The purpose of this research was to investigate music performer/music teacher identity by examining double majors in various stages of their programs of study aspiring to become a performer and music educator. Unlike their single-major peers, double majors cope with additional challenges as they simultaneously develop both identities, determining who they are and who they hope to become. Using individual and focus group interviews and e-mail prompts, I investigated the experiences of five undergraduate students majoring in music education and music performance. Participants expressed various degrees of blended musician identity. Although they described similar socialization processes, training as performers and teachers—in conjunction with challenging schedules—enhanced and exacerbated those processes. Participants identified performer and teacher qualities influencing self-perceptions and described conflict between performance and music education majors within studios and university. Music teacher educators can use their role as socialization agents as they guide performer-teachers through dual- and single-degree programs.
AustinJ. R.IsbellD. S.RussellJ. A. (2010). A multi-institution exploration of secondary socialization and occupational identity among undergraduate music majors. Psychology of Music, 40, 66–83. doi:10.1177/0305735610381886
2.
BalzacqT. (2002). Security, identity, and symbolic interactionism. International Review of Sociology, 12, 469–506. doi:10.1080/0390670022000041439
BouijC. (1998). Swedish music teachers in training and professional life. International Journal of Music Education, 32, 24–32. doi:10.1177/025576149803200103
5.
BouijC. (2004, December). Two theoretical perspectives on the socialization of music teachers. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 3(3). Retrieved from http://act.maydaygroup.org/articles/Bouij3_3.pdf
6.
BurkeP. J.StetsJ. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
ConwayC.ErosJ.PellegrinoK.WestC. (2010). Instrumental music education students’ perceptions of tensions experienced during their undergraduate degree. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58, 260–275. doi:10.1177/0022429410377114
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DeauxK.BurkeP. (2010). Bridging identities. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 315–320. doi:10.1177/0190272510388996
10.
FroehlichH. (2007). Sociology for music teachers: Perspectives for practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
11.
HargreavesD. J.MiellD.MacDonaldR. A. R. (2002). What are musical identities, and why are they important? In MacDonaldR. A. R.HargreavesD. J.MeillD.(Eds.), Musical identities (pp. 1–20). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12.
HellmanD. (2008). Do music education majors intend to teach music?Update: Application of Research in Music Education, 27, 65–70. doi:10.1177/8755123308322378
13.
HoggM. A.TerryD. J.WhiteK. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255–269.
14.
IsbellD. S. (2008). Musicians and teachers: The socialization and occupational identity of preservice music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 162–178. doi:10.1177/0022429408322853
15.
JamesW. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
16.
MadsenC. K.KellyS. N. (2002). First remembrances of wanting to become a music teacher. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 323–332. doi:10.2307/3345358
17.
MarkD. (1998). The music teacher’s dilemma—musician or teacher?International Journal of Music Education, 32, 3–23. doi:10.1177/025576149803200102
18.
McCallG. J.SimmonsJ. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life. New York, NY: Free Press.
19.
NelsonL. (1998). Herbert Blumer’s symbolic interactionism. Meta discourses: Human communication theory. Boulder: University of Colorado at Boulder.
20.
NettlB. (1995). Heartland excursions: Ethnomusicological reflections on schools of music. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
21.
RobertsB. A. (1991). Music teacher education as identity construction. International Journal of Music Education, 18, 30–39. doi:10.1177/025576149101800104
22.
RobertsB. A. (1993). I, musician: Towards a model of identity construction and maintenance by music education students as musicians. St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
23.
ScheibJ. W. (2006). Policy implications for teacher retention: Meeting the needs of the dual identity. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(6), 5–10. doi:10.3200/AEPR.107.6.5-10
24.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
StrykerS. (1987). The vitalization of symbolic interactionism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 83–84.
26.
TeachoutD. J. (2001). The relationship between personality and the teaching effectiveness of music student teachers. Psychology of Music, 29, 179–192. doi:10.1177/0305735601292007
27.
TeachoutD. J.McKoyC. L. (2010). The effect of teacher role development training on undergraduate music education majors: A preliminary study. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20, 88–104. doi:10.1177/1057083710365052
28.
ThoitsP. A. (2003). Personal agency in the accumulation of multiple role-identities. In BurkeP.OwensT.SerpeR.ThoitsP. (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 179–194). New York, NY: Kluwer Acedemic/Plenum.
29.
ThompsonL. K.CampbellM. R. (2003). Gods, guides, and gardeners: Preservice music educators’ personal teaching metaphors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 158, 43–54.
30.
WoodfordP. G. (2002). The social construction of music teacher identity in undergraduate music education majors. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 675–694). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
