Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Music teachers commonly lack basic awareness of and skill in navigating various education policy areas. One explanation for this lack of policy acumen is the general absence of policy content within the preservice music teacher curriculum. While music teacher educators have primary responsibility for curricular decisions, music education program leaders and music school administrators who regularly operate within policy realms might be expected to indirectly influence policy integration as part of undergraduate and graduate music education courses. To test this theory, we surveyed administrators who influence and finalize these curricular decisions. Respondents tended to have modest policy dispositions, which was consistent with similar work done with different populations and stakeholders. Given this finding, we provide suggestions to help garner more interest in policy among music teacher educators and administrators in an attempt to make the topic more germane to both pre- and inservice music teachers.

Keywords

curriculum disposition music administrators music teacher preparation policy preservice teachers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilar

C. E.

Dye

C. K.

(2020). Developing music education policy wonks: Preservice music education and policy. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083719885335

Aguilar

C. E.

Kapalka Richerme

(2016). A descriptive study of music teacher educators’ beliefs about policy. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083714553986

Aguilar

C. E.

Kapalka Richerme

(2020). The everyday practice of policy. Music Educators Journal, 107(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432120941062

Burton

S. L.

Knaster

Knieste

(2015). Staying in tune with music education: Policy awareness among music education majors. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083714548587

Conway

Pellegrino

Stanley

A. M.

West

(2020). Setting an agenda for music teacher education practice, research, and policy. In Conway

Pellegrino

Stanley

A. M.

West

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of preservice music teacher education in the United States (pp. 905–916). Oxford University Press.

Doerksen

P. F.

(2020). Curricular frameworks in preservice music teacher education. In Conway

Pellegrino

Stanley

A. M.

West

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of preservice music teacher education in the United States (pp. 205–230). Oxford University Press.

Dye

C. K.

Kapalka Richerme

(2015). Indiana music educators and policy: An examination of awareness, engagement, trust, and efficacy. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 206(Fall), 7–21.

Fautley

(2017). Policy and question of assessment. In Schmidt

Colwell

(Eds.), Policy and the political life of music education (pp. 85–103). Oxford University Press.

Groves

R. M.

Presser

Dipko

(2004). The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh002

10.

Helton

B. C.

(2021). The arts’ legitimacy problem. Arts Education Policy Review, 122(4), 224–238. https://doi.org/10/1080/10632913.2020.1731898

11.

Hendra

Hill

(2019). Rethinking response rates: New evidence of little relationship between survey response rates and nonresponse bias. Evaluation Review, 43(5), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X88Q7719

12.

Hibberts

Johnson

R. B.

Hudson

(2012). Common survey sampling techniques. In Gideon

(Ed.), Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences (pp. 53–74). Springer.

13.

Jones

P. M.

(2009). Hard and soft policies in music education: Building the capacity of teachers to understand, study, and influence them. Arts Education Policy Review, 110(4), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.110.4.27-32

14.

Jones

P. M.

(2017). Policy and higher education. In Schmidt

Colwell

(Eds.), Policy and the political life of music education (pp. 241–251). Oxford University Press.

15.

Kingdon

J. W.

(2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Updated second ed.). Longman.

16.

Kos

(2010). Developing capacity for change: A policy analysis for the music education profession. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(3), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.110.3.3-8

17.

Miksza

Elpus

(2018). Design and analysis for quantitative research in music education. Oxford University Press.

18.

National Association of Schools of Music. (2004). Creating a positive future for P-12 music education. https://nasm.arts-accredit.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/02/NASM-BackgroundPaper-Pos-Futr-4-P12-Music-Ed-1.pdf

19.

National Association of Schools of Music. (2022). Handbook 2011-2022. https://nasm.arts-accredit.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/04/M-2021-22-Handbook-Final-04-08-2022.pdf

20.

Parkes

K. A.

Richter

G. K.

Doerkson

P. F.

(2019). Measuring dispositions in preservice music educators. In Brophy

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of assessment policy and practice in music education (Vol. 1, pp. 871–899). Oxford University Press.

21.

Schmidt

(2009). Reinventing from within: Thinking spherically as a policy imperative in music education. Arts Education Policy Review, 110(4), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.110.4.39-47

22.

Schmidt

(2015). The ethics of policy: Why a social justice vision of music education requires a commitment to policy thought. In Benedict

Schmidt

Spruce

Woodford

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 47–61). Oxford University Press.

23.

Schmidt

(2017). Why policy matters: Developing a policy vocabulary within music education. In Schmidt

Colwell

(Eds.), Policy and the political life of music education (pp. 1–36). Oxford University Press.

24.

Schmidt

(2020). Policy as practice: A guide for music educators. Oxford University Press.

25.

Title II. (n.d.). https://title2.ed.gov/Public/Report/FullReport/FullReport.aspx?p=3_14

26.

Webster

P. R.

(2017). Foreward. In Schmidt

Colwell

(Eds.), Policy and the political life of music education (pp. ix–xvi). Oxford University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

0.02 MB

Policy Dispositions Among Music Administrators in Higher Education

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material