The combined effect of pre-existing cracks and pores on the damage evolution behaviour and mechanical properties of rocklike materials under uniaxial compression was numerically studied. Simulations of cracks and pores alone showed that increasing crack length and pore diameter decrease uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and elastic modulus. Subsequent simulations considered two types of combinations of pre-existing cracks and pores – two cracks either side of a centric pore, and two pores either side of a centric crack – and the distance between cracks and pores was changed. In the case of two cracks at either side of the pore, UCS increased only slightly when the distance between the cracks and pore was increased. This was attributed to the more profound effect of the presence of the pore on UCS, and was confirmed by the progressive crack development characteristics and the major principal stress distribution patterns, which showed that the cracks initiated from the tips of the two pre-existing cracks made little or no contribution to the ultimate macroscopic failure. In contrast, models with two pores at either side of a centric crack showed a marked dependency of UCS on the distance between the pores and the crack. Cracks propagating from pre-existing pores made a greater contribution to the ultimate macroscopic failure when the pores were close to the centric crack and the effect gradually diminished with increasing space between pre-existing pores and the centric crack. Major principal stress distributions showed an asymmetric mobilisation of compressive stresses at the right and left sides of the two pores, favouring macroscopic shear failure when they were close to the centric crack which had led to a lower UCS. Overall, this study presents some critical insights into crack-pore interaction behaviour and the resulting mechanical response of rocklike materials to assist with the design of rock structures.
AshbyMFHallamSD (1986)
The failure of brittle solids containing small cracks under compressive stress states. Acta Metallurgica34(3): 497–510.
2.
BahaaddiniMSharrockGHebblewhiteBK (2013)
Numerical investigation of the effect of joint geometrical parameters on the mechanical properties of a non-persistent jointed rock mass under uniaxial compression. Computers and Geotechnics49: 206–225.
3.
BaudPWongT-fZhuW (2014)
Effects of porosity and crack density on the compressive strength of rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences67: 202–211.
4.
BobetA (1997) Fracture coalescence in rock materials: experimental observations and numerical predictions. Sc.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, pp. 824.
5.
CaoPLiuTPuC, et al. (2015)
Crack propagation and coalescence of brittle rock-like specimens with pre-existing cracks in compression. Engineering Geology187: 113–121.
6.
CaoRHCaoPLinH, et al. (2018)
Mechanical behavior of an opening in a jointed rock-like specimen under uniaxial loading: Experimental studies and particle mechanics approach. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering18(1): 198–214.
7.
ChalmersGRLBustinRMPowerIM (2012)
Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: examples from the barnett, woodford, haynesville, marcellus, and doig units. AAPG Bulletin96(6): 1099–1119.
8.
DaiBGuichengHZhijunZ (2018)
A numerical research on crack process of gypsum containing single flaw with different angle and length in uniaxial loading. Shock and Vibration, Article ID 2968205, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2968205
9.
DengHNemat-NasserS (1994)
Microcrack interaction and shear fault failure. International Journal of Damage Mechanics3(1): 3–37.
10.
DuriezJScholtesLDonzeF-V (2016)
Micromechanics of wing crack propagation for different flaw properties. Engineering Fracture Mechanics153: 378–398.
11.
DyskinAVSahouryehEJewellRJ, et al. (2003)
Influence of shape and locations of initial 3-D cracks on their growth in uniaxial compression. Engineering Fracture Mechanics70(15): 2115–2136.,
12.
FanXChenRLinH, et al. (2018)
Cracking and failure in rock specimen containing combined flaw and hole under uniaxial compression. Advances in Civil Engineering, Article ID 9818250, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9818250
13.
FanXLiKLaiH, et al. (2018)
Internal stress distribution and cracking around flaws and openings of rock block under uniaxial compression: a particle mechanics approach. Computers and Geotechnics102: 28–38.
14.
GriffithAA (1920)
The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal SocietyA221: 63–98.
15.
GuiYLZhaoZYZhangC, et al. (2017)
Numerical investigation of the opening effect on the mechanical behaviours in rocks under uniaxial loading using hybrid continuum discrete element method. Computers and Geotechnics90: 55–72.
16.
HeapMJXuTChenC-f (2014)
The influence of porosity and vesicle size on the brittle strength of volcanic rocks and magma. Bulletin of Volcanology76(9): 856.
17.
HoekE (1983)
Twenty-third rankine lecture: Strength of jointed rock masses. Géotechnique33(3): 187–223.
18.
HuangDGuDYangC, et al. (2016)
Investigation on mechanical behaviors of sandstone with two pre-existing flaws under triaxial compression. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering49(2): 375–399.
19.
HuangYHYangSQ (2019)
Mechanical and cracking behavior of granite containing two coplanar flaws under conventional triaxial compression. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(4): 590–610.
20.
HuangYHYangSQRanjithPG, et al. (2017)
Strength failure behavior and crack evolution mechanism of granite containing pre-existing non-coplanar holes: Experimental study and particle flow modelling. Computers and Geotechnics88: 182–198.
21.
Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2013) Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC) – Manual.
Minneapolis, MN:
Author.
22.
KachanovM (1999)
Solids with cracks and non-spherical pores: proper parameters of defect density and effective elastic properties. International Journal of Fracture97(1/4): 1–32.
LajtaiEZ (1974)
Brittle fracture in compression. International Journal of Fracture10(4): 525–536.
25.
LinPWongRHCTangCA (2015)
Experimental study of coalescence mechanisms and failure under uniaxial compression of granite containing multiple holes. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences77: 313–327.
26.
LoucksRGReedRMRuppelSC, et al. (2009)
Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the mississippian Barnett shale. Journal of Sedimentary Research79(12): 848–861.
27.
MartiniCDReadRSMartinoJB (1997)
Observations of brittle failure around a circular test tunnel. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences34(7): 1065–1073.
28.
Nemat-NasserSHoriiH (1982)
Compression induced nonplanar crack extension with application to splitting, exfoliation, and rock burst. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth87(B8): 6805–6821.
29.
NesetovaVLajtaiEZ (1973)
Fracture from compressive stress concentrations around elastic flaws. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts10(4): 265–284.
30.
ParkCHBobetA (2009)
Crack coalescence in specimens with open and closed flaws: a comparison. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences46(5): 819–829.
31.
PatersonMSWongT-f (2005) Experimental Rock Deformation—The Brittle Field. 2nd ed.
New York:
Springer.
32.
PrudencioMVan Sint JanM (2007)
Strength and failure modes of rock mass models with non-persistent joints. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences44(6): 890–902.
33.
SagongMBobetA (2002)
Coalescence of multiple flaws in a rock-model material in uniaxial compression. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences39(2): 229–241.
34.
SagongMParkDYooJ, et al. (2011)
Experimental and numerical analyses of an opening in a jointed rock mass under biaxial compression. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences48(7): 1055–1067.
35.
SammisCGAshbyMF (1986)
The failure of brittle porous solids under compressive stress states. Acta Metallurgica34(3): 511–526.
36.
SarfaraziVHaeriH (2016) Investigation of micro defect on the shear crack growth properties using FRANC2D. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Advanced Material Engineering. DOI:10.2991/ame-16.2016.126
37.
ShenBStephanssonOEinsteinHH, et al. (1995)
Coalescence of fractures under shear stress experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth100(B4): 5975–5990.
38.
SinghMRaoKS (2005)
Empirical methods to estimate the strength of jointed rock masses. Engineering Geology77(1-2): 127–137.
39.
SinghMSinghB (2008)
High lateral strain ratio in jointed rock masses. Engineering Geology98(3-4): 75–85.
40.
TerzaghiRD (1965)
Sources of error in joint surveys. Géotechnique15(3): 287–304.
41.
UsefzadehAYousefzadehHSalari-RadH, et al. (2013)
Empirical and mathematical formulation of the shear behavior of rock joints. Engineering Geology164: 243–252.
42.
WangSYSloanSWShengDC, et al. (2012)
Numerical analysis of the failure process around a circular opening in rock. Computers and Geotechnics39: 8–16.
43.
WasanthaPLPRanjithPGVieteDR (2016)
Comparative study of the hydromechanical behavior of intact, horizontally jointed, and vertically jointed rocks under undrained conditions. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering28(9): 04016083.
44.
WasanthaPLPRanjithPGXuT, et al. (2014)
A new parameter to describe the persistency of non-persistent joints. Engineering Geology181: 71–77.
45.
WongLNY (2008) Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara marble. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
46.
WongLNYEinsteinHH (2009)
Systematic evaluation of cracking behavior in specimens containing single flaws under uniaxial compression. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences46(2): 239–249.
47.
WongLNYPengJ (2020)
Numerical investigation of micro-cracking behavior of brittle rock containing a pore-like flaw under uniaxial compression. International Journal of Damage Mechanics29(10): 1543–1568.
48.
WongLNYZhangXP (2014)
Size effects on cracking behaviour of flaw-containing specimens under compressive loading. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering47(5): 1921–1930.
49.
WongRHCChauKT (1998)
Crack coalescence in a rock-like material containing two cracks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences35(2): 147–164.
50.
WongRHCChauKTTangCA, et al. (2001)
Analysis of crack coalescence in rock-like materials containing three flaws—part I: experimental approach. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences38(7): 909–924.
51.
WongRHCLinPTangCA (2006)
Experimental and numerical study on splitting failure of brittle solids containing single pore under uniaxial compression. Mechanics of Materials38(1-2): 142–159.
52.
WongTFBaudP (2012)
The brittle-ductile transition in porous rock: a review. Journal of Structural Geology44: 25–53.
53.
YangSQLiuXRJingHW (2013)
Experimental investigation on fracture coalescence behavior of red sandstone containing two unparallel fissures under uniaxial compression. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences63: 82–92.
54.
YangWLiGRanjithPG, et al. (2019)
An experimental study of mechanical behavior of brittle rock-like specimens with multi-non-persistent joints under uniaxial compression and damage analysis. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(10): 1490–1522.
55.
YangXXJingHWTangCA, et al. (2017)
Effect of parallel joint interaction on mechanical behavior of jointed rock mass models. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences92: 40–53.
56.
YangYWuKZhangT, et al. (2015)
Characterization of the pore system in an over-mature marine shale reservoir: a case study of a successful shale gas well in Southern Sichuan basin. Petroleum1(3): 173–186.
57.
ZhaoCMatsudaHMoritaC, et al. (2011)
Study on failure characteristic of rock-like materials with an open-hole under uniaxial compression. Strain47(5): 405–413.
58.
ZhaoCZhouYZhaoC, et al. (2018)
Cracking processes and coalescence modes in rock-like specimens with two parallel pre-existing cracks. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering51(11): 3377–3393.
59.
ZhaoYZhangLWangW, et al. (2016)
Cracking and stress-strain behavior of rock-like material containing two flaws under uniaxial compression. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering49(7): 2665–2687.
60.
ZhouXPChengHFengYF (2014)
An experimental study of crack coalescence behaviour in rock-like materials containing multiple flaws under uniaxial compression. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering47(6): 1961–1986.
61.
ZhuWbaudPWongT-f (2010)
Micromechanics of cataclastic pore collapse in limestone. Journal of Geophysical Research115: B04405.
62.
ZhuWZhangQLiS, et al. (2003)
Brittle elastoplastic damage constitutive model for jointed rock masses and computation concerning bolt-reinforcement. International Journal of Damage Mechanics12(1): 65–84.
