Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this instrumental multiple case study was to examine and compare five inservice music teachers’ and one administrator’s perceptions of three school–university partnership programs, in various stages of development, across one semester. Data sources included participants’ observation notes, researchers’ field notes, and individual semi-structured interviews. The following themes emerged from the data: (a) benefits of reinforcement, (b) benefits of promoting best practice and research, (c) challenges of navigating multiple teachers, (d) challenges of time management, and (e) observed differences between partnerships. Participants offered the following suggestions to implement and sustain successful partnerships: (a) preservice music educator preparation, including preparation in music planning, responsive teaching, and developing student connections, and (b) logistics, including increased communication, understanding all aspects of full-time music teaching, and expanding the number of visits. Implications for practice include engaging stakeholders in equal planning, reflection, and evaluation to create mutually beneficial partnership experiences.

Keywords

case method effective teaching field experience mentoring music teacher preparation practicum preservice teachers school/university partnerships stakeholders in music education team teaching

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahams

(2011). Nurturing preservice music teacher dispositions: Collaborating to connect practice, theory, and policy. Arts Education Policy Review, 112(3), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2011.566076

Alemán

Jr Freire

J. A.

McKinney

Dolores

D. B.

(2017). School–university–community pathways to higher education: Teacher perceptions, school culture and partnership building. The Urban Review, 49(5), 852–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0424-y

Apfelstadt

(1989). The nature of collaboration in music education. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 7(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/875512338800700102

Austin

J. R.

(2019). Promoting research partnerships in music education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 28(2), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083718819323

Borthwick

A. C.

Stirling

Nauman

A. D.

Cook

D. L.

(2003). Achieving successful school-university collaboration. Urban Education, 38(3), 330–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085903038003003

Bradshaw

L. K.

(2000). The changing role of principals in school partnerships. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650008461613

Brady

(2002). School university partnerships: What do the schools want? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2002v27n1.1

Burroughs

Lewis

Battey

Curran

Hyland

N. E.

Ryan

(2020). From mediated fieldwork to co-constructed partnerships: A framework for guiding and reflecting on P–12 school–university partnerships. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119858992

Burton

S. L.

Greher

G. R.

(2007). School–university partnerships: What do we know and why do they matter? Arts Education Policy Review, 109(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.1.13-24

10.

Conkling

S. W.

Henry

(1999). Professional development partnerships: A new model for music teacher preparation. Arts Education Policy Review, 100(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632919909599465

11.

Conkling

S. W.

Henry

(2002). The impact of professional development partnerships: Our part of the story. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 11(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/105708370201100203

12.

Conway

(2012). Ten years later: Teachers reflect on “Perceptions of beginning teachers, their mentors, and administrator regarding preservice music teacher preparation.” Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429412453601

13.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.

14.

Darling-Hammond

Bransford

(2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.

15.

Darling-Hammond

Lieberman

(2012). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. Routledge.

16.

Fallace

Fantozzi

(2017). The Dewey school as triumph, tragedy, and misunderstood: Exploring the myths and historiography of the University of Chicago laboratory school. Teachers College Record, 119(2), 1–32.

17.

Fuller

F. F.

(1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental characterization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207–226.

18.

Gilbert

Hobbs

Kenny

Jones

Campbell

Chittleborough

Herbert

Redman

(2018). Principal perceptions regarding the impact of school-university partnerships in primary science contexts. School-University Partnerships, 11(2), 73–83.

19.

Gilles

Wilson

Elias

(2009). School-university partnership: Perceptions of the teachers. School-university Partnerships, 3(1), 100–112.

20.

Hallam

(2011). Effective partnership working in music education: Principles and practice. International Journal of Music Education, 29(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761410396963

21.

Kruse

N. B.

(2011). Sociological perspectives of school-university partnerships: Contextual learning through three lenses. Arts Education Policy Review, 112(3), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2011.566080

22.

Kruse

N. B.

(2012). Silent partners: Uncovering middle school and high school students’ perceptions of their roles in two school–university partnerships. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 31(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123312458438

23.

Lanier

J. E.

Little

J. W.

(1996). Research on teacher education. In Wittrock

M. C.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 527–567). Macmillan.

24.

Lemon

Wilson

Oxworth

Zavros-Orr

Wood

(2018). Lines of school-university partnership: Perception, sensation and meshwork reshaping of pre-service teachers’ experiences. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(10), 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43.n10.5

25.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldana

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

26.

Parker

A. K.

Parsons

S. A.

Groth

Brown

E. L.

(2016). Pathways to partnership: A developmental framework for building PDS relationships. School-university Partnerships, 9(3), 34–48. https://napds.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/93-parker.pdf

27.

Patton

M. Q.

(2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

28.

Peel

H. A.

Peel

B. B.

Baker

M. E.

(2002). School/university partnerships: A viable model. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(7), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540210448077

29.

Powell

S. R.

(2023). Music teachers as music teacher educators. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 32(3), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837231166050

30.

Rawlings

J. R.

Larsen

B. K.

Weimer

(2022). Examining a music education school-university partnership in relation to the development of pedagogical content knowledge/knowing. School-University Partnerships, 15, 54–63.

31.

Robinson

(2001). From visitors to partners: The evolution of a methods course. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 11(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/105708370101100105

32.

Rosaen

Florio-Ruane

(1990). The metaphors by which we teach: Experience, metaphor, and culture in teacher education. In Cochran-Smith

Feiman-Nemser

McIntyre

D. J.

Demers

K. E.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 706–731). Association of Teacher Educators.

33.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.

34.

Soto

A. C.

Lum

C. H.

Campbell

P. S.

(2009). A university–School music partnership for music education majors in a culturally distinctive community. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(4), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408329106

35.

Stake

R. E.

(1995). The art of case study research. SAGE.

36.

Stake

R. E.

(2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB