BrindleyG. and HoodS., 1990. Curriculum Innovation in Adult ESL. In BrindleyG. (Ed.), The Second Language Curriculum in Action.Sydney: NCELTR.
2.
CarlessD.1997. “Managing Systemic Curriculum Change: A Critical Analysis of Hong Kong's Target-Oriented Curriculum Initiative.”International Review of Education, 43(4): 349–366.
3.
CarlessD.1998a. Factors Affecting the Implementation of Innovations: Hong Kong'sTarget-Oriented Curriculum Initiative. Paper presented at the International Teacher Education Conference, Shanghai, April 1998.
4.
CarlessD.1998b. “A Case Study of Curriculum Implementation in Hong Kong.”System, 26(3): 353–368.
5.
CheahY. M.1998. “The Examination Culture and Its Impact on Literacy Innovations: The Case of Singapore.”Language and Education, 12, (3): 192–209.
6.
ChengK. M.1997. The Education System. In PostiglioneG. and LeeW. O. (Eds.), Schooling in Hong Kong: Organisation, Teaching and Social Context.Hong Kong: Honk Kong University Press.
7.
ClarkJ., ScarinoA. and BrownellJ.1994. Improving the Quality of Learning: A Framework for Target-Oriented Curriculum Renewal in Hong KongHong Kong: Institute of Language in Education.
8.
ClarkJ., LoY. C., HuiM. F., KamM., CarlessD. and WongP. M., 1998. An Investigation into the Development and Implementation of the TOC Initiative with Special Reference to Professional Competencies, Professional Development and Resources.Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.
9.
DoyleW. and PonderG., 1997. “The Practicality Ethic in Teacher Decision-Making.”Interchange8(3): 1–12.
10.
EllisG.1996. “How Culturally Appropriate Is the Communicative Approach?”English Language Teaching Journal, 50(3): 213–218.
11.
EvansS.1996. “The Context of English Language Education: The Case of Hong Kong.”RELC Journal, 27(2): 30–55.
12.
EverardK. and MorrisG., 1996. Effective School Management (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
13.
FullanM.1991. The New Meaning of Educational Change.London: Cassell Educational Limited.
14.
FullanM.1993. Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform.London: Falmer Press.
15.
FullanM. and MilesM., 1992. “Getting Reform Right: What Works and What Doesn't.”Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10): 744–752.
16.
HargreavesA.1992. Foreword. In FullanM. and HargreavesA. (Eds.), Teacher Development and Educational Change.London: Falmer Press.
17.
HarrisonI.1996. Look Who's Talking Now: Listening to Voices in Curriculum Renewal. In BaileyK. and NunanD. (Eds.), Voices from the Language Classroom.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HeA. E.1998. “The Chinese Experience with Implementing the College English Syllabus.”International Journal of Educational Reform, 7(4): 319–329.
19.
HollidayA.1991. “From Materials Development to Staff Development: An Informed Change of Direction in an EFL Project.”System, 19(3): 301–308.
20.
HollidayA.1992a. “Tissue Rejection and Informal Orders in ELT Projects: Collecting the Right Information.”Applied Linguistics, 13(4): 403–424.
21.
HollidayA.1992b. “Intercompetence: Sources of Conflict Between Local and Expatriate ELT Personnel.”System, 20(2): 223–234.
22.
HollidayA.1994. Appropriate Methodology and Social Context.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HuiL.1997. “New Bottles, Old Wine: Communicative Language Teaching in China.”English Teaching Forum, 38–41.
24.
Karavas-DoukasE.1995. “Teacher Identified Factors Affecting the Implementation of an EFL Innovation in Greek Public Secondary Schools.”Language, Culture and Curriculum, 8(1): 53–68.
25.
KennedyC. and KennedyJ., 1996. “Teacher Attitudes and Change Implementation.”System, 24(3): 351–360.
26.
KramschK. and SullivanP., 1996. “Appropriate Pedagogy.”English Language Teaching Journal, 50(3): 199–212.
27.
LeithwoodK. P. Begley, and CousinsJ. B., 1992. Developing Expert Leadership for Future Schools.London: Falmer Press.
28.
LoM. L.1998. Understanding the Process of Teachers’ Professional Development in Hong Kong Primary Schools: The Impact of Curriculum Reform on Reflective Practice. In StimpsonP. and MorrisP. (Eds.), Curriculum and Assessment for Hong Kong: Two Components, One System.Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong Press.
29.
LoCastroV.1996. English Language Education in Japan. In ColemanH. (Ed.), Society and the Language Classroom.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
LouisK. and MilesM.1990. Improving the Urban High School: What Works and Why.New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
MarkeeN.1993. “The Diffusion of Innovation in Language Teaching.”Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13: 229–243.
32.
MarkeeN.1997. Managing Curricular Innovation.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MorrisP.1995. The Hong Kong School Curriculum.Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
O'DonoghueT. and DimmockC., 1997. “The Principal's Contribution to School Restructuring Initiatives Aimed at Improving Teaching and Learning.”Educational Management and Administration, 25(1): 35–49.
36.
OrnsteinA. and HunkinsF., 1993. Curriculum Foundations, Principles and Theory. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
37.
PennerJ.1995. “Change and Conflict: Introduction of the Communicative Approach in China.”TESL Canada Journal12(2): 1–17.
38.
SmithH.1996. Aid-Funded ELT Projects and the Ownership of Change. In O'DwyerJ. (Ed.), Quality Management and the Management of Change.Ankara: Bilkent University.
39.
StephensonH.1994. “Management and Participation in ELT Projects.”English Language Teaching Journal, 48(3): 225–232.
40.
StollerF.1994. “The Diffusion of Innovation in Intensive ESL Programs.”Applied Linguistics, 15(3): 300–327.
41.
WhiteR.1998. The ELT Curriculum.Oxford: Blackwell.