, Inc. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., 71 F.R.D. 388 (N.D. Cal. 1976). Russel Ogden v. Simon Fraser University. Burnaby Registry of the British Columbia Provincial Court: Case No.26780 (1998). Text of the decision available: http://www.sfu.ca/-palys/steinbrg.htn.
50.
Scarce, R. (1994). (No) trial (but) tribulations: When courts and ethnography conflict. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23, 123-149.
51.
Scarce, R. (1999). Good faith, bad ethics: When scholars go the distance and scholarly associations do not. Law and Social Inquiry, 24, 977-986.
52.
Smith v. Jones, 1 S.C.R. 455 (1999).
53.
Sopinka, J., Lederman, S. N., & Bryant, A. W. (1992). The law of evidence in Canada. Toronto: Butterworth.
54.
Teitelbaum, L. E. (1983). Spurious, tractable and intractable legal problems: A positivist approach to law and social science research. In R. F. Boruch & J. S. Cecil (Eds.), Solutions to ethical and legal problems in social research (pp. 11-48). New York: Academic Press.
55.
Traynor, M. (1996). Countering the excessive subpoena for scholarly research. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59, 119-148.
56.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1999). Confidentiality: No sharing of census data. Los Angeles: Regional Office.
57.
Wiggins, E. D., & McKenna, J. A. (1996). Researchers' reactions to compelled disclosure of scientific information. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59, 67-94.
58.
Wigmore, J. H. (1905). A treatise on the system of evidence in trials at common law, including the statutes and judicial decisions of all jurisdictions of the United States, England, and Canada. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
59.
Wolfgang, M. (1976). Ethical issues of research in criminology. In P. Nejelski (Ed.), Social research in conflict with ethics and the law (pp. 25-34). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
60.
Wolfgang, M. (1981). Criminology: Confidentiality in criminological research and other ethical issues. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 345-361.
61.
Wolfgang, M. (1982). Ethics and research. In F. Elliston & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethics, public policy, and criminal justice research (pp. 391-418). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, and Hain, Publishers, Inc.
