This paper is concerned with numerical modeling of deformation and fracture of a metal ligament bridging the crack faces in ceramic–metal composites, as a prerequisite for the determination of the J integral for composites with interpenetrating microstructure. A finite element model is proposed of an elasto-plastic crack-reinforcing fiber undergoing large plastic deformations and progressive debonding from the elastic matrix through a cohesive matrix–fiber interface. The σ-u relationships are derived first in the case of pullout of an elasto-plastic fiber embedded in an elastic matrix and then in uniaxial tension of the elasto-plastic fiber bridging the crack faces in elastic matrix. The obtained numerical results are discussed and compared with the theoretical predictions reported by other authors.
AdamsGG (1998) Steady sliding of two elastic half-spaces with friction reduction due to interface stick-slip. Journal of Applied Mechanics65: 470–475.
3.
AshbyMFBluntFJBannisterM (1989) Flow characteristics of highly constrained metal wires. Acta Metallurgica37(7): 1847–1857.
4.
AuricchioFTaylorRL (1999) A return-map algorithm for general associative isotropic elasto-plastic materials in large deformation regimes. International Journal of Plasticity15: 1359–1378.
5.
BheemreddyVChandrashekharaKDharaniLR, (2013) Modeling of fiber pull-out in continuous fiber reinforced ceramic composites using finite element method and artificial neural networks. Computational Materials Science79: 663–673.
6.
BlalNDaridonLMonerieY, (2012) Artificial compliance inherent to the intrinsic cohesive zone models: Criteria and application to planar meshes. International Journal of Fracture178: 71–83.
7.
BlalNDaridonLMonerieY, (2013) Micromechanical-based criteria for the calibration of cohesive zone parameters. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics246: 206–214.
8.
BridgmanPW (1964) Studies of Large Plastic Flow and Fracture, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
9.
BudianskyBAmazigoJCEvansAG (1988) Small-scale crack bridging and the fracture toughness of particulate-reinforced ceramics. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids36(2): 167–187.
10.
CartieDDRCoxBNFleckNA (2004) Mechanisms of crack bridging by composite and metallic rods. Composites Part A35: 1325–1336.
11.
ChandraNLiHShetC, (2002) Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal-ceramic interfaces. International Journal of Solids and Structures39: 2827–2855.
12.
CotterellBRiceJR (1980) Slightly curved or kinked cracks. International Journal of Fracture16(2): 155–169.
13.
DandekarCRShinYC (2011) Effect of porosity on the interface behavior of an Al2O3–aluminum composite: A molecular dynamics study. Composites Science and Technology71: 350–356.
14.
Emmel T (1995) Untersuchung des Bruchverhaltens von Metall-Keramik-Verbundwerkstoffen. MSc Thesis, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Germany.
15.
EsmaeiliNTomitaY (2008) The role of interphase on micro- to macroscopic responses and prediction for initiation of debonding damage of glass—Fiber reinforced polycarbonate. International Journal of Damage Mechanics17(1): 45–64.
16.
EspinosaHZavattieriP (2003) A grain level model for the study of failure initiation and evolution in polycrystalline brittle materials. Part I: Theory and numerical implementation. Mechanics of Materials35: 333–364.
17.
EvansAGDagleishBJHeM, (1989) On crack path selection and the interface fracture energy in bimaterial systems. Acta Metallurgica37(12): 3249–3254.
18.
EvansAGFuY (1985) Some effects of microcracks on the mechanical properties of brittle solids—II. Microcrack toughening. Acta Metallurgica33(8): 1525–1531.
19.
FuaS-YYueaC-YHuaX, (2000) Analyses of the micromechanics of stress transfer in single- and multi-fiber pull-out tests. Composites Science and Technology60: 569–579.
20.
FünfschillingSFettTHoffmannMJ, (2011) Mechanisms of toughening in silicon nitrides: The roles of crack bridging and microstructure. Acta Materialia59: 3978–3989.
21.
GilbertRI (2001) Shrinkage, cracking and deflection-the serviceability of concrete structures. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering1(1): 2–14.
22.
GoncalvesJPMDe MouraMFSFDe CastroPMST, (2000) Interface element including point-to-surface constraints for three dimensional problems with damage propagation. Engineering Computations17(1): 28–47.
23.
GrassiMZhangX (2003) Finite element analyses of mode I interlaminar delamination in z-fiber reinforced composite laminates. Composites Science and Technology63: 1815–1832.
24.
HoffmanMFiedlerBEmmelT, (1997) Fracture behaviour in metal fiber reinforced ceramics. Acta Materialia45(9): 3609–3623.
25.
HutchinsonJW (1987) Crack tip shielding by micro-cracking in brittle solids. Acta Metallurgica35: 1605–1619.
26.
HutchinsonJWJensenHM (1990) Models of fiber debonding and pullout in brittle composites with friction. Mechanics of Materials9(2): 139–163.
27.
Jia YY, Yan W and Liu H-Y (2011) Numetrical study on carbon fiber pullout using a cohesive zone model. In: Proceeding of 18th International Conference on Composite Materials, Jeju Island, South Korea: International Committee on Composite Materials (ICCM), August 2011, pp. 21–26.
28.
Jia YY, Yan W and Liu H-Y (2012) Numerical study on residual thermal stresses in carbon fiber pullout. In: Proceeding of 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Brisbane, Australia, 23–28 September 2012, pp. 1855–1860. International Council of The Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS).
29.
JuJWKoYF (2008) Micromechanical elastoplastic damage modeling of progressive interfacial arc debonding for fiber reinforced composites. International Journal of Damage Mechanics17(4): 307–356.
30.
KimI-SLeeI (1999) Alumina-composites made by reactive infiltration of molten aluminum alloy into fibrous insulation board. Journal of Materials Science Letters18: 1945–1948.
31.
KruzicJJMcNaneyJMCannonRM, (2004) Effects of plastic constraint on the cyclic and static fatigue behavior of metal/ceramic layered structures. Mechanics of Materials36: 57–72.
32.
KruzicJJNallaRKKinneyJH, (2003) Crack blunting, crack bridging and resistance-curve fracture mechanics in dentin: effect of hydration. Biomaterials24(28): 5209–5221.
33.
LapczykIHurtadoJA (2007) Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials. Composites Part A38: 2333–2341.
34.
MatagaPA (1989) Deformation of crack bridging ductile reinforcements in toughened brittle materials. Acta Metallurgica37: 3349–3359.
35.
MiYCrisfieldMA (1996) Analytical Derivation of Load/Displacement Relationships for Mixed-Mode Delamination and Comparison with Finite Element Results, London: Imperial College, Department of Aeronautics.
36.
MunroRG (1997) Evaluated material properties for a sintered a-Alumina. Journal of the American Ceramic Society80(8): 1919–1928.
37.
Nairn JA, Liu C-H, Mendels D-A, et al. (2001) Fracture mechanics analysis of the single-fiber pull-out test and the microbond test including the effects of friction and thermal stresses. In: Proceedings of the 16th Ann. Technical Conference of the American Society of Composites, VPI, Blacksburg VA, 9–12 September, American Society for Composites.
38.
PupursAVarnaJ (2013) FEM modeling of fiber/matrix debond growth in tension-tension cyclic loading of unidirectional composites. International Journal of Damage Mechanics22(8): 1144–1160.
39.
SchelleckensJCJDe BorstR (1993) On the numerical integration of interface elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering36: 43–66.
40.
ShaoYZhaoH-PFengX-Q, (2012) Discontinuous crack-bridging model for fracture toughness analysis of nacre. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids60(8): 1400–1419.
41.
ShumDKMHutchinsonJW (1990) On toughening by microcracks. Mechanics of Materials9: 83–91.
42.
SiglLSMatagaPADagleishBJ, (1988) On the toughness of brittle materials reinforced with a ductile phase. Acta Metallurgica36(4): 945–953.
43.
SimoJC (1992) Algorithms for static and dynamic multiplicative plasticity that preserve the classical return mapping schemes of the infinitesimal theory. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering99: 61–112.
44.
SimoJCHughesTJR (1998) Computational Inelasticity, New York: Springer-Verlag.
45.
StangHLiZShahSP (1990) Pullout problem: Stress versus fracture mechanical approach. Journal of Engineering Mechanics116: 2136–2150.
46.
TsaiJHPatraAWetherholdR (2005) Finite element simulation of shaped ductile fiber pullout using a mixed cohesive zone/friction interface model. Composites Part A36: 827–838.
47.
TuronADâvilaCCamanhoP, (2007) An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Engineering Fracture Mechanics4: 1665–1682.
48.
TvergaardV (1990) Material failure by void growth to coalescence. Advances in Applied Mechanics27: 83–151.
49.
VenkatakrishnaiahSDharaniLR (1995) Analysis of an axisymmetric matrix crack with interfacial debond. International Journal of Damage Mechanics4(4): 319–337.
50.
WęglewskiWBasistaMManescuA, (2014) Effect of grain size on thermal residual stresses and damage in sintered chromium–alumina composites: Measurement and modeling. Composites Part B67: 119–124.
51.
WęglewskiWBochenekKBasistaM, (2013) Comparative assessment of Young’s modulus measurements of metal–ceramic composites using mechanical and non-destructive tests and micro-CT based computational modeling. Computational Materials Science77: 19–30.
52.
YaoYChenS (2013) Effects of the longitudinal surface roughness on fiber pull-out behavior in carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin composites. Journal of Applied Mechanics80(2): 021015.
53.
ZhangGQSuwatnodomPJuJW (2012) Micromechanics of crack bridging stress-displacement and fracture energy in steel hooked-end fiber-reinforced cementitious composites. International Journal of Damage Mechanics22(6): 829–859.
54.
ZhongWPanN (2003) A computer simulation of single fiber pull out process in a composite. Journal of Composite Materials37: 1951–1969.
55.
ZouZReidSRLiS, (2002) Modelling interlaminar and intralaminar damage in filament wound pipes under quasi-static indentation. Journal of Composite Materials36: 477–499.
56.
ŻyczkowskiM (1981) Combined Loadings in the Theory of Plasticity, Warsaw, Poland: PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers.
