The Prevalence of Impostor Phenomenon Among Music Student Teachers: A Mixed Methods Approach

Abstract

Impostor Phenomenon (IP) is a psychological construct that causes high-achieving individuals to doubt their competence, intelligence, and sense of belonging. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to examine the prevalence of IP among music student teachers and their experiences with the construct. Participants in this study were music student teachers (N = 173) from the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM)-accredited institutions across the United States who completed a survey to determine the extent to which they experienced IP. In a follow-up focus group, six participants from the original survey portion discussed their personal experiences with IP. Results indicated that IP was prevalent among music student teachers, with focus group participants expressing feelings of fraudulence, fear of failure, and the need to discuss their experiences with others. Participants also discussed the need to achieve immediate success and expressed an awareness of the relationship between IP feelings and their role as musicians.

Keywords

focus group Impostor Phenomenon mixed-methods preservice music teachers student teaching

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acocella

(2012). The focus groups in social research: Advantages and disadvantages. Quality & Quantity, 46, 1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9600-4

Baumgartner

C. M.

Councill

K. H.

(2017). Music student teaching seminars: An examination of current practices across the United States. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(2), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123315615183

Baumgartner

C. M.

Councill

K. H.

(2019). Music student teachers’ perceptions of their seminar experience: An exploratory study. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083719867340

Bernard

N. S.

Dollinger

S. J.

Ramaniah

N. V.

(2002). Applying the big five personality factors to the impostor phenomenon. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(2), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7802_07

Bravata

D. M.

Watts

S. A.

Keefer

A. L.

Madhusudhan

D. K.

Taylor

K. T.

Clark

D. M.

Nelson

R. S.

Cokley

K. O.

Hagg

H. K.

(2020). Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(4), 1252–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05364-1

Brems

Baldwin

M. R.

Davis

Namyniuk

(1994). The imposter syndrome as related to teaching evaluations and advising relationships of university faculty members. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943923

Chrisman

S. M.

Pieper

W. A.

Clance

P. R.

Holland

C. L.

Glickauf-Hughes

(1995). Validation of the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(3), 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_6

Clance

P. R

. (n.d). Impostor phenomenon [website]. https://paulineroseclance.com/pdf/IPTestandscoring.pdf

Clance

P. R.

(1985). The impostor phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Peachtree Publishing.

10.

Clance

P. R.

(1995). Impostor phenomenon in an interpersonal/social context: Origins and treatment. Women & Therapy, 16(4), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015v16n04_07

11.

Clance

P. R.

Imes

S. A.

(1978). The Imposter Phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006

12.

Clance

P. R.

O’Toole

M. A.

(1987). The Imposter Phenomenon: An internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women & Therapy, 6(3), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015V06N03_05

13.

Craddock

Birnbaum

Rodriguez

Cobb

Zeeh

(2011). Doctoral students and the Impostor Phenomenon: Am I smart enough to be here? Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 48(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.6321

14.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

15.

Darwin Holmes

A. G

. (2020). Researcher positionality—A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research—A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232

16.

Draves

T. J.

(2013). Transition from student to teacher–student teaching: The capstone experience. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 23(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083712474935

17.

Dweck

C. S.

(2016). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Ballantine Books.

18.

Elpus

(2015). Music teacher licensure candidates in the United States. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(3), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415602470

19.

Friebus

R. J.

(1977). Agents of socialization involved in student teaching. Journal of Educational Research, 70(5), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1977.10885001

20.

Hanson

(2021). Research-to-resource: Confronting and overcoming music teacher burnout. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 40(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233211019999

21.

Haston

Russell

J. A.

(2012). Turning into teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(4), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411414716

22.

Henning

Shaw

(1998). Perfectionism, the Impostor Phenomenon and psychological adjustment in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy students. Medical Education, 32(5), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00234.x

23.

Hutchins

H. M.

Rainbolt

(2017). What triggers Imposter Phenomenon among academic faculty? A critical incident study exploring antecedents, coping, and development opportunities. Human Resource Development International, 20(3), 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2016.1248205

24.

Isbell

D. S.

(2015). The socialization of music teachers: A review of the literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 34(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314547912

25.

Ivankova

N. V.

Creswell

J. W.

Stick

S. L.

(2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

26.

Lane

J. A.

(2015). The Imposter Phenomenon among emerging adults transitioning into professional life: Developing a grounded theory. Adultspan Journal, 14(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsp.12009

27.

Larson

R. B.

(2019). Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 61(5), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318805305

28.

Lee

L. E.

Rinn

A. N.

Crutchfield

Ottwein

J. K.

Hodges

Mun

R. U.

(2020). Perfectionism and the Imposter Phenomenon in academically talented undergraduates. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220969396

29.

Mak

K. K. L.

Kleitman

Abbott

M. J.

(2019). Impostor Phenomenon measurement scales: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(671), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00671

30.

McElwee

Yurak

(2010). The phenomenology of the Impostor Phenomenon. Individual Differences Research, 8, 184–197.

31.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

32.

Miksza

Berg

M. H.

(2013). Transition from student to teacher: Frameworks for understanding preservice music teacher development. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 23(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713480888

33.

Nápoles

Springer

D. G.

Silvey

B. A.

Montemayor

Rinn

T. J.

(2024). Burnout and Impostor Phenomenon among undergraduate music education majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 72(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294231207267

34.

Norman

(2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

35.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Dickinson

W. B.

Leech

N. L.

Zoran

A. G.

(2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301

36.

Parkman

(2016). The Imposter Phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 6(1), 51–60. http://www.m.www.na-businesspress.com/JHETP/ParkmanA_Web16_1_.pdf

37.

Patton

(2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

38.

Payne

P. D.

Lewis

McCaskill

(2020). Looking within: An investigation of music education majors and mental health. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(3), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083720927748

39.

Peteet

B. J.

Montgomery

Weekes

J. C.

(2015). Predictors of Imposter Phenomenon among talented ethnic minority undergraduate students. Journal of Negro Education, 84(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.84.2.0175

40.

Prichard

(2017). A mixed-methods investigation of preservice music teaching efficacy beliefs and commitment to music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417710387

41.

Prichard

(2018). A profile of high-stakes assessment practices in music teacher education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 27(3), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717750079

42.

Ramey

(2022). Impostor Phenomenon responses of university-level choral faculty (Publication No. 29254473) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

43.

Sims

(2017). A phenomenological examination of Imposter Phenomenon in music therapy students (Publication No. 10282756) [Master’s thesis, University of Oklahoma]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

44.

Sims

W. L.

Cassidy

J. W.

(2019). Impostor Phenomenon responses of early career music education faculty. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429418812464

45.

Sims

W. L.

Cassidy

J. W.

(2020). Impostor feelings of music education graduate students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420946899

46.

Stone

Saucer

Bailey

Garba

Hurst

Jackson

S. M.

Krueger

Cokley

(2018). Learning while Black: A culturally informed model of the Impostor Phenomenon for Black graduate students. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(6), 491–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418786648

47.

Villwock

J. A.

Sobin

L. B.

Koester

L. A.

Harris

T. M.

(2016). Impostor syndrome and burnout among American medical students: A pilot study. International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5801.eac4

48.

Wiener

S. E.

(2008). The Impostor Phenomenon: An exploratory study of the socializing factors that contribute to feelings of fraudulence among high achieving, diverse female undergraduates [Master’s thesis, Smith College]. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/theses/436

49.

Young

(2011). The secret thoughts of successful women: Why capable people suffer from the impostor syndrome and how to thrive in spite of it (1st ed.). Crown Publishing Group.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB