The development of musicianship is a fundamental learning outcome for music students. The purpose of this study was to examine the early socialization experiences of preservice music teachers, as well as their opinions about musicianship. A total of 138 undergraduate music education students completed a three-part online questionnaire. The large ensemble setting was the most common source of learning and participants believed this setting contributed to the development of overall musicianship more so than any other source of learning. “Learning songs from notation” and “Music analysis” were perceived as most valuable in developing musicianship. Kruskal–Wallis tests showed differences in conceptions of musicianship based on the instrument played, but not among other socialization variables. Based on the findings, I conclude that preservice music teachers are being socialized to conceive of musicianship in ways that suit an existing school model, rather than contemporary and evolving music cultures found outside of schools.
AllsupR. E.BenedictC. (2008). The problems of band: An inquiry into the future of instrumental music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 16(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.2979/PME.2008.16.2.156
2.
AustinJ. R. (1998). Comprehensive musicianship research: Implications for addressing the national standards in music ensemble classes. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 17(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875512339801700106
3.
AustinJ. R.IsbellD. S.RussellJ. A. (2012). A multi-institution exploration of secondary socialization and occupational identity among undergraduate music majors. Psychology of Music, 40(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610381886
4.
BarrettJ. R.VeblenK. K. (2012). Meaningful connections in a comprehensive approach to the music curriculum. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (Vol. 1. pp. 361–380). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730810.013.0022
5.
BattistiF. L. (1989). Clarifying priorities for the high school band. Music Educators Journal, 76(1), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/3400894
BuonviriN. (2013). Idea bank: I can’t do that! Improvisation for classically trained musicians. Music Educators Journal, 99(4), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432113486251
9.
ConwayC. (2008). The implementation of the National Standards in Music Education: Capturing the spirit of the standards: What were the national standards intended to accomplish? What are the challenges in implementing them?Music Educators Journal, 94(4), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/00274321080940040104
10.
De VriesP. (2010). What we want: The music preferences of upper primary school students and the ways they engage with music. Australian Journal of Music Education, 1, 3–16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ912411.pdf
11.
ElliotD. J. (Ed.). (2005). Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues. Oxford University Press.
12.
ElpusK.AbrilC. R. (2011). High school music ensemble students in the United States: A demographic profile. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411405207
13.
FolkestadG. (2006). Formal and informal learning situations or practices vs. formal and informal ways of learning. British Journal of Music Education, 23, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051706006887
14.
ForsytheJ. L.KinneyD. W.BraunE. W. (2007). Opinions of music teacher educators and pre-service music students on the National Association of Schools of Music Standards for Teacher Education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 16(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837070160020104
HallamS.CreechA.McQueenH. (2018). Pupils’ perceptions of informal learning in school music lessons. Music Education Research, 20(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2016.1249358
IsbellD. S. (2008). Musicians and teachers: The socialization and occupational identity of preservice music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408322853
19.
IsbellD. S. (2016). Apprehensive and excited: Music education students’ experience vernacular musicianship. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(3), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083714568020
JorgensenE. R. (2003). What philosophy can bring to music education: Musicianship as a case in point. British Journal of Music Education, 20(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051703005382
22.
KingsburyH. (2001). Music, talent, and performance: A conservatory cultural system. Temple University Press.
MarkM. L.GaryC. L. (2007). A history of American music education (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
McPhersonG. E.HendricksK. S. (2010). Students’ motivation to study music: The United States of America. Research Studies in Music Education, 32(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X10384200
27.
MENC. (1994). The school music program: A new vision: The K-12 National Standards, PreK Standards, and what they mean to music educators. Rowman & Littlefield Education.
28.
MillicanJ. S. (2008). A new framework for music education knowledge and skill. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 18(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083708323146
NerlandM. (2007). One-to-one teaching as cultural practice: Two case studies from an academy of music. Music Education Research, 9(3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800701587761
RogersM. R. (1984). Teaching approaches in music theory: An overview of pedagogical philosophies. SIU Press.
36.
SaldanaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
37.
SchimittT.LamondJ. (2011). The 2011 NAMM global report. NAMM, The International Music Products Association.
38.
SchmidtW. (2000). Challenging the status quo in school performance classes: New approaches to band, choir, and orchestra suggested by the music standards. In ReimerB. (Ed.), Performing with understanding: The challenge of the national standards for music education (pp. 45–58). Roman & Littlefield.
39.
ShivelyJ. L. (2004). In the face of tradition: Questioning the roles of conductors and ensemble members in school bands, choirs, and orchestras. In BartelL. (Ed.), Questioning the music education paradigm (pp. 179–190). Canadian Music Educators Association.
40.
ShouldiceH. N. (2014). Elementary students’ definitions and self-perceptions of being a “good musician.”Music Education Research, 16(3), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2014.909396
41.
ShulerS. C. (1995). The impact of national standards on the preparation, in-service professional development, and assessment of music teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(3), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.1995.9934544
42.
SindbergL. (2007). Comprehensive Musicianship through Performance (CMP) in the lived experience of students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 174(Fall), 25–43.
43.
WhitenerJ. L. (2016). Using the elements of cooperative learning in school band classes in the United States. International Journal of Music Education, 34(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761414541865
WoodfordP. G. (2002). The social construction of music teacher identity in undergraduate music education majors. In ColwellR. (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 675–694). Schirmer Books.
46.
WoodyR. H.LehmannA. C. (2010). Student musicians’ ear-playing ability as a function of vernacular music experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410370785
