To examine music education faculty members’ promotion and tenure experiences, we interviewed (N = 9) and surveyed (N = 124) music teacher educators (MTEs) who were pretenure or tenured within the past 3 years. Findings highlighted MTE’s perceptions of evaluative criteria and standards, mentoring programs and experiences, professional identity, and work-life balance. We found that MTEs valued three aspects of their professional identity: teacher educator, researcher, and musician, although most reported that music activities did not count as scholarly activities. We also found that MTEs need multiple mentors: someone familiar with institutional tenure policy and expectations and MTEs within and/or outside of the same institution. MTE survey respondents (70%) reported feeling stress related to the tenure process. Male respondents were more likely to feel satisfied (63%) with the balance of teaching, research, and service than female respondents (33%), and more likely to feel satisfied with the balance achieved between personal life and professional life (57%) than their female counterparts (36%).
BarrettM. S.BallantyneJ.HarrisonS.TemmermanN. (2009). On building a community of practice: Reflective narratives of academic learning and growth. Reflective Practice, 10, 403–416. doi:10.1080/14623940903138233
2.
BondV. L.KoopsL. H. (2014). Together through transitions: A narrative inquiry of emergent identity as music teacher educators. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 24(1), 38–50. doi:10.1177/1057083713494012
3.
BoyerE. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
4.
BrewerW. D.RickelsD. A. (2011). Demographics and faculty time allocation of music education professors in the United States. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 22(1), 63–74. doi:10.1177/1057083711424504
5.
BrownW. O.Jr. (1997). University governance and academic tenure: A property rights explanation. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153, 441–461.
6.
CeciS. J.GintherD. K.KahnS.WilliamsW. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 75–141. doi:10.1177/1529100614541236
ConklingS. W.HenryW. (2008). Doctoral students in music and their socialization into teaching. In ThompsonL. K.CampbellM. R. (Eds.), Diverse methodologies in the study of music teaching and learning (pp. 183–200). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
9.
ConwayC. M. (2015). The experiences of first year music teachers: A literature review. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(2), 65–72. doi:10.1177/8755123314547911
10.
ConwayC. M.ErosJ.PellegrinoK.WestC. (2010). The role of graduate and undergraduate interactions in the development of preservice and music teachers and music teacher educators: A self-study in music teacher education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 183, 49–64.
11.
ConwayC. M.HibbardS.RawlingsJ. R. (2015). The potential use of micropolitics in examining personal and professional experiences of music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(1), 23–36.
12.
ConwayC. M.SmithM. V.HodgmanT. M. (2010). Handbook for the music mentor. Chicago: GIA Publications.
13.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
DiamantesT. (2002). Promotion and tenure decisions using the Boyer model. Education, 123, 322–333.
15.
DravesT. J.KoopsL. H. (2011). Peer mentoring: Key to new music teacher educator success. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(2), 67–77.
16.
GappaJ. M.AustinA. E.TriceA. G. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education’s strategic imperative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
GleichJ. (2016). Write first, ask questions later: Publishing and the race to tenure track. Cinema Journal, 55, 133–138. doi:10.1353/cj.2016.0050
18.
GreeneH. C.O’ConnorK. A.GoodA. J.LedfordC. C.PeelB. B.ZhangG. (2008). Building a support system toward tenure: Challenges and needs of tenure-track faculty in colleges of education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16, 429–447.
19.
HelmsM. M.WilliamsA. B.NixonJ. C. (2001). TQM principles and their relevance to higher education: The question of tenure and post-tenure review. International Journal of Educational Management, 15, 322–331. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005932
20.
HewittM. P.ThompsonL. K. (2006). A survey of music teacher educators’ professional backgrounds, responsibilities and demographics. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 170, 47–61.
21.
HillN. R. (2004). The challenges experienced by pretenured faculty members in counselor education: A wellness perspective. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44, 135–146.
22.
HillerM. D.RitvoR. A. (1991). Rethinking the promotion and tenure process. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 85–93.
23.
IsbellD. S. (2015). The socialization of music teachers: A review of the literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 34(1), 5–12. doi:10.1177/8755123314547912.
24.
KastnerJ.ReeseJ.PellegrinoK.RussellH. (in press). The rollercoaster ride of our music teacher educator identity development: Describing crucial turning points. Research Studies in Music Education.
25.
LoopeD. R. (1995). Academic tenure: Its origins, administration, and importance (South Carolina Commission on Higher Education Staff Position Paper). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED382149.pdf
26.
McPhersonM. S.SchapiroM. O. (1999). Tenure issues in higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 85–98.
27.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
MertensD. M. (2005). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
MullenC. A.ForbesS. A. (2000). Untenured faculty: Issues of transition, adjustment and mentorship. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 8, 31–46.
31.
NirA. E.Zilberstein-LevyR. (2006). Planning for academic excellence: Tenure and professional considerations. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 537–554.
PellegrinoK.KastnerJ.ReeseJ.RussellH. A. (2017). Examining the long-term impact of participating in a professional development community of music teacher educators in the USA: An anchor through turbulent transitions. International Journal of Music Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0255761417704214
34.
PellegrinoK.SweetB.KastnerJ.RussellH.ReeseJ. (2014). Becoming music teacher educators: Learning from and with each other in a professional development community. International Journal of Music Education, 32, 462–477. doi:10.1177/0255761413515819
35.
PernaL. W. (2001). Sex and race differences in faculty tenure and promotion. Research in Higher Education, 42, 541–567. doi:10.1023/A:1011050226672
36.
SabharwalM.CorleyE. A. (2009). Faculty job satisfaction across gender and discipline. Social Science Journal, 46, 539–556. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2009.04.015
StupniskyR. H.Weaver-HightowerM. B.KartoshkinaY. (2015). Exploring and testing the predictors of new faculty success: A mixed methods study. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 368–390. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.842220
39.
SullivanJ. M.WeaverM. A. (2015). Formative feedback in peer teaching: Results from a national survey of music-teacher educators. Paper presented at The 2015 Symposium on Music Teacher Education, Greensboro, NC.
40.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
