In the engineering application of high strength steel and surface strengthening steel, fisheye failure is often happened in high cycle fatigue. To explore the effect of fisheye failure on high cycle fatigue properties of materials, a high cycle fatigue life model was established based on the Murakami and Tanaka’s fatigue strength models. The model introduces the error circle to evaluate fisheye size, and discusses the influencing factors of fatigue strength. The results show that the size and depth of fisheye failure will affect performance of materials. The proposed model considering the size and depth of defect quantitatively shows the influence of fisheye details on material performance, and effectively predicts the high/ultra-high cycle fatigue life.
AlazwariMARaoSS (2019)
Modeling and analysis of composite laminates in the presence of uncertainties. Composites Part B: Engineering161: 107–120.
2.
BiffiCAFiocchiJBassaniP, et al. (2017)
Microstructure and preliminary fatigue analysis on AlSi10Mg samples manufactured by SLM. Procedia Structural Integrity7: 50–57.
3.
BlasonSCorreiaJAFOJesusAMPD, et al. (2016)
A probabilistic analysis of Miner’s law for different loading conditions. Structural Engineering and Mechanics60(1): 71–90.
4.
ChapettiMDTagawaTMiyataT (2003)
Ultra-long cycle fatigue of high-strength carbon steels part II: Estimation of fatigue limit for failure from internal inclusions. Materials Science and Engineering: A356(1–2): 236–244.
5.
ChenHDöringMJensenU (2018)
Test for model selection using Cramér–Von Mises distance in a fixed design regression setting. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis102(4): 505–535.
6.
CrupiVEpastoGGuglielminoE, et al. (2015)
Analysis of temperature and fracture surface of AISI4140 steel in very high cycle fatigue regime. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics80: 22–30.
7.
GeHYLiuXTFangY, et al. (2021)
An improved bootstrap method introducing error ellipse for numerical analysis of fatigue life parameters. Engineering Computations38(1): 289–312.
8.
GengFSuikerASJ (2019)
An interface damage model for high-cycle fatigue. Engineering Fracture Mechanics221: 106644.
9.
GengSLLiuXTYangXB, et al. (2019)
Load spectrum for automotive wheels hub based on mixed probability distribution model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering233(14): 3707–3720.
10.
GuerchaisRMorelFSaintierN (2017)
Effect of defect size and shape on the high-cycle fatigue behavior. International Journal of Fatigue100: 530–539.
11.
HuYNWuSCWuZK, et al. (2020)
A new approach to correlate the defect population with the fatigue life of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy. International Journal of Fatigue136: 105584.
12.
JinXChowTWSSunY, et al. (2015)
Kuiper test and autoregressive model-based approach for wireless sensor network fault diagnosis. Wireless Networks21(3): 829–839.
13.
LiWWangPLuLT, et al. (2014)
Evaluation of gigacycle fatigue limit and life of high-strength steel with interior inclusion-induced failure. International Journal of Damage Mechanics23(7): 931–948.
14.
LiuXTKanFCXinXF, et al. (2020a)
Fatigue life prediction of clutch sleeve based on abrasion mathematical model in service period. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures43(3): 488–501.
15.
LiuXTMaoKWangXL, et al. (2020b)
A modified quality loss model of service life prediction for products via wear regularity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety204: 107187.
16.
LiuXTZhangMHWangHJ, et al. (2020c)
Fatigue life analysis of automotive key parts based on improved peak-over-threshold method. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures43(8): 1824–1836.
17.
LiuYWangWHeZ, et al. (2020d)
Nonlinear creep damage model considering effect of pore pressure and analysis of long-term stability of rock structure. International Journal of Damage Mechanics29(1): 144–165.
18.
MasudaCIsiiANishijiamaS (1985)
Heat-to-heat variation in fatigue strength of SCr420 carburized steels. Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part A51: 847–852.
19.
MasudaCNishijimaSTanakaY (1986)
Relationship between fatigue strength and hardness for high strength steels. Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers Series A52(476): 847–852.
20.
MurakamiYEndoM (1994)
Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength. International Journal of Fatigue16(3): 163–182.
21.
NasrAHassineWSaggarM, et al. (2018)
High cycle fatigue approach based on affected depth and considering the secondary dendrite arming spacing (SDAS) effect for a defective A356-T6 alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology98(9–12): 2579–2589.
22.
NehilaALiWZhaoH (2018)
Interior failure mechanism and life prediction of surface-treated 17Cr-Ni steel under high and very high cycle fatigue. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures41(6): 1318–1329.
23.
PanXHongY (2019)
High-cycle and very-high-cycle fatigue behaviour of a titanium alloy with equiaxed microstructure under different mean stresses. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures42(9): 1950–1964.
24.
PaolinoDSTridelloAChiandussiG, et al. (2017)
Estimation of P-S-N curves in very-high-cycle fatigue: Statistical procedure based on a general crack growth rate model. Procedia Structural Integrity7: 335–342.
25.
PaolinoDSTridelloAChiandussiG, et al. (2018)
Estimation of P-S-N curves in very-high-cycle fatigue: Statistical procedure based on a general crack growth rate model. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures41(4): 718–726.
26.
ParantPPicartSLhuissierP, et al. (2020)
Strength of porous oxide microspheres: The role of internal porosity and defects. Journal of the European Ceramic Society40(4): 1613–1619.
27.
ParisPCMarines-GarciaIHertzbergRW, et al. (2004) The relationship of effective stress intensity, elastic modulus and Burgers-vector on fatigue crack growth as associated with“fisheye” gigacycle fatigue phenomena. In: Proc.VHCF-3, Kyoto, Japan. Kyoto, Japan: Society of Materials Science, Japan (JSMS).
28.
PereiraMVTeixeiraMCDarwishFA (2019)
Correlation between fractographic aspects and stress intensity factor in very high cycle fatigue. Procedia Structural Integrity17: 105–114.
29.
QianGAJianZOPanXG, et al. (2020)
In-situ investigation on fatigue behaviors of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by selective laser melting. International Journal of Fatigue133: 105424.
30.
RomanoSNezhadfarPDShamsaeiN, et al. (2020)
High cycle fatigue behavior and life prediction for additively manufactured 17-4 PH stainless steel: Effect of Sub-surface porosity and surface roughness. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics106: 102477.
31.
SakaiTSatoYOgumaN (2002)
Characteristic S-N properties of high-carbon-chromium-bearing steel under axial loading in long-life fatigue. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures25(8–9): 765–773.
32.
SunCSongQZhouL, et al. (2019)
Characteristic of interior crack initiation and early growth for high cycle and very high cycle fatigue of a martensitic stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A758: 112–120.
33.
SunZD (2016) Competitive failure mechanisms and strength-life prediction approaches of carburized/nitrided gear steel under very high cycle fatigue. PhD Thesis, Beijing Institute of Technology, China.
34.
TanakaKAkiniwaY (2002)
Fatigue crack propagation behaviour derived from S-N data in very high cycle regime. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures25(8–9): 775–784.
35.
TolikasKHeraviS (2008)
The Anderson–Darling goodness-of-fit test statistic for the three-parameter lognormal distribution. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods37(19): 3135–3143.
36.
TridelloAFiocchiJBiffiCA, et al. (2019)
VHCF response of heat-treated SLM Ti6Al4V Gaussian specimens with large loaded volume. Procedia Structural Integrity18: 314–321.
37.
XieWMorganD (2018)
CALPHAD modeling and ab initio calculations of the Np-U-Zr system. Computational Materials Science143: 505–514.
38.
YousefiRMoradiMBordbarGH, et al. (2020)
Role of non-stoichiometric defects in optical properties of metal-selenide nanostructures. Journal of Luminescence223: 117211.
39.
YuYGuJLXuL, et al. (2010)
Very high cycle fatigue behaviors of Mn–Si–Cr series Bainite/Martensite dual phase steels. Materials & Design31(6): 3067–3072.
40.
WangHJLiuXTWangXL, et al. (2019a)
Numerical method for estimating fatigue crack initiation size using elastic-plastic fracture mechanics method. Applied Mathematical Modelling73: 365–377.
41.
WangHJLiuXTZhangMH, et al. (2019b)
Prediction of material fatigue parameters for low alloy forged steels considering error circle. International Journal of Fatigue121: 135–145.
42.
WangMLLiuXTWangXL, et al. (2018)
Probabilistic modeling of unified S-N curves for mechanical parts. International Journal of Damage Mechanics27(7): 979–999.
43.
WuJNYanSZZuoMJ (2016)
Evaluating the reliability of multi-body mechanisms: A method considering the uncertainties of dynamic performance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety149: 96–106.
44.
ZhangMHLiuXTWangYS, et al. (2019)
Parameters distribution characteristics of material fatigue life based on improved bootstrap method. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(5): 772–793.
45.
ZhaoPLiuZDuF, et al. (2018)
Ultra-high cycle fatigue property of a multiphase steel microalloyed with niobium. Materials Science and Engineering: A718: 1–8.
46.
ZhuSPHaoYZLiaoD (2020)
Probabilistic modeling and simulation of multiple surface crack propagation and coalescence. Applied Mathematical Modelling78: 383–398.
