Why Select New Music Teachers Chose to,or Chose Not to,Apply to Teach in an Urban School District

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to describe the criteria that highly qualified music-education students with cultural diversity training from a Hispanic-serving institution used in their decision to apply or not apply to teach in an urban district on graduation. Eleven participants were selected. Three of them applied to an urban district and one accepted an urban job. Findings from employment inducement studies formed the theoretical basis to analyze the criteria the participants used to make their employment decisions. Content analysis of open-ended interviews reveals the importance of the following criteria in making the decision to apply to teach in an urban school district: the participants’ perceptions of the match of their own values to the organization’s values, specifically, whether they would be able to achieve what they wanted to and the proximity of the school district to where the participant grew up. These participants did not place great importance on salary. The finding of most interest is that the four participants who did not apply to teach in an urban district instead accepted jobs in midurban Title One schools, thereby teaching the same socioeconomic population they would have taught in an urban school. These particular participants were willing to teach students in lower socioeconomic circumstances, but they wanted to do so in a district where they believed that their ensembles would be competitive.

Keywords

teacher recruitment urban music teaching music teacher education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abril, C. ( 2006). Teaching music in urban landscapes: Three perspectives . In C. Frierson-Campbell (Ed.), Teaching music in the urban classroom (Vol. 1, pp. 75-98). Lanham, MD: MENC/Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Boyd, D. , Lankford, H. , Loeb, S. , & Wyckoff, J. ( 2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113-132.

Charmaz, K. ( 2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis . In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 675-694). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cox, P. ( 1997). The professional socialization of music teachers as musicians and educators. In R. Rideout (Ed.), On the sociology of music education (pp. 112-120). Norman: University of Oklahoma.

Darling-Hammond, L. ( 1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching . Kutztown, PA: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.

Emmanuel, D. ( 2006a). Building bridges: collaboration between elementary music students and music education undergraduates. In C. Frierson-Campbell (Ed.), Teaching music in the urban classroom (Vol. 2, pp. 95-104). Oxford , UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

Emmanuel, D. ( 2006b). Cultural clashes: The complexity of identifying urban culture. In C. Frierson-Campbell (Ed.), Teaching music in the urban classroom (Vol. 1, pp. 15-24). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

Farkas, S. , Johnson, J. , & Foleno, T. ( 2000). A sense of calling: Who teaches and why. New York: Public Agenda. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://www.publicagenda.org/reports/sense-calling

Fredrickson, W.E. , & Burton, J.B. ( 2005). Where will the supply of new teachers come from, where shall we recruit, and who will teach these prospective teachers? Journal of Music Teacher Education, 14(2), 30-36. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://jmt.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/14/2/30

10.

Frierson-Campbell, C. (Ed.). (2006a). Teaching music in the urban classroom (Vol. 1). Oxford , UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

11.

Frierson-Campbell, C. (Ed.). (2006b). Teaching music in the urban classroom (Vol. 2). Oxford , UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

12.

Glesne, G. ( 1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

13.

Hirsh, E. ( 2001). Teacher recruitment: Staffing classrooms with quality teachers. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers. Retrieved July 7, 2008, from http://www.sheeo.org

14.

Kelly, S.N. ( 2003). The influence of selected cultural factors on the environmental teaching preference of undergraduate music education majors. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 12(2), 40-50. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://jmt.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/12/2/40

15.

Kindall-Smith, M. ( 2006). I plant my feet on higher ground: Music teacher education for urban schools. In C. Frierson-Campbell (Ed.), Teaching music in the urban classroom (Vol. 2, pp. 47-66). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

16.

LaPlante, A. ( 2005). Teachers’ preferences for where they teach may disadvantage urban schools. Retrieved September 1, 2007, from http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/research/socialinnovation_loeb_teachers.shtml

17.

Liu, E. , Johnson, S.M. , & Peske, H.G. ( 2004). New teachers and the Massachusetts signing bonus: The limits of inducements. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 26, 217-236.

18.

Patton, M.Q. ( 1990). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

19.

Phillips, K.H. ( 2008). Exploring research in music education & music therapy . New York: Oxford University Press .

20.

Roberts, B.A. ( 1991). A place to play: The social world of university schools of music. St. John’s, Canada: Memorial University of Newfoundland.

21.

Rohwer, D. , & Henry, H. ( 2004). University teachers’ perceptions of requisite skills and characteristics of effective music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 13(2), 18-27. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://jmt.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/13/2/18

22.

Shipp, V.H. ( 1999). Factors influencing the career choices of African American collegians: Implications for minority teacher recruitment. Journal of Negro Education, 68(3), 342-351.

23.

Smith, J. ( 2006). The challenges of urban teaching: Young urban music educators at work. In C. Frierson-Campbell (Ed.), Teaching music in the urban classroom (Vol. 1, pp. 57-74). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

24.

Texas Association of Suburban/Mid-Urban Schools. (n.d.). Retrieved September 15, 2007, from http://www.tasanet.org/conferences/content.cfm?ItemNumber=2139

25.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Developing Hispanic-serving institutions program- Title V. Retrieved June 18, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/idueshsi/index.html

26.

Wolcott, P. ( 2007, April 21). Curious about TAS/MUS? Retrieved August 17, 2009 from http://www.peytonwolcott.com/TASMUS2.html

27.

Young, I.P. , Place, A.W. , Rinehart, J.S. , Jury, J.C. , & Baits, D.F. ( 1997). Teacher recruitment: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis for race and sex. Educational Administration Quarterly , 33(1), 86-106.

28.

Zulich, J. , Bean, T.W. , & Herrick, J. ( 1992). Charting stages of preservice teacher development and reflection in a multicultural community through dialogue journal analysis . Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(4), 345-360.