Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate undergraduates’ perceptions of peer mentoring and the impact of peer mentoring in a music teacher preparation course. The following questions were included: What knowledge and abilities do students bring to the peer mentoring process? How do students perceive their roles as teachers and learners in the peer mentoring experiences? How do the students benefit, if at all, from peer mentoring experiences? Students participated in four planned peer mentoring experiences; an unanticipated, informal mode of peer mentoring emerged during large-group teaching experiences. Analysis revealed that student perceptions of and comfort levels with peer mentoring varied as their roles as teacher or learner changed. Findings suggest that students use prior music and teaching knowledge when engaged in peer mentoring and their enactment of teaching roles varied depending on the structure of peer mentoring episodes. Benefits to students included increased awareness of themselves as teachers and enhanced comfort with providing and receiving critique.

Keywords

music teacher preparation peer teaching preservice teachers teaching effectiveness teaching techniques

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

L. D.

(1980). Peer tutoring effects on the music performance of tutors and tutees in beginning band classes (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8015062)

Barrett

(2014). Case study in music education research. In Conway

C. M.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research in American music education (pp. 113–132). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Berg

M. H.

(2000). Thinking for yourself: The social construction of chamber music experience. In Rideout

Paul

S. J.

(Eds.), On the sociology of music education II: Papers from the music education symposium at the University of Oklahoma (pp. 91–112). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Budge

(2006). Peer mentoring in post-secondary education: Implications for research and practice. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(1), 71–85.

Cangro

(2016). Student collaboration and standards-based music learning: A literature review. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 34(3), 63–68. doi:10.1177/8755123314568794

Colvin

J. W.

Ashman

(2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring, 18, 121–134. doi:10.1080/13611261003678879

Conway

(2003). Great beginnings for music teachers: Mentoring and supporting new teachers. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.

Conway

Holcomb

(2008). Perceptions of experienced music teachers regarding their work as music mentors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 55–67. doi:10.1177/0022429408323073

Cornu

(2005). Peer mentoring: Engaging pre-service teachers in mentoring one another. Mentoring & Tutoring, 12, 355–366. doi:10.1080/13611260500105592

10.

Creech

Papageorgi

Duffy

Morton

Haddon

Potter

. . . Welch

(2008). From music student to professional: The process of transition. British Journal of Music Education, 25, 315–331.

11.

Creswell

(2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

Darrow

A. A.

Gibbs

Wedel

(2005). Use of classwide peer tutoring in the general music classroom. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 24(1), 15–26. doi:10.1177/87551233050240010103

13.

Draves

T. J.

Koops

L. H.

(2011). Peer mentoring: Key to new music teacher educator success. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(2), 67–77. doi:10.1177/1057083710375538

14.

Gibbs

G. R.

(2007). The Sage qualitative research kit: Vol. 6. Analyzing qualitative data ( Flick

Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Glesne

(2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York, NY: Longman.

16.

Goodrich

(2007). Peer mentoring in a high school jazz ensemble. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 94–114. doi:10.1177/002242940705500202

17.

Goodrich

(2016). Peer mentoring in a university jazz ensemble. Visions of Research in Music Education, 28. Retrieved from http://www-usr.rider.edu/~vrme/v28n1/visions/Goodrich_Mentoring_in_Jazz_Ensemble.pdf

18.

Goodrich

Kracht

McDonald

Sapp

(2014). Comentoring in a university jazz ensemble. Visions of Research in Music Education, 25. Retrieved from http://www-usr.rider.edu/~vrme/v25n1/visions/Goodrich_Comentoring_University_Jazz_Ensemble.pdf

19.

Johnson

E. A.

(2011). The effect of peer-based instruction on rhythm reading achievement. Contributions to Music Education, 38, 43–60.

20.

Johnson

(2013). The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical peer-assisted structures on music achievement and learner engagement in the secondary large ensemble (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3561981)

21.

Johnson

(2015). Peer-teaching in the secondary music ensemble. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3, 35–42. doi:10.11114/jets.v3i5.906

22.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Madsen

C. K.

(2011). Music teacher education students as cross-age reading tutors in an after-school setting. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(2), 40–54. doi:10.1177/1057083710371441

24.

McCormack

West

(2006). Facilitated group mentoring develops key career competencies for university women: A case study. Mentoring & Tutoring, 14, 409–431. doi:10.1080/13611260600739290

25.

Napoles

(2008). Relationships among instructor, peer, and self-evaluations of undergraduate music education majors’ micro-teaching experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 82–91. doi:10.1177/0022429408323071

26.

Pellegrino

(2015). Becoming music-making music teachers: Connecting music-making, identity, wellbeing, and teaching for four student teachers. Research Studies in Music Education, 37, 175–194. doi:10.1177/1321103X15589396

27.

Schmidt

(1998). Defining “good” music teaching: Four student teachers’ beliefs and practices. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 138, 19–46.

28.

Simons

(2014). Case study research: In-depth understanding in context. In Leavy

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 455–470). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

29.

Stader

D. L.

(2001). Lifeworld and system: Promoting respect and responsibility in high school. Journal of School Improvement, 2(2), 11–15.

30.

Stake

R. E.

(1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Webb

R. S.

(2015). An exploration of three peer tutoring cases in the school orchestra program. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 203, 63–80.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB

Peer Mentoring in a University Music Methods Class

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material