The focus of this study is to investigate the mechanical properties, of ±35° and ±55° filament wound (FW) composite tubes under axial compression loading using the acoustic emission technique. For this purpose, material failure, crashworthiness characteristics, and the effect of each mechanism on the energy absorption capacity were studied using numerical and experimental approaches. Also, to identify and estimate the contribution percentage of damage mechanisms as well as how the damage grows in the specimens, the analysis of acoustic emission signals recorded during loading was performed. Digital image correlation was additionally used to capture displacement/strain contour maps. Finally, to analyze the effect of the winding pattern in the experimental test, the tubes were simulated using finite element analysis (FEA). For modeling of damage mechanisms, a 3D continuum damage model was used. The results of signal processing showed that by increasing the weaving angle of fibers from ±35° to ±55°, the separation of fibers from the matrix decreases, and the percentage of matrix crushing and fiber failure increases. The assessment of damage percentages showed that the reason for the large drop in force at ±55° compared to ±35° is the increase in matrix crushing. Furthermore, the failure behavior of FW tubes appeared to be dominated by local buckling, and the FEA effectively predicted the linear behavior and maximum load value of the composite tubes.
ASTM D2584 (1968)
Standard test method for ignition loss of cured reinforced resins. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 8.01, pp.328–329.
2.
ASTM D3410/D3410M-95 (2003)
Standard test methods for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials with unsupported gage section by shear loading. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 8.01, pp.116–131.
3.
AzeemMYaHHKumarM, et al. (2022)
Application of filament winding technology in composite pressure vessels and challenges: a review. Journal of Energy Storage49: 103468.
4.
BarberoEJ (2010) Introduction to Composite Materials Design. USA: CRC Press.
5.
BettsDSadeghianPFamA (2021)
Experimental and analytical investigations of the flexural behavior of hollow ±55° filament wound GFRP tubes. Thin-Walled Structures159: 107246.
6.
BoczarTLorencM (2006)
Standard guide for determining the reproducibility of acoustic emission sensor response. Phys Chem Solid State7: 585–588.
7.
AlmeidaJHSJrBittrichLJansenE, et al. (2019)
Buckling optimization of composite cylinders for axial compression: A design methodology considering a variable-axial fiber layout. Composite Structures222: 110928.
8.
AlmeidaJHSJrRibeiroMLTitaV, et al. (2016)
Damage and failure in carbon/epoxy filament wound composite tubes under external pressure: Experimental and numerical approaches. Materials & Design96: 431–438.
9.
AlmeidaJHSJrRibeiroMLTitaV, et al. (2017a)
Damage modeling for carbon fiber/epoxy filament wound composite tubes under radial compression. Composite Structures160: 204–210.
10.
AlmeidaJHSJrRibeiroMLTitaV, et al. (2017b)
Stacking sequence optimization in composite tubes under internal pressure based on genetic algorithm accounting for progressive damage. Composite Structures178: 20–26.
11.
AlmeidaJHSJrTonattoMLRibeiroML, et al. (2018)
Buckling and post-buckling of filament wound composite tubes under axial compression: Linear, nonlinear, damage and experimental analyses. Composites Part B: Engineering149: 227–239.
12.
DavijaniABHajikhaniMAhmadiM (2011)
Acoustic emission based on sentry function to monitor the initiation of delamination in composite materials. Materials & Design32(5): 3059–3065.
13.
DenizMEKarakuzuRIctenBM (2013)
Transverse impact and axial compression behaviors of glass/epoxy pipes subjected to seawater and impact loading. International Journal of Damage Mechanics22(7): 1071–1085.
14.
El-HageHMallickPKZamaniN (2006)
A numerical study on the quasi-static axial crush characteristics of square aluminum–composite hybrid tubes. Composite Structures73(4): 505–514.
15.
EllobodyEYoungB (2011)
Numerical simulation of concrete encased steel composite columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research67(2): 211–222.
16.
EsnaolaAElguezabalBAurrekoetxeaJ, et al. (2016)
Optimization of the semi-hexagonal geometry of a composite crush structure by finite element analysis. Composites Part B: Engineering93: 56–66.
17.
FangJSunGQiuN, et al. (2017)
On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization55(3): 1091–1119.
18.
FotouhiMHeidaryHAhmadiM, et al. (2012)
Characterization of composite materials damage under quasi-static three-point bending test using wavelet and fuzzy C-means clustering. Journal of Composite Materials46(15): 1795–1808.
19.
FotouhiMJalalvandMSaeedifarM, et al. (2020)
High performance quasi-isotropic thin-ply carbon/glass hybrid composites with pseudo-ductile behaviour loaded off-axis. Composite Structures247: 112444.
20.
GaoYWangZ (2021)
Experimental study on the damage process of marble under true triaxial pre-peak unloading conditions. International Journal of Damage Mechanics30(10): 1542–1557.
21.
GemiLKöroğluMAAshourA (2018)
Experimental study on compressive behavior and failure analysis of composite concrete confined by glass/epoxy ±55° filament wound pipes. Composite Structures187: 157–168.
22.
GemiLMorkavukSKöklüU, et al. (2020b)
The effects of stacking sequence on drilling machinability of filament wound hybrid composite pipes: Part-2 damage analysis and surface quality. Composite Structures235: 111737.
23.
GemiDSŞahinÖSGemiL (2021)
Experimental investigation of the effect of diameter upon low velocity impact response of glass fiber reinforced composite pipes. Composite Structures275: 114428.
24.
GemiDSŞahinÖSGemiL (2022)
Experimental investigation of axial compression behavior after low velocity impact of glass fiber reinforced filament wound pipes with different diameter. Composite Structures280: 114929.
25.
GemiLSinan ŞahinÖAkdemirA (2017)
Experimental investigation of fatigue damage formation of hybrid pipes subjected to impact loading under internal pre-stress. Composites Part B: Engineering119: 196–205.
26.
GemiLTarakçioğluNAkdemirA, et al. (2009)
Progressive fatigue failure behavior of glass/epoxy (±75)2 filament-wound pipes under pure internal pressure. Materials & Design30(10): 4293–4298.
27.
GemiLKöklüUYazmanŞ, et al. (2020a)
The effects of stacking sequence on drilling machinability of filament wound hybrid composite pipes: Part-1 mechanical characterization and drilling tests. Composites Part B: Engineering186: 107787.
HashinZ (1980)
Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. Journal of Applied Mechanics47(2): 329–334.
30.
HibbittKS and Sorensen Inc. (2000) Abaqus/Standard User's Manual. Volume III, Version 6.1, USA: Sorensen, Inc.
31.
HuijerAKassapoglouCPahlavanL (2021)
Acoustic emission monitoring of carbon fibre reinforced composites with embedded sensors for in-situ damage identification. Sensors21(20): 6926.
32.
IsometsäJSjölindSG (1999)
A continuum damage mechanics model for fiber reinforced composites. International Journal of Damage Mechanics8(1): 2–17.
33.
JinYWuZPanZ, et al. (2020)
Numerical and experimental study on effect of braiding angle on low-velocity transverse punch response of braided composite tube. International Journal of Damage Mechanics29(4): 667–686.
34.
JonesRM (2018) Mechanics of Composite Materials. USA: CRC Press.
35.
KaramiPTabatabaeiSAZangarakiR, et al. (2015)
Experimental and numerical analyses of progressive damage in non-circular metal/composite hybrid vessels under internal pressure. International Journal of Damage Mechanics24(8): 1261–1279.
36.
KhalifaABZidiMAbdelwahedL (2012)
Mechanical characterization of glass/vinylester ±55 filament wound pipes by acoustic emission under axial monotonic loading. Comptes Rendus Mécanique340(6): 453–460.
37.
KordkheiliSAHKarimianMJafariHR (2021)
A particular criterion for progressive failure analysis of carbon/phenolic tape-wounded conic shells. International Journal of Damage Mechanics30(8): 1238–1260.
38.
LiuXZhuHJuJ, et al. (2020)
Investigation of the unbiased probabilistic behavior of the fiber-reinforced concrete's elastic moduli using stochastic micromechanical approach. International Journal of Damage Mechanics29(7): 1059–1075.
39.
LuoHYanYMengX, et al. (2016)
Progressive failure analysis and energy-absorbing experiment of composite tubes under axial dynamic impact. Composites Part B: Engineering87: 1–11.
40.
MahdiEHamoudaAMSSahariBB, et al. (2003)
Effect of hybridisation on crushing behaviour of carbon/glass fibre/epoxy circular–cylindrical shells. Journal of Materials Processing Technology132(1–3): 49–57.
41.
MazizARechakSTarfaouiM (2020)
Comparative study of tubular composite structure subjected to internal pressure loading: Analytical and numerical investigation. Journal of Composite Materials55(11): 1517–1533.
42.
MazizATarfaouiMGemiL, et al. (2021b)
A progressive damage model for pressurized filament-wound hybrid composite pipe under low-velocity impact. Composite Structures276: 114520.
43.
MazizATarfaouiMRechakS, et al. (2021a)
Finite element analysis of impact-induced damage in pressurized hybrid composites pipes. International Journal of Applied Mechanics13(7): 2150074.
44.
MertinyPEllyinFHothanA (2004)
An experimental investigation on the effect of multi-angle filament winding on the strength of tubular composite structures. Composites Science and Technology64(1): 1–9.
45.
MohamadFHosseinHFarzadP, et al. (2012)
Composite materials damage characterization under quasi-static 3-point bending test using fuzzy C-means clustering. Applied Mechanics and Materials110–116: 1221–1228.
46.
MohammadiRNajafabadiMASaeedifarM, et al. (2017)
Correlation of acoustic emission with finite element predicted damages in open-hole tensile laminated composites. Composites Part B: Engineering108: 427–435.
47.
MuhammadA (2014)
Energy absorption behaviour of filament wound glass and carbon epoxies composite tubes. IOSR Journal of Applied Physics6(4): 30–37.
48.
NiQQIwamotoM (2002)
Wavelet transform of acoustic emission signals in failure of model composites. Engineering Fracture Mechanics69(6): 717–728.
49.
OskoueiAAhmadiMHajikhaniM (2009)
Wavelet-based acoustic emission characterization of damage mechanism in composite materials under mode I delamination at different interfaces. Express Polymer Letters3(12): 804–813.
50.
ÖzbekÖBozkurtÖY (2019a)
The influence of fiber orientation on crashworthiness behavior of carbon fiber reinforced composite pipes. European Journal of Engineering Science and Technology2(3): 53–63.
51.
ÖzbekÖBozkurtÖY (2019c)
Hoop tensile and compression behavior of glass-carbon intraply hybrid fiber reinforced filament wound composite pipes. Materials Testing61(8): 763–769.
52.
ÖzbekÖBozkurtÖYErkliğA (2019b)
An experimental study on intraply fiber hybridization of filament wound composite pipes subjected to quasi-static compression loading. Polymer Testing79: 106082.
53.
ÖzbekÖBozkurtÖYErkliğA (2022)
Development of a trigger mechanism with circular cut-outs to improve crashworthiness characteristics of glass fiber-reinforced composite pipes. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering44(1): 1–14.
54.
ÖzbekÖDoğanNFBozkurtÖY (2020)
An experimental investigation on lateral crushing response of glass/carbon intraply hybrid filament wound composite pipes. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering42(7): 1–13.
55.
PanZWangMYingZ, et al. (2022)
Failure mechanism of Ω-shape 3D orthogonal woven composite component under transverse low-velocity impact and subsequent axial compression load. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 1056789521103650231(2): 246–274.
56.
RibeiroMLTitaVVandepitteD (2012)
A new damage model for composite laminates. Composite Structures94(2): 635–642.
57.
RousseauJPerreuxDVerdiereN (1999)
The influence of winding patterns on the damage behaviour of filament-wound pipes. Composites Science and Technology59(9): 1439–1449.
58.
SaeedifarMSalehMNNijhuisP, et al. (2022)
Damage assessment of a titanium skin adhesively bonded to carbon fiber–reinforced plastic omega stringers using acoustic emission. Structural Health Monitoring 1475921721100175221(2): 407–423.
59.
SaeedifarMZarouchasD (2020)
Damage characterization of laminated composites using acoustic emission: a review. Composites Part B: Engineering195: 108039.
60.
SevkatETumerH (2013)
Residual torsional properties of composite shafts subjected to impact loadings. Materials & Design51: 956–967.
61.
ŠoferMCiencialaJFusekM, et al. (2021)
Damage analysis of composite CFRP tubes using acoustic emission monitoring and pattern recognition approach. Materials14(4): 786.
62.
Van PaepegemWDe BaereIDegriecJ (2006)
Modelling the nonlinear shear stress–strain response of glass fibre-reinforced composites. Part I: experimental results. Composites Science and Technology66(10): 1455–1464.
63.
WeiKShiHLiJ, et al. (2022)
A new progressive damage model for predicting the tensile behavior of the three-dimensional woven carbon/carbon composites using micromechanics method. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 1056789521103549631(2): 294–322.
64.
WojtaszczykP (1997) A Mathematical Introduction to Wavelets. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, p.37.
65.
WuFChenKWangTY, et al. (2019)
Stochastic hybrid perturbation technique-based smoothed finite element-statistical energy method for mid-frequency analysis of structure–acoustic systems with parametric and nonparametric uncertainties. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering349: 522–549.
66.
XuDLiuPFChenZP (2020)
A waveform clustering method for damage mode identification for composite laminates under hygrothermal environment. Engineering Fracture Mechanics239: 107290.
67.
YangKYanQZhangC, et al. (2021)
Study on mechanical properties and damage evolution of carbonaceous shale under triaxial compression with acoustic emission. International Journal of Damage Mechanics30(6): 899–922.
68.
YazmanŞ (2021)
The effects of back-up on drilling machinability of filament wound GFRP composite pipes: Mechanical characterization and drilling tests. Journal of Manufacturing Processes68: 1535–1552.
69.
ZhuHWeiXJuJW, et al. (2021)
Statistical micromechanical damage model for SH-SFRC under tensile load considering the interfacial slip-softening and matrix spalling effects. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 1056789521101122530(9): 1423–1449.
70.
ZhuGSunGYuH, et al. (2018)
Energy absorption of metal, composite and metal/composite hybrid structures under oblique crushing loading. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences135: 458–483.
