Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-6
Music Mentor Preparation and Professional Development: A Program Review of the NAfME Music Mentorship Program Facilitator and Mentor Support Project (MMSP)
The purpose of this program review was to provide an in-depth analysis of the National Association for Music Education Music Mentorship Program Facilitator and Mentor Support Project, led by members of Society for Music Teacher Education’s Supporting Beginning Music Teachers Area of Strategic Planning and Action. We used an illuminative evaluation process (Patton, 2015) to present (a) a rich description of the project, (b) perceptions of key stakeholders (organizers, session leaders, participating mentors/mentorship program facilitators), and (c) findings pertinent to developing new music teacher mentor programs. Along with a description of the program, the findings are organized into successes, opportunities, weaknesses, and challenges as outlined by a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges analysis (Even Zahav & Hazzan, 2017). Within these areas, the unique design, workshop calendar and pace, as well as transferable content to state music education association (MEA) programs are presented. The review presents the program design as well as recommendations for making clearer connections to the needs of state-level MEA-sponsored mentoring programs.
BarrettJ. R. (2014). Case study in music education. In ConwayC. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook for qualitative research in American music education (pp. 113–132). Oxford Publication.
2.
BaumgartnerC. M. (2019). Supporting beginning music teachers: The development of the Oklahoma Music Educators Association Mentorship Program. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(3), 10–23. http://doi.org/10.1177/105708371985645
3.
BaumgartnerC. M.BaughmanM. M.BondV. L.KoernerB. D.GreeneJ.GottliebB. A.SojaM. C.StanleyS. (2015, September). The current status of beginning music teacher mentoring and induction programs across the US [Paper presentation] Symposium for Music Teacher Education, Greensboro, NC, United States.
4.
BensonM. A. (2008). Effective mentoring for new music teachers: An analysis of the mentoring programs for new music teachers as described in the literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 26(2), 42–49. http://doi.org/10.1177/8755123308317953
5.
BergM. H.ConwayC. M. (2020). Retired teachers as mentors in the American String Teachers Association Mentor Program. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 223, 59–78. http://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.223.0059
6.
BergM. H.RickelsD. A. (2018). Mentoring for mentors: The Music Mentor Plus program. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 27(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717720634
7.
ConwayC. M. (2002). Perceptions of beginning teachers, their mentors, and administrators regarding preservice music teacher preparation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345690
8.
ConwayC. M. (2003). An examination of district-sponsored beginning music teacher mentor practices. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345645
9.
ConwayC. M. (2015). Beginning music teacher mentor practices: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 24(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713512837
10.
ConwayC. M.HolcombA. (2008). Perceptions of experienced music teachers regarding their work as music mentors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408323073
11.
ConwayC. M.KruegerP.RobinsonM.HaackP.SmithM. V. (2002). Beginning music teacher induction and mentor policies: A cross-state perspective. Arts Education Policy Review, 104(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632910209605998
12.
ConwayC. M.SmithM. V.HodgmanT. M. (2010). Handbook for the music mentor. GIA Publications.
13.
ConwayC. M.ZermanT. E. H. (2004). Perceptions of an instrumental music teacher regarding mentoring, induction, and the first year of teaching. Research Studies in Music Education, 22(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X040220011001
14.
EasterL.Jr. (2020). A descriptive analysis of contest administration, contestant participation, and adjudication within the Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Association jazz ensemble competition from 2014–2019: A mixed methods case study [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma]. University of Oklahoma Archive. https://shareok.org/bitstream/handle/11244/326634/2020_Easter_Lonnie_Dissertation.pdf?sequence=6
Feiman-NemserS. (2012). Teachers as learners. Harvard Education Press.
17.
FitzpatrickK. R. (2014). Blogging through the music student teaching experience: Developing virtual communities of practice. Research Studies in Music Education, 36(1), 91–105. http://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x13509350
18.
FullerE. (2003). Beginning teacher retention rates for TxBESS and non-TxBESS teachers [Unpublished paper]. State Board for Educator Certification, Texas.
GreeneJ. R.KoernerB. D.WilsonJ. (2020). From the inside out: Exemplary music education association mentoring programs. Arts Education Policy Review, 121(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2019.1596852
21.
IngersollR.StrongM. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81, 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323
22.
KnowlesM. S.HoltonE. F.SwansonR. A. (2005). The adult learner (6th ed.). Elsevier.
23.
KoernerB. D.BaughmanM. M.BaumgartnerC. M.MillicanJ. S.StanberyD. (2016, March17–19). “Best practices” for designing music teacher mentor, induction, and professional development programs [Conference session]. Music Research and Teacher Education National Conference (NAfME), Atlanta, GA, United States.
24.
MerriamS. B.CaffarellaR. S.BaumgartnerL. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
25.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
26.
NAfME Society for Music Teacher Education. (n.d.). Areas of strategic planning and action. https://smte.us/aspas/
27.
NewcomerK. E.HarryH. P.WhollyJ. S. (2015). Handbook of practical program evaluation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
ReeseJ. (2016). Virtual mentoring of preservice teachers: Mentors’ perceptions. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(3), 39–52. http://doi.org/10.1177/1057083715577793
31.
ReeseJ. A. (2015). Online status: Virtual field experiences and mentoring during an elementary general music methods course. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 24(2), 23–39. http://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713506119
32.
SabbaghiA.VaidyanathanG. (2004). SWOT analysis and theory of constraint in information technology projects. Information Systems Education Journal, 2(23), 1–19.
33.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed). SAGE.
34.
SchwilleS. A. (2008). The professional practice of mentoring. American Journal of Education, 115(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1086/590678
35.
ShawR. D.MayoW. (2022). Music education and distance learning during COVID-19: A survey. Arts Education Policy Review, 123(3), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1931597
Vaughan-MarraJ.ShouldiceH. (2021). Teachers’ experiences as participants in a music-learning-theory-focused virtual mentoring program. Audea: A Journal for Research and Applications of Music Learning Theory, 21(1), 13–26.
38.
Vaughan-MarraJ. C. (2019). New teacher learning in a digital mentoring environment: Voices of the mentors [Doctoral Dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 27536182)
39.
WeimerK. R. (2017). “We’re just kind of walking side by side”: Music teacher mentor/mentee relationships in Connecticut’s teacher education and mentoring program (TEAM) [Doctoral Dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 1920140827)
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
