This paper presents an experimental study about the effects of damage on modal parameters of haunch strengthened composite column–steel beam connections. Five specimens having various composite column and steel beam connection details were constructed in order to be examined in laboratory condition. Non-destructive experimental measurements were conducted to extract the modal parameters using frequency and time domain methods before and after damage conditions. Quasi-static cyclic tests were performed to assess the damaged conditions in connection zones of the test specimens. At the end of the study, it is observed distinctly that there is a decreasing trend in natural frequencies with damages. Also, no compliance is observed between mode shapes pre- and post-cycling loading tests. The biggest dissimilarities concerning natural frequencies were determined among 26.57% and 36.54%. The value for modal assurance criterion was 1.0 for undamaged condition. However, in post-damaged situation, the mode shapes have changed and modal assurance criterion values nearly approached zero. Finally, experimentally obtained damping ratios have been analyzed. The outcome of the study has shown some dissimilarity and that the values are not being correlated constructively. Despite the fact that the results are consistent with the available literature, it is assumed that these dissimilarities point to the fact that higher levels of excitation might be need to precisely record the damping ratios.
AkbarJAhmadNAlamB, et al. (2018) Seismic performance of RC frames retrofitted with haunch technique. Structural Engineering and Mechanics67(1): 1–8.
3.
AllemangRJ (2003) The modal assurance criterion: Twenty years of use and abuse. Sound and Vibration37: 14–23.
4.
Allemang RJ and Brown DL (1982) A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. In: Proceedings of the 1st international modal analysis conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 8 November 1982, pp. 110–116.
5.
AltunişikACAdanurSGençAF, et al. (2016) Non-destructive testing of an ancient masonry bastion. Journal of Cultural Heritage22: 1049–1054.
6.
AltunışıkACOkurFYKahyaV (2017) Automated model updating of multiple cracked cantilever beams for damage detection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research138: 499–512.
7.
AnYFHanLH (2014) Behaviour of concrete-encased CFST columns under combined compression and bending. Journal of Constructional Steel Research101: 314–330.
8.
Archundia-ArandaHITena-ColungaAGrande-VegaA (2013) Behavior of reinforced concrete haunched beams subjected to cyclic shear loading. Engineering Structures49: 27–42.
9.
Avitabile P and Pechinsky F (1994) Coordinate orthogonality check (CORTHOG). In: Proceedings of the 12th international modal analysis, Honolulu, Hawaii, 31 January – 3 February 1994, p. 2251.
10.
BaghieeNEsfahaniRMMoslemK (2009) Studies on damage and FRP strengthening of reinforced concrete beams by vibration monitoring. Engineering Structures31: 875–893.
11.
BayraktarASevimBAltunişikAC, et al. (2010) Earthquake analysis of reinforced concrete minarets using ambient vibration test results. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings19(3): 257–273.
12.
BendatJSPiersolAG (2004) Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
13.
Brechlin E, Bendel K and Keiper W (1998) A new scaled modal assurance criterion for eigenmodes containing rotational degrees of freedom. In: Proceedings, international seminar on modal analysis, Leuven, Belgium, 2-5 February 1998, pp. 1175–1182.
14.
Bridge RQ, Ernst S, Patrick M and Wheeler AT (2006) The behaviour and design of haunches in composite beams and their reinforcement. In Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete V: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, 18-23 July 2004, Kruger National Park, Berg-en-Dal, Mpumalanga, South Africa.
15.
BrownjohnJMWRabyABassittJ, et al. (2018) Experimental modal analysis of British rock lighthouses. Marine Structures62: 1–22.
16.
CaiJPanJLiX (2018) Behavior of ECC-encased CFST columns under axial compression. Engineering Structures171: 1–9.
17.
CampianCNagyZPopM (2015) Behavior of fully encased steel-concrete composite columns subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading. Procedia Engineering117: 439–451.
18.
ChelliniGDe RoeckGNardiniL, et al. (2010) Damage analysis of a steel–concrete composite frame by finite element model updating. Journal of Constructional Steel Research66(3): 398–411.
19.
ChenCCChenCCShenJH (2018) Effects of steel-to-member depth ratio and axial load on flexural ductility of concrete-encased steel composite columns. Engineering Structures155: 157–166.
20.
CompanVPachónPCámaraM (2017) Ambient vibration testing and dynamic identification of a historical building. Procedia Engineering199: 3392–3397.
21.
D'AmbrisiAMarianiVMezziM (2012) Seismic assessment of a historical masonry tower with nonlinear static and dynamic analyses tuned on ambient vibration tests. Engineering Structures36: 210–219.
22.
DingFXYinGAJiangLZ, et al. (2018) Composite frame of circular CFST column to steel-concrete composite beam under lateral cyclic loading. Thin-Walled Structures122: 137–146.
23.
DinuFMargineanIDubinaD (2017) Experimental testing and numerical modelling of steel moment-frame connections under column loss. Engineering Structures151: 861–878.
24.
El-NiemaEI (1988) Investigation of concrete haunched T-beams under shear. Journal of Structural Engineering114(4): 917–930.
25.
ErcanE (2018) Assessing the impact of retrofitting on structural safety in historical buildings via ambient vibration tests. Construction and Building Materials164: 337–349.
26.
EwinsDJ (1995) Modal Testing: Theory and Practice, New York, NY: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.
27.
FarrarCRDuffeyTA (1998) Bridge modal properties using simplified finite element analysis. Journal of Bridge Engineering3(1): 38–46.
28.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2007) FEMA 461: Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
29.
Felber AJ (1993) Development of hybrid bridge evaluation system. PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
30.
Fotsch D and Ewins DJ (2001) Further applications of the FMAC. In: Proceedings international modal analysis conference, pp. 635–639.
31.
GalalKYangQ (2009) Experimental and analytical behavior of haunched thin-walled RC girders and box girders. Thin-Walled Structures47(2): 202–218.
32.
HeylenWJanterT (1990) Extensions of the modal assurance criterion. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics112(4): 468–472.
33.
Heylen W and Lammens S (1996) FRAC: A consistent way of comparing frequency response functions. In: Proceedings of the conference on identification in engineering systems, pp. 48–57.
34.
HüsemMNaseryMMOkurFY, et al. (2018) Experimental evaluation of damage effect on dynamic characteristics of concrete encased composite column-beam connections. Engineering Failure Analysis91: 129–150.
35.
HwangHJEomTSParkHG, et al. (2015) Cyclic loading test for beam-column connections of concrete-filled U-shaped steel beams and concrete-encased steel angle columns. Journal of Structural Engineering141(11): 04015020-1–12.
36.
Jacobsen NJ, Andersen P and Brincker R (2006) Using enhanced frequency domain decomposition as a robust technique to harmonic excitation in operational modal analysis. In: Proceedings of ISMA2006: International conference on noise & vibration engineering, Leuven, Belgium.
37.
JaishiBKimHJKimMK, et al. (2007) Finite element model updating of concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge under operational condition using modal flexibility. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing21(6): 2406–2426.
38.
JinLDingZLiDDuX (2018) Experimental and numerical investigations on the size effect of moderate high-strength reinforced concrete columns under small-eccentric compression. International Journal of Damage Mechanics27(5): 657–685.
39.
JuangJN (1994) Applied System Identification, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40.
KimCSParkHGChungKS, et al. (2011) Eccentric axial load testing for concrete-encased steel columns using 800 MPa steel and 100 MPa concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering138(8): 1019–1031.
41.
LacannaGRipepeMMarchettiE, et al. (2016) Dynamic response of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence, Italy, based on ambient vibration test. Journal of Cultural Heritage20: 632–640.
42.
Lachal A, Aribert JM and Loho G (2005). Static design and cyclic behaviour of end-plate steel and composite joints strengthened by haunches. In: Fourth international conference on advances in steel structures, Shanghai, China, 13-15 June 2005. pp. 1353–1358.
43.
Lam HF, Peng HY and Au SK (2014) Structural Model Updating of a Steel Truss Structure Utilizing Ambient Vibration Measurement. In 2nd International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management, ICVRAM 2014 and the 6th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2014. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
44.
LawsonRMRackhamJW (1989) Design of Haunched Composite Beam in Buildings, London: Steel Construction Institute.
45.
LeeHJParkHGParkSS, et al. (2015) Cyclic loading test for exterior beam-column joints of CEFT columns. Journal of Structural Engineering142(2): 04015147.
46.
LiBYYangYLChenYF, et al. (2018a) Behavior of connections between square CFST columns and H-section steel beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research145: 10–27.
47.
LiSHanLHHouC (2018b) Concrete-encased CFST columns under combined compression and torsion: Analytical behaviour. Journal of Constructional Steel Research144: 236–252.
48.
Liang QQ (2014) Analysis and Design of Steel and Composite Structures. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
49.
Lieven NAJ and Ewins DJ (1988) Spatial correlation of mode shapes, the coordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC). In: Proc. of IMAC, February 1-4, 1988, Hyatt Orlando, Kissimmee, Florida, USA, pp. 690–695.
50.
MaDYHanLHJiX, et al. (2018) Behaviour of hexagonal concrete-encased CFST columns subjected to cyclic bending. Journal of Constructional Steel Research144: 283–294.
51.
MaDYHanLHLiW, et al. (2017) Seismic performance of concrete-encased CFST piers: analysis. Journal of Bridge Engineering23(1): 04017119.
52.
MalveiroJRibeiroDSousaC, et al. (2018) Model updating of a dynamic model of a composite steel-concrete railway viaduct based on experimental tests. Engineering Structures164: 40–52.
53.
MunozPRHsuCTT (1997) Behavior of biaxially loaded concrete-encased composite columns. Journal of Structural Engineering123(9): 1163–1171.
54.
NgYHShanmugamNELiewJR (2012) Experimental studies on composite haunch beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research75: 160–168.
ParkMYangBJKimBR, et al. (2017) Structural strengthening and damage behaviors of hybrid sprayed fiber-reinforced polymer composites containing carbon fiber cores. International Journal of Damage Mechanics26(2): 358–376.
57.
Peeters B (2000) System identification and damage detection in civil engineering. PhD Thesis, K.U, Leuven, Belgium.
58.
Peeters B and De Roeck G (1999) Reference based stochastic subspace identification in civil engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on identification in engineering systems, Swansea, UK.
59.
PereiraSMagalhãesFGomesJP, et al. (2018) Dynamic monitoring of a concrete arch dam during the first filling of the reservoir. Engineering Structures174: 548–560.
60.
PolancoNRMayGHernandezEM (2016) Finite element model updating of semi-composite bridge decks using operational acceleration measurements. Engineering Structures126: 264–277.
61.
PULSE (2006) Analyzers and Solutions, Release 11.2. Denmark: Bruel and Kjaer, Sound and Vibration Measurement A/S.
62.
QianWWLiWHanLH, et al. (2016) Analytical behavior of concrete-encased CFST columns under cyclic lateral loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research120: 206–220.
63.
Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G, Cosenza E, et al. (2007) Implementation of OMA procedures using labview: Theory and application. In: 2nd international operational modal analysis conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
64.
RenWXZhaoTHarikIE (2004) Experimental and analytical modal analysis of steel arch bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering130(7): 1022–1031.
65.
SaberiHKheyroddinAGeramiM (2016) Welded haunches for seismic retrofitting of bolted T-stub connections and flexural strengthening of simple connections. Engineering Structures129: 31–43.
66.
SasmalSVogguS (2018) Strut-relieved single steel haunch bracing system for mitigating seismic damage of gravity load designed structures. Journal of Structural Engineering144(10): 04018167.
SoangTYHanLH (2014) Post-fire behaviour of concrete-filled steel tubular column to axially and rotationally restrained steel beam joint. Fire Safety Journal69: 147–163.
69.
TanakaN (2003) Evaluation of maximum strength and optimum haunch length of steel beam-end with horizontal haunch. Engineering Structures25(2): 229–239.
70.
Turkish Earthquake Code (2007) Turkish Earthquake Design Code. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Republic the Ministry of Public Works and Settlement.
71.
Tena-ColungaAUrbina-CaliforniasLAArchundia-ArandaHI (2017) Cyclic behavior of continuous reinforced concrete haunched beams with transverse reinforcement designed to fail in shear. Construction and Building Materials151: 546–562.
72.
VotsisRAKyriakidesNChrysostomouCZ, et al. (2012) Ambient vibration testing of two masonry monuments in Cyprus. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering43: 58–68.
73.
WangKLuXFYuanSF, et al. (2017) Analysis on hysteretic behavior of composite frames with concrete-encased CFST columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research135: 176–186.
74.
WangWQianXYangB (2014) Fracture in concrete-filled square hollow section to H-section joints under low-cycle loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research101: 363–372.
75.
WangXSwansonJAHelmickiAJ, et al. (2007) Development of dynamic response-based objective functions for finite-element modeling of bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering12(5): 552–561.
76.
WhelanMJGangoneMVJanoyanKD, et al. (2009) Real-time wireless vibration monitoring for operational modal analysis of an integral abutment highway bridge. Engineering Structures31(10): 2224–2235.
77.
XiangKPanYCWangGH (2018) Axial compression analysis of square concrete-encased concrete filled steel tubular stub columns after fire exposure. Procedia Engineering211: 1151–1159.
78.
XueXYangX (2014) A damage model for concrete under cyclic actions. International Journal of Damage Mechanics23(2): 155–177.
79.
YuDJRenWX (2005) EMD-based stochastic subspace identification of structures from operational vibration measurements. Engineering Structures27(12): 1741–1751.
80.
YukselSBYararA (2015) Neuro-fuzzy and artificial neural networks modeling of uniform temperature effects of symmetric parabolic haunched beams. Structural Engineering and Mechanics56(5): 787–796.
81.
Yu-LiaoFHai HanLTaoZ (2014) Behaviour of composite joints with concrete encased CFST columns under cyclic loading: Experiments. Engineering Structures59: 745–764.
82.
Zhang J (2004). Design of Composite Columns. Helsinki: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology.
83.
ZhouSZhuHJuJW, et al. (2017) Modeling microcapsule-enabled self-healing cementitious composite materials using discrete element method. International Journal of Damage Mechanics26(2): 340–357.
84.
ZhouYZhangJYiW, et al. (2017) Structural identification of a concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge via ambient vibration test data. Journal of Bridge Engineering22(8): 04017049.
