In this paper, a multi-disciplinary analysis method is proposed for evaluating the fatigue life of railway vehicle car body structure under random dynamic loads. Firstly, the hybrid fatigue analysis method was used with Multi-Body System simulation and finite element method for evaluating the carbody structure dynamic stress histories. The dynamics stress is calculated from the longitudinal load using longitudinal train dynamics. Secondly, the nonlinear damage accumulation model was used in fatigue analysis, and carbody structure fatigue life and fatigue damage were predicted. The mathematical model simulations are compared with results produced experimentally, showing good agreement. Finally, the mode is determined after the finite element model is established. To achieve the dynamic stress at each node, the modal response is used as excitation. The carbody damage was obtained by combining dynamics stress with the NMCCMF damage accumulation model. As a result, the effect of longitudinal load on carbody fatigue damage is investigated. The longitudinal load contributes significantly to the fatigue damage of the carbody.
AmiteshVCKalePChandratrePKV (2016)
Failure analysis of a helical compression spring. Int J Mod Trends Eng Res3(4): 28–30.
3.
BertiniLCeraAFrendoF (2014)
Experimental investigation of the fatigue resistance of pipe-to-plate welded connections under bending, torsion and mixed mode loading. International Journal of Fatigue68: 178–185.
4.
Bhardawaj S, Sharma RC and Sharma SK (2020)
Ride analysis of track-vehicle-human body interaction subjected to random excitation. J Chinese Soc Mech Eng41(2): 237–236.
5.
BhardawajSSharmaRCSharmaSK (2020)
Development of multibody dynamical using MR damper based semi-active bio-inspired chaotic fruit fly and fuzzy logic hybrid suspension control for rail vehicle system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics234(4): 723–744.
6.
ChandraK (2002) Maintenance manual for BG coaches of LHB design.
Gwalior, India:
Centre for Advanced Maintenance Technology.
7.
ChuYSYupJS (2016)
Track–bridge interaction analysis using interface elements adaptive to various loading cases. J Bridg Eng21(9): 4016056.
8.
CruceanuCCrăciunCICruceanuIC (2015)
Effects of mechanical wheel slide protection devices action on railway vehicles braking process. Applied Mechanics and Materials809–810: 1085–1090.
9.
DaiLChiMGaoH, et al. (2020)
An investigation into the modeling methodology of the coil spring. Shock Vib2020. DOI:doi:10.1155/2020/8814332.
10.
FerhatoğluECiğeroğluEÖzgüvenHN (2016)
A modal superposition method for the analysis of nonlinear systems. Conf. Proc. Soc. Exp. Mech. Ser6(January): 269–278. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29910-5_28.
11.
FerhatogluECigerogluEÖzgüvenHN (2018)
A new modal superposition method for nonlinear vibration analysis of structures using hybrid mode shapes. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing107: 317–342.
12.
GargVKDukkipatiR V (1984)
Chapter 6 – Tangent track response of railway vehicles. Dynamics of Railway Vehicle Systems, Elsevier: Academic Press. ISBN 9780122759505: pp.177–224. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-275950-5.50011-0.
13.
GoyalSAnandCSSharmaSK, et al. (2019)
Crashworthiness analysis of foam filled star shape polygon of thin-walled structure. Thin-Walled Structures144: 106312.
14.
GuoFWuSLiuJ, et al. (2021)
A time-domain stepwise fatigue assessment to bridge small-scale fracture mechanics with large-scale system dynamics for high-speed maglev lightweight bogies. Engineering Fracture Mechanics248: 107711.
15.
HanJ-WKimJ-DSongS-Y (2013)
Fatigue strength evaluation of a bogie frame for urban maglev train with fatigue test on full-scale test rig. Engineering Failure Analysis31: 412–420.
16.
IwnickiS (2006) Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics. Boca Raton: CRC Press, ISBN 1420004891.
17.
LingLJinX (2014)
A 3D model for coupling dynamics analysis of high-speed train/track system. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A15: 964–983.
18.
LinhartVČernýI (2011)
An effect of strength of railway axle steels on fatigue resistance under press fit. Engineering Fracture Mechanics78(5): 731–741.
19.
LuYBiWZhangX, et al. (2020)
Calculation method of dynamic loads spectrum and effects on fatigue damage of a full-scale carbody for high-speed trains. Vehicle System Dynamics58(7): 1037–1056.
20.
MilovanovićVDunićVRakićD, et al. (2013)
Identification causes of cracking on the underframe of wagon for containers transportation – Fatigue strength assessment of wagon welded joints. Engineering Failure Analysis31: 118–131.
21.
PalliSKoonaRSharmaSK, et al. (2018)
A review on dynamic analysis of rail vehicle coach. International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems10(3): 204–211.
22.
SharmaRCSharmaSSharmaSK, et al. (2020)
Analysis of generalized force and its influence on ride and stability of railway vehicle. Noise & Vibration Worldwide51(6): 95–109.
23.
SharmaRCSharmaSSharmaSK, et al. (2021)
Analysis of bio-dynamic model of seated human subject and optimization of the passenger ride comfort for three-wheel vehicle using random search technique. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics235(1): 106–121.
24.
SharmaSK (2019)
Multibody analysis of longitudinal train dynamics on the passenger ride performance due to brake application. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics233(2): 266–279.
25.
SharmaSKKumarA (2017)
Impact of electric locomotive traction of the passenger vehicle ride quality in longitudinal train dynamics in the context of Indian railways. Mechanics & Industry18(2): 222.
26.
SharmaSKKumarA (2017)
Ride performance of a high speed rail vehicle using controlled semi active suspension system. Smart Materials and Structures26(5): 055026.
27.
SharmaSKKumarA (2018)
Disturbance rejection and force-tracking controller of nonlinear lateral vibrations in passenger rail vehicle using magnetorheological fluid damper. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures29(2): 279–297.
28.
SharmaSKKumarA (2018)
Impact of longitudinal train dynamics on train operations: A simulation-based study. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies6(3): 197–203.
29.
SharmaSKKumarA (2018)
Ride comfort of a higher speed rail vehicle using a magnetorheological suspension system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics232(1): 32–48.
30.
SharmaSKLeeJ (2020)
Design and development of smart semi active suspension for nonlinear rail vehicle vibration reduction. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics20(11): 2050120.
31.
SharmaSKLeeJ (2021)
Crashworthiness analysis for structural stability and dynamics. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics21(04): 2150039.
32.
SharmaSKSharmaRC (2018)
An investigation of a locomotive structural crashworthiness using finite element simulation. SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles11(4): 235–244.
33.
SharmaSKPhanHLeeJ (2020)
An application study on road surface monitoring using DTW based image processing and ultrasonic sensors. Applied Sciences10(13): 4490.
34.
SharmaSKSainiUKumarA (2019)
Semi-active control to reduce lateral vibration of passenger rail vehicle using disturbance rejection and continuous state damper controllers. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies7(2): 117–129.
35.
SimKSNiaMETanTL, et al.
Characteristics of different frequency ranges in scanning electron microscope images. AIP Conf. Proc1669(2015): 020056. doi:10.1063/1.4919194.
36.
SosnovskiyLSherbakovS (2017)
A model of mechanothermodynamic entropy in tribology. Entropy19(3): 115.
37.
SunWThompsonDZhouJ (2020)
The influence of vehicle–track dynamic coupling on the fatigue failure of coil springs within the primary suspension of metro vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics58(11): 1694–1710.
38.
SunWThompsonDJZhouJ, et al. (2016)
Analysis of dynamic stiffness effect of primary suspension helical springs on railway vehicle vibration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series744: 012149.
39.
WuSCZhangSQXuZW, et al. (2016)
Cyclic plastic strain based damage tolerance for railway axles in China. International Journal of Fatigue93: 64–70.
40.
XiLSonglinZ (2009)
Strengthening and damaging under low-amplitude loads below the fatigue limit. International Journal of Fatigue31(2): 341–345.
41.
ZhangJFuXLinJ, et al. (2018)
Study on damage accumulation and life prediction with loads below fatigue limit based on a modified nonlinear model. Materials (Basel)11(11): 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112298.
42.
ZhouXLiFSXieJL, et al. (2015)
Equivalent stress evaluation of the load spectrum measured on the EMU axle based on damage tolerance. Journal of Mechanical Engineering51(8): 131–136.
