The Perceived Effectiveness of Nonverbal,Co-Verbal,and Verbal String Ensemble Instruction: Student,Teacher,and Observer Views

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how students, teachers, and outside observers perceive teaching effectiveness within a university-level string ensemble rehearsal setting. Students, teachers, and observers reflected on six rehearsal segments that used primarily nonverbal, co-verbal, or verbal instruction as outlined by Bob Culver in the Master Teacher Profile. Overall, participants viewed the verbal teaching episodes as being most effective, and expressed a preference for several elements associated with the verbal instructional mode. Five common elements of effective rehearsals identified by participants were Specific Instructions and Feedback, Delivery Skills and Eye Contact, Audible and Focused Co-Verbal Instruction Prompts, Conducting Effectiveness, and Ensemble Progress. Effectiveness perceptions were colored by participants’ sense of each teacher’s comfort with the different instructional modes as well as the elements of rehearsal teaching they personally valued.

Keywords

co-verbal instruction effective teaching nonverbal instruction verbal instruction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American String Teachers Association. (n.d.). Robert Culver. Retrieved from http://www.astaweb.com/Public/Conferences/Robert_Culver.aspx

Blanton

Dillon

MacLeod

R. B.

(2015). Tradition bearers as educations: A multi-case study of the teaching behaviors and beliefs of three old-time musicians. String Research Journal, 5, 55–72.

Butler

(2001). Preservice music teachers’ conceptions of teaching effectiveness, microteaching experiences, and teaching performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 258–272.

Byo

J. L.

Austin

K. R.

(1994). Comparison of expert and novice conductors: An approach to the analysis of nonverbal behaviors. Journal of Band Research, 50(1), 11–34.

Caldwell

W. M.

(1980). A time analysis of selected musical elements and leadership behaviors of successful high school choral conductors (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(3A), 976.

Culver

(1989). The master teacher profile: Elements of delivery at work in the classroom. University of Wisconsin–Madison, Division of University Outreach, Department of Continuing Education in the Arts.

Dickey

M. R.

(1991). A comparison of verbal instruction and nonverbal teacher-student modeling in instrumental ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 132–142. doi:10.2307/3344693

Dunn

D. E.

(1997). Effect of rehearsal hierarchy and reinforcement on attention, achievement, and attitude of selected choirs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 547–567. doi:10.2307/3345422

Gallimore

Tharp

(2004). What a coach can teach a teacher, 1975-2004: Reflections and reanalysis of John Wooden’s teaching practices. The Sport Psychologist, 18, 119–137. doi:10.1123/tsp.18.2.119

10.

Goolsby

T. W.

(1999). A comparison of expert and novice music teachers’ preparing identical band compositions: An operational replication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 174–187. doi:10.2307/3345722

11.

Hamann

D. L.

Baker

D. S.

McAllister

P. A.

Bauer

W. I.

(2000). Factors affecting university music students’ perceptions of lesson quality and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 102–113. doi:10.2307/3345569

12.

Hamann

D. L.

Gillespie

R. A.

(2012). Strategies for teaching strings: Building a successful string and orchestra program (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

13.

Hamann

D. L.

Lineburgh

Paul

(1998). Teaching effectiveness and social skill development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 87–101.

14.

Hopkins

(2015). String pedagogy notebook. Retrieved from http://stringtechnique.com/

15.

Johnson

Darrow

Eason

B. J.

(2008). Novice and skilled music teachers’ nonverbal behaviors and their relationship to perceived effectiveness and rapport. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 178, 73–83.

16.

Juchniewicz

(2010). The influence of social intelligence on effective music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58, 276–293. doi:10.1177/0022429410378368

17.

Knapp

M. L.

Hall

J. A.

(2014). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

18.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

19.

MacLeod

R. B.

(2010). A comparison of instructional strategies used by experienced band and orchestra teachers when teaching a first year class a new line of music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 185, 49–62.

20.

MacLeod

R. B.

Walter

J. S.

(2011). A descriptive study of cooperating teachers’ perceptions regarding student teacher preparation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 190, 21–24. doi:10.5406/190.0021

21.

Madsen

C. K.

Standley

J. M.

Cassidy

J. W.

(1989). Demonstration and recognition of high and low contrasts in teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 85–92.

22.

Madsen

Cassidy

J. W.

(2005). The effect of focus of attention and teaching experience on perceptions of teaching effectiveness and student learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 222–233. doi:10.1177/002242940505300304

23.

Mehrabian

(1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

24.

Nápoles

(2017). Teacher talk and perceived teacher effectiveness: An exploratory study. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(3), 5–10.

25.

Nápoles

(2007). The effect of duration of teacher talk on the attitude, attentiveness, and performance achievement of high school choral students. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 11, 22–29.

26.

Nápoles

Vazquez-Ramos

A. M.

(2013). Perceptions of time spent in teacher talk: A comparison among self-estimates, peer estimates, and actual time. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 452–461. doi:10.1177/0022429412463246

27.

Pontious

M. F.

(1982). A profile of rehearsal techniques and interaction of selected band conductors. Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 8302966)

28.

Remland

(2000). Non-verbal communication in everyday life. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

29.

Sang

R. C.

(1998). Conductor communication in the ensemble rehearsal: The relative effects of verbal communication, visual communication, and modeling on performance improvement of high school bands. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 136, 68–76.

30.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Silvey

B. A.

(2013). The role of conductor facial expression in students’ evaluation of ensemble expressivity. Journal of Research in Music education, 60, 419–439 doi:10.1177/0022429412462580

32.

Spradling

R. L.

(1985). The effect of timeout from performance on attentiveness and attitude of university band students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 123–37. doi:10.2307/3344732

33.

Tharp

R. G.

Gallimore

(1976). What a coach can teach a teacher. Psychology Today, 9(8), 74–78.

34.

Thurman

V. L.

(1977). A frequency and time description of selected rehearsal behaviors used by five choral directors. Retrieved from ProQuest. (UMI No. 7726765)

35.

VanWeelden

(2002). Relationships between perceptions of conducting effectiveness and ensemble performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 165–176. doi:10.2307/3345820

36.

Wagner

M. J.

Strul

E. P.

(1979). Comparisons of beginning versus experienced elementary music educators in the use of teaching time. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 113–125. doi:10.2307/3344897

37.

Whitaker

J. A.

(2011). High school band students’ and directors’ perceptions of verbal and nonverbal teaching behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 290–309. doi:10.1177/0022429411414910.

38.

Witt

A. C.

(1986). Use of class time and student attentiveness in secondary instrumental music rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 34–42.

39.

Worthy

M. D.

(2006). Observations of three expert wind conductors in college rehearsals. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 168, 51–61.

40.

Worthy

M. D.

Thompson

B. L.

(2009). Observation and analysis of expert teaching in beginning band. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 180, 29–41.

41.

Yarbrough

(1975). Effect of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 134–146. doi:10.2307/3345286

42.

Yarbrough

Price

H. E.

(1981). Prediction of performer attentiveness based on rehearsal activity and teacher behavior. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 209–217. doi:10.2307/3344994

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB