The pedagogical content knowledge framework has been used to decipher the complexities of teaching by integrating subject matter knowledge with knowledge of teaching and knowledge of learners. Researchers in math, English, and history have modified this framework to identify core teaching practices within their disciplines. Core teaching practices are those that novices can begin to master and have a direct impact on student success. We developed a preliminary list of core practices in music using a Delphi panel approach. This panel of public school and college teachers with expertise in band, choir, orchestra, and elementary music found that modeling, sequencing instruction, and deconstructing musical concepts were core teaching practices that apply across a wide variety of teaching and learning contexts. The panel felt developing knowledge of and relationships with students was important for in-service teachers, but other practices should be developed first by novice teachers.
BallD. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 241–247. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003013
3.
BallD. L.BassH. (1999). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In DavisB.SimmtE. (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Association Study Group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: CMESG/GDEDM.
4.
BallD. L.BassH. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In SimmtE.DavisB. (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: CMESG/GDEDM.
5.
BallD. L.BassH.HillH.SchillingS. (2005, February). Developing measures of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Presentation at the Teachers Development Group Leadership seminar, Portland, OR. Retrieved from http://lmt.soe.umich.edu/files/hillshillingball.pdf
6.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497–511.
7.
BallD. L.SleepL.BoerstT. A.BassH. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 109, 458–474. doi:10.1086/596996
8.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554
9.
BallantyneJ. (2006). Reconceptualising pre-service teacher education courses for music teachers: The importance of pedagogical content knowledge and skills and professional knowledge and skills. Research Studies in Music Education, 26(1), 37–50. doi:10.1177/1321103X060260010101
10.
BallantyneJ.PackerJ. (2004). Effectiveness of preservice music teacher education programs: Perceptions of early-career music teachers. Music Education Research, 6, 299–312. doi:10.1080/1461380042000281749
11.
BremmerM. L. V. (2015). What the body knows about teaching music. The specialist preschool music teacher’s pedagogical content knowing regarding teaching and learning rhythm skills viewed from an embodied cognition perspective. Retrieved from https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/18010
12.
ChandlerK. W. (2012). A survey of choral methods instructors at NASM-accredited institutions: Pedagogical content knowledge orientation and the choral methods class (Doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado at Boulder. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3527275)
13.
ClarkC.LampertM. (1986). The study of teacher thinking: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5), 27–31. doi:10.1177/002248718603700506
14.
Cochran-SmithM.FriesK. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In Cochran-SmithM. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 69–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CrappellC.MillicanJ. S. (2015). Describing independent studio piano teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. MTNA E-Journal, 6(4), 2–12.
16.
DeweyJ. (1964). John Dewey on education (ArchambaultR.Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. (Original work published 1904)
17.
DukeR. A. (2009). Intelligent music teaching: Essays on the core principles of effective instruction. Austin, TX: Learning and Behavior Resources.
18.
DulingE. B. (1992). The development of pedagogical-content knowledge: Two case studies of exemplary general music teachers (Doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9227261)
19.
FogoB. (2014). Core practices for teaching history: The results of a Delphi panel survey. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(2), 151–196. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.902781
20.
ForresterS. H. (2015). Music teacher knowledge: An examination of the intersections between instrumental music teaching and conducting (Doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/111554
21.
ForzaniF. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 357–368. doi:10.1177/0022487114533800
22.
FrankeM. L.KazemiE.BatteyD. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In LesterF. K.(Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225–256). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
23.
FreemanD. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. Language Teaching, 35(1), 1–13. doi:10.1017/S0261444801001720
24.
GohlkeL. J. (1994). The music methods class: Acquisition of pedagogical content knowledge by preservice music teachers (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9504621)
25.
GoodmanC. M. (1987). The Delphi method: A description, review, and criticism. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12, 729–734.
26.
GrossmanP. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College.
27.
GrossmanP. (2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In Cochran-SmithM.ZeichnerK. M. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 425–476). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
GrossmanP.McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 184–205. doi:10.3102/0002831207312906
30.
HassonF.KeeneyS.McKennaH. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1008–1015. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
31.
HastonW. (2013). Perceived use of teacher questioning in secondary music ensembles. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 195, 77–94. doi:10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.195.0077
32.
HastonW.Leon-GuerreroA. (2008). Sources of pedagogical content knowledge: Reports by preservice instrumental music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 17(2), 48–59. doi:10.1177/1057083708317644
33.
HiebertJ.MorrisA. K. (2012). Teaching, rather than teachers, as a path toward improving classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 92–102. doi:10.1177/0022487111428328
34.
HillH. C.BallD. L.SchillingS. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372–400.
35.
HillH. C.SchillingS. G.BallD. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.
36.
HsuC.SandfordB. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12(10). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=10
37.
KazemiE.LampertM.FrankeM. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teacher’s ability to enact ambitious instruction. In HunterR.BicknellB.BurgessT. (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 12–30). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA.
38.
KennedyM. (2016). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 6–17. doi:10.1177/0022487115614617
39.
KloserM. (2014). Identifing a core set of science teaching practices: A Delphi expert panel approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 1185–1217. doi:10.1002/tea.21171
40.
LampertM. (2009). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21–34. doi:10.1177/0022487109347321
41.
LampertM.FrankeM. L.KazemiE.GhousseiniH.TurrouA. C.BeasleyH.. . . CroweK. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 226–243. doi:10.1177/0022487112473837
42.
MacLeodR. (2010). A comparison of instructional strategies used by experienced band and orchestra teachers when teaching a first-year class an unfamiliar music excerpt. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 185, 49–61.
43.
MateiroT.RussellJ.WestvallM. (2012). Student music teachers’ perceptions of pedagogical content knowledge-in-action: An inquiry across three countries. Musiikkikasvatus: The Finnish Journal of Music Education, 15(2), 53–64.
44.
MatthewsK. P. (2014). An investigation of teacher performance and instrument modeling in the band classroom (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1617975418)
45.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education a call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 378–386. doi:10.1177/0022487113493807
46.
MillicanJ. S. (2008). A new framework for music education knowledge and skill. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 18(1), 67–78. doi:10.1177/1057083708323146
47.
MillicanJ. S. (2013). Describing wind instrument teachers’ thinking: Implications for understanding pedagogical content knowledge. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 31(2), 45–53.
48.
MillicanJ. S. (2014). Describing preservice instrumental music educators’ pedagogical content knowledge. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 31(2), 45–53. doi:10.1177/8755123314552664
49.
MillicanJ. S. (2017). Examining pedagogical content knowledge of an expert band director teaching lips slurs. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(2), 90–103. doi:10.1177/1057083716629610
50.
MillicanJ. S.ForresterS. H. (in press). Music teacher rankings of selected core teaching practices.
51.
OkoliC.PawlowskiS. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42, 15–29. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
SackmanH. (1974). Delphi critique; expert opinion, forecasting, and group process. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
54.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
55.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
56.
TamirP. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 99–110.
57.
UhlN. P. (1983). Using the Delphi technique in institutional planning. Institutional Research, 37, 81–94.
58.
VenesileC. J. (2011). The acquisition of pedagogical content knowledge by vocal jazz educators (Doctoral dissertation). Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtft/docview/857033005/
59.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM.StroupeD. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96, 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.21027
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
