The goal of damage-mitigating control is to enhance the service life of complex mechanical systems without any significant performance loss. A prescribed performance damage-mitigating controller is designed in this paper to mitigate the damage during longitudinal tracking control of a generic hypersonic flight vehicle. Based on the analysis of stress conditions of wing and construction of damage accumulation model, a hierarchical damage-mitigating controller is designed using prescribed performance which ensures the robustness of performance even after damage-mitigation. Simulation results are presented to show that after damage information feedback, the dynamic performance of the flight is maintained and the damage accumulation is vastly reduced.
BechlioulisCPDoulgeriZRovithakisGA (2010) Neuro-adaptive force/position control with prescribed performance and guaranteed contact maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks21(12): 1857–1868.
2.
BechlioulisCPRovithakisGA (2010) Prescribed performance adaptive control for multi-input multi-output affine in the control nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control55(5): 1220–1226.
3.
Bermúdez LM, Gladden RD and Jeffries MS (2003) Aerodynamic characterization of the hyper-X launch vehicle. In: Proceedings of 12th international space planes and hypersonics systems and technologies conference, Norfolk, 15–19 December 2003, VI, AIAA Paper 7074: 5.
4.
BolenderMADomanDB (2007) Nonlinear longitudinal dynamical model of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets44(2): 374–387.
5.
BollerCSeegerT (1987) Materials Data for Cyclic Loading: Aluminium and Titanium Alloys, New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 133–135.
6.
BoltinVV (1988) Prediction of Service Life for Machines and Structures, New York, NY: ASME Press.
7.
GrossDEhlersWWriggersPet al.(2017) Mechanics of Materials-Formulas and Problems, Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 29–56.
8.
JonesRM (2009) Deformation Theory of Plasticity, Blacksburg, VA: Bull Ridge Corporation, pp. 146–158.
9.
Joyce PJ, Pomroy JB and Grindle L (2005) The hyper-X launch vehicle: Challenges and design considerations for hypersonic flight testing. In: Proceedings of 13th international space planes and hypersonics systems and technologies conference, Capua, Italy, 16–20 May 2005, AIAA Paper 3333, pp. 3–6.
10.
KallappaPHolmesMSRayA (1997) Life-extending control of fossil fuel power plants. Automatica33(6): 1101–1118.
11.
LorenzoCF (1994) Continuum fatigue damage modeling for use in life extending control. NASA Technical Memorandum 106691, Lewis Research Center.
12.
LorenzoCF (1996) Continuum fatigue damage modeling for critical design, control, and fault prognosis. NASA Technical Memorandum 107065, Lewis Research Center.
13.
LvZHuangHZZhuSPet al.(2015) A modified nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation model. International Journal of Damage Mechanics24(2): 168–181.
14.
MatsuzakiYUedaTMiyazawaYet al.(1989) Gust load alleviation of a transport-type wing-test and analysis. Journal of Aircraft26(4): 322–327.
15.
MinerMA (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue. Journal of Applied Mechanics67(9): 159–164.
16.
NewmanJJamesC (1992) FASTRAN-2: a fatigue crack growth structural analysis program. NASA Technical Memorandum 104159, Langley Research Center.
17.
Patil MJ (2003) Nonlinear aeroelastic Analysis of joined-wing aircraft. In: Proceedings of 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Norfolk, VI, 7–10 April 2003, AIAA Paper 1487, 2003.
18.
PatilMJHodgesDH (2004) On the importance of aerodynamic and structural geometrical nonlinearities in aeroelastic behavior of high-aspect-ratio wings. Journal of Fluids and Structures19(7): 905–915.
19.
PengZCHuangHZWangHKet al.(2016) A new approach to the investigation of load interaction effects and its application in residual fatigue life prediction. International Journal of Damage Mechanics25(5): 672–690.
20.
RayADaiX (1996) Damage-mitigating control of a reusable rocket engine for high performance and extended life. NASA Contractor Report 4640, Lewis Research Center.
21.
Ray A and Wu MK (1993) Damage-mitigating control of space propulsion systems for high performance and extended life. In: Proceedings of 29th joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Monterey, CA, 28–30 June 1993, AIAA Paper 3052: 3056.
22.
RozakJNRayA (1997) Robust multivariable control of rotorcraft in forward flight. Journal of the American Helicopter Society42(2): 149–160.
23.
Walker, Laurence A and William FS (1988) Actuator for a g-limiter override. Patent 4,717,098, USA.
24.
WangZYuWWangK (2009) Strength analysis and optimization design for wing joint based on ANSYS. Machinery Design and Manufacture7: 20.
25.
XuHJMirmiraniMDIoannouPA (2004) Adaptive sliding mode control design for a hypersonic flight vehicle. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics27(5): 829–838.
26.
YuMH (2004) Unified Strength Theory its Applications, Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 237–291.
