The purpose of this study is to describe the current process of selecting cooperating teachers and their preparation for this role in music teacher education throughout the state of Illinois to improve future practices and policies. Coordinators of student teaching and music education professors (N = 19) were surveyed regarding their school's selection and preparation practices. Findings include a reliance on the personal and professional relationships between K–12 and collegiate music educators when selecting music cooperating teachers rather than on the recommendation of school principals (p = .003) as reported throughout the general education literature. Preparation activities are limited to the use of handbooks of student teaching, one-on-one conferences between cooperating teachers and college or university supervisors, and an occasional class or workshop. Finally, current selection practices based on previous knowledge of cooperating teacher candidates may in fact decrease the need for preparation.
Applegate, J., & Lasley, T. (1982). Cooperating teachers' problems with preservice field experience students. Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 15-18.
Ball, J.I. (1982). The effects on student teachers of supervisory personnel in an innovative student teaching experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign .
4.
Bauer, H.E. (1968). A guide for the cooperating teacher in music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University , New York.
5.
Blocker, L.S., & Swetnam, L.A. (1995). The selection and evaluation of cooperating teachers: A status report. Teacher Educator, 30(3), 19-30.
6.
Brand, M. (1982). Effects of student teaching on the classroom management beliefs and skills of music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30(4), 255-265.
7.
Brand, M. (1993). Does student teaching make a difference? In R. L. Robinson (Ed.), Preparing to teach music in today's schools: The best of MEJ (pp. 19-22). Reston, VA: MENC.
8.
Brodbelt, S. (1980). Selecting the supervising teacher. Contemporary Education, 51(2), 86-88.
9.
Browne, D., & Hoover, J.H. (1990). The degree to which student teachers report using instructional strategies valued by university faculty. Action in Teacher Education, 12(1), 20-24.
10.
The College Music Society. (2004). Directory of music faculties in colleges and universities, U.S. and Canada, 2004-05 (26th ed.). Retrieved October 6, 2004, from http://www.collegemusicsociety.org
11.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Hammerness, K. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 390-441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Drafall, L.E. (1991). The use of developmental clinical supervision with student teachers in secondary choral music: Two case studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign .
13.
Edwards, M.C., & Briers, G.E. (2001). Cooperating teachers' perceptions of important elements of the student teaching experience: A focus group approach with quantitative follow-up. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(3), 31-42.
14.
Fowler, F.J., Jr. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Glasberg, S., & Sprinthall, N. (1980). Student teaching: A developmental approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 31-38.
16.
Glickman, C.D., & Bey, T.M. (1990). Supervision. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 549-566). New York: Macmillan.
17.
Guyton, E., & McIntyre, D.J. (1990). Student teaching and school experiences. In W. R. Houston (Ed.) Handbook of research in teacher education (pp. 514-534). New York: Macmillan.
18.
Kahn, B. (2001). Portrait of success: Cooperating teachers and the student teaching experience. Action in Teacher Education , 22(4), 48-58.
19.
Koerner, M.E. (1992). The cooperating teacher: An ambivalent participant in student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 4(1), 46-56.
20.
Koerner, M.E., Rust, F., & Baumgartner, F. (2002). Exploring roles in student teaching placements. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 35-58.
21.
Korinek, L.A. (1989). Teacher preferences for training and compensation for field supervision. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 46-51.
22.
Koster, B., Korthagen, F.A.J., & Wubbels, T. (1998). Is there anything left for us? Functions of cooperating teachers and teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 21(1), 75-89.
23.
LaBoskey, V.K., & Richert, A.E. (2002). Identifying good student teaching placements: A programmatic perspective. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 7-34.
24.
Richardson-Koehler, V. (1988). Barriers to the effective supervision of student teaching: A field study. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 28-34.
25.
Rideout, R., & Feldman, A. (2002). Research in music student teaching. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 874-886). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Rohe, C.J. (1984). Towards a model for improving the professional quality of the student teaching practicum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
27.
Schleuter, L.J. (1988). An analysis of elementary general music student teachers' pre-active and post-active thinking about curricula. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, OH.
28.
Schmidt, M. (1994). Learning from experience: Influences on music student teachers' perceptions and practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Michigan, Ann Arbor .
29.
Snyder, D.W. (1996). Classroom management and the music student teacher. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati , OH.
30.
Sudzina, M., Giebelhaus, C., & Coolican, M. (1997). Mentor or tormentor: The role of the cooperating teacher in student teacher success or failure. Action in Teacher Education, 18(4), 23-35.
